Veil Of Politics
Behind the Obama Justice Department‘s flagrantly unconstitutional abuse of the Espionage Act to prosecute intelligence community whistle-blowers is a treasonous drive, first launched under President George W. Bush, to impose a British Official Secrets Act on the United States.
Given that Federal Judges have repeatedly ruled against Justice Department efforts to silence legitimate critics by prosecuting them as foreign spies, sources confirm that the Obama Administration, led by the President himself, has concluded that now is the time to press Congress to rip up the Constitution altogether by imposing Official Secrets.
What this means is that Obama is out to impose a foreign system — Britain’s heinous suppression of free speech and any legitimate dissent — upon the United States. As Lyndon LaRouche commented today, “If this is not treasonous, I don’t know what is.”
Justice Department and intelligence community sources have provided some background on the Obama drive to stifle all dissent and prosecute whistle-blowers and journalists alike under a U.S. Official Secrets Act. During the Bush Administration, then-Attorney General Alberto Gonzales traveled to London to be briefed by Tony Blair’s Attorney General and Home Secretary on the inner workings of the Official Secrets Act. After Gonzales returned to Washington, Justice Department prosecutors launched the Espionage Act cases against National Security Agency (NSA) official Thomas Drake and CIA officer Jeffrey Sterling, who were only suspected of leaking embarrassing information to American journalists — not foreign spy services.
The Larry Franklin case, launched around the same time, implicating two AIPAC officials, Steve Rosen and Keith Weissman, did involve classified data being passed along to a foreign power — Israel. The Bush Administration left office before indictments were handed down against Drake and Sterling, and it would be the Obama Justice Department, under William M. Welch II, that would actually launch the prosecutions under the Espionage Act.
Welch is under criminal investigation by a special prosecutor for his role in the frameup of the late Senator Ted Stevens (R-Alaska). He is also under investigation for his role in the earlier railroading of the former Governor of Alabama. He is involved in the Sterling case and was heavily involved in the Drake prosecution until it blew up.
According to one Justice Department source, the harsh reaction against the prosecutions by even some conservative Federal Judges has made it clear that the path to an Official Secrets Act is going to be through legislation — not judicial precedents. A senior intelligence official warned that the mood in Congress, after a number of highly embarrassing Wikileak revelations, is to succumb to Obama White House and Justice Department pressure to accept the flagrant assault on the First Amendment and other Constitutionally protected basic rights.
One August 2009 classified State Department cable released by Wikileaks was especially embarrassing to Senators John McCain, Joseph Lieberman, and Lindsey Graham.
The cable provided a detailed account of the visit to Tripoli, Libya, by the three Senators and several others, to meet with Muammar Qaddafi and work on accelerating normalization of relations, including sales of weapons and other, non-lethal equipment used to suppress civil disorder. McCain and Lieberman praised Qaddafi as a true ally in the war against terrorism, and all three vowed to accelerate arms sales to Qaddafi. Now, according to both the Justice Department and intelligence community sources, they are ready to do anything to suppress further leaks. They are expected to possibly champion Administration legislation to impose an Official Secrets Act.
This is one more serious addition to the bill of impeachment against President Obama. To impose a foreign system that is patently unconstitutional is a high crime and misdemeanor that warrants the President’s immediate impeachment! Recall that in his recent trip to London, President Obama established a joint national security council with the newly established British National Security Council.
Rage continues to build across this country over the obvious forged birth certificate Barry Soetoro, aka Barack Obama, released April 27, 2011, as do calls for his impeachment. However, Obama cannot be impeached.
Let me quote Dr. Edwin Vieira, who wrote about this back in December 2008 before Obama was “sworn” into office:
If Obama is not “a natural born Citizen” or has renounced such citizenship, he is simply not eligible for “the Office of President” (ArticleII, Section 1, Clause 4). That being so, he cannot be “elected” by the voters, by theElectoralCollege, or by the House of Representatives (see Amendment XII).
For neither the voters, nor the Electors, nor members of the House can change the constitutional requirement, even by unanimous vote inter sese (see Article V). If, nonetheless, the voters, the Electors, or the members of the House purport to “elect” Obama, he will be nothing but a usurper, because the Constitution defines him as such.
And he can never become anything else, because a usurper cannot gain legitimacy if even all of the country aid, abets, accedes to, or acquiesces in his usurpation.
If Obama dares to take the Presidential “Oath or Affirmation” of office, knowing that he is not “a natural born Citizen,” he will commit the crime of perjury or false swearing (see Article II, Section 1, Clause 7). For, being ineligible for “the Office of President,” he cannot “faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States,” or even execute it at all, to any degree. Thus, his very act of taking the “Oath or Affirmation” will be a violation thereof! So, even if the chief justice of the Supreme Court himself looks the other way and administers the “Oath or Affirmation,” Obama will derive no authority whatsoever from it.
Third, his purported “Oath or Affirmation” being perjured from the beginning, Obama’s every subsequent act in the usurped “Office of President” will be a criminal offense under Title 18, United States Code, Section 242.
If Obama does become an usurper posturing as “the President,” Congress cannot even impeach him because, not being the actual President, he cannot be “removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors” (see Article II, Section 4).
For those who think Dr. Vieira Jr., Ph.D., J.D., is just some run-of-the-mill attorney, let me give you a very condensed bio: He holds four degrees from Harvard. For more than 30 years he has practiced law, with emphasis on constitutional issues. In the Supreme Court of the United States, he successfully argued or briefed the cases leading to the landmark decisions Abood v. Detroit Board of Education, Chicago Teachers Union v. Hudson and Communications Workers of America v. Beck. His two volume to me, “Pieces of Eight: The Monetary Powers and Disabilities of the United States Constitution,” is the most comprehensive study in existence of American monetary law and history viewed from a constitutional perspective.
Despite all the noise out there by Obama’s supporters, it is crystal clear the putative president was born with dual citizenship and is forever ineligible to be president.
Obama seized the office of president through fraud. As a usurper, he’s never held office. That’s what the word usurp means: to seize and hold (a position, office, power, etc.) by force or without legal right. Since he legally has never occupied the White House as president, he cannot be impeached.
Now, when I have pointed this out countless times to groups demanding impeachment, I get this response: I don’t care – we just have to get him out.
Those are people who proudly proclaim they only want to see the U.S. Constitution upheld. Those are people who state unequivocally that the usurper was never eligible to run because he’s not a natural born citizen under the U.S. Constitution.
You can’t have it both ways. In essence, what those folks are saying is we can do the same thing as Obama and his coconspirators: circumvent the Constitution.
But, the usurper has committed crimes while in office! Indeed, he has and continues to do so. Knowing he was not eligible to run, the putative president solicited campaign donations to the tune of about $700 million dollars. He can still be indicted for wire fraud.
To impeach would also accomplish this: Every piece of legislation he’s signed into law would remain on the books. Let me quote Dr. Vieira one more time:Those who demand his impeachment are asking to set one of the worst legal precedents in our history: Any constitutionally ineligible thug can come along and buy his way into the White House. We’ll just impeach him later!
“Perhaps most importantly, Congress can pass no law while an usurper pretends to occupy “the Office of President.” The Constitution provides that “[e]very Bill which shall have passed the House of Representatives and the Senate, shall, before it become a Law, be presented to the PresidentoftheUnitedStates” (Article I, Section 7, Clause 2). Not to a usurper posturing as “the President of the United States,” but to the true and rightful President. If no such true and rightful President occupies the White House, no “Bill” will or can, “before it become a Law, be presented to [him].” If no “Bill” is so presented, no “Bill” will or can become a “Law.” And any purported “Law” that the usurper “approve[s]” and “sign[s],” or that Congress passes over the usurper’s “Objections,” will be a nullity. Thus, if Obama deceitfully “enters office” as an usurper, Congress will be rendered effectively impotent for as long as it acquiesces in his pretenses as “President.”
Besides removing a usurper from office,that should be our second-highest consideration and why the outlaw Congress hasn’t moved against him. All 535 of them allowed this to happen, and now it’s gone so far; they don’t have the courage to take on the mess they’ve made.
The usurper can be indicted once out of office, but how to get him out? Please take the time to read my column on that process. Will he ever be indicted for his crimes? With enough public pressure, it can happen because his handlers would simply throw him under the bus as a liability.
There will be a massive push to keep the putative president off the ballot in dozens of states. It will come from candidates who understand the process discussed in my column above. Mark my words, what’s coming will be a nightmare for the DNC and Obama’s handlers. Time is running out for them to find another viable candidate; something will have to give. One way or the other, Obama’s crimes are going to catch up with him, but please stop working toward setting the wrong legal precedent. It’s beyond frustrating, I know, but either we live our words in supporting the U.S. Constitution or we take the wrong road opening the door for another ineligible candidate with enough money and corrupt individuals behind him to seize the office of president.