The H1N1 vaccination propaganda machine is going full-tilt, and the timetable for rapid population reduction is upon us. This is soooooo obvious, people! They are telling us what is going to happen before it happens, because they are going to cause it. They know people will drop dead after the shot, and are putting out the pre-op denial propaganda so that people will think, ‘hey, they warned us of this, and it is nothing to worry about.’
As soon as swine flu vaccinations start next month, some people getting them will drop dead of heart attacks or strokes, some children will have seizures and some pregnant women will miscarry. But those events will not necessarily have anything to do with the vaccine. That poses a public relations challenge for federal officials, who remember how sensational reports of deaths and illnesses derailed the large-scale flu vaccine drive of 1976. This time they are making plans to respond rapidly to such events and to try to reassure a nervous public — and headline-hunting journalists — that the vaccine is not responsible. Every year, there are 1.1 million heart attacks in the United States, 795,000 strokes and 876,000 miscarriages, and 200,000 Americans have their first seizure. Inevitably, officials say, some of these will happen within hours or days of a flu shot…
And just to make sure that this vaccine is as lethal as possible, Washington suspends the law regarding the amount of mercury it can have.
The state Health Department will allow more mercury than usual in some of the swine flu vaccine to make sure shots are available to pregnant women and children under age three.
The department says mercury-free swine flu vaccine may not always be in stock, so it wants to give people the choice of using vaccine with the mercury preservative called thimerosal, which is believed to be safe.
The Centers for Disease Control’s Web site says the following about thimerosal:
“There is no convincing scientific evidence of harm caused by the low doses of thimerosal in vaccines, except for minor reactions like redness and swelling at the injection site.
“However, in July 1999, the Public Health Service agencies, the American Academy of Pediatrics and vaccine manufacturers agreed that thimerosal should be reduced or eliminated in vaccines as a precautionary measure. Most vaccines for children under six are thimerosal-free.”
The suspension of the mercury limit announced Thursday lasts six months and applies only to the swine flu vaccine expected to become available in October…
Here is the priority list of recipients for swine flu shots once the vaccine arrives:
– Anyone age 6 months to 24 years
– Pregnant women
– Healthcare workers
– People under 50 with chronic illnesses
I guess they are keeping to the time-honored tradition of women and children first, and as an added bonus, their shots will most likely have added mercury, since the clinical trials for the vaccine on pregnant women is scheduled to end approximately 9 days before the vaccine goes on the market for that target group.
I remember when the adjuvant Thimerosal (mercury) came out for horse vaccines. Horses were having a very bad reaction to it, and most people that I know of knew this and avoided them. Well, I guess if it is bad for horses, it must be good for people.
Mass Vaccination Schedule
The H1N1 vaccine was approved on September 15, 2009, with clinical trials done in mid-August for most adults. Vaccine clinical trials for pregnant women started on September 17, 2009, and a full-scale vaccination effort for all groups of people is set to begin in mid-October.
The FDA reported the following on September 15, 2009 regarding vaccine approval for most adults:
FDA Approves Vaccines for 2009 H1N1 Influenza Virus
The H1N1 vaccines approved today undergo the same rigorous FDA manufacturing oversight, product quality testing and lot release procedures that apply to seasonal influenza vaccines.
Testing began shortly thereafter for children, and the following was reported by ABC on September 17, 2009 regarding clinical trials for pregnant women:
Twenty participants in the trial will get two doses 21 days apart and they’ll be monitored in several different ways. Their cord blood will be checked too to see how it’s affecting the unborn child.
On September 15, 2009, Reuters reported:
U.S. officials are launching a large-scale vaccination effort in mid-October to inoculate the population, including those most at risk such as pregnant women and young people ages 6 months to 24 years.
Let’s take a closer look at the clinical testing procedure. They start testing on pregnant women on September 15. The women get 2 doses, 21 days apart, and are tested. That would mean that on September 15, they would get the first dose, and 21 days later, Oct. 6, the second. The vaccination program is scheduled to start mid-Oct., which is around Oct. 15. That leaves approximately 9 days to determine that the vaccine is safe, and get it ready for distribution.
Running a pretty tight schedule there, eh? Jab ‘em and if they don’t drop dead in 21 days, jab ‘em again. If they don’t collapse on the second jab, then it’s on to the public we go! So much for extensive testing. Wait, didn’t I just read something about rigorous FDA testing?
“The H1N1 vaccines approved today undergo the same rigorous FDA manufacturing oversight, product quality testing and lot release procedures that apply to seasonal influenza vaccines,” Dr. Jesse Goodman, FDA’s acting chief scientist, said in a statement.
Just how rigorous can that testing be if between the last shot and full scale implementation on the population is a mere 9 days? Has anyone tried to get tests back from the lab lately? How long did it take? This is a done deal, folks. They don’t care if people drop dead because the PR spin is already in high gear. In fact, they are boldly telling us what is going to happen before it happens, because they are going to cause it. They know people will drop dead or get sick after the shot, and are putting out the pre-op denial propaganda so that people will think, ‘hey, they warned us of this, and it is nothing to worry about – it couldn’t possibly be the vaccine, they said so.’
Let me tell you, if I look at someone and that person receives a vaccination, and then drops dead 5 minutes later, IT WAS THE VACCINE! No amount of denial will convince me otherwise. This is a eugenics program, plain and simple. And as any good eugenics program goes, it is being forced on the public by any means possible.
Implementing the Mass Vaccination Program
Let’s look at how this vaccination program is being implemented. After all, it is supposed to be voluntary, right? After all, Obama said so. NOT! Here are the steps:
1. First they try and get you to comply through a propaganda campaign to effect voluntary compliance.
2. Second, they try and get you to take it under color of law.
3. Third, it becomes mandatory
The Propaganda Campaign
Any good vaccination propaganda campaign will start with the demonization of target groups to effect voluntary compliance. Propaganda is used to convince the public that the unvaccinated pose a threat to what is called “herd immunity.” Herd immunity is defined by the Free Medical Dictionary as:
The resistance of a group to attack by a disease to which a large proportion of the members are immune.
If you take the vaccine, you are supposed to be immune, correct? If you don’t take the vaccine, you are supposed to be susceptible to the virus. Why should the vaccinated worry about the unvaccinated if they are immune? If people do not want to take the vaccine and decide to protect themselves via natural methods, how does that affect supposed “herd immunity?” Are we a bunch of cattle that lose value if we get sick? The H1N1 is not a major health risk. The regular seasonal flu is worse than the H1N1 variety, and even health professionals refuse to take it. Yet, the propaganda goes on to convince people that if certain groups of people do not take the vaccine, then “herd immunity” is compromised, and everyone is in danger. Take this piece from the Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine:
Mandatory School Vaccinations: The Role of Tort Law
“Religious Communities as Disease “Hot Spots.”
Governments traditionally have considered “communities” in relatively broad terms, viewing entire states — or sometimes even the whole nation — as a “community” for herd immunity purposes . However, recent experiences have demonstrated that actual communities are far smaller. For instance, although nationwide measles vaccination rates appeared high enough to ensure national herd immunity, disproportionately low vaccination rates among blacks and Hispanics resulted in measles outbreaks in several large urban areas, most notably Los Angeles .
Religious communities — particularly Christian Science, Amish, and Mennonite communities — have been the source of many preventable disease outbreaks in recent years. Diseases from polio  to measles  to rubella  have resurfaced with increasing frequency in the United States due to herd immunity being lost in such religious ghettos. This comes at a tremendous cost to society, for “vaccine-preventable diseases impose $10 billion worth of healthcare costs and over 30,000 otherwise avoidable deaths in America each year” .”
Religious ghettos? A typical propaganda technique and scare tactic – demonize the opposition, then accuse it of infecting others and lay blame. If people get sick because they do not take the vaccine, then your health care costs will go up. But wait, it gets better:
For decades, all 50 states have required that parents vaccinate their children against various diseases, including polio and measles, as a prerequisite to enrolling them in public schools . While virtually all states have tailored their immunization statutes to exempt those with religious (and sometimes philosophical) objections to vaccines from these requirements , widespread use of these exemptions threatens to undermine many of the benefits of mandatory vaccinations, such as preserving “herd immunity” . Since it is unlikely that state governments will eliminate such exemptions outright, society must consider other methods of providing incentives for vaccination and compensating those who have suffered due to a disease outbreak caused by a community’s loss of herd immunity.
Now the vaccinated become the victims of the unvaccinated because they may have suffered due to a disease outbreak caused by a lack of “herd immunity,” and the unvaccinated can be threatened with a Tort lawsuit for “failure to vaccinate” if someone gets a disease and an unvaccinated person happens to be there.
The following article from Dr. Sherri Tenpenny shows how the Amish were used to advance “herd immunity” propaganda:
On October 14,  the major media outlets shrieked a report of “the first outbreak of polio in the United States in 26 years,” occurring in an Amish community in central Minnesota. The specter of hundreds of children in braces and iron lung machines lining the halls of hospitals immediately danced through the air, and directly into the minds of parents who have chosen to not vaccinate their children.
“First of all, there wasn’t an “outbreak of polio.” There was only the discovery of an inactivated polio virus in the stool of four children. The first confirmation was in a 7-month old Amish infant, presumably hospitalized, with severe immune deficiency. The “find” prompted screening of other children in the community; four children were confirmed positive. None experienced any type of paralysis.
Part of the panic can be blamed on inaccurate reporting. The virus that was identified was not “wild polio.” It was a virus that is found only in the oral polio vaccine (OPV). Oral vaccine-strain viruses are inactivated with formaldehyde and are generally considered by the CDC “too weak” to cause disease. Even though the OPV is still used extensively in Third World countries, it has not been used in the United States since 2000. How did children in an isolated Amish community, with no exposure to foreigners, become exposed to vaccine-strain polio virus? That remains a mystery.
Color of Law
Now let’s take a look at what is known as the color of law. It is not against the law to not vaccinate your children. However, non-mandatory vaccinations do not have to be law to be mandatory. If the system around you forces you to do something against your will or suffer penalties for non-compliance via the back door approach such as the following example, then the result is the same as if there was a mandatory vaccination law.
Example: If your kids are enrolled in a public school, and you cannot homeschool them because of economics or other hardship, then you face mandatory vaccines. If you go the waiver route, then public officials can make it extremely difficult if not impossible to comply with the waiver requirements, and you end up violating an actual law requiring enrollment of your child in school. You’ve got to get them to school on time or face penalties for compulsory education violations because you refused the vaccinations and did not complete the waiver in time for the start of school. This is how non-mandatory becomes mandatory without being law, but is enforced under color of law.
Note: color of law. The appearance or semblance, without the substance, of a legal right. • The term usu. implies a misuse of power made possible because the wrongdoer is clothed with the authority of the state. State action is synonymous with color of [state] law in the context of federal civil-rights statutes or criminal law. See STATE ACTION. [Cases: Civil Rights 1323. C.J.S. Civil Rights §§ 92-94.] BLACK’S LAW DICTIONARY 282 (8th ed. 2004)
When outright propaganda and color of law don’t work, and not enough people take the vaccine, it becomes mandatory. All semblance of fair play is now thrown out, and the real motive becomes clear. Take the vaccine or else.
They’re upset over an ultimatum from the health department. Workers are being told to either get the swine flu vaccine or lose their jobs.
New York is the first state in the country to mandate flu vaccinations for its health care workers. The first doses of swine flu vaccine will be available beginning next week. Much of it is reserved for state health care workers, but there is growing opposition to required inoculations.
Health care workers in Hauppauge screamed “No forced shots!” as they rallied Tuesday against the state regulation requiring them to roll up their sleeves.
“I don’t even tend to the sick. I am in the nutrition field. They are telling me I must get the shot because I work in a health clinic setting,” said Paula Small, a Women, Infants and Children health care worker.
Small said she will refuse, worried the vaccine is untested and unproven, leaving her vulnerable. In 1976, there were some deaths associated with a swine flu vaccination.
Registered nurse Frank Mannino, 50, was also angry. He said the state regulation violates his personal freedom and civil rights. “And now I will lose my job if I don’t take the regular flu shot or the swine flu shot.”
When asked if he’s willing to lose his job, Mannino said, “Absolutely. I will not take it, will not be forced. This is still America.”
The protest also shook Albany Tuesday. Hundreds of demonstrators demanded freedom of choice. After all, as health care professionals they argue they’re already constantly washing their hands and aren’t likely to transmit or contract the flu.
Around 500,000 health care workers are slated to receive the vaccine.
“It’s certainly their prerogative to voice their opinion,” said Dr. Susan Donelan of Stony Brook University Hospital. Donelan said most in the medical community see the benefits and safety of the shots and welcome them, and that hospitals must obey the law. “Our hospital is committed to following the mandate to have our personnel vaccinated,” she said.
The state said change was needed this year to save lives, typically only about 45 percent of health care workers take advantage of voluntary flu vaccines.
More than 150 institutional outbreaks of seasonal and H1N1 flu are expected this year in hospitals, nursing homes and hospice centers. New York and New Jersey will get their first doses of the swine flu vaccine next week. It will be the nasal mist, not a shot.
Dangers of Recombination
Now that we have looked at the supposed “rigorous testing procedures,” the potentially harmful doses of mercury involved, and how a mandatory vaccination program is implemented, let’s take a look at another danger that the vaccination program pushers don’t want you to know about.
Jeffrey M. Smith shows us the dangers of genetically modified live virus vaccines, such as the H1N1:
In what may be the first experiment of its kind, scientists infected cell cultures with two related viruses. One was a genetically engineered poxvirus, (vaccinia virus (VIC) with a transgene from the influenza virus). The other was a naturally occurring relative of the first virus, isolated from Norwegian wildlife. Both were orthopoxviruses. The two viruses interacted and created many new hybrid viruses by recombination. The characteristics of some of the new viruses included traits not expressed in either parent virus. Some viruses, for example, spread faster than either parent, while others produced different, more serious cell culture changes. A single virus multiplied into hundreds of thousands of viruses in a few hours, with unpredictable consequences. Since the marker gene in the transgenic virus was not present in some of the newly formed hybrid viruses, it would not be possible to track transgenic viruses as the origin of the hybrids, if they were found in the wild.
When a person receives a dose of the genetically engineered H1N1 live virus vaccine, that virus has the potential to recombine in the host. As with all live virus vaccines, the host will shed this newly recombined virus for around 21 days after inoculation. Persons who come in contact with the newly inoculated are subjected not to the original virus, but the newly recombined one thanks to genetic engineering. The new virus is potentially more lethal than the original live vaccine virus. This is the way to spread a lethal strain of flu to whatever segment of the population you are aiming to destroy. Create a virus via genetic engineering, inject as many as you can with it, and let nature do the rest.
The powers that be do not want anyone to know about the active shedding threat because they want the genetically modified recombined virus to spread just as far and wide as possible, thereby validating their fear mongering and creating more of a demand for the product (vaccine). This validation justifies all of the emergency measures already in place, such as quarantine facilities, forced vaccination checkpoints, etc.
It is a typical marketing ploy used in a most evil way.
We have a vaccine that has undergone such a limited “testing” that no sane person would willingly take it, the law regarding the amount of mercury allowed in vaccines has been suspended just so this one can have a bigger dose of it, and they are targeting pregnant women and children first.
The vaccine is supposedly voluntary, yet certain segments of the population are required to have it to keep their jobs. The health department has made mandatory the vaccines for health care workers already, and if not enough people take it to meet the “herd immunity” quota, it becomes mandatory for everyone. A certain percentage of the population has to take the shot to be active carriers in order to shed the virus to others to reduce the population to 500 mil, as required by eugenicists.
A Possible Scenario
I anticipate that we will have a window of opportunity that will last while the H1N1 flu shot volunteers run to the pharmas for their shot when they become available on or around October 15. There is a formula that is used to determine what percentage of the populace needs to be vaccinated to maintain “herd immunity,” and the time schedule for forced vaccinations will be based on that, at least for a little while.
“Herd immunity” propaganda statistics will be used to implement forced vaccinations. If not enough people volunteer for the shots, “herd immunity” is supposedly compromised and a national health emergency can be declared, and people will buy into it.
When the live genetically modified virus recombines in the host and the vaccinated shed the newly mutated virus, people will be getting sick from having contact with the vaccinated, and this will reinforce the need for forced vaccinations to “solve the problem.” More people will rush to get the vaccine “cure” and more live genetically modified virus will be passed on to others.
This will snowball into an all-out emergency event, which will involve the use of checkpoints, FEMA camps for quarantine, and martial law. We want to be off the streets as much as possible to avoid not only any quarantine and mandatory shot procedures, but also the mutated virus.
I hope I am wrong, but I am advising everyone reading this to be prepared just in case I am right.
Barbara H. Peterson
October 16, 2009