Captain Chaos Rothschild ~ The Joker: Stop The British Empire’s Drive For Genocide And War, Pass LPAC’s Emergency Resolution! Glass Steagall

Posted on May 2, 2012


Yesterday’s interventions from the British imperial oligarchy underscore the crucial nature of our Emergency Mobilization for Glass-Steagall, national banking, and NAWAPA XXI. Building an unstoppable movement for this policy is the only way we can destroy the Empire, and its agenda of genocide and war. The resolution is a weapon to save humanity from destruction.

The Empire’s drive for genocide came to the fore with a new report, entitled “People and the Planet,” written in the name of the Royal Society — yes, the same Royal Society, founded in 1660, from which we got that miserable quack Isaac Newton and many of his epigones since. The 106-page report, decorated with phony concerns about the 1.3 billion people starving in the world today, has one clear message: population and consumption have to be reduced. Man’s impact (technology) on the Earth must be reduced, advanced technologies have to be junked in favor of redistribution of limited resources, and carbon emissions slashed. As the report’s introduction says, this tome is explicitly aimed to further create the climate — along with the Club of Rome/WWF report coming May 7 — for the world genocide program at Rio+20.

Perhaps appropriately, the director of the report, Sir John Sulston, is a Nobelist who worked on the Genome project, and is an expert on… worms.

Doing the Royal Society report one better was none other than arch-genocidalist Paul Ehrlich, author of the 1968 book “The Population Bomb.” Interviewed by the London Guardian on the Royal Society findings, Ehrlich echoed Prince Philip, by demanding that world population be reduced to 1.5 billion people! The way the Guardian put it was more delicate: the world needs to move “rapidly” toward “population shrinkage.”

It is this agenda the British Empire seeks to impose on the planet — and which provides the reason it insists on eliminating the nation-state institution. If the nations of Eurasia, especially Russia and China, object, the Empire fully intends to use its puppet, Barack Obama, to threaten thermonuclear war.

The British war agenda is also escalating, particularly around the Blair-Nazi doctrine of “humanitarian intervention,” also known as preventive war. As you’ll see below, there is a huge ratchet-up in pressure for military intervention to depose Assad — and create the genocidal chaos which would almost certainly follow.

Against these horrors, the LPAC mobilization hits against the heart of the Empire, by demanding Glass-Steagall, national banking, and NAWAPA XXI. We have just begun to set this in motion, with the mass mailing to the LPAC list, a few presentations before local governmental bodies, and circulation of the NAWAPA XXI special report. We are challenging Americans to return to their tradition, to “think big” enough to destroy the Empire. Those who claim it’s “too big” for them, need to be reminded that it was Americans mobilizing in their small communities, in committees of mechanics and committees of correspondence, for example, who thought big enough to challenge the British Empire in the 18th Century — and thus were responsible for creating the United States.

Our appropriate model, to the extent there is one, is our mobilization for the SDI, which encompassed every layer of the population — from Washington government institutions, to academic and scientific layers, to the population in local constituencies and locales. These all combined at that time to bring us a victory, which terrified the British enemy to the point they’ve never forgotten. It’s long past time we did that again.

The mobilization of our European associates, and broader forces, against the British-devised dictatorship for Europe, provides us with crucial flanking support. Look particularly at Ireland, scheduled to hold a referendum on the Austerity Pact, and at France, where the potential election of Socialist Hollande, despite his obvious weaknesses, is flipping out the monetarists. Former Italian Economics Minister Tremonti’s public support for Hollande reflects just how important he sees that race. Jacques Cheminade‘s mobilization inside France, around the policies of Glass-Steagall and a credit system, will be absolutely crucial to forcing Hollande to act in the defense of the nation.

We’ve come down to the wire on the fight against the Empire, the fight for civilization. Forge breakthroughs for the Emergency Resolution every day, because that’s the only way to assure a future for our nation, and mankind.

LPAC

On February 17, 1950, James Paul Warburg confidently declared to the United States Senate: “We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent.” [1] James Paul Warburg (1896-1969) was the son of Paul Moritz Warburg, and a nephew of both Felix Warburg and Jacob Schiff, both associated with Kuhn, Loeb & Company which financed the Russian Revolution through James’ brother Max, banker to the government of Germany. [2] A world government is a world without borders, national sovereignty, constitutions, privacy, autonomy, individual liberties, religious freedoms, private property, the right to bear arms, the rights of marriage and family and a dramatic population reduction (two thirds). A world government establishes a slave/master environment wherein the state controls everything.

Unfortunately, in the United States, the Establishment’s goal of a One World Order is reaching fruition through complacent consent and subversive conquest. America, a Constitutional Republic, is plunging into the satanical One World Order facilitated by the calculated placement of unscrupulous individuals deeply dedicated to the goals of the secret societies they belong to. America, formerly the home of the brave and the free, is currently the home of the people who merely think they are free. None are more enslaved and manipulated than those who mistakenly view themselves as free, therefore rendering them exceptionally vulnerable.

Consent, using mass population management can be achieved by using elements of Hegelian Dialectics. Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (1770-1831), [3] the political and social scientist and professor at the University of Berlin from 1817 until his death in 1831, clearly defined his philosophical/political concepts that came to be known as Hegelianism. His ideas are still taught [4] and authors continue to elaborate on his philosophies, [5] though inattentive Americans fail to acknowledge or even distinguish their application in our own society despite the obvious and devastating consequences.

“The philosophy which has dominated the Western world since the mid 19th century can be reduced to one tenet—ultimate peace comes only through conflict… It proposes that a clash between ideologies (thesis and antithesis) is a normal historical phenomenon which always results in compromise (synthesis) that advances civilization to a higher level of order. “Conflict, in other words, is good, and peace is not necessarily desirable (or profitable).” [6] The essence of Hegel’s dialectical process is that an idea (thesis) is challenged by its opposite (antithesis) creating a crisis, problem or conflict and the two are ultimately reconciled into a third idea (synthesis) or compromise which includes both. As compromise (synthesis) is achieved the process is incessantly repeated, with synthesis posturing as thesis, for sustained conflict-filled advancement. And like spectators at a tennis match, the populace is so totally distracted by the contrived contentious confrontations that we do not perceive the motives of the entire conflict charade. Government creates a crisis for which the public demands a solution. That solution instigates the changes that the government initially wanted but which the people would have been unwilling to accept. It is Order out of Chaos! Worldwide chaos will lead to worldwide solutions which will establish the One World Order.

Several current crises receiving media attention definitely demand serious scrutiny. Trust me; the government already has the perfect solution for each problem.

Crisis #1: Deliberate destabilization is occurring: well financed demonstrations donning foreign flags, government fines of small business, chaos, high crime rates, eradicated contagious diseases returning, bankrupt hospitals, high welfare burdens, lost American wages, and overcrowded schools are emotionally eviscerating Americans. Minutemen marches and justified activities are ineffective against the floodgate of the Mexican masses. Public demand is high as we witness the seemingly impotent government (thesis) which is apathetic to the voter’s wishes while their usually supportive squad of talk radio show shills and the Fox News faction posture as a very effective opposition (antithesis) purportedly embracing the average citizen’s viewpoint against the government.

Solution or synthesis: The completely orchestrated invasion by invitation is essentially the well planned stealthy strategic function of combining the countries of Canada, the United States and Mexico according to the treacherous treaty signed on March 23, 2005, by the top political leaders of the United States, Mexico and Canada: Bush, Fox and Martin. [7] Download the CFR associated document, Building a North American Community, Task Force Report 53 for comprehensive details. This invasion enables their goal with additional perks: thousands of additional jobless citizens will be available for perpetual warfare paid by borrowed funds from the international banking cabal. Rampant chaos, assisted by the predicted avian pandemic may necessitate permanent Martial Law or military order (as after 9-11) which may prevent the 2006 and 2008 “elections” from taking place. Those “representatives” loyal to the One World Order would then remain in office, an unlikely circumstance, if our votes actually counted, after their duplicity in this immigration fiasco.

For security, “voters” (people who actually think they have a voice) will settle for the compromise legislation that we were unwilling to accept originally. To prove our legality, we will be amenable to an implanted ID chip. We won’t complain too loudly about the incarceration of illegals in those FEMA Concentration Camps. This will make it easier for the government to imprison dissenters, whistleblowers and patriots. What they can do to one person, they can do to multitudes.

Crisis #2: Members of the government-friendly mass media are apparently attempting to provoke public alarm by castigating watchdog journalists who allegedly leak information which might affect our “national security.” One popular obedience-trained radio talk show shill suggested subpoenas instead of Pulitzers. William J. Bennett, Neo-con war hawk PNAC member said: “But these people who reveal our secrets, who hurt our war effort, who hurt the efforts of our CIA, who hurt efforts of the president’s people–they shouldn’t be given prizes and awards for this; they should be looked into–the Espionage Act, the investigation of these leaks.” [8]

Journalistic exposés about Randy “Duke” Cunningham (R-California), Bush’s warrant-less domestic surveillance program and the Jack Abramoff lobbying scandal expose government abuse and corruption. Government is accountable to the people, not the other way around. In an attempt to prevent publication of Bush’s illegal assault on our privacy “Bush met with Executive Editor Bill Keller and Publisher Arthur Sulzberger Jr. to argue against publication.” [9] Gagging the press is censorship – typical only in a tyrannical government. Freedom of speech is always lost gradually – unfortunately with the consent of a propagandized frightened populace willing to give up their freedoms for a measure of security.

“Once a government is committed to the principle of silencing the voice of opposition, it has only one way to go, and that is down the path of increasingly repressive measures, until it becomes a source of terror to all its citizens and creates a country where everyone lives in fear.” – Harry S. Truman

Solution or synthesis: Full ramifications of the legislation already in place will unfold, which the unwitting populace will readily accept, with the next contrived crisis or pandemic – the 2007 Intelligence Authorization Act spells total control from just about every major bureaucratic agency. “H.R. 5020 provides strategic and substantial enhancements in funding for critical, world-wide intelligence capabilities, strengthens our overall capabilities, and gives America the modern, lean, mean, agile, and aggressive Intelligence Community it needs.” [10]

“Finally, the bill requires the Office of the Director of National Intelligence to develop a comprehensive overhead architecture program to eliminate waste and ensure rational and coordinated technical programs; improves coordination between the Intelligence Community and military to increase our efforts and effectiveness in the Global War on Terror; and increases House Intelligence and Armed Services coordination to advance common systems and capabilities to fight the Global War on Terror.” [11] The “war of terror” is significantly defined as global, the ominous foreshadowing of “perpetual war for perpetual peace”. Anti-war advocates will be classified as unpatriotic or worse – probably depicted as traitors via a daily “2-minute hate session.” “Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel.”

Obviously, there are other crises, orchestrated oppositions, for which Americans are and will demand solutions – premeditated plans that bring us closer to the One World Order. People are demanding a solution to the gas prices which affect every aspect of American life. It isn’t just about gas availability for summer vacations. Petitions against profanity from friends and family are wending their way through the Internet asking for a government solution. Hey people, police yourself and your children – turn the television off – read a book! Don’t hand the job of parenting to Big Brother! If they can eliminate profanity, they can eliminate anything – religion, etc.

Criminal activity, hyped in the news and exacerbated by numerous CSI style shows, creates the perception of pervasive crime which promotes a general feeling of fear and vulnerability. Some Chicago churches are compensating individuals for turning in their guns. Is this a faith-based initiative – churches collecting guns appears very benign compared to confiscation by uniformed government agents. Gun control is a major step! Only criminals and the government (excuse the redundancy) will have guns – now that is the scariest scenario.

“Our main agenda is to have all guns banned of course. We must use whatever means possible. It doesn’t matter if you have to distort facts or even lie. Our task of creating a socialist America can only succeed when those who would resist us have been totally disarmed.” Sarah Brady, 1994

It is amazing that the government can predict the pandemic arrival of the avian flu Small business suffers while big multinational agri-business increases. And who knows what is in that vaccine serum – metal, mercury or some other waste product? Collateral benefit: Donald Rumsfeld makes big bucks on Gilead stock.

Is another war on the horizon? Should we preemptively nuke Iran – the threat is whatever the Ministry of Truth and the complicit news media says it is. Collateral benefit: war profits for the Carlyle Group, that well-connected defense contractor and don’t forget about Halliburton.

Warrantless domestic surveillance is an affront to our basic Constitutional freedoms but has been going on for decades. The latest incident was intentionally “leaked” to evaluate mass response to a more intense invasion of our privacy. Naïve citizens who aren’t “guilty of anything anyway” claim they don’t mind if Big Brother listens to their private conversations. “Just keep us safe from those bogeymen terrorists!”

Certainly, there is a massive amount of contrived crises but I hope I made my point regarding thesis, antithesis and synthesis.

To provide the ongoing application of these devilish dialectics individuals from well established covert societies, some more secret than others, finagle their way into powerful positions within the three branches of the federal government. This is accomplished through complicit consent and contrived choice. The quantity of such infiltration is insignificant especially if we consider the “one rotten apple in a basket” concept. Secret societies, the genuine conspiracies, are secret for a reason and they exist despite denials and well-placed “official” counter charges. Activities carried on under the darkness of concealment are most frequently illegal. Secrecy is not essential in the glaring light of day.

Antony Sutton stated: “Secret political organizations can be and have been extremely dangerous to the social health and constitutional validity of a society. In a truly free society the exercise of political power must always be open and known.” “Moreover, organizations devoted to violent overthrow of political structures have always, by necessity, been secret organizations. Communist revolutionary cells are an obvious example. In fact, such revolutionary organizations can only function if their existence was secret. In brief, secrecy in matters political is historically associated with coercion. Furthermore, the existence of secrecy in organizations with political ambitions or with a history of political actions is always suspect. Freedom is always associated with open political action and discussion while coercion is always associated with secrecy.” [12]We have been brainwashed into believing absolute secrecy is imperative for our national security.

President Kennedy said of Freemasonry: “The very word ‘secrecy’ is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it.”  President John F. Kennedy— address to newspaper publishers, April 27, 1961

Most of these groups or societies embrace One World Order goals; they include but are not limited to: The Illuminati, Club of Rome, the Bilderbergs, the Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA), also known as The Chatham House Study Group founded 1919 in Great Britain and its sinister sister the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) founded 1921 in America. The CFR is the largest group. “The plans for these two groups were drawn up at the 1919 Paris Peace Conference. The RIIA was largely funded by the Astor family, The Rhodes Trust and certain British banks whilst the CFR was a front for JP Morgan &Co.” [13]

“The main purpose of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) is promoting the disarmament of U.S. sovereignty and national independence and submergence into an all powerful, one world government.” Chester Ward, Rear Admiral and former Navy Judge Advocate 1956 – 1960 and a CFR member for 15 years. Is his attitude reflective of other military leaders who have also sworn to uphold the Constitution?

Both of these groups were established as proxies for the Rhodes-Milner Group which was founded at All Souls College, Oxford University by diamond tycoon Cecil Rhodes (Rhodesia was named for), inspired by John Ruskin, professor of Fine Arts at Oxford University and Lord Alfred Milner at the end of the 19th century. The Rhodes Scholarships were created as a result of an attachment to the 1902 will of Cecil Rhodes:

“The idea gliding and dancing before our eyes like a willow – a wish at last frames itself into a plan. Why should we not join (or form as other writers have interpreted Rhodes’ handwriting) a secret society with but one object: the furtherance of the British Empire, for the bringing of the whole uncivilized world under British rule, for the recovery of the United States, for the making the Anglo-Saxon race but one Empire.” [14]

The function of the Rhodes-Milner Group, now referred to as The Rhodes Trust, is to identify and give scholarships to specially-qualified individuals to study at Oxford University. Potential scholars must demonstrate an aptitude to function as political leaders, educators, military leaders and/or skillful communicators who demonstrate the necessary skills to ultimately influence others to accept the New World Order agenda. Students are introduced to certain concepts/values to implement within their respective countries. Names of just a few of these scholars appear on the following very brief list: CFR denotes membership in the Council on Foreign Relations and TC denotes membership in the Trilateral Commission, both organizations that promote and work for a New World Order:

·        Bill Clinton (CFR – TC) (The first Rhodes Scholar to be President)

  • ·        David Souter (Supreme Court Judge)
  • ·        R. James Woolsey (CFR) (ex-CIA Director 1993-1995)
  • ·        Alan Keith Henrikson (CFR) (The Fletcher Roundtable on a New World Order; Associate, Center for International Affairs, United Nations Development Programme)
  • ·        Richard Jeffrey Danzig (former Under Secretary of the Navy)
  • ·        Wesley Kanne Clark (CFR) (Supreme Allied Commander, NATO, 1997-2000; Democratic presidential candidate, 2004; West Point graduate and a big fan of Douglas MacArthur; author of The Fire This Time, a critique and exposé of the Bush administration and war crimes which possibly functions as orchestrated opposition)
  • ·        Naomi Wolf – charismatic author of several books on feminism. The feminist movement was initially a CIA-funded operation. She wrote The End of America: A Letter of Warning to a Young Patriot (2007), a book that may function as orchestrated opposition in preparation for the predictable 2008 regime change. She also wrote Give Me Liberty: A Handbook for American Revolutionaries (Simon & Schuster, 2008). She is married to a former Clinton speechwriter, David Shipley. She has appeared on numerous main stream media networks as well as several alternative radio networks.
  • ·        David Ruick Bock (spent 16 years at the World Bank)
  • ·        David Carter Hardesty Jr. (West Virginia University’s 21st president)
  • ·        Ronald Stanley Katz (CFR) (United States Department of State, Office of the Law of the Sea Negotiations; Deputy Director, 1977 – 1978 United States Justice Department)
  • ·        Stephen Alan Oxman (CFR) (Assistant Secretary of State for European and Canadian Affairs from 1993-1997)
  • ·        Dennis Cutler Blair (Joint Chiefs of Staff; U.S. Associate Director of Central Intelligence for Military Support)
  • ·        David Odell Beim (CFR) (executive vice president of the Export-Import Bank of the United States)
  • ·        Walter Becker Slocombe (CFR) (Under Secretary of Defense for Policy; was a member of the Program Analysis Office of the National Security Council staff. Senior Advisor for National Defense for the CPA, Baghdad, 2003)
  • ·        Willard Scott Thompson (CFR) (Director, U S Institute for Peace; Assistant Secretary of Defense)
  • ·        W. Bowman Cutter (CFR) (chairman of the Global Information Infrastructure Commission (GIIC) Steering Committee for the Center for Strategic & International Studies; Deputy Assistant to the President for Economic Policy under Clinton, Office of Management and Budget)
  • ·        Walter Isaacson (President of the Aspen Institute; Managing Editor of Time magazine (1995-2001); Chairman and CEO of CNN)
  • ·        Neil L. Rudenstine (CFR) (President of Harvard University; Executive Vice President of The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation; the American Philosophical Society; Committee for Economic Development)
  • ·        Robert B. Reich (American commentator and author; U.S. Secretary of Labor, 1993-1997)
  • ·        Boisfeuillet Jones, Jr. (Publisher and CEO of The Washington Post)
  • ·        Strobe Talbott (American diplomat and journalist; U.S. Deputy Secretary of State (1994-2001); President of the Brookings Institution)
  • ·        Richard N. Haass (CFR) (President of the Council on Foreign Relations; Director of the Policy Planning Staff at the U.S. Department of State, 2001-2003. From 1989-93, he was special assistant to President George Bush and senior director for Near East and South Asian affairs on the staff of the National Security Council.)
  • ·        E. J. Dionne (American journalist and Washington Post columnist)
  • ·        Paul Blustein (American author and journalist The Washington Post)
  • ·        Clark Kent Ervin (Inspector General of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security)
  • ·        William Averell Harriman (CFR) (Initiated into the Skull and Bones Society with his friend Prescott Bush; Club of Rome; Charter Member – American Academy of Diplomacy; Knights of Pythias; and Psi Upsilon Fraternity. US Ambassador to Soviet Union 1943-1946; Ambassador to Britain in 1946; Secretary of Commerce; Ambassador at Large in the Kennedy Administration; Assistant Secretary of State for Far Eastern Affairs; Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs; Chief U.S. Negotiator Paris Peace Talks on Vietnam. He established W. A. Harriman & Co. in 1922 which was changed to Harriman Brothers & Co. when his brother E. Roland joined the company in 1927. They merged with Brown Bros. & Co. in 1931 to become Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. Employees included George Herbert Walker and Prescott Bush, who were likewise employed alongside E. R. Harriman at Union Banking Corporation (UBC), a company which was temporarily closed in 1943 by the U.S. Government for Trading with the Enemy[ii] Harriman was not a Rhodes Scholar but is included here because of his association with other elites who were.
  • ·        Ivan A. Getting (American weapons scientist and co-inventor of GPS technology) [iii]

See the complete list.

The Bilderberg Group, another very secret society, was under the chairmanship of H. R. H. Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands, who served in that position for twenty-two years beginning in 1954. Creation of the group was not Bernhard’s brainchild but that of politically connected Dr Joseph H. Retinger. [iv] After decades of covert conniving, it was most likely the first formally scheduled meeting of the banking elite and other prominent individuals. The group’s purpose: coordination of American and European foreign policy towards establishing a New World Order. “At a small hotel near Arnhem in the deeply wooded uplands of eastern Holland on May 29-31, 1954, a group of eminent statesmen, financiers, and intellectuals from the principal nations of Europe and the United States met together in, perhaps, the most unusual international conference ever held until then.” [v]

The hotel was The Hotel de Bilderberg in the Dutch town of Oosterbeek from which the group takes its name. Since then, a yearly meeting, strictly secure and highly confidential, is held in various places where powerful people, who crave even more power, meet. See the lists of attendees since 1991; they include media, government, and corporate business owners. Governor Bill Clinton attended in 1991 – pre-approval of his presidency? Do a cross-check of the Bilderberg and the Rhodes Scholar list. Non-Catholic George W. Bush decided to visit the Pope in 2004 at the very same time as the Bilderbergs 50th anniversary conference in Stresa, Italy – what a coincidence! [vi]Additionally, Senator John Edwards was also there – perhaps to gain acceptance as Kerry’s running mate.

“It is a fact that in Europe, membership in the Bilderberger group guarantees political success. Not surprisingly, opposition to Bilderberger dogma results in loss of power and position.” [vii] European politicians adhere to the Bilderberg policies or suffer the consequences. Margaret Thatcher, former Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, opposed the Bilderbergs and their target date of 1992 for consolidating the European Union along with the adoption of a standard European currency. Apparently she voiced her opposition at the annual meeting in Spain in May 1989 much to the detriment of her career. Thereafter, “Thatcher was viciously attacked by every known media source within days of the meeting. She was denounced in almost every European newspaper, television, and radio as a ‘provisionalist’ and an ‘Ultra-nationalist,’ and that was only the beginning. Within days, a parliamentary assault was initiated against her.” On November 28, 1990, she was succeeded by John Major.

The Bilderberg elite demanded that President Ronald Reagan provide $50 billion taxpayer dollars from the U.S. Treasury over the period of his eight-year presidency, to be given to third world countries through the World Bank and the IMF. Again, in the 1988 meeting, the group insisted that America implement a tax increase to further enhance the IMF and World Bank coffers. These deceptive acts constituted a redistribution of money from the American taxpayer’s pocket into the banker’s vaults. The poor rarely receive benefits. That tax increase apparently cost George H. W. Bush a second term. Perhaps his first-born son, George W. Bush, would be compensated later for his father’s political losses. It was the Bilderbergs who decided that hundreds of billions of American taxpayer dollars should fund the new democratic government in the former Soviet Union. We were also required to buy needless, over-priced, undelivered Soviet products to pump up their economy – more taxpayer dollars for covetous bankers and payola for accommodating third world Judases who also sacrificed their people. The Bilderbergers mandated the invasion of Bosnia. When the wicked rule, those who aren’t slaughtered mourn.

Though select members of the media have always attended Bilderberg meetings, they are very discreet. David Rockefeller, speaking at the June 1991, Bilderberger meeting in Baden Baden, Germany said: “We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national determination practiced in past centuries.” The media does, however, spin webs of deceit and furnish fluff and appropriate propaganda to advance pre-selected political candidates. Among other, Bilderberger Bill Kristol, publisher of The Weekly Standard, edited by Fred Barnes, wrote a remarkably favorable report portraying George W. Bush as the “heavyweight” candidate in anticipation of the 2000 elections. His purported business acuity was actually the result of family and business connections and had nothing to do with his personal skills.

The Illuminati, a secret society established to counter the positive influence of the clergy, was founded and structured after the Masonic model at the University of Ingolstadton May 1, 1776 by atheist Adam Weishaupt. The contest between good and evil embraced Manichean symbolism, a war between light and darkness, between the illumination of reason and the allegedly sordid dark ignorance of religious superstition. [viii] The Illuminati goal was a secularized, counterfeit perfection of mankind, minus Jesus Christ.

In an attempt to emulate Christianity reason postured as revelation and nature; creations, like the earth replaced the Creator. The Bible was/is the holy book for Christian enlightenment; the 36 volumes of the atheistic Diderot’s Encyclopedia provided the inspiration of the Enlightenment – all the while trying to eliminate God. This encyclopedia included imprints of Voltaire, Montesque, Rousseau, Buffon and Turgot. Significantly, the title page of Diderot’s first edition included a drawing of Lucifer, symbol of light and rebellion, standing next to the Masonic symbols of the square and the compass.

The Illuminati studied the Enlightenment philosophers to battle against the Jesuits and strengthen the Illuminati philosophy through their literature. Weishaupt stated: “Princes and Nations shall disappear from off the face of the earth! Yes, a time shall come when man shall acknowledge no other law but the great book of nature; this revelation shall be the work of Secret Societies and that is one of our grand mysteries.” [ix] The Illuminati had two to three thousand members and spread throughout Europe including Poland, Holland, England and France. Many functioned within illuminized Masonic Lodges. “Johann Gottfried von Herder (1744-1803), the German philosopher, Atheist and composer was an Illuminist. Johann Wolfgang Goethe (1749-1823), also a German philosopher, writer and privy councilor. Goethe is best known as the creator of Faust, perhaps, as speculated by many, an Illuminist allegory. [x] In 1785, the Order that was intent on restructuring the state and destroying the church was officially abolished, unless of course it merely resurfaced in America as the more sinister, more secretive Brotherhood of Death, also known as the Order of Skull and Bones.

Probably the most secretive group, the Order of Skull and Bones, also known as Chapter 322 or simply The Order, is the powerful all-male society that was established at Yale University for the elite children or grandchildren of the Wall Street Banking Establishment. George W. Bush, whose father and grandfather were also members, remarked: “My senior year, I joined Skull and Bones, a secret society, so secret I can’t say anything more.” The Order was co-founded by Alphonso Taft (Secretary of War in the Grant Administration) and William Huntington Russell and thirteen others. Skull and Bones “is a clear and obvious threat to the constitutional freedom of the United States. Its secrecy, power and use of influence are greater by far than the Masons, or any other semi-secret mutual or fraternal organization.” [xi]

The Order was incorporated as The Russell Trust in 1856 by Daniel Coit Gilman as treasurer and William H. Russell as president. For the next fourteen years Gilman consolidated the power of The Order. More about Gilman and his influence in the field of medicine will be given later.

William Russell’s cousin Samuel established Russell and Company in 1823 which was an opium empire which acquired opium in Turkey and smuggled it into China. More than one prominent American family made a fortune through drug smuggling. Warren Delano, Jr. (grandfather of Franklin Roosevelt) was Chief of Operations for Russell and Company in Canton. Other Russell business associates included John Cleve Green (financed Princeton), Abiel Low (financed construction of Columbia.), and Joseph Coolidge (his son organized United Fruit and grandson, Archibald C. Coolidge, was a co-founder of the Council on Foreign Relations.) [xii] Read about United Fruit and their monopolies in third world countries here.

The un-American chapter of a German Order was established at Yale on June 28, 1832 when Russell returned there after studying in Germany from 1831-1832 where he was exposed to Hegel’s philosophical ideas which found great popularity and ready acceptance in the German educational system. [xiii] It has been suggested that while William Huntington Russell was in Germany “he was initiated into a secret society with a skull and bones for its emblem. Some even claim that he was initiated into a continuation of the Illuminati and granted authorization to start a Yale chapter.” [xiv]

“Members are chosen in their junior year and spend only one year on campus, the senior year, with Skull & Bones. In other words, the organization is oriented to the post graduate outside world.” [xv] This society is by invitation only – just fifteen candidates each year for a total membership of about 2500. At any given time only about 600 or so members of The Order are alive. Of that number only 150 (about one-quarter) take an active role in the society. It is estimated that a core of perhaps 20-30 families run The Order. “The most likely potential member is from a Bones family, who is energetic, resourceful, political and probably an amoral team player. A man who understands that to get along you have to go along. A man who will sacrifice himself for the good of the team… In real life the thrust of The Order is to bring about certain objectives. Honors and financial rewards are guaranteed by the power of The Order.” [xvi]

Members of Skull & Bones have infiltrated “just about every significant research, policy, opinion-making organization in the United States, in addition to the church, business, law, government and politics. The evolution of American society is not, and has not been for a century, a voluntary development reflecting individual opinion, ideas and decisions at the grass roots. On the contrary, the broad direction has been created artificially and stimulated by The Order.” [xvii]

Bonesmen support one another in their quests for successful infiltration into various endeavors. A couple of Bonesmen supplied the finances to launch George Bush’s business career when he founded the Arbusto Oil Company; Bush acquired the money to buy a stake in the Texas Rangers from another Bonesman; and another fraternity member paid for the million dollar billboards that boosted Bush’s 2000 presidential campaign. After Bush’s installation as president, he threw a lavish dinner for his fraternity brothers, probably at the taxpayer’s expense. [xviii]

The super secretive Order of Skull and Bones (hereafter called The Order) is non partisan – it is neither right or left, conservative or liberal, Republican or Democrat. Of the secret groups, The Order and the Bilderberg Group are the most secretive. The Order may, in fact, be the core of the others. Each group appears to have specific activities towards the development of the One World Order. The activities of The Order are focused on changing our society and the world, to bring about a One World Order, a very structured society, encompassing all current countries. Individual freedoms will be more heavily restricted. There will be even less Constitutional protection, no national boundaries or cultural distinctions. [i] Therefore, The Order controls Republican Bonesmen and Democrat Bonesmen.

The Order’s methodology is a strict adherence to Hegelian Dialectics. Apply those dialectics to the two political parties. Essentially, political parties are artificial groupings designed to create cultural and emotional division. A contrived choice between two bad options, without recognizing alternative better choices, creates the perception of freedom. Ostensibly opposing ideologies generate deliberate distraction and polarization. It is the old divide and conquer tactic. The very public, distracting, lengthy, increasingly hostile battle between the Republicans, posing as thesis, and the Democrats posing as antithesis constitutes orchestrated opposition. Elections, staged for the masses, are completely irrelevant political tennis matches. Domestic and foreign policies remain intact, regardless of the political affiliation of the puppet president.

Despite popular misconceptions, our government is supposed to be a representative Republic, not a democracy, as deceptively asserted and popularly accepted. Citizens vote in both democracies and republics. That single act does not make you free. Those who finagle their way into office supposedly represent the voters who purportedly put them there. Moreover, they are to sustain an invariable written law – the Constitution which mandates civil law and our response to it. The non-negotiable Constitution is our explicit gauge of right and wrong, applicable to all without special considerations for occupation, political, social or cultural status, or ethnicity. Since Woodrow Wilson, we have descended into a Socialistic democracy with adaptable mob rule, adjustable laws and poll-driven public opinions. All democracies, in which selective enforcement of law is tolerated, are short lived, for they typically morph into oppressive tyrannies.

“Whenever laws are passed, under whatever form, if they do not represent the will of the majority of the people or their desires, then they represent oppression. That is to say, we in America today have an oppressive government because it passes laws against the will of the people. Thus, we no longer have a Republic. A strong case can be made that America in the 21st century is an Empire, as was Britain in the 19th. Any government that would even consider an issue as ludicrous as ‘hate crimes,’ i.e. the concept of policing thought, is in very serious jeopardy.” [ii]

Of the three branches of government, only the legislative branch is authorized to make law. Presidential executive orders have been unconstitutionally used to make law. The Judicial branch, the Supreme Court, is supposed to interpret the constitutionality of a law. Rather, they invent new interpretations never envisioned by the founding fathers. “It is the duty of the Supreme Court to interpret the Constitution as ratified by the states, not to invent preposterous meanings which were not originally intended by the authors. The judiciary makes law through changing precedents as well as by invention, neither of which are constitutionally authorized.” [iii]

Of the choices in 2004 we had two professional politicians, members of the same silver-spooned secret society whose dedicated function is the destruction of the country, pretending to relate to the working masses while the media sheltered the compromised loyalties of the candidates and ignored any other possibilities. The elite have achieved synthesis – a merging of the two parties into one which favors mammoth government, unrestrained illegals, out-of-control deficit spending, high taxes, continued abortion, big brother spying, loss of freedoms via such documents as Patriot Act, big business/big government cronyism, preemptive war, job losses and the authentic free market. Treasonous trade agreements are not about trade but about cheap labor and corporate profits. Impervious to party behavior as opposed to their rhetoric, conditioned party loyalists accept a multitude of misconceptions.

Lack of unification behind the Constitution, the law of the land, will lead U.S. citizens into unbearable bondage – while enjoying their perceptions of freedom. “We are either a united people, or we are not.  If the former, let us, in all maters of general concern act as a nation, which have national objects to promote, and a national character to support. If we are not, let us no longer act a farce by pretending to it.” George Washington (letter to James Madison, 30 November 1785) Reference: George Washington: A Collection, W.B. Allen, ed. (315)

We are sadly deceived. We do not select and then elect candidates. Influence and money determines the selection of acquiescent local and federal candidates. “Since its founding, the Bilderberg Group has functioned as a de facto private Global Politburo with 120 attendees at recent yearly meetings. Historically, the Group’s power is awesome. Bill Clinton, an obscure Arkansas governor, was tapped to run for president. Likewise, Margaret Thatcher, as well as Tony Blair, was tapped by the Bilderbergers to assume the reins of government in the United Kingdom. Congressman Gerald Ford, later U.S. president, also attended Group meetings in 1964 and 1966.” [iv] Georgia Governor Jimmy Carter, an unknown peanut farmer, joined forces with the Bilderberg Group. In all likelihood, every presidential candidate in the last five decades has collaborated with the Bilderberg.

Voters witness this contrived opposition in every national election. In the staged elections of 2000, our “choices” were Gore and Bush. Months before the November elections, Florida Governor, Jeb Bush ordered election supervisors to purge 58,000 voters on the grounds that they were felons and not entitled to vote. Actually, only a handful of those voters were felons. This purging prevented 50,000 people from voting. Ninety percent of those voters were Democrats. This incident, assuring older brother Bush’s victory, never made the news. [v] “In four states — Alabama, Kentucky, Virginia and Florida — people with any felony conviction are barred for life from the polls, unless the government grants them individual rights through a petition process.” [vi]

Puppet leaders in any country owe their allegiance to the entities that installed them into office, not to the masses they profess to lead. Political fixing involves several tactics: forced resignations, military coups, CIA assassinations of leaders who are antagonistic to American big business interests, paperless electronic voting machines, or illegal Supreme Court decisions. [vii] Installed dictators wreak havoc against their own citizens and other targeted countries to accommodate their handler’s world government goal.

Idealistically, individuals are elected to faithfully represent and proxy vote in the name of their constituents. However, there are variables – representatives may vote in several different ways:

  • ·        Vote their conscience
  • ·        Vote for what they think their constituents want
  • ·        Vote based on Executive Branch pressure
  • ·        Vote based on lobbyists’ perks
  • ·        Vote with the party leadership

The last, voting with the party leadership is the most common – it is party politics and is frequently at the expense of the people’s pocket. How many of us have ever requested a substantial raise for a congressional leader or a millionaire-maker, life-long pension or a family health care program that dwarfs any of the benefits or salaries of the average hard-working American? Yet, this routinely occurs. However, many of us have made numerous calls, sent abundant faxes, letters and emails requesting, nay demanding, constitutionally sound votes on such things as CAFTA to have our “representative” vote against the constitution, against their campaign rhetoric, against the citizens and in favor of their party financiers. I did get a reply from my pro-abortion, pro-big business Republican representative telling me that she had voted for the CAFTA (August 2, 2005) bill for three reasons:

1.     “It will help our manufacturers.

2.     It bolsters our national security as it helps strengthen relationships with six very important new governments in our own backyard.

3.     This agreement will help the anti-poor efforts in these six nations, stem the flow of illegal immigration to the U.S., and reverse China’s dominance in textiles and apparel.” [viii]

She ended her letter by saying: “I am sorry we did not see eye-to-eye on this issue, but I hope this information and the enclosed fact sheet on benefits for Illinois might help to allay some of your concerns about the agreement. Please don’t hesitate to contact me again on this or any other issue that interests you.” [ix] Representative Biggert’s belated response reminded me that she no longer represents the voter. It takes time and creativity to concoct the rational for congressional complicity in the destruction of U.S. sovereignty. Congressional members rarely read before signing legislation, written by interest groups or paid corporate lobbyists. It is rubber-stamp legislation according to the corporate-owned congress.

I am certain that the voter’s views of CAFTA paralleled their perceptions of NAFTA. The “representatives” didn’t read that bill either. It wasn’t even published until several weeks after the vote. Over 80% of the American population opposed NAFTA. Obviously, Biggert and other “representatives” didn’t bother to review the disastrous results of NAFTA on the American middle class and she apparently assumes that no one else will connect the huge demise of 7 million manufacturing jobs to treasonous trade treaties. Fifteen hundred manufacturing plants relocated to Mexico as a result of NAFTA. So why are so many Mexicans coming north to work in “jobs Americans won’t do”? Moving those plants should have provided motivation for workers to remain in their own country. Folks, we are lied to on a regular basis. Only a complicit politician ignores the cause and effect of any legislative disaster and hopes the voters won’t notice. Biggert and others of her ilk will continue to be reelected by amnesia-afflicted or ignorant voters who may currently work two jobs to stay afloat.

Suffice it to say – both parties are owned and reek with corruption. In the 2004 election the Establishment selected Kerry to run against the incumbent Bush, both committed members of The Order and both adept in the art of orchestrated opposition. The candidates deliberately ignored the real issues while focusing attention on insignificant distractions. Bush’s Bones membership would have been the very last issue that the Democrats would have mentioned. Instead attention to military and drug/DUI arrest records and Kerry’s possible lack of dedication to the Iraqi War with the intention of introducing the frightening possibility that Kerry couldn’t keep us safe from those bogeymen terrorists. That timely counterfeit Osama video, in addition to the dedicated, yet deceitful, Republicans monitoring the software in the Ohio voting machines clinched the staged election.

With the assistance of Katherine Harris and the U.S. Supreme Court, Bush “won” the election. [x] What a surprise!! – NOT! Papa George H. W. Bush nominated two of the Judges that sat on that Court. Three other Court members were: Sandra Day O’Connor, Steve G. Breyer, and Ruth B. Ginsburg, members of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), another group dedicated to obliterating American sovereignty. [xi]

George W. Bush, despite threats of impending impeachment and indictments, and magazine articles [i] claiming he is the worst president in history has had a more incredibly successful presidential administration than any other in the last 100 years. We can attribute this to his character, his society affiliations, his astute political appointments, his Yale education, his experience and his Eastern Establishment family background. The vast and very vocal Christian right played a major part in his success. They were greatly influenced by Bush’s claim that his role model was Jesus Christ. He is the right man for this crucial time in history. His success and accomplishments are unmatched. His America First Acceptance Speech of 2000 bears absolutely no resemblance to his New World Order actions. [ii] Despite the globalist accomplishments of previous administrations, he has virtually left all of them in the dust. And speaking of leaving people in the dust – as a result of his invasion of Iraq, depleted uranium dust has covered more territory, crept into more water and affected the health of more people than at any other time in history.

George W. Bush is definitely his father’s son. The senior Bush, also a member of The Order, served the ignoble New World Order cause as a Vice-President, President, head of the CIA, ambassador to the People’s Republic of China and other influential positions. [iii] It is unfortunate that the citizens do not have a complete record of his many deeds and activities. This is partly due to Executive Order 13233 which conveniently restricts access to the records of former presidents. [iv] This was drafted by Alberto R. Gonzales, then White House council and issued by George W. Bush on November 1, 2001, just before the National Archives was due to release some very revealing records, “some of which might prove embarrassing to the President’s father, George H. W. Bush, due to his involvement in the Iran-Contra Affair.” [v]

Censorship by Executive Order or theft by former national security advisers suppresses or destroys a lot of evidence. Any “leak” is absolutely intentional! With the Bush administration, secrecy is epidemic, [vi] much more genuine than any impending crisis-driven bird flu outbreak. Donald H. Rumsfeld is one happy Gilead Sciences stock holder with this orchestrated improbable scare crisis. He was Chairman of the Board of Gilead until early 2001 when he became Secretary of Preemptive War. Tamiflu, made by Gilead, is the bird flu drug of choice in the world market. [vii] He will certainly not suffer any Martha Stewart style complications. Nor will the insider/insiders who made millions immediately before 9/11 because of their foreknowledge. Can insider trading be repetitive or addictive, I wonder…

The elder Bush appointed two Supreme Court judges: David Souter, a Rhodes Scholar and Clarence Thomas who is a member of the right-wing Federalist Society which tends to dominate the legal profession. Scalia is also a member of the Federalist Society. The Rhodes Trust is intent on overthrowing the American government. Both Scalia’s and Thomas’ votes were crucial in putting Bush into the White House in 2000 despite a minority of popular votes.

Son Bush has also pushed through two Supreme Court judges who will further the cause. Naïve Republican supporters focused on the abortion issue, the so-called “settled law of the land” when shoo-ins John Roberts and Samuel Alito were nominated after the Harriet Miers pretense. Anticipated rejection of Miers set up easier acceptance of successive nominees. “Conservatives” would have been wiser to focus on the nominee’s views of executive powers. Fathers with unfinished goals typically hope that their children can rise to the occasion and complete those unfinished tasks. [viii] George W. has certainly done this. In fact, to ensure continuation of the agenda, he has chosen or appointed many of the same accomplices as were in his father’s sphere of influence. [ix] Additionally, he has selected other CFR members to speed up the pace. [x]

President George H. W. Bush, a member of The Order of Skull and Bones, said in 1991: “We have before us the opportunity to forge for ourselves and for future generations a new world order, a world where the rule of law, not the rule of the jungle, governs the conduct of nations. When we are successful, and we will be, we have a real chance at this new world order, an order in which a credible United Nations can use its peacekeeping role to fulfill the promise and vision of the U.N.’s founders.” Nuclear clouds and deadly depleted uranium dust are rarely experienced in the natural interactions of the jungle, only human animals use such implements of death against their own kind.

Papa Bush is extremely loyal to the United Nations which is attempting to replace Christianity with a new world religion: “It is the sacred principles enshrined in the United Nations charter to which the American people will henceforth pledge their allegiance,” said President George Bush, Sr. addressing the General Assembly of the United Nations, February 1, 1992

Referring to Saddam Hussein, President George H. W. Bush on January 1991: “If we do not follow the dictates of our inner moral compass and stand up for human life, then his lawlessness will threaten the peace and democracy of the emerging new world order we now see, this long dreamed-of vision we’ve all worked toward for so long.” He said this just prior to bombing Iraq into the Stone Age and killing thousands of people. Lawlessness is lawlessness – whether it is Saddam Hussein using United States supplied weapons of mass destruction against the citizens of Iraq or a United States president using United States weapons of mass destruction against the citizens of Iraq. The results are the same: thousands of dead Iraqis! Only the captured, the mind-controlled or the losers in this war racket go to trial for crimes. Labels make all the difference: calling it war justifies the mounds of dead bodies attributed to the United States and the acquiescent accommodating taxpayers.

He couldn’t have done a better job if he were a dictator. “If this were a dictatorship, it’d be a heck of a lot easier, just so long as I’m the dictator.” President-elect George W. Bush, CNN News, aired December 18, 2000. He is a member of The Order of Skull and Bones first and an American Republican second. Bush has taken the following oath twice: “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.” We do not have a copy of the oath for The Order of Skull and Bones – it is secret. That should tell volumes.

“Members of the Order (Skull and Bones) take an oath that absolves them from any allegiance to any nation or king or government or constitution, and that includes the negating of any subsequent oath which they may be required to take. They swear allegiance only to the Order and its goal of a New World Order…according to the oath Bush took when he was initiated into Skull and Bones, his oath of office as President of the United States means nothing.” [xi]

Just what has Bush achieved in taking America into the New World Order?

  • ·        He continually minimizes the Constitution by repeatedly demonstrating his unwillingness to follow it
  • ·        He has issued thousands of unconstitutional Presidential Executive Orders
  • ·        The invasion of Afghanistan 3,000 – 3,400 dead civilians [October 7, 2001 thru March 2002]
  • ·        Consequent resumption of poppy production in Afghanistan
  • ·        He got rid of the Bridas Corporation an obstacle to the United States controlling the Trans-Afghanistan Pipeline.
  • ·        The invasion of Iraq – see the population reducing Civilian body count
  • ·        The undefended invasion of America – 9-11
  • ·        He strengthened FEMA
  • ·        Invasion by invitation of America – 2000 -2008 by poverty stricken illegal aliens to be used as cheap labor
  • ·        Continued destruction of the middle class
  • ·        Increased the deficit – pouring trillions into the banker’s coffers.
  • ·        Politically blackmailed Congress into passing the un-read CAFTA
  • ·        Politically blackmailed Congress into passing the un-read Patriot Act 1 and 2
  • ·        Established the nefarious Department of Homeland Security
  • ·        Fooled ordinary Christians into believing he was one of them
  • ·        Returned the war hawk neo-cons to leadership positions in strategic fields
  • ·        Collaborated with two foreign countries about the dissolution of our borders
  • ·        Enriched his cronies and family through no-bid contracts
  • ·        Strengthened Detention and Removal Strategy for a Secure Homeland 2003-2012 – part of the Department of Homeland Security. PDF file
  • ·        Implemented the building of all of those detention centers by Halliburton
  • ·        Bush has claimed the authority to break more rules than any other president
  • ·        Sent billions of confiscated tax dollars out of the country – not his to give
  • ·        Abetted in the sale of national properties to foreign governments
  • ·        He told us to stop worrying about conspiracy theories and some people did
  • ·        He has responded to the concerns of the drug companies and agri-business
  • ·        Through his efforts there are higher profits for the pharmaceutical industry
  • ·        Got rid of that annoying Geneva Conventions requiring humane treatment
  • ·        He broadened the government’s wiretapping, surveillance and search-and-seizure authority
  • ·        He ushered in a new era of secrecy for presidential activities
  • ·        He has assumed sole authority to impose martial law, suspend habeas corpus and ignore the Posse Comitatus Act
  • ·        He bypassed the Senate and appointed John Bolton as ambassador to the United Nations.
  • ·        Instituted The National Security Strategy of the United States of America

Although he has accomplished many things there are a few areas where he has failed: he did not find Osama bin Laden. 750,000 Americans are homeless, 250,000 of them are Veterans. 1,600,000 jobs have been lost in the private sector since Bush took office. He didn’t get those warrants or the authority for all that wire tapping. And the number of lobbyists in Washington has increased. But, hey, we can’t quibble about the goals he didn’t accomplish when we see just how successful he has been!

Illegal entry into the country has doubled since Bush’s infamous guest worker flood-gate invitation. This has certainly ravaged our sovereignty and pitted the pro-amnesty against the no-amnesty factions. The illegals are mostly comprised of poor Mexicans, made poorer by illegal trade agreements like NAFTA. “George H. W. Bush’s government, along with the Conservative Canadian Prime Minister Brian Mulroney, spearheaded the negotiations of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), which Bill Clinton signed in 1993.” [xii] NAFTA, which was staunchly supported by Governor George W. Bush, [xiii] is a major means of combining Canada, the United States and Mexico into the North American Community. The next plan to attack our sovereignty is another phony trade agreement, the FTAA.

July 18, 1993 — CFR member and Trilateralist Henry Kissinger writes in the Los Angeles Times concerning NAFTA: “What Congress will have before it is not a conventional trade agreement but the architecture of a new international system… a first step toward a new world order.”

“When NAFTA was passed, one of the primary arguments was that trading with Mexico would create new jobs in America. The argument prevailed despite historical and research studies indicating that a NAFTA would encourage movement of manufacturing and labor intensive jobs to Mexican nationals, at the expense of American jobs. The Mexicans spent millions on lobbyists, and in public meetings in Mexico, bragged about how with NAFTA they had ‘out-traded the Americans again’ and that a new flood of industrial jobs would come into Mexico. NAFTA passed, and the flow of capital into Mexico increased further. Mexico created new companies almost daily, but also incurred new debt. Of the some 70 billion dollars invested in Mexico, only 10 billion actually went into new factories, industry, capital creation, and job creation entities. The rest went into speculation, debt service, and into the coffers of the 32 wealthiest ‘haciendas’ of Mexico. Much of it flowed into offshore banks and investment houses.” [xiv]“Mexico is a land of 90,000,000 people. Perhaps 200,000 people in Mexico control most of the wealth, and some 32 families, all billionaires, control the vast majority of wealth in Mexico.” In this regard, there are similarities with the United States.

Unfortunately, Mexico, along with many other third world countries, was a victim of some economic hit men. Their tactics were recently revealed by John Perkins in his excellent, must-read book: Confessions of an Economic Hit Man. Mexico was generating about 30 billion dollars a year towards paying the debt service or interest on its international banking cabal loans. Yet the actual cost amounted to 40-45 billion dollars per year. Alan Greenspan, then chairman of the privately owned Federal Reserve increased the interest rates in late 1994 which “devastated the Mexican Economy.” [xv] In December 1994, Mexico devalued the peso by about 40 percent. [xvi] Congress immediately approved a $40 taxpayer funded billion dollar loan despite debt burdened Mexico’s inability to repay it. That loan was merely a transfer from our pockets into the international bankers’ coffers.

Spending confiscated taxpayer money to partially “fix” orchestrated problems furthers the New World Order goal. Government solutions deceptively deprive security seeking citizens of their liberties by installing totalitarian policies. This is the case with our current southern border problem. We have moved from a protective, American friendly immigration policy to an open Swiss cheese farce of a border. [xvii] While Americans take sides and witness Republican and Democrat congressmen pair up against us, we fail to recognize that the disbanding of both the southern and northern borders is part of an organized plan to reject national sovereignty and establish the North American Community encompassing Canada, Mexico and the United States. [xviii]

All the attending uproar and big-money-financed demonstrations are for mass media benefit. “In late December 2005, Mexican President Vicente Fox hired a lobbying firm to sweeten political sentiment in the US towards Mexicans and the immigration issue. The same PR expert and GOP political consultant helped George W. Bush defeat Ann Richards for the governorship of Texas in 1994 and worked on both Bush’s presidential campaigns.” [xix] This PR firm planned highly organized, expensive, flag-flying, controlled opposition demonstrations with the expected congressional treasonous response is designed to change mass American opposition into complacent acceptance – and provide justification for the impending national ID, which will serve as an alleged attempt to monitor all of those newly created citizens.

President George W. Bush said: “Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we.” [xx] Is this another Bushism or the absolute truth – you decide! Or does “The Decider” get to make that decision?

“To achieve world government, it is necessary to remove from the minds of men their individualism, loyalty to family tradition, national patriotism, and religious dogmas.” “We have swallowed all manner of poisonous certainties fed us by our parents, our Sunday and day school teachers, our politicians, our priests….The reinterpretation and eventual eradication of the concept of right and wrong which has been the basis of child training, the substitution of intelligent and rational thinking for faith in the certainties of old people, these are the belated objectives …for charting the changes in human behavior.” Brock Chisholm, 1959 Humanist of the Year and former head of World Health Organization, in the February 1946 issue of Psychiatry

The manipulating maneuvers of The Order of Skull and Bones (hereafter called The Order) have focused on specifically changing society with an eye towards the globalist goal of a One World Order. In order to drastically alter civilization, members of The Order infiltrate society’s institutions and use their influence, backed by the vast wealth of the international bankers, to gain absolute control. The societal elements as defined by Antony C. Sutton in An Introduction to the Order of Skull & Bones:

  • ·        Education – how the population of the future will behave.
  • ·        Money – the means of holding wealth and exchanging goods.
  • ·        Law – the authority to enforce the will of the state, a world law and a world court is needed for a world state.
  • ·        Politics – the direction of the state.
  • ·        Economy – the creation of wealth.
  • ·        History – what people believe happened in the past.
  • ·        Psychology – the means of controlling how people think.
  • ·        Philanthropy – so that the people think well of the controllers.
  • ·        Medicine – the power over health, life and death.
  • ·        Religion – people’s spiritual beliefs, the spur to action for many.
  • ·        Media – what people know and learn about current events.
  • ·        Continuity – the power to appoint who follows in your footsteps. [i]

I will briefly address, in this and forthcoming articles in this current series, each of these fundamental facets of society and how they have been controlled in order to devastate the American Republic and enslave every average American in the bonds of satanic globalism.

Education:
Real education, as opposed to brainwashing, should be a lifelong personal pursuit rather than a state scheduled mass indoctrination limited to just what the state wants you to know or believe in order to fulfill some stealthily crafted agenda for the dismal existence of the masses. Ideally, people, as they are exposed to a growing body of information and technology, should have the opportunity to exercise their inherent abilities in order to expand their understanding.

At birth, our minds are empty vessels waiting to be stimulated. We adapt to what we absorb. Perceptions about the world, about ourselves and others are developed primarily by our parents and then by our teachers, our relatives, friends, politicians and the media. Discrimination and wisdom increase with age – we must choose exactly what we wish to imbibe: facts which educate or fiction that merely entertains. Most entertainment leaves us ignorant and vulnerable to misinformation and deceptive propaganda. A dumbed-down, non reading adult society is much easier to influence and control than an alert, well educated principled population who have been schooled in history, classical literature, a foreign language, grammar, and have an understanding of their moral civic responsibilities. Education should inspire us how to think, not what to think – we have not learned if we merely regurgitate information on command. Our education should motivate us to scrutinize data, evaluate evidence, make comparisons and make appropriate application.

A principled population, not seeking government entitlements, would also demand responsible, principled leaders. Independent personal study after high school or college, beyond readily accessible information, requires time and is not effortlessly available to overtaxed individuals attempting to keep their heads above water in an economically depressed society. Yes, despite official contradictory claims, we are not merely depressed but bankrupt.

Obedience trained students read specific books, designed to produce globalist convictions, introduce faith shattering alternative beliefs and create distrust of traditionalism, but rarely read anything not required. Many graduates never open a book after they leave school. They are satisfied to read, if they are able, the newspaper headlines, Peoplemagazine or catch a few “news” shows on television. After all, why bother to read if one can tune into some familiar pleasant personality disseminating the “news”? People who do not read have no advantage over those who cannot read. Thus, ignorance, definitely not bliss but rather intellectually lethal, is unfortunately ubiquitous.

Current classrooms, as well as life in general, are chaotic. Reasonable discipline and mutual respect are absent. Moral relativism has replaced the moral compass of our Judeo-Christian foundation. Anything related to that foundation has been legally altered and unfortunately legalization gives credibility to decadence. Judges, who have falsely sworn to protect and abide by the Constitution, have verbally manipulated that foundational document into oblivion. They are globalists, sympathizers, or fellow travelers who trade principles for money, power or “just to get along.” It is not coincidental! The evidence surrounds us: our drugged disrespectful children cannot read, communicate without repetitive language laziness, write intelligibly, calculate numbers without a calculator or spell without a spell checker. It does not take a genius to acknowledge that there is something horribly amiss with our children. A brief comparison with previous generations provides justification for the obvious – the onslaught against our youth carried out by the government’s educational system is deviously deliberate. A spurious curriculum has been designed to inculcate America’s children to function as the submissive workers of the One World Order, compliments of the taxpayers.

Chester M. Pierce, Harvard University psychiatrist said the following at the 1973 International Education Seminar, as quoted in Educating For The New World Order (June 1991), [ii] an excellent book by Beverly K. Eakman: “Every child in America who enters school with an allegiance toward our elected officials, toward our founding fathers, toward our institutions, toward the preservation of this form of government… all of this proves the children are sick, because the truly well individual is one who has rejected all of those things and is what I would call the true international child of the future.” [iii]

There is certainly not a dearth of books that express views about America’s dismal educational problems as well as the other associated problems that affront our children. Another excellent, well researched and documented book is the deliberate dumbing down of america (September 1999) by educational whistle-blower Charlotte Thomson Iserbyt. This book is available free as a PDF file. It remains Barnes and Noble’s #1 bestseller in their History of Education category. Iserbyt is a former school board director in Camden, Maine and was co-founder and research analyst of Guardians of Education for Maine (GEM) from 1978 to 2000. During the first Reagan administration Iserbyt was the Senior Policy Advisor working in the U.S. Department of Education’s Office of Educational Research and Improvement (OERI). She was instrumental in revealing a “major technology initiative which would control curriculum in America’s classrooms. [iv]

A huge educational modification gradually occurred – America went from an academic education (1880–1960) to a values education (1960–1980) to a workforce training “education” (1980–2000). In Iserbyt’s book “the case is made that the values education period was critical to the transformation of education. It succeeded in persuading (brainwashing? duping?) Americans into accepting the belief that values were transient, flexible and situational—subject to the evolution of human society. Brave new values were integrated into curricula and instruction. The mind of the average American became ‘trained’ (conditioned) to accept the idea that education exists solely for the purpose of getting a good paying job in the global workforce economy.” [v]

This isn’t just about your own children. Everyone should thoroughly read her comprehensive book as well as the other books available on this important issue. See a list below.

The federal government should not be dictating curriculum. Local property taxes pay for schools but they have been seduced into accepting additional funds which always include federal regulations, policies and programs including Bush’s “No Child Left Behind.” This is nothing but a disguised UNESCO school to work program, a detriment to America’s children, her greatest resource.

Following is a much abbreviated timeline from Iserbyt’s must read book revealing tax-exempt financial backing and government compliance in the collapse of America’s educational system:

1902
The General Education Board (GEB) was incorporated by an act of the United States Congress. Approved January 12, 1902, the General Education Board was endowed by Mr. John D. Rockefeller, Sr., for the purpose of establishing an educational laboratory to experiment with early innovations in education. [vi]

1905
The Intercollegiate Socialist Society (ISS) was founded in New York City by Upton Sinclair, Jack London, Clarence Darrow and others. Its permanent headquarters were established at the Rand School of Social Studies in 1908 and ISS became the League for Industrial Democracy (LID) in 1921. John Dewey became president of the League for Industrial Democracy in 1939.

The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching was founded. [vii]

1906
National Education Association (NEA) became a federally chartered association for teachers under the authority of H.R. 10501. [viii]

1908
Italian educator, the late Maria Montessori (1870–1952), developed a method of teaching—relying on guidance and training of senses rather than more rigid control of children’s activities—which would be very influential throughout the rest of the century.

The Montessori Method was published in 1912 and much of Montessori’s work was printed by the Theosophical Publishing House.

Elizabeth Clare Prophet, the cultic head of the Church Universal and Triumphant, founded a group called Montessori International, and previous U.N. Deputy Secretary-General Robert Muller, the celebrated author of the New Age World Core Curriculum, claimed that the Montessori Method was one of the educational programs which would greatly benefit global children for the New Age. [ix]

1913
Frederick T. Gates, director of charity for the Rockefeller foundation, set up the Southern Education Board (SEB), which was later incorporated into the General Education Board (GEB), setting in motion “the deliberate dumbing down of America.” Gates wrote The Country School of Tomorrow: Occasional Papers No. 1 (General EducationBoard: New York, 1913) [x]

1918
In the January 13, 1918 issue of New York World William Boyce Thompson, Federal Reserve Bank director and founding member of the Council on Foreign Relations applauded Russia for their “sweeping world changes”.

Carnegie and Rockefeller Foundations planned the demise of traditional academic education. Rockefeller’s focus would be national education; Carnegie would be in charge of international education. [xi]

1919
“The Institute of International Education (IIE) was founded through a grant from the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. The Institute’s purpose was to operate a student exchange program. The U.S.-Soviet Education Agreements were negotiated by the Carnegie Endowment’s parent organization, the Carnegie Corporation, fostering exchanges of curriculum, pedagogy and materials as well as students.”

“The Progressive Education Association (P.E.A.) was founded and organized by John Dewey, even though he would not become a member in its early years. P.E.A.’s goals and aims were projected for the last half of this century at a board meeting held November 15–17, 1943 in Chicago, Illinois.” [xii]

1921
The league for Industrial Democracy changed its name from the Intercollegiate Socialist Society (ISS) and stated its purpose as: “Education for a new social order based on production and not for profit” (“A Chronology of Education,” Dorothy Dawson, 1978).

Harold Rugg, writer of social studies textbook series entitled The Frontier Thinkers (1921) published by the Progressive Education Association became president of the National Association of Directors of Education Research which would later become known as the American Educational Research Association.

“The Council on Foreign Relations was established through the efforts of Col. Edwin Mandell House. He was the initiator of the effort to establish this American branch of the English Royal Institute of International Affairs.” … “The late Professor Carroll Quigley of Georgetown University described the CFR as “a front for J.P. Morgan and Company in association with the very small American Round Table Group.” [xiii]

1922
On December 15 the Council on Foreign Relations endorsed world government. [xiv]

1925
The International Bureau of Education, formerly known as The Institute Jean-Jacques Rousseau, was established with a grant from the Rockefeller Foundation. The Bureau became part of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). [xv]

The following books, among many others, were published urging a New World Order facilitated, in large part, by the American educational system:

“Toward Soviet America” by William Z. Foster, Head of the Communist Party USA, Foster indicates that a National Department of Education would be one of the means used to develop a new socialist society in the U.S. [xvi]

“The New World Order” by F. S. Marvin, describing the League of Nations as the first attempt at a New World Order. Marvin says, “Nationality must rank below the claims of mankind as a whole.” [xvii]

“Dare the School Build a New Social Order?” by educator-author George Counts who asserts that “the teachers should deliberately reach for power and then make the most of their conquest” in order to “influence the social attitudes, ideals and behavior of the coming generation. The growth of science and technology has carried us into a new age where ignorance must be replaced by knowledge, competition by cooperation, and trust in Providence by careful planning and private capitalism by some form of social economy.” [xviii]

“Humanist Manifesto” (1933) co-author John Dewey, the noted philosopher and educator, calls for a synthesizing of all religions and “a socialized and cooperative economic order.” Co-signer C. F. Potter said in 1930, “Education is thus a most powerful ally of humanism, and every American public school is a school of humanism. What can the theistic Sunday schools, meeting for an hour once a week; teaching only a fraction of the children, do to stem the tide of a five-day program of humanistic teaching?” [xix]

“The Teacher and World Government” (1946) written by former editor of the “NEA Journal” (National Education Association) Joy Elmer Morgan. He says: “In the struggle to establish an adequate world government, the teacher can do much to prepare the hearts and minds of children for global understanding and cooperation. At the very heart of all the agencies which will assure the coming of world government must stand the school, the teacher, and the organized profession.” [xx]

“In 1940, teachers were asked what they regarded as the three major problems in American schools. They identified the three major problems as: Littering, noise, and chewing gum. Teachers last year were asked what the three major problems in American schools were, and they defined them as: Rape, assault, and suicide.”
William Bennett (1993) [xxi]

Suggested Books:

America’s Schools: The Battleground for Freedom By Allen Quist
Brave New Schools By Berit Kjos
Children No More: How We Lost a Generation By Brenda Scott
Cloning of the American Mind: Eradicating Morality through Education By B. K. Eakman
History of American Education: From Harvard Scholars to Worker Bees of the New World Order  By Vaughn Shatzer
Mental Health Screening: How Will it Affect Your Children? By Dennis L. Cuddy, Ph.D.
NEA Grab for Power By Dennis Cuddy, Ph. D.
Outcome-Based Education: The State’s Assault on Our Children’s Values By Peg Luksik and Pamela Hobbs Hoffecker
Pokemon & Harry Potter: A Fatal Attraction By Phil Arms
Public Schools, Public Menace, How Public Schools Lie to Parents and Betray Our Children By Joel Turtel
The Myth of ADHD And Other Learning Disabilities By Dr. Jan Strydom and Susan duPlessis
Who’s Watching The Playpen? By David Benoit

In conjunction with the deliberate dumbing down of America, the populace has surreptitiously been indoctrinated to abhor, tolerate, and then embrace the basest behavior in human sexuality. It is not coincidental that the raging, rebellious, out-of-control, bra burning sixties followed the deliberately decadent “research” of Alfred Charles Kinsey (1894-1956), a biologist and a professor of entomology and zoology, given credibility by the Indiana University in Bloomington. His insidious influence drastically affected American culture and society.

Kinsey was brought up in a “strict churchgoing Methodist household where dancing, tobacco, alcohol, and dating were forbidden.” [i] He joined the Boy Scouts at 17 and enjoyed camping and the other outdoor activities associated with scouting, an interest he retained for years. He later claimed that “adolescent homosexuality is a common phenomenon.” [ii] Whether this claim is a result of observation or participation is unknown. He went from agnosticism to atheism by the time he turned 26 – if God does not exist then neither does morality and right and wrong.

In 1914 he entered Bowdoin College in Brunswick, Maine, initially affiliated with the Congregational Church. In 1916 “Kinsey was elected to Phi Beta Kappa and graduated magna cum laude with degrees in biology and psychology. Charles Darwin was such a major influence that Kinsey quoted him in his commencement address when he graduated from Bowdoin.

Kinsey continued his graduate studies at Harvard University’s Bussey Institute, “a hotbed of Darwinism and the ‘New Biology’ that led scientists to envision improvement of the human species through ‘eugenics’.” Bussey Institute “had one of the most highly regarded biology programs in the United States… Kinsey was granted a Sc.D. degree in 1919 by Harvard University.” [iii] During his time at Harvard, Kinsey was active with the Bethany Boys’ Club. Kinsey preferred the company of boys and continued camping with younger males past college graduation.

Kinsey became a big proponent of Aldous Huxley and his brother Julian, a geneticist and the first director-general of UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization). Aldous Huxley wrote Brave New World (1932), required reading in many American schools. “It is often misunderstood as ‘science fiction,’ but was actually an exposé of the cosmopolitan eugenic vision of state-controlled free love and selective breeding.” [iv] Those who embraced the eugenics movement felt nothing but contempt for Judeo Christian beliefs. Unfortunately, “non-admiring” individuals researching the foundations of Kinsey’s personal and professional attitudes are not permitted entrance into the Kinsey Institute archives. [v] There are apparently many secrets that lay hidden from public scrutiny in those archives.

A Kinsey biographer said that he was “one of the scholarly pre-World War II eugenicists who issued a ‘terrifying’ call for the mass sterilization of ‘lower level’ Americans and a breeding plan for superior classes.” [vi] Not surprisingly, Margaret Sanger (1879-1966), a eugenicist and the founder of Planned Parenthood (population control) also believed that the lower classes should not be allowed to have children even if that meant sterilization. “The Margaret Sanger Papers Project is supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities, the National Historical Publications and Records Commission, and such private foundations as the Rockefeller Foundation, the Ford Foundation, and the Samuel Rubin Foundation, among others.” [vii] The Rockefeller Foundation and others support population control for the rest of us. [viii]

In 1920 Kinsey joined the Department of Zoology at Indiana University in Bloomington as an assistant professor. Once there, he joined a faculty discussion group whose friendship and support helped him to overcome some controversy later.

Despite a misogynistic attitude and frequently abusive treatment toward women, he married Clara Bracken McMillen, a chemistry student at Ohio State, after a casual, platonic relationship. They married on June 3, 1921 and spent their honeymoon on an all weather camping trip, climbing mountains and eating trail foods. They had four children, the first of which died at a young age. Clara and Alfred Kinsey, along with their surviving children, attended church and gave every indication of being a respectable, conservative, average Midwestern family.

While camping as a professor, he was quite comfortable parading around camp in the nude and participating in community baths with his male students. “Kinsey seemed totally oblivious to sexual taboos…as though he was determined to flaunt them…Kinsey had become a sexual rebel…manipulative and aggressive, a man who abused his professional authority and betrayed his trust as a teacher.” [ix]

Kinsey, who had gathered sexual data since 1935, aggressively created interest in a prospective human sexuality class through his controversial lectures. Eager students, future teachers and leaders allegedly petitioned the University to offer this class which he began teaching in 1938. Its popularity increased with each semester despite some justified general objections from other faculty members. However, “Indiana University marketed Kinsey, the free-sex crusader, as a disinterested scholar in an attempt to pacify Kinsey’s colleagues and the public.” [x] For whatever reason, the University president, Herman Wells, unmarried and living at home with his mother “enthusiastically approved Kinsey’s proposals for everything.” [xi]

In his classes, Kinsey promoted biological information devoid of any moral, legal or ethical instruction. He apparently had the same mentality as Magnus Hirschfeld, a professed homosexual, who headed the Institute for Sexology in Berlin, Germany. Hirschfeld was an active proponent of abortion, gay rights, and feminism and a participant in a global sexology movement which demanded worldwide elimination of prudish sex laws and sexual repression. [xii] Kinsey, an alleged Midwestern family man would prove to be a deceptively acceptable advocate of the same social, cultural suicide that Hirschfeld was disseminating in Germany.

Kinsey came to the attention of the Rockefeller Foundation which earmarked funds for sex “research.” The National Research Council and the Medical Division of the Rockefeller Foundation provided thousands of dollars towards studies in sexual physiology and behavior. The Rockefeller Foundation initially helped to organize and fund the American Social Hygiene Association in 1913 to alter public attitudes regarding prostitution, and to work for birth control and other social reforms. During the 1920s faulty research, designed to satisfy a specific agenda, was produced by Margaret Mead and others “while misleading the West with effusive claims about the supposedly positive, happy nature of wildly promiscuous ‘primitive’ sexuality.” [xiii]

Herman Wells, the president of Indiana University was in attendance in New York when the Rockefeller Foundation celebrated its prestigious fiftieth anniversary in 1963. For five full decades they had made important research grants that greatly impacted society. Dr. Robert S. Morison, head of the Medical Division of the Foundation explained to Wells, when asked, that the reason he was invited was because of the wide spread influence of Kinsey’s work which now appeared in the newest and best gynecology book for medical students. “You’re here because we consider the Institute financing one of the most significant things we ever did.” [xiv]

Kinsey, along with specially selected individuals – no prudes, no Christians, no females, began conducting surveys consisting of 350 questions, supposedly approved by the Indiana University Board of Trustees. These “research” assistants had to divulge their sexual history to determine their attitudes. Individuals who expressed negative attitudes towards premarital or extramarital intimacy, homosexuality, or relations with animals were not hired. Project secrecy, a source of power and/or blackmail, was essential in the ostensibly embarrassing sexual surveys which would currently constitute an invasion of privacy or worse – sexual harassment.

Those interviewed were purportedly randomly chosen, ordinary individuals. However, in order to skew the survey results to facilitate his agenda, the Kinsey group “resorted to reclassifying prostitutes as married women.” In addition, most women would be reticent to reveal such personal information. [xv] Obviously, this skewed the research results to accommodate that specific agenda. Other major irregularities should also be noted:

  • ·        Kinsey interviewed imprisoned sex offenders and portrayed them as normal
  • ·        Kinsey’s tactics included “unethical, possibly criminal, observations of children”
  • ·        Kinsey and cohorts classified 1,400+ criminals and sex offenders as normal
  • ·        Kinsey sought out the worst sex offenders avoiding the more common offenses such as statutory rape
  • ·        Kinsey professed interviewing many thousands more men than he did
  • ·        His scientific methodology was flawed – he only used the data that fit his hypothesis
  • ·        Kinsey and cohorts rejected anyone who had not experienced some form of sexual perversion
  • ·        Kinsey included so-called feebleminded subjects from the Michigan State Training School
  • ·        All the subjects were portrayed as average no matter their “unconventional” behavior [xvi]
  • ·        Clandestine homosexuality is relatively commonplace
  • ·        Most normal Americans hypocritically and secretly engage in illicit sex
  • ·        People are commonly bisexual
  • ·        Prejudice against homosexuality is hypocritical and based on ignorance [xvii]

Kinsey’s notorious books referred to as reports are a result of the imbalanced sex surveys: Sexual Behavior in the Human Male (1948) and Sexual Behavior in the Human Female (1953). “For Kinsey, ‘normal’ was a non-word, as were ‘criminal’ and ‘crime’ … the terms ‘love’ and ‘childbirth’ do not appear in the indices.” Kinsey also rejected the idea of “motherhood” as a legitimate, average aspiration. Kinsey produced spurious statistics of babies born out of wedlock. [xviii] Otherwise the amoral Kinsey and cohorts didn’t define the very serious consequences of irresponsible, depraved behavior – one of the most profound – loss of one’s soul.

It is of interest that Hugh Hefner also published a book Playboy in 1953. Hefner provided generous financial support through his Playboy Foundation for the Kinsey Institute. One can only imagine the kinds of projects this foundation supports. Apparently each had their own targeted audience designed to tear society apart with an “anything goes” mentality. The trash they produced changed the mutual respect that the genders previously expressed for each other. It promoted crimes against the vulnerable, influenced the lonely, destroyed faith, and promoted pervasive flawed information that indoctrinated the masses. For what – money, fame? Money at the expense of morality!!

Kinsey’s books immediately created shock and outrage. “They challenged conventional beliefs about sexuality and because they discussed subjects that had previously been taboo. The belief that heterosexuality and abstinence were both ethical and statistical norms had never before been seriously challenged.” [xix] No matter the initial reactions – Kinsey’s noxious notions received Madison Avenue mass media acceptance.

“The Rockefeller Foundation believed that the media constituted a uniquely powerful force in modern society for imposing the will of the elite on the masses. Secret psychological war projects to control public opinion were supported by America’s tax-exempt foundations. For example, campaigns were developed to induce Americans to support U.S. entry into World War II.” [xx]

Kinsey’s “research” results were compatible with Rockefeller’s New World Order goal of changing “America’s way of life” – altering “breeding patterns”, respect for life and the sanctity of marriage and family. Kinsey contended that there was pervasive promiscuity throughout America in the late 1940s and early 1950s. There wasn’t – it would take a few decades for his influence to permeate the media the schools, and stealthily filter into America’s homes.

There were massive advertisements, free advance copies directed at the medical profession, and wining and dining of journalists. The publicity was designed to create a spontaneous clamor and curiosity for the books possibly similar to the same buildup for Dan Brown’s book and movie – The Da Vinci Code. Well known journalists and personalities endorsed and therefore lent credibility to Kinsey’s sexual philosophies which made them palatable to the public and led to manipulated mass purchases. W. B. Saunders, a very well known medical publisher, authenticated the books by publishing them.

In 1946, The Rockefeller Foundation began providing funds for “library” activities such as Kinsey’s production of very explicit films which soon found their way into medical schools. This activity became so important that a sophisticated photographic laboratory with a full time photographer was hired – all compliments of the Rockefeller Foundation. “Vernon Mark, a professor at Harvard Medical School, noted that the introduction of pornographic films into medical training, and the unwholesome influence of the films on individual doctors and the profession as a whole, was brought about by Kinsey. Physicians had traditionally been a highly respected class of spokesmen for sexual conservatism. Kinsey’s obscenity training served to erode that standard.” [xxi]

After Kinsey died, his close associate Wardell Pomeroy took charge of The Sex and Drug Forum, later called the Institute for the Advanced Study of Human Sexuality (IASHS) located in San Francisco. This organization spews forth the same decadent, culture destroying refuse that the Kinsey Institute did. It is the “leading institution in the sexology field (controlling conference selections, journal publications, lectures, etc.) IASHS has trained more than 100,000 sex educators, doctors and ‘safe sex’ instructors.”[xxii] After learning about desensitization (eradication of inhibitions) through a program like SAR (Sexual Attitude Restructuring) they are teaching this nation’s children unless parents have opted to home-school and save their offspring from nefarious programs like “No Child Left Behind.” The mass media has gradually desensitized anyone foolish enough to watch and/or read it day after day.

Then there is SIECUS (Sex Information and Education Council of the United States) which was initially funded by the Playboy Foundation. Were parents given an opportunity to evaluate any of the data or corporate connections? Do parents know that some of the same people who worked with Kinsey sit on the SIECUS Sex Education Curriculum Board? Just exactly what have they been teaching your children? Unfortunately, teachers who have also been influenced by this so-called credible “research” spend more hours influencing children than a lot of parents do.

Pomeroy explains that Kinsey’s “grand scheme” was to move “American society from its traditional moral standard based on marriage, to one predicated on ‘free love’. Images intended to promote and legitimize deviant behaviors were critical to this moral and cultural conversion.” [xxiii] He has attained a large measure of success – Our moral decline is not a coincidence but a devilish design. Rampant immorality tarnishes our national character. One does not have to look hard to discover the cause and effect surge of homosexuality, pervasive illicit sexual activity, loss of peace, self esteem, innocence, and self discipline often followed by physical consequences such as abortion, illness and death.

Kinsey’s books, data, fetid films, and his despicable amoral, totally insensitive brutal behavior and utter disrespect for others are unconscionable. He did not merit the title of scientist but brings dishonor to those engaged in true scientific research for the benefit of mankind. He was nothing more than an educated complicit, compromised sexual predator/criminal that was bent on bringing others down to his hellish level of perversity and immorality while destroying the basic unit of society – the family. And, unfortunately, his influence has outlived him.

“What is liberty without wisdom and without virtue? It is the greatest of all possible evils, for it is folly, vice, and madness, without restraint…” Edmund Burke

Full implementation of a one world government requires the annihilation of all defiant governments in order to establish central banks in every country, all under the control of the international banking elite. One World Order Proponent, Madeleine Albright, while Secretary of State, said: “If we have to use force, it is because we are America. We are the indispensable nation.” [i] While sounding arrogant and ego-driven, the establishment of the New World Order depends on our duplicitous military involvement for we are the military minions of the Power Elite. To garner popular acceptance for offensive invasions, those nations that resist the globalist agenda automatically become America’s enemies and are vilified as Communists, Marxists or terrorists.

Communist Party leaders proclaimed to its U.S. members in 1943: “When certain obstructionists become too irritating, label them, after suitable build-ups, as Fascist or Nazi or anti-Semitic; and use the prestige of anti-Fascist and tolerance organizations to discredit them. In the public mind constantly associate those who oppose us with those names which already have a bad smell.”

If the U.S. government, through the CIA, fails to install political puppets in target countries, then military interventions, using contrived reasons, are employed. Various subversive tactics include “shock and awe” invasions, armed occupation, economic sanctions or orchestrated economic collapse, and cultural, social and religious decimation perpetuated overtly by our super power military or covertly by our super secret CIA. The major function of secrecy in Washington is to keep the U.S. citizens ignorant, to keep them from knowing what their leaders are doing. “Secrecy is power. Secrecy is license.  Secrecy covers up mistakes. Secrecy covers up corruption.” [ii] Governments that function in secrecy are dictatorships!

Author John Stockwell stated: “Extrapolating the figures as best we can, there have been about 3,000 major covert operations and over 10,000 minor operations, all illegal, and all designed to disrupt, destabilize, or modify the activities of other countries.” [iii] The targets of CIA destabilization have included, but are not limited to, the following countries: Grenada, Jamaica, Cuba, Nicaragua, El Salvador, Honduras, Panama, Iraq and Vietnam. [iv] Would they still be third world without our subversive economic destabilization efforts?

So please, despite cheerleader Laura Ingraham’s assertions, and other propaganda parrots, WE ARE NOT FIGHTING FOR OUR FREEDOM!! We won our freedom over two hundred years ago. Since that time we have fought in sixteen acknowledged wars. Our military has entered other countries for the purpose of influencing foreign governments approximately 200 times. It has never been about our freedom. The only entity attempting to deprive us of that hard-won freedom appears to be our own government with deceptive documents like the Patriot Act One and Two which defines the innovative crime of “domestic terrorism.” New laws will further criminalize political protest and dissent, impacting our freedom of speech. Many, including ex-military men are hesitant to speak for fear of the certain negative consequences to their reputations and pensions. Active duty military, suspected of probable squealing, are suicided. George Orwell said: “We are living in a world in which nobody is free, in which hardly anybody is secure, in which it is almost impossible to be honest and to remain alive.”

It is the presidents, the kings and other leaders, driven by the international bankers and their goals, abetted by the press, who inflame the compliant citizens to go into battle against people who allegedly have harmed us or who might harm us, despite their lack of an army or weapons. Since our wars with Great Britain, the battles waged by America have been offensive. Even our retaliation against Japan was the result of the contrived and provoked attack on Pearl Harbor. Our wars, police actions, deposing dictators and concealed CIA interventions have always been for economic reasons – to enrich the bankers who typically fund both sides of the conflict.

Caesar said: “Beware of the leader who bangs the drums of war to whip the citizenry into patriotic fervor, for patriotism is indeed a double-edged sword. It both emboldens the blood, just as it narrows the mind. And when the drums have reached fever pitch, and the blood boils with hate and the mind is closed, the leader will have no need in seizing the rights of the citizenry, rather, the citizenry, infused with fear and blinded by patriotism, will offer up all of their rights unto the leader, and gladly so. How do I know? For this is what I have done. And I am Caesar.”

Acquiescent Americans have been seduced by pro-war propaganda. Our super power status has metastasized into a “police the world” super ego mentality that we apparently applaud with our voices and surrender our tax dollars for. Our questionable pride precludes any premonitions about our own demise. Other formerly strong empires fell because of decadence and corruption – do we claim immunity to a similar collapse? Wake up people! Turn off the TV and read.

Author Harold Thomas says in his booklet: “In their day to day lives, in their immediate physical environment, most Americans have no discernable enemies. It is always possible that there could be governments and other organizations that pose a genuine physical threat to the American people. However, it is virtually impossible for the people to know this for themselves. They must depend almost entirely upon information provided by government and the mainstream media.” [v]

Again Harold says: “In all of human behavior, what can be more serious than supporting acts of violence against people in faraway places? Or for that matter, at home! Is there not a profound, moral responsibility to be absolutely sure of both the accuracy and urgency of the situation before perpetrating acts of death and destruction upon other human beings? How difficult does this become when one is at the mercy of sources of information that cannot be verified? What if those sources have lied to you at other times and on other issues, and you know it? What if both intuition and available facts tell you that your government has not only been lying to you, but may have been involved in creating the very danger it now says will require the use of violence? Is it morally justifiable to support your government’s acts of violence against people anywhere when:

1)     You are not in immediate physical danger

2)     You feel strongly that you cannot trust your government

3)     You have no way to verify the information the government is providing as its excuse for violence?” [vi]

From infancy, Americans are media-conditioned to glorify war as a patriotic obligation. After years of viewing desensitizing violent multi-media marketing disseminated as entertainment or even news, naïve Americans are ready and willing to “fight for their country.” By graduation, high school seniors, who lack experience and real world awareness, are prime enlistment targets. After all the “good guys” should do everything possible to defeat the “bad guys” even if those actions go against individual, family, religious and moral values, right?

The government will proficiently train willing recruits, after instilling strict discipline, to use guns, knives, land mines, bombs, napalm, cruise missiles, smart bombs, cluster bombs and white phosphorous in order to kill or maim complete strangers – men, women and children, often referred to as collateral damage. Does that mean that the Power Elite regard the rest of us as commodities? After utilizing their expert killing skills during active duty, individuals are supposed to compartmentalize their horrific experiences and proceed psychologically and emotionally as if nothing had ever happened when they attempt to resume a civilian status.

Not only do we train our own citizens to be killing machines, we have trained some of the most sadistic people on the planet. We have established schools and have trained tens of thousands of military and police officers in countries all over Latin and Central America, and in Africa in three nations – Zaire, Ethiopia, and Uganda, and in Asia. [vii]These students were educated in techniques of population control, repression, and torture. In some instances, former Nazi officers from Hitler’s Third Reich functioned as instructors. [viii] U.S. Special Operations Forces trained 9,100 foreign soldiers in the 208 Joint Combined Exchange Training exercises. Under the International Military and Education Training program, U.S. forces trained 3,454 foreign forces, mostly officers. [ix] Drug trafficker Manuel Noriega and Roberto D’Aubuisson, the deadly architect of El Salvador’s right-wing death squad network graduated from The School of the Americas, just one of 150 such training facilities. [x]

One of our government’s major areas of training has been in the use of torture. When training films proved inadequate, beggars were rounded up as instructional guinea pigs. One homeless person, used as an instructional model, endured excruciating torture for over two years before international protests secured her release. One of America’s foremost torture instructors was Dan Mitrione, allegedly a typical family man, a devout Catholic, and a devoted father. Regardless, he dedicated his life to torturing people, some of whom he knew were innocent of any crime, simply because his government had decided to reject all humane considerations because of something called “national security.” These words somehow justified torture. [xi] Just how much evil has been perpetrated under the ambiguous term “national security?

To facilitate foreign torture our government issued over 350 export licenses from September 1991 to December 1993 for more than $27 million for saps, thumb-cuffs, thumb-screws, leg-irons, shackles, handcuffs, strait jackets, and plastic handcuffs. These were issued for 57 countries, many of them with deplorable human rights records. Additionally, over 2,000 licenses were issued for 105 countries under another export category, which combined electro-shock batons and cattle prods with shotguns and shells. The next time you are outraged by news of state-authorized torture in some faraway country, please consider that our CIA probably provided the brutal training and that our government licensed the exportation of the torture equipment that was used.

Torture is incompatible to our rhetorical history of espousing human rights and our current claims of compassionate concern for the Iraqis. But I suppose as long as this vile practice is concealed we can still maintain the appearance of Christian civility among the misinformed. The tortured are well aware of the source. George Orwell reminded us with this statement: “The nationalist not only does not disapprove of atrocities committed by his own side, but he has a remarkable capacity for not even hearing about them.”  [xii]

Our technology has surpassed our humanity. Our arsenals are overflowing to the point that we supply the arms or munitions to the entire world. Author David McGowan says: “From 1989 to 1996 the U.S. sold more than $117 billion of arms, about 45 percent of the global total.” In a ten year period of time the world-wide arms business jumped from 16 percent to 63 percent. “U.S. arms dealers sell $10 billion in weapons to non-democratic governments each year.” “In 1986 the United States accounted for 13 percent of worldwide arms exports, but by 1995 the market was 70 percent, most “to developing nations, many with fragile autocracies that are easily destabilized” [xiii]

Interesting Facts:

  • ·        Between 1993-1997 we sold or gave $190 billion in weapons to every nation on earth.
  • ·        Non-democratic Eritrea and Ethiopia fought each other using U.S. arms and training.
  • ·        Opponents Greece and Turkey are two of America’s biggest arms customers.
  • ·        U.S. military support was provided to 168 nations in 1998.
  • ·        U.S. arms sales doubled during Clinton’s first year in office.
  • ·        Five nations received over $1 billion in U.S. military support in 1997: Taiwan, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Turkey and Egypt.
  • ·        Sixteen nations received over $100 million in military support.
  • ·        Of the 53 armed forces in Africa, 41 received U.S. military training.
  • ·        Of the eleven nations intervening in the civil war in the Congo in 1998, nine received U.S. arms and training in 1997.
  • ·        Since 1990, the government has given away more than $8 billion worth of surplus equipment from U.S. military stocks including 4,000 tanks, 500 bombers and 200,000 light arms to Bahrain, Colombia, Egypt, Israel, Jordan, Mexico, Peru and Turkey.
  • ·        Lockheed Martin, the world’s largest arms maker, is selling sophisticated fighter airplanes and air defense systems to at least 21 nations. [xiv]
  • ·        The United States spends more on arms annually than the rest of the Security Council combined.
  • ·        The U.S. has more nuclear bombs, chemical and biological weapons, aircraft, rockets and delivery systems than the rest of the combined world.
  • ·        We have troops stationed at over 395 major military bases in over 35 countries. [xv]

In America’s last five armed conflicts, the opposing troops were battling adversaries who had previously received U.S. weapons, military technology, or training. [xvi]

Killing is more profitable than using our God-given genius to enrich and edify mankind – we use swords rather than plows. The resources of the world are enough and to spare but the power-hungry seize and use those resources to garner control over the souls of men to bind them with the awful chains of hell. There is something drastically wrong when an allegedly Christian nation that kills over 45 million innocent citizens in the name of women’s rights and wages preemptive wars against defenseless nations in the name of spreading or establishing democracy, protecting our national security, toppling previously-installed CIA dictators or some other noble-sounding, trumped-up justification. Our military superiority alleviates all competition – all one has to do is recall Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

John Fitzgerald Kennedy “People have not been horrified by war to a sufficient extent … War will exist until that distant day when the conscientious objector enjoys the same reputation and prestige as the warrior does today.”

There have been many contrived justifications to goad Americans into spilling their blood and allowing their money to be confiscated for war: the explosion on the Maine, Pearl Harbor, which our government allowed to happen, the Tonkin Bay incident which we now know didn’t happen as stated, and most recently 9-11, a veritable shock and awe illustration that “evil-doers” are supposedly out to get America. That catastrophe had nothing to do with the citizens of Afghanistan or Iraq. Yet, statements, via the official Ministry of Truth television networks, CBS, ABC, CNN, NBC and FOX, repeated over and over and over, just the right combination of words: WMDs, terrorists, Osama bin Laden, and Saddam Hussein. Those words manipulated Americans into accepting yet another war. David Rockefeller said: “We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order.” So David was 9-11 the “right” major crisis or are there others planned that might be more right?  The Vietnam anti-war movement is an example of an orchestrated opposition tactic. Some anti-war activists were government plants who were also acknowledged CIA assets. They easily attract followers and attract a mountain of press – intentionally negative to suggest that they are non-supportive and completely unpatriotic. Any anti-war movement, including the current, small but thoroughly justified, creates an opportunity for division. Media attention is designed to develop hatred towards anti-war activists like Cindy Sheehan. I admire her tenacity! Whether they are paid assets or not, they are labeled as unpatriotic. Combined with the media, they actually serve the pro-war agenda. If the anti-war mentality equals disloyalty, the mass majority will support the war which is the actual goal of the orchestrated opposition.The government has always provided enemies and justifications for war: Operation Northwoods was a plan, written with the approval of the Chairman and every member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. The plan suggested that innocent people be shot on American streets, or that boats full of refugees fleeing Cuba be sunk, or that a wave of violent terrorism be launched in Washington, D.C., Miami, and elsewhere. Innocent people, patsies, would then be framed and immediately eliminated (like Lee Harvey Oswald) for things they had not done. Or planes could be hijacked or shot down. Our government, using any of these strategies, could then attribute the terrorist attacks to Castro, thus giving Lemnitzer and his criminal cabal the excuse, as well as the public and international backing, to launch a war. [i] It is, unfortunately, a typical false-flag technique.    George W. Bush, in speaking before the UN General Assembly on November 10, 2001 said: “We must speak the truth about terror. Let us never tolerate outrageousconspiracy theories concerning the attacks of September the 11th, malicious lies that attempt to shift the blame away from the terrorists themselves, away from the guilty.” With the Bush administration and every previous administration – truth becomes whatever lies they can get away with. Liars need excellent memories, unless of course one is a politician. Then it is the public that requires communal recollection. Alexander Solzhenitsyn, a Russian writer, and Soviet dissident, was imprisoned for 8 years for criticizing Stalin in a personal letter. He said: “The simple step of a courageous individual is not to take part in the lie. One word of truth outweighs the world.” [ii] The comfort zone of conformity keeps the masses ignorant and pliable. Majority belief, however sincere, is not assurance of verity. It is quite the opposite!Financial benefits always follow military destruction. The U.S. military, accommodating the corporations, bomb and destroy. Then no-bid multi-million dollar contracts are passed out to well-connected corporations for reconstruction. Follow the money! War is always about money. Therefore, profitless peaceful alternatives are never an option. The Global War on Terror is a big farce based on an event as contrived as the Operation Northwoods plan.

The shameful intimacy between government and the military industrial complex results in legislatively-approved mass killing for profit. While some countries concentrate on building infrastructure and exportable products, we focus on a weapons buildup in preparation for preemptive invasion or alleged defense against bogeymen enemies of our own creation. The military buildup, deployed or not, results in enormous financial benefits for international military contractors. The citizens of other countries are manufacturing computers, cars, televisions and other life-enhancing commodities while we produce weapons of mass inhumanity. Japan and Germany, creditor nations, are technologically advanced, enjoy better health, have a manufacturing base, don’t have trade imbalances, and use their resources to benefit and feed their citizens.

Our massive military budget, the biggest in the world, is funneled directly into the pockets of government connected companies like the Carlyle Group, Halliburton, Brown & Root, Bechtel and others. The international bankers, who control the puppet politicians, reap huge financial profits. Additionally, the spoils of destabilization, offensive invasion, government infiltration and war fall under the control of the victor. This includes all of the natural resources, including the drug producing plants of the vanquished country. Drugs produce billions in laundered dollars.

How annoying for the major drug dealers that the Taliban halted poppy growth in favor of low profit edibles. However, cultivation levels have increased since the invasion and have a potential production of 4,950 metric tons of opium. This represents a 239 percent increase in the poppy crop and a 73 percent increase in potential opium production over 2003 estimates. [iii] Our invasion had nothing to do with the Taliban concealment of Osama bin Laden who supposedly, from a cave, shut down our entire defense system on 9/11 and has controlled the cover story ever since. The FBI maintains that it has no hard evidence of his involvement.

The Taliban offered, on September 20, 2001, to relinquish Osama bin Laden to a neutral Islamic country to stand trial, provided the U.S. supply them with substantial evidence that he was responsible for the attacks on New York and Washington. The U.S. rejected the offer. Invasion was preferable and already planned – circulating drug currency is much more profitable for the privileged elite than feeding Afghanis who might be categorized, along with other disadvantaged third world individuals, as useless eaters. The Power Elite claim that population has to decrease throughout the world, especially in the undeveloped countries. They claim there is an excess of population[iv]

The solution, then, they say is the euphemistically named “population control,” which in essence is the use of government power to discourage, compel, or restrict the the growth, or the numbers of people already in existence. [v]

Dr. Jacques Cousteau said: “350,000 people will have to be eliminated every day in order to sustain the planet. It’s a terrible thing to say but somebody has to say it.”

Martin Luther King III, the eldest son of legendary civil rights leader Martin Luther King Jr., said: “We all have to be concerned about terrorism, but you will never end terrorism by terrorizing others.” [vi] More Americans die as a result of automobile accidents, tobacco related illnesses, cancer and heart disease than from terrorism. Over 100,000 people unexpectedly die at the hands of the medical establishment each year. A comparable number die from adverse legal drug reactions. Then we must also consider the once healthy U.S. non military citizens whose well-being has been compromised due to exposure to the numerous New Mexico and Nevada desert detonations[vii] of nuclear weapons[viii]

Population-decreasing wars are designed to enhance presidential ratings – Bush Sr., role model for son George, used this device in Panama and Iraq. Wars also distract us from escalating domestic problems: a skyrocketing deficit, decreasing standard of living, loss of our manufacturing base, genuine environmental issues, collapse of the U.S. economy, and loss of social services exacerbated by hoards of unrestrained illegal occupiers who were invited into the country by Señor Bush as part of his guest worker facade. Tenacious Mexicans will undoubtedly ultimately fill those positions vacated by tired, wounded second and third tour of duty soldiers or those sent home unceremoniously in body bags.

In conjunction with our wars our veterans face the very serious situation of homelessness. They willingly agreed to “fight for our country” and face possible death, but are quickly forgotten after their service. Apparently they are viewed as spent cannon fodder whose worth is no longer of value. Lacking marketable skills, opportunities and frequently suffering from war-related illnesses, they easily fall into justifiable discouragement, alcoholism and drug use. Whereas they used to fill the ranks of the military, they now fill the ranks of the homeless. Our government ignores or disputes their depleted uranium diseases caused by our use of dual-duty weapons created from our nuclear waste.

Our government has known for years, since the Gulf War, that depleted uranium, our nuclear waste, is deadly harmful to both our troops and those we use it against. “The Preventive Psychiatry Newsletter has written to its subscribers telling them that the real reason the former Veterans Affairs Secretary, Anthony Principi, recently resigned was because he has been involved in a massive scandal covering up the fact that Gulf War Syndrome was caused by the use of depleted uranium, according to the SF Bay View.”[ix] Despite this knowledge, along with substantial physical evidence and grievances by those whose lives are permanently shattered, the pentagon continues its use. The U.S. Army placed a $38 million order for more depleted uranium tank shells the end of February 2006. [x] Yes, what a pity they don’t warn our troops to give them the option of serving at their own risk, in addition to be wounded or killed by the “enemy.” Surely, it must have been just a government oversight?

Economic sanctions, another terrible inhumane tactic aimed at civilians, became part of the U.N. Charter in 1945 as a method of control. Deliberately depriving civilians of food and basic necessities until they are starving, miserable, desperate or dead is unconscionable. Yet, sanctions have been used fourteen times – twelve times since 1990. [xi]

This dreadful device says more about us than about our contrived enemies. The Iraqis, nor others, will ever hear a shred of remorse for these unforgivable crimes. The only mention of forgiveness had nothing to do with America. Given our propensity for similar brutality it is apropos that George H. W. Bush remarked: “Let’s forgive the Nazi war criminals.” [xii] He also spoke of the impending war in 1991 with Iraq’s Saddam Hussein, the on again/off again enemy, as a sign that the world was on the “threshold of a New World Order.” That war began January 12, 1991, and supposedly ended with a cease fire on February 22, 1991. In reality, it never ended. We opportunistically bombed Iraq from 1991 onward, along with our other offensive strategies. [xiii]

In 1996 “Lesley Stahl asked the previous U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Madeleine Albright about the half million Iraqi children that died. … “That is more children than died in Hiroshima. And, you know, is the price worth it?” Albright answered: “I think this is a very hard choice, but the price, we think the price is worth it. [i]“THE PRICE IS WORTH IT?” Killing other people’s children should certainly provoke outrage and compassion. Apparently Albright and Powell, who were not concerned with civilian body counts, have much in common.” [ii] In 1998, Albright said: “I am willing to make a bet to anyone here that we care more about the Iraqi people than Saddam Hussein does.” [iii]

Given America’s apathy and ignorance, will we ever apologize to the parents of those 500,000 children who starved as a result of our sanctions? Quite the contrary, our leaders justify their actions and claim that it was worth it: In addition, will we ever apologize for the birth defects, accelerating cancers, or other toxic diseases caused byAmerica’s depleted uranium weapons of mass inhumanity?

We have not only lost our humanity, we have lost our humility – an accurate perception of our relationship to God and the other people who inhabit an increasingly contaminated earth. “Since the advent of the Nuclear Age, everything has changed but the way people think, thus, we drift towards unparalleled catastrophe.” Albert Einstein

Though understandable, if it were the Iraqis, they did not perpetrate the “shock and awe” of 9/11. Purportedly fifteen of the highjackers were from the New World Order compliant, Bush-friendly Saudi Arabia which automatically makes them our allies. Perhaps that is also the reason we could label fifteen of their citizens’ as terrorists?

Shifting the blame for misery has often been affective. Wretchedness is the goal of economic destabilization. We blamed the Sandinistas in Nicaragua and Castro for the economic woes in Cuba. George H. W. Bush easily blamed the serious post war health problems on Saddam Hussein. However, we purposely destroyed their entire infrastructure, their electrical capacity and their water supply which is egregious and completely against the Geneva Conventions. This is evidenced in a document dated November 15, 1991.” [iv] The art imitating life film The Manchurian Candidate may enlighten us to the farce trials of Moussaoui and Saddam Hussein.

Yes, of course, it’s true that Hussein killed Iraqi citizens. This also occurred when he was trained by our CIA before we installed him as our dictator in Iraq. The CIA helped him to murder thousands of political opponents; we even supplied the munitions for his war with Iran. Those are the same atrocities that we used, leaving out the CIA’s participation, to gain acceptance for deposing the tyrant that we helped to create.  We publicized his heinous atrocities against others only when it conveniently supported our own actions.

One popular pundit, subtly attempting to associate Iraq with the events of 9/11, recently read the following on her talk radio show regarding the skeletal remains found on the edge of the Ash Sham desert: “The man was thrown backward by automatic weapons fire, his eyes blindfolded and his arms tied behind his back, his skull jerked upward at the neck, his fleshless mouth gaping, his two rows of teeth stretched apart, as though in a primal scream.” [v] And then she craftily compared this man’s evident horror to the terror of those who jumped from the buildings on 9/11. Other hate-spewing pundits are merciless in their evaluations of anyone, such as the 9/11 widows, who dares verbalize opposing opinions.

Don’t be deceived; had Hussein been compliant to the New World Order agenda, he would have remained in power. Tyrants are tolerated if they are our tyrants and serve the banking and oil interests. The war that has thus far cost $3 trillion, wreaked havoc on our economy, decimated Iraq, destroyed the health of the Iraqis and many in our military and took the lives of over a million while displacing tens of thousands of others was really about the unconsummated oil proposal between Rockefeller and Hussein.[vi]

But for propaganda purposes, the vanquished, toppled tyrants, actors, patsies or whomever, face a tribunal or jury! And if a tribunal doesn’t work, air strikes effectively silence the alleged accused, as well as make a point and distract the masses. [vii] “Abu Musab Saddam Osama al-Zarqawi, the extremely elusive if not entirely mythical terrorist mastermind responsible for every single insurgent action in Iraq except for the ones caused by the red-tailed devils in Iran or the stripy-tailed devils in Syria, has reportedly been killed in an air strike in Hibhib, an area north of Baghdad, Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri Kamal al-Maliki announced Thursday.” [viii]

Just exactly why are we hated – it shouldn’t take a genius to figure that out? The American government, without distinction to either political party, has a lot to apologize for. We have become a giant propagandized war machine, complete with all the unconstitutional, brutal, covert CIA style entities, abuse-of-power presidential directives and the elimination of the majority of all constitutional congressional responsibilities. Political power, pensions, perks and other unprincipled payola are obviously exceptional for Congress to turn a blind eye for. America is the biggest bully in the world’s playground and big bullies rarely exhibit regret or contrition.

We demand that other countries open their facilities for weapons inspections. These countries would never rationally assault us – it would be suicidal. The country which consistently uses weapons of mass inhumanity on civilian populations is the United States. The United States has signed international treaties, trashed in 2001, to halt the testing, manufacture and development of chemical and biological weapons. Thus we are required to allow United Nations inspectors to verify our compliance to the treaties. “In defiance of the treaties’ provisions, the United States Senate passed a bill in 1997 allowing the president to deny international inspections of U.S. weapons facilities ‘on the grounds of national security.’” [ix]

A government that does not value the life of its own citizens yet claims to demonstrate its compassion and concern by the “humanitarian bombing” of a populace in a foreign nation thousands of miles away is practicing extreme hypocrisy and devilish deceit. Unsurprisingly, governments consistently lie, including our own. This is particularly true as we experience the obvious farce of spreading democracy while consequentially killing thousands of Iraqi citizens.  There have been over a million citizens killed during the entire length of the Iraqi War. Larry Eagleburger, appearing on CNN on September 12, 2001 said the following: “There is only one way to deal with people like this, and that is you have to kill some of them, even if they are not directly involved in this thing.”

Since World War II, American military actions, in one form or another, have caused more death and destruction around the world than the actions of any other country. I understand that the government doesn’t tabulate civilian deaths but the survivors do. Josef Stalin once remarked: “One death is a tragedy, but a million deaths are merely a statistic.”

Orchestrated opposition enables a predetermined result. It is thesis versus antithesis which results in synthesis, used repeatedly. The Establishment’s goal (synthesis) is the New World Order. Opposition in all things is also a gospel principle and is frequently cited as the purpose of our existence – to experience tribulation in order to obtain strength through our diligence and faith. Lucifer is apparently also familiar with the function of opposition but applies it deceptively. Absent controlled conflict, this achievement could not be met. The unplanned actions of individuals within any society would not lead to this synthetic synthesis – it has to be created and highly calculated. Enter the International Banking cartel, including American firms, always receptive to mega profits at anyone’s expense. They have made billions in blood money by backing the Nazis, the Soviet Union, North Korea, North Vietnam, and the list goes – all against the United States. [x]

It is military musical chairs as the circumstances and the alleged villains have changed and the orchestrated opposition continues under a variety of justifications. The goal remains static: New World Order!!!! Making the world “safe for democracy” is as old as Woodrow Wilson’s promise when he led the United States into the First World War after attacks on American ships. “The State Department reported that the number of ‘significant’ terrorist attacks reached a record 655 in 2004, up from 175 in 2003.” Terrorism begets more terrorism! How long are the wealthy and their minions going to use that double-speak justification for bloodshed and mass murder? Democracy is rule by whoever has the weapons, the opportunity, and the motives to bomb others into compliance and submission.

Nuclear bombs, formerly known as atomic bombs, made a huge statement to the rest of the world. Towards the official end of World War Two and months after the Japanese offered to surrender, we used atomic bombs on the civilian population of two cities with a Christian majority. A small military flight crew with a bomb is a highly efficient killing machine – more so than ground troops. The official rationale for bombing instead of ground troops was to save Americans lives. Apparently Japanese lives have less value than American lives – what is the ratio, I wonder?

Collective guilt is much smoother to digest if one even acknowledges or shares the responsibility of the actions of their rogue government despite the fact that we finance those actions. Group-think is much safer and engenders less culpability than independent thinking. Thinking “outside of the box” takes one out of his/her comfort zone and might additionally bring criticism or the loss of friends.

History is replete with tales of the conquering hoards who explore, discover, confiscate and kill the citizens or merely leave them to die in desperate poverty. The principles of exploitation are eternal. Author John T. Flynn remarked: “Imperialism is an institution under which one nation asserts the right to seize the land or at least to control the government or resources of another people.” [xi]

There is a major difference between what happens to insiders and anyone else: sports figures, some movie stars and politicians often remain unscathed by their behavior. A commoner like John Walker Lindh was in the wrong place at the wrong time and is serving time. Liar Martha Stewart served time. Her biggest mistake is being an unconnected successful business woman. Liar Sandy Berger, Clinton’s national security adviser, the very height of irony, who claimed to have made an “honest mistake,” stole and then destroyed government property (evidence), merely paid a fine and served no jail time. [xii] Their lies were significantly different. But then, politicians lie incessantly and only appear to suffer legal consequences when it serves the Establishment’s purpose and/or to distract attention from foreign bombings by the United States.

Give up reality television and recognize that concentration camps, a censored press, a dictatorial secretive government, preemptive war against non-threatening countries are all genuine reality. As a youth I was outraged by what the Nazis did to the Jews and others. Why would the general population allow the inhumane torture, death and destruction directed at the citizens of their own country? Why did they invade Poland? My youthful anger at the Germans for not standing up against government tyranny and brutality was passionate, despite their claims of ignorance. How could they not know? Why do Americans tolerate the same behavior from our government?

George W. Bush remarked: “When I was coming up, it was a dangerous world, and you knew exactly who they were. It was us versus them, and it was clear who them was. Today, we are not so sure who the they are, but we know they’re there.” Well phrased, Mr. President! But, I think some of us might have it figured out.

Most of us are happy to have sufficient for our needs but with the elite, enough is never enough. It isn’t simply resource accumulation but an insatiable, obsessive demonic lust for power over others. Controlling others necessitates an absolute infiltration into every area of our lives including the source of our acquired knowledge and our perceptions about current events. To facilitate this goal, a suspension of the First Amendment, specifically our freedom of speech, is absolutely essential.

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

The First Amendment protects our freedom of speech and of the press. Absent the First Amendment, protestors could be silenced, the press could be censored, citizens could not criticize their government nor could they organize for social change. No rational individual would readily relinquish the vital freedoms of the First Amendment. But like the proverbial frog who remains in incrementally heated water, the masses are slowly surrendering all of their freedoms without so much of a whimper. Some people will even be relieved and anxious to surrender the freedoms patriots died for. With hardly a struggle or even majority acknowledgement, the allied elite have progressively seized ownership and control of the media.

The “free” press has been seized by mega media owners who are “free” to deliver mounds of distracting drivel camouflaged as news and information. Objectivity has been replaced by restraint. Instead of receiving unbiased information we are indoctrinated by the cultural, moral, economic and globalist philosophies and falsehoods supported by elite corporate owners.

In March 1915, the J. P. Morgan interests, the steel, shipbuilding and powder interests, and their subsidiary organizations, met with twelve men, influential in the newspaper world and employed them to select the most powerful newspapers in the United States and determine the number it would take to generally control the policy of the daily press of the United States. [1]

These twelve men selected 179 newspapers and then began, by an elimination process, to retain only those necessary for the purpose of controlling the general policy of the daily press throughout the country. They found it was only necessary to purchase the control of twenty-five of the greatest papers. The twenty-five papers were agreed upon and emissaries were sent to purchase the policy, national and international, of those papers. The policy of those papers was bought, to be paid for by the month. An editor was furnished for each paper to properly supervise and edit information regarding the questions of preparedness, militarism, financial policies, and other things of national and international nature considered vital to the interests of the purchasers. [2] This policy also included the suppression of everything in opposition to the wishes of the interests served. [3]

Bernard Baruch, American financier, stock market speculator, statesman, and presidential adviser, financially backed both newspapers and columnists. Arthur Krock, a columnist for the Louisville Courier-Journal was under Baruch’s influence and attended the Paris Peace Conference with Baruch and Herbert Hoover in 1919. Baruch convinced Adolph Ochs, publisher of the New York Times that he should hire Krock who reorganized the New York Times Washington bureau in 1932.

In 1926, Baruch invested $50,000 to assist David Lawrence to found the United States Daily, which became United States News and after World War II, it was re-name US News and World Report. Baruch also financed Maxwell Lincoln Schuster and Dick Simon to form Simon and Schuster. Baruch also made investments in Vogue, Vanity Fair, Raleigh News and Observer, Our World Magazine and others. [4]

Simon & Schuster grew to include seven divisions – the Simon & Schuster Adult Publishing Group, Simon & Schuster Children’s Publishing, Simon & Schuster Audio, Simon & Schuster Online, Simon & Schuster UK, Simon & Schuster Canada and Simon & Schuster Australia. Their imprints and brand names include:  Simon & Schuster, Scribner, Pocket Books, Downtown Press, The Free Press, Atria, Fireside, Touchstone, Washington Square Press, Atheneum, Margaret K. McElderrry, Aladdin Paperbacks, Little Simon, Simon Spotlight, Simon Spotlight Entertainment, Star Trek, MTV Books and Wall Street Journal Books. [5]

Simon & Schuster published more than 2,000 titles annually. They have won fifty-four Pulitzer Prizes and have received numerous National Book Awards and National Book Critics Circle Awards. They have published both Rush Limbaugh’s and Howard Stern’s books.

Beginning in 1984, the company acquired more than sixty additional companies, including Prentice Hall and culminated in 1994 with the acquisition of Macmillan Publishing Company. In 2002, Simon & Schuster was integrated with the Paramount motion picture and television studios as part of the Viacom Entertainment Group. [6]Effective December 31, 2005, this corporate entity changed its name to CBS Corporation. The present firm known as Viacom beginning December 31, 2005 is a new spin-off company created during the CBS-Viacom split. [7]

A very comprehensive current list of media ownership is in the book Censored 2006, Chapter 6. You can download this must-read chapter as a PDF file. In 1985, there were fifty media conglomerates in the United States. Now there are ten top major media entities with connections to government, higher education, major institutions, banking and corporate America:  AOL Time Warner, Walt Disney, Gannett, Viacom (now CBS Corporation), New York Times, Washington Post, Knight-Ridder, The Tribune Company, General Electric and News Corporation. These media corporations share board members with a variety of other large corporations, including banks, investment companies, oil companies, health care and pharmaceutical companies and technology companies.” [8] The information contained in that file established a startling fact: media owners and their editor minions act as the unelected, unaccountable disseminators of all truth and information. They are free to distort, misinform, and skew all information to their financial benefit without repercussions because of their privileged government industry appointments and swinging-door connections.

Alexander Solzhenitsyn stated: “Such as it is, the press has become the greatest power within the Western World, more powerful than the legislature, the executive and judiciary. One would like to ask: by whom has it been elected, and to whom is it responsible?”  [9]

We can thank the Telecommunications Act of 1996 which was supposed to facilitate competition. Instead it allowed the big media companies to gobble up and digest the smaller companies, increasing their monopoly. What a coincidence – a law that does the exact opposite of what was intended.

Most of us believe that journalists have a particular responsibility to investigate and then divulge the information that they discover. To do otherwise is to perpetuate a facade of “reality” which is unconscionable and irresponsible. Withholding vital information, particularly when considering the election of our representatives, is grossly negligent and unfair to the voters, perpetuates corruption, and squanders the lives of our own citizens as well as foreigners. In addition, the very destruction of our country may be an imminent reality. The media has an obligation! The deliberate omission of truth or the calculated commission of a lie defines the measure of an individual’s integrity. It also denotes group integrity. George Orwell said: “During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.”

Newspaper editor John Swinton said: “There is no such thing in America as an independent press. You know it and I know it. There is not one of you who dares write his honest opinions, and if you did you know beforehand that it would never appear in print. I am paid… for keeping my honest opinions out of the paper … others of you are paid similar salaries for similar things… any of you who would be so foolish as to write his honest opinions would be out on the streets looking for another job… We are the tools and vassals of rich men behind the scenes. We are the jumping jacks; they pull the strings and we dance. Our talents, possibilities, and lives are all the property of other men. We are intellectual prostitutes.” [10]

It is incompatible to be dishonest in one area of one’s life and honest in another. “Integrity comprises the personal inner sense of ‘wholeness’ deriving from honesty and consistent uprightness of character.” [11] Values should remain static, not situational or flexible. However, standards and integrity no longer apply – the rules are flexible, adjustable and situational to ensure that politicians, ethically-challenged corporate executives and others can escape the consequences of those annoying investigations by conscientious journalists. Currently we witness news executives “groveling for public forgiveness because something their reporters wrote offended powerful interests, or raised uncomfortable questions about the past. Stories that meet every traditional standard of objective journalism are retracted or renounced, not because they are false – but because they are true.” [12] Retractions, distortions and omissions are rampant.

CNN/Time Warner retracted a report on the CIA operation known as Tailwind at the request of a New York attorney, Floyd Abrams. [13] Abrams represented John Singlaub, a retired Army general who was the source of the June 7, 1998 report that accused the military of using nerve gas on Vietnam War-era defectors in Southeast Asia in the 1970s. The lead reporter, Peter Arnett, ultimately left the network. April Oliver, the gutsy CNN producer, was fired and ended up suing the network who defamed her “Charging that CNN retracted the 1998 story ‘to mollify the military establishment,’ Oliver accused senior network executives of approving the substance and sourcing of the explosive script, then surrendering to unfounded criticism after the reports aired.” Oliver said she would have gone to prison to protect Singlaub who she claims “smeared her to distance himself from the report.” [14] The Department of Defense whitewashed the whole incident with a timely news briefing on Tuesday, July 21, 1998.

This is from a Rumsfeld Department of Defense news briefing in February 2002: “Reports that say that something hasn’t happened are always interesting to me, because as we know, there are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns — the ones we don’t know we don’t know.” [15] That sounds to me like a lot of stammering, stalling double talk. Isn’t it frightening to realize we have had and continue to have such questionably qualified people in leadership positions?

Investigative reporters are routinely fired or arrested for reporting on government or corporate corruption perpetrated in other countries – against foreign strangers who are desperately vulnerable. Reporters have been forced to apologize and renounce their work. Afterwards, these conscientious reporters are reviled and ruined. One reporter, Mike Gallagher, [16] was ruined as a result of his exposé of Chiquita Brands International, a company known for their numerous CIA protected exploitations in Central and South America. [[17]] When money or politics are affected, truth appears to be irrelevant. I suppose one could say that you can buy anything in the world for money, including anonymity viewed as permission – yet others like journalists, pay the very high cost, often their lives, for the corruption and crimes of others.

Because of what amounts to imposed censorship, intimidation can induce journalists to restrict their writing to the approved party line. Privileged government status often tempts the wholly unprincipled to use that protected position for personal financial enhancement or for illegalities that are rarely revealed. And if exposed – just destroy the message by obliterating the credibility of the messenger. Governments can and do commit crimes against large segments of the population, foreign or domestic, without exposure and culpability.

Unaccustomed to independent thinking, distracted and lazy minds are susceptible to the improvised, official version of any propagandized orchestrated crisis. Those same complacent mental captives who feel well informed by snippets of “news” from the “Ministry of Truth” are immediately willing to support premeditated government schemes or legislation presented as a viable solution. Rule by crisis increases Big Brother government power, the bureaucracy, civil chaos and our gullibility and fear – of government and whatever enemy they have currently devised while rapidly decreasing our personal liberties, our savings accounts, our pensions, our health [18] and our jobs through constitutionally illegal trade agreements.

Dr. Joseph M. Goebbels, Propaganda Minister of Nazi Germany said: “The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth becomes the greatest enemy of the State.”

“In February 2003, A Florida Court Of Appeals unanimously agreed with an assertion by FOX News that there is no rule against distorting or falsifying the news in the United States.” [19]

I will close with quotes from two very wise and honest men, Patrick Henry said: “We are apt to shut our eyes against a painful truth…for my part, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst; and to provide for it.”  Thomas Jefferson said: “All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent.”

Joseph Goebbels said: “The rank and file is usually much more primitive than we imagine. Propaganda must therefore always be essentially simple and repetitious. The most brilliant propagandist technique will yield no success unless one fundamental principle is borne in mind constantly… it must confine itself to a few points and repeat them over and over.”

One very key point, repeated daily for decades, by the most vociferous voices, is that the media is liberal. The conservatives have a giant advantage over their appointed opponents, the liberals: a cohesive, complaining group who monopolize air time claiming that a liberal bias exists in the media. From rich to poor, the masses gain the majority of their information from the media and take great pride in being well-informed, morally superior, pro-war conservatives. One might doubt a premise from just one media source but multiple sources gives credibility despite any lack of clear-cut evidence on any issue. Switch channels or stations – it is all the same news and every network conceals the most egregious of the government’s actions.

Dissident voices are rare and quickly disqualified as treasonous, out of touch, unpatriotic, un-American or putting our troops in harm’s way or helping Al Qaeda – all a subtle excuse for media censorship and suspension of the 1st Amendment. Dissent is never allowed in a dictatorship, especially one that claims to promote freedom. One apparent exception is the illegal alien invasion, however misdirected the criticism really is. Typical voter apathy has turned to outrage over what is essentially an invasion by invitation. As usual, Congress languishes, pretending to work on the situation while Americans pay the price.

The purported conservative voices include but are not limited to: Rush Limbaugh, Bill O’Reilly, Michael Savage, Laura Ingraham, Dennis Praeger, Bill Bennett, Sean Hannity, Michael Reagan, Matt Drudge, Oliver North, Ann Coulter, Michael Medved, Hugh Hewitt, Rusty Humphries, Larry Elder, Neal Boortz, Mark Davis, G. Gordon Liddy and don’t forget the televangelists. There are also numerous individuals who author newspaper columns and well publicized books. Who do the liberals have? Who iscomparable among the radio, television, and print personalities? If you can think of anyone – how regularly is he or she verbally vanquished and vilified by the conservatives?

So-called conservative talk show hosts do not educate or enlighten but present a deceptive dialogue of disinformation which promotes the theoretical global war of terror and supports the party line, despite which party is currently running the show. They brainwash their listeners and intimidate and insult their non compliant callers as they glorify death and war disguised as patriotism. Howard Zinn says that “patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel.” [1]

Mark Hertzgaard said: “The biggest political joke in America is that we have a liberal press. It’s a joke taken seriously by a surprisingly large number of people. The myth of the liberal press has served as a political weapon for conservative and right-wing forces eager to discourage critical coverage of government and corporate power. Americans now have the worst of both worlds: a press that, at best, parrots the pronouncements of the powerful and, at worst, encourages people to be stupid with pseudo-news that illuminates nothing but the bottom line.”  [2]

In 1995 Bill Kristol confessed to the New Yorker: “The liberal media were never that powerful, and the whole thing was often used as an excuse by conservatives for conservative failures.” [3]

The charges of liberal bias are just maneuvers in a cynical game explained Rich Bond, the former chairman of the Republican National Committee. The nasty accusations hurled at the liberals by angry wannabe victims function like the heckling of passionate sports spectators who scream and yell “unfair” over every single penalty. “The referee will think twice before blowing the whistle” and might “cut you a little slack on the next one. Conservatives have learned to ‘work the ref’ so diligently that their exclusion is one of the most widely discussed topics in the media – with them doing most of the talking.” [4] The poor, pitiful highly visible and very verbal, amply paid conservatives would have us believe that they are all “media outcasts” all the while hosting and appearing on numerous radio and television shows.

According to Mark Crispin Miller, the so-called liberal press was a consistent advocate for Bush and his collaborating cronies. The mainstream media either downplayed or suppressed the following brief list of fascistic incidences involving an insecure but dictatorial President Bush who obviously recognized his numerous shortcomings but could never tolerate any appearance of opposition:

  • ·        They hid the many evidences of Bush’s unpopularity;
  • ·        They repressed some of the worst news of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan;
  • ·        The media repressed news of war crimes repeatedly facilitated by the lies of the administration;
  • ·        The Bush White House withheld the October 19th CIA report on 9/11 until after the election;
  • ·        There was no mainstream coverage of Bush’s true standing in his party;
  • ·        Many well-known Republicans were actually backing Kerry;
  • ·        The press hid evidence of Bush’s low repute;
  • ·        The press was silent on Bush’s international unpopularity;
  • ·        In the 2004 campaign the press ignored any evidence that the president was not well liked;
  • ·        The press ignored new voters and many polls which preferred Kerry;
  • ·        The press did not report the egregious behavior on the part of Bush and company on the campaign trail such as barring people from events, or having others arrested who happened to voice any opposition;
  • ·        Hundreds, some not even protestors, were arrested and held illegally during the Republican convention in New York;
  • ·        Anyone not showing obvious enthusiasm on the convention floor was ousted;
  • ·        The TV networks refused to air ads for Michael Moore’s film Fahrenheit 911
  • ·        A couple in Corpus Christi were arrested for wearing anti-Bush T-shirts at a Bush speech. After their release she was fired from her FEMA job;
  • ·        Admission was denied to a Bush event for anyone wearing Kerry stickers on their clothes;
  • ·        The press ignored the fact that Bush selected certain groups to speak to on the campaign trail – perfect for photo ops.
  • ·        Hours and hours of air time and column space was given to the “Swift Boat Veterans for Truth,” an expensive propaganda tactic hatched by Karl Rove;
  • ·        There was hardly a mention of Bush’s military irregularities including the missing 1972 physical, 1970 pictures of Bush wearing medals he had not received and unexplained lengthy absences (AWOL);
  • ·        The press ignored the fact that Bush could not or would not produce a valid DD214 (discharge papers). [5]
    Our current president has refused to produce legitimate records regarding his birth, his college records or his records at Columbia University where no one can remember him.

One glaring incident involved Dan Rather, along with four television news producers, all formerly of CBS News. The four were Mary MapesBetsy WestJosh Howard, andMary Murphy[6] Their offense: they “exposed a rich kid whose powerful daddy got him out of the military draft during the war in Vietnam. The rich kid is the president; the daddy was another president.” [7] CBS appointed an Independent Review Panel, consisting of just two people, to determine the ethics of the five individuals. The two experts were Dick Thornburgh, Attorney General in the administration of George H. W. Bush and Louis Boccardi. Thornburgh, hardly objective, is known to have “whitewashed the investigation of the Exxon Valdez oil spill.” With his help, Exxon escaped full culpability. [8] Oil and water do not mix but oil and Bush have always been an interesting concoction.

Viacom, the owner of CBS, is the second-largest media company in the country and is owned by Sumner M. Redstone, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, a very rich media mogul. Viacom also owns Nickelodeon, MTV, Infinity Broadcasting, Paramount, Blockbuster and BET on cable, as well the UPN broadcast network. Redstone is the mega media mogul responsible for the ousting of Dan Rather who dared question the war president’s military record. Out with free speech, investigative reporting and in with political and corporate expediency.

“Reacting to the document scandal at CBS News, Sumner M. Redstone, chairman and chief executive of Viacom, CBS’ parent, vowed that the results of a recently announced probe would be ‘appropriate’ and the consequences will be appropriate.” [9] In December 2005, Viacom changed its name to CBS Corporation. See a list of CBS assets here. Viacom became a spin-off company.

Redstone spoke at the Forbes Global CEO Conference and stated that he was “very concerned” about a 60 Minutes story from September 8, 2004 by Dan Rather that suggested glaring irregularities in President George W. Bush’s military record. “CBS has since conceded that the documents on which the story was based could not be authenticated. Rather has apologized, and CBS News has said the story was a mistake.” [10] A lengthy career was over – and his name will always be associated with this incident – an inconvenient truth jeopardizing the One World Order agenda of a Bush second term. If the media were truly liberal, as frequently claimed, the exposure of the multiple skeletons in the Bush closet would have been quickly revealed by the so-called liberal media.

Prior to Rather’s CBS demise the former CBS anchor appeared on the BBC in June 2002. He appeared older, looked defeated and admitted that he dared not speak on American TV. He said: “Fear keeps journalists from asking the toughest of the tough questions.” Rather remarked that a deadly censorship had seized U.S. newsrooms, especially after the September 11 attack. He said that news on the U.S. tube was “bound and gagged.” He continued: “Any reporter who stepped out of line would be professionally lynched as un-American.” Certain reporters from The New York Times are currently finding this to be the case. Back in the U.S. Rather “smothered his professional conscience and told his TV audience, “George Bush is the president. He makes the decisions. If he wants me to line up, just tell me where.” [11]

In commenting on the upcoming U.S. presidential election, media mogul Redstone said that while Senator John Kerry (D-Mass.) was a nice guy, the re-election of President Bush would be better for Viacom’s interests, since the Administration backed deregulation and other issues that would help the company. [12] Kerry, who did go to Vietnamcompared to Bush who didn’t, was the subject of Unfit for Duty, an explosive and very timely book allegedly exposing Kerry’s unearned medals and lack of courage. Private, corporate ownership of the media includes an exclusive opportunity, through firing and hiring practices, to greatly affect elections. The neo-cons stated in their PNAC Statement of Principles: “It is important to shape circumstances.” [13]

At 10:22 a.m. (EST) on the morning of November 3, 2004, the day after the election and before Kerry’s concession at 1:57 p.m., the president of the Heritage Foundation sent email to 200,000 members asking for a “generous contribution” to help the foundation do “what we have to do right now” – help “President Bush and his allies in Congress” to keep cutting taxes, “modernize Social Security, “weed out terrorists and perfect the military.” Jumping the gun and speeding ahead with one’s agenda is either arrogant overconfidence, supported by the corporate press or sure knowledge supplied by conspiratorial vote counters. [14]

“For the media owners, allegations of a liberal bias make it easier for them to impose the conservative bias they prefer. For the pseudo liberals who work in the media system, confessing to a liberal bias is far more comfortable than admitting that they’ve sold out their beliefs for a nice salary. It’s only because the mainstream media is so conservative that all these right-wing pundits can make accusations of liberal bias without opposition.” [15] Bernard Goldberg and Ann Coulter, just two outraged conservatives bravely battling the liberal dragon press, have successfully scammed the public with their big money-making, insubstantial accusations. Goldberg, a former correspondent, was associated with the same network CBS that career-crunched Dan Rather. His very biased book Bias was published on February 25, 2001 and propped up the conservative charade.

In addition to those issues mentioned above, I would like to see the following imperative issues covered in the so-called liberal mainstream media and the professed conservative news:

  • ·        Locations of the American concentration camps built by Kellogg, Brown and Root;
  • ·        Bush’s plan to merge Canada, Mexico and the United States;
  • ·        More news on the inland ports;
  • ·        Media reviews of Aaron Russo’s new movie: America: From Freedom to Fascism;
  • ·        An expose on the use of depleted uranium;
  • ·        Information about privatized military industry (PMI)
  • ·        An objective investigation of the irregularities of 9/11;
  • ·        Voting irregularities in 2000 and 2004;
  • ·        Bush’s regard for human rights and the Bill of Rights
  • ·        An expose of the Federal Reserve fraud;
  • ·        Why is the government selling off big chunks of America;
  • ·        Information on the Six-Point Agenda for Department of Homeland Security
  • ·        Tell the American citizens about the amero, the dollar replacement;
  • ·        How about all of those stories that Project Censored defines in their books;
  • ·        The real truth about job growth, not the jobs the government is creating;

What about those jobs? What are those employees manufacturing? Or are they being trained to implant ID chips, spy on their neighbors, and work as camp guards or perhaps work on that secret super highway?

We are not any freer than the controlled, contentious cover-up media. [16] Rush Limbaugh is the acclaimed original “right wing” radio talk jock who continues to successfully lambaste liberals and the purported liberal media bias even though he admitted in 2002 that liberal bias was non existent. [17] Several more have joined him in this crusade. They bash the allegedly morally decadent liberal left as compared to the “righteous” right who claim moral superiority despite ample evidence to the contrary.

Thousands of clueless disciples, in what propagandist Michael Medved calls “the greatest nation on God’s green earth,” tune in daily to get conservative views  as opposed to the big, bad, ugly, deceitful ‘liberal’ lies. Folks, it is orchestrated opposition – owned by the same entities. Whether you read the Twinkie Times, listen to tough fluff, pro-war Laura Ingraham, or watch any of the Fox “fair and balanced” shows, including the king of castigation – Bill O’Reilly, it is the same. [18] Devotees are daily rewarded and energized by the vicious attacks and criticism directed at the evil enemy – the liberal opposition. We are so distracted we fail to recognize the synthesized Republican/Democratic party. [19] The genuine dissenters supporting such things as anti-tax, pro-2nd Amendment rights, pro-Constitution, anti-big government, and anti-war can anticipate being lumped with the terrorists – “Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists.” [20] How can conservatives claim to prefer less government and in the same breath ask, among other things, the government to seize the church’s authority over marriage?

“Neo-con” talk radio has lent legitimacy to the Bush administration plus phony patriotic propaganda for continual preemptive war. War means the killing, the maiming, and the devastating illnesses of thousands of Middle-Eastern citizens because their leader was/is non-compliant to One World Order demands. And with the Bushs – like father, like son, nuclear air strikes are preferable to diplomacy for establishing power, instilling fear and furthering the work of death.

Christians should be the first to recognize the probability of secret societies or secret combinations and money interests intent on depriving others of their liberty or life. The death of Christ was the result of a conspiracy associated with currency. There were plots to kill Paul and numerous others. There were also those early day “public relations” groups who deliberately influenced the masses to perpetuate their covert agenda – remember, the admirers who bowed before Christ upon his entry into Jerusalem were the same people who, a mere few days, later clamored for his death. What changed?

Before citizens jump on that political war machine that promotes continual conflict, we must evaluate and scrutinize the sources of our perceptions – is it orchestrated opposition propaganda or real information?

According to the Hegelian Dialectics there must be a crisis, or controlled opposition, with a predetermined solution designed to move society towards a one world government. Opportunistic circumstances are devised by positioning effectual, charismatic people into situations where they can manipulate perceptions and then ultimately use their increasing power to establish and escalate minor concerns into major calamities. The elite manufactures and finances fear in order to generate weakness for the sole purpose of bringing the masses under their control. There are a few methods of positioning appropriate individuals into suitable circumstances: a contrived election, a coup d’état, CIA sponsorship and assignment, or a combination of the three with supportive, unmerited media promotion or the opposite – character assassination. And there are susceptible personalities, either unprincipled or incredibly naïve, who will permit globalist manipulation for a variety of reasons. Political assassinations (ritual public executions), allegedly carried out by crazed lone gunmen, fall into the category of the coup d’état. The CIA, the primary functionary of big business and international banking, recruits naïve but willing college students, radical religious fundamentalists and anyone else who demonstrates charisma, aptitude, and guiltless mendacity and is willing to sacrifice integrity for financial rewards and power. These obliging, newly-trained individuals are systematically entrenched within every facet of society in order to obscure our perceptions, dismantle our values, falsify our history, corrupt our communities and destabilize families. Conventional appearing infiltrators, posturing as benefactors are embedded within the government, the courts, the media, the fields of medicine and psychology, and religion. Soon after the establishment of the U.N. and the CIA our traditional values, stable marriages and morality rapidly began to decline while crime, drug use, divorce, promiscuity, pornography and perversion accelerated. Family destabilization is not happenstance but a very deliberate plan. The Rockefeller Foundation had funded the “research” efforts of the decadent Alfred Kinsey whose junk science instigated the family-destroying moral metamorphosis of America. Kinsey’s work was further enhanced by the American Law Institute’s Model Penal Code. The American Law Institute was created in 1923 as the educational arm of the American Bar Association. The development of the Model Penal Code was, not surprisingly, also funded by the Rockefeller Foundation. The Penal Code decreased criminal accountability for criminal predators engaging in serious crime against women and children. Kinsey’s deliberately misleading research brought about predictable social behavior minus the appropriate liability. Sleazy speculation masquerading as authentic research took on an aura of respectability and credibility because it was highly publicized by allegedly trustworthy media people. The initial responses of shocked abhorrence gradually developed into acceptance. Inclusion of this “research,” in textbooks and daily newspapers apparently endorsed it despite the emerging societal cause and effect consequences. The successful escalation of every synchronized crisis depends on mass media deception. As defined by the founding fathers, a free press should serve the public interest, not the opportunistic tyrants who have absconded with the reins of government. Another CIA asset, Gloria Steinem (Smith College graduate), was recruited by Cord Meyer after being referred to him by an acquaintance from the CIA financed National Student Association. Meyer was the head of the CIA’s International Organizations division. With CIA money, funneled through the tax-free Ford Foundation, [1] Steinem set up the Independent Research Service (part of Meyer’s Congress for Cultural Freedom) in order to organize a trip for a group of students, scholars and others to the seventh postwar World Youth Festival to be held in Vienna in 1959. [2] One World Order proponent Zbigniew Brzezinski, then an assistant professor at Harvard, accompanied Steinem to Vienna at CIA expense. [3] Steinem’s feminist articles were published in Esquire and New York Magazine in the early 1960s through editor and publisher Clay Felker, another CIA asset. Her own monthly magazine Ms. Magazine, subsidized by Warner Communications, came out in the summer of 1972. The charismatic Steinem always had sufficient positive media coverage to perpetuate the globalist agenda which effectively implied and generated grassroots support. The feminist movement, a totally managed crisis, exploded into a viable vehicle which provoked competition and contention between the genders and deliberately wreaked havoc among families of every ethnic group.The result of “liberating” women constituted enforced labor cloaked as a unique privilege but was calculatingly designed to benefit the abundantly rich international bankers through additional income tax revenue. Women could then work full time in addition to responsibilities at home. Besides, two incomes, frequently necessitated by continuous and intentional Federal Reserve inflation, compel mothers to abandon their precious children to strangers at daycare centers where their vulnerable minds can be saturated. Nothing fills the emotional void of missing one’s mother in the formative years – not even the extra guilt gifts that two incomes might produce.

The Supreme Court ruled on Roe v. Wade on 22 January 1973, which wasn’t really about women’s reproductive rights. The once desperate and pregnant Norma McCorvey, alias Jane Roe, recently testified before Congress: “I am not a trained spokesperson, nor a judge, but I am a real person – a living human being who was supposed to be helped by my lawyers and the courts in Roe v. Wade. But instead, I believe that I was used and abused by the court system in America. Instead of helping women in Roe v. Wade, I brought destruction to me and millions of women throughout the nation.” … “My lawyers wanted to eliminate the right of society to protect women and children from abortionists.” [4] After Kinsey and the Supreme Court, abortion statistics predictably accelerated into a national crisis. Private decisions between a woman and her doctor were now under government jurisdiction.

There was a textbook censorship case in Kanawha County, West Virginia, which energized local religious groups. The Kanawha school board approved 325 books on March 12, 1974 which incensed members of the local Ku Klux Klan.[5] However, it was publicized as a concerned parents’ rights issue. The “problem” concerned specific books written by some African-American authors that described their inequitable status before the law as well as their typically substandard lifestyles. Heaven forbid that middle-class American children should discover the realities of the dismal lives of those less fortunate for lack of opportunity. Bootstrap success is only achievable on a level playing field.

Three religious leaders, Reverend Marvin Horan, Reverend Ezra Graley and Ed Miller, a self-proclaimed Klansman organized rallies and instigated parent disapproval and participation. Additionally, Reverend Horan was charged with attempting to blow up one of the schools. Reverend Ezra Graley, a liaison to the newly organized Heritage Foundation, worked closely with Miller and Horan. They sent James T. McKenna, the general counsel to the Heritage Foundation in the mid 1970s, to represent the protesters. Congressman Phillip Crane, also in concert with the Heritage Foundation, appealed to constituents for funds for the protesters. Reverend James Lewis, pastor of the Charleston Episcopal Church attempted to counter the protestors and later testified that Crane refused to say what the funds were used for. McKenna was able to obtain press coverage through the Washington Post. [6]

Well-placed individuals and well-financed tax-free foundations (501 (c) (3), like the Heritage Foundation, fund political activists and disseminate disinformation and misinformation via the corporate media and extensive bulk mailings to concerned, provoked subscribers who ultimately finance their own demise through their contributions. “The early 1970s were the worst of times, and the best of times in which to launch a conservative think tank in Washington, D.C. Conservative leaders and conservative ideas were out of public favor.” [7]

And because it was the worst of times for Americans – from the bra-burning rebellious sixties through the extensive casualties (58,000) and the massive debt of the Vietnam War which understandably created a lot of anti-war sentiment – particularly after many Americans discovered the devastating nature of the weapons used in Vietnam. Many POWs were left behind, abandoned by our own government. [8] All of the losses were without a constitutional declaration of war. Americans supposedly battled against international Communism. The only benefactors were Wall Street brokers and Johnson’s business cronies in Texas, California and Washington. That prolonged war took the life of about one million Vietnamese – whole villages were needlessly destroyed.

Then there was the 1972 break-in at the national Democratic Party headquarters at the Watergate. This fiasco led to the resignation of Richard Nixon on August 9, 1974. Nixon was the president who signed SALT I giving the Soviet Union nuclear parity with America. He also instituted wage and price controls and tried to implement such welfare proposals as the Family Assistance Plan. He proudly proclaimed, “I am now a Keynesian in economics.” Justifiable distrust of government was prevalent. Such circumstances, not happenstance by any means, created the perfect social climate for multitudes of good versus evil (thesis versus antithesis) bitter battles.

On August 7, 1974, Congressmen John J. Rhodes, minority leader of the House of Representatives, joined Senators Barry M. Goldwater and Hugh D. Scott to inform Nixon that impeachment was inevitable if he did not resign. That meeting followed the release of the Watergate cover-up tapes on June 23, 1972, which revealed Nixon’s involvement. Nixon antagonists welcomed the resignation.

Albert Harold Quie [9] and John J. Rhodes, members of The Fellowship, an influential exclusive society, visited Vice President Gerald Ford at a special prayer meeting on August 8, 1974, the day before Ford was sworn in as president. Interestingly, Ford’s Chief of Staff was Dick Cheney. His Defense Secretary was Donald Rumsfeld and George H. W. Bush served as Director of the CIA. The elite repeatedly resurface. Allegedly, Nixon resigned at the suggestion of the powerful Fellowship. Chuck Colson, a Fellowship member, invited Nixon to join them in an attempt to salvage his image but he wanted nothing to do with them. [10]

Americans had little trust in their government and felt vulnerable, disillusioned and betrayed, the perfect environment for the candidacy of the perceived kinder, gentler James Earl Carter, a born again Christian. [11] He was not the first president to invoke religious rhetoric, accompanied by a plethora of social and moral ills. The religion tactic would now be more effective in generating votes than in past generations. The great awakening of a formerly silent section of the electorate began to be heard. Political activity and dialogue emanated from a distinct Christian group which helped elect Jimmy Carter.

For decades, we have not really elected the candidates of our choice – we merely go through the charade of voting for the pre selected individuals that will do the diabolical bidding of the elite. “Late in 1972, W. Averell Harriman (known at that time as the ‘grand old man of the Democrats’), Establishment strategist and CFR member, told Milton Katz (CFR member), Director of International Studies at Harvard: ‘We’ve got to get off our high horses and look at some of those southern governors.’ Carter was mentioned, and Katz informed Rockefeller. Rockefeller had met with Carter in 1971, when they had lunch in the Chase Manhattan’s Board of Director’s dining room, and was impressed with the fact that Carter had opened trade offices for the state of Georgia in Tokyo.” [12]

Beginning in 1973 the Republican’s “Southern Strategy” was cultivated and nurtured by George H. W. Bush, the then recently-installed chairman of the Republican National Committee – complete with two assistants who would do whatever it took to further the agenda : Karl Rove and Lee Atwater. With the additional strength and unique fundraising skills of Pat Robertson, Jerry Falwell, Bob Jones, and other fundamentalist Christians the south fell into the welcome arms of the Republican Party.

Zbigniew Brzezinski, co-founder of the Trilateral Commission in 1973, along with David Rockefeller, said in an October 1973 speech: “The Democratic candidate will have to emphasize work, family, religion, and increasingly, patriotism, if he has any desire to be elected.” [13] “One of the commission’s primary goals was to place a Trilateral-influenced president in the White House in 1976, and to achieve that goal it was necessary to groom an appropriate candidate who would be willing to cooperate with trilateral aims.” [14] Carter had also attended an invitation-only Bilderberg meeting before his “election.” With assistance from the Establishment media [15] Carter, posing as an “outsider,” promised to clean up the mess in Washington. He stressed the very items that his mentor Brzezinski suggested: work, family, religion and patriotism. Carter’s religious convictions became a big part of his campaign.

Senator Barry M. Goldwater stated in his book With No Apologies: “This may cost me everything that I have, but I’ve got to get out an alert to the American people. The Trilateral Commission represents a skillfully coordinated effort to seize control and consolidate the four centers of power, political, monetary, intellectual, and ecclesiastical. What the Trilateralists intend is the creation of a world-wide economic power superior to the government of the nation states. In other words, what they are driving, orchestrating, meshing and gearing to accomplish is the New World Order, the one-world government.”

The 1976 election of the amiable Trilateralist (recommended for membership April 13, 1973) and CFR member Jimmy Carter, with all the appearances of a political anomaly, also had the right aptitude. To celebrate the Trilateral election, Carter was Time Magazine’s Man of the Year, January 3, 1977 (he also graced Time’s cover on July 26, 1976). Hedley Donovan, Time’s former Editor-in-Chief is a Trilateralist and a Rhodes Scholar. He was also Carter’s senior adviser on domestic affairs and media relations. “According to the Dektor Psychological Stress Evaluator, a lie detector which measures voice stress with an oscillograph, there was no stress in Carter’s voice when he lied, which would seem to indicate that he is a pathological liar.” [16] Imagine that, a politician that compulsively lies!

Zbigniew Brzezinski became Carter’s National Security Advisor and Cyrus Vance (nephew of John W. Davis, of the J. P. Morgan bank who was the first President of the CFR) was his Secretary of State. Foreign policy was clearly established and dictated by Brzezinski. Carter appointed dozens of CFR members [17] and about three dozen members [18] of the Trilateral Commission to the highest unelected offices in government. Many current officials also have connections and influence with the Trilateral Commission and the CFR.[19] From Carter on, each president has filled his administration with members of the CFR and the Trilateral Commission. The current president, Barack Obama, has filled his administration with members of the Trilateral Commission, a group determined to create a one-world economic system.

As soon as so-called conservative politicians realized that fundamentalists and other evangelicals might be encouraged to become more politically active and that it might be possible to mold political action to support Republican candidates, they provided financial resources to help create groups like the Moral Majority, the Christian Voice, and the Religious Roundtable in 1978 and 1979.” [20]

Leave it to the elite, with sufficient time to conspire, to orchestrate an election designed to manipulate America’s sleeping religious while implementing other nefarious objectives.

The movement known as the Religious Right did not suddenly emerge. New World Order proponents recognized that to fulfill their nefarious plans they would have to manipulate others to accomplish certain tasks – the destruction of the Republic and the Constitution via faulty interpretations, abuse and the lack of checks and balances, Executive Orders and other legally prohibited activities. To facilitate the objectives, individuals or organizations that Americans already trusted would be manipulated. Overt activities and obvious lies would never suffice. It would have to be subtle. As with Judas, someone familiar and nominally trustworthy would garner confidence. But half truths about genuine issues, combined with messages of hope and faith and a few lies, lead the passionate masses to accept the whole package. Useful idiots, knowledgeable minions or ego-driven, power-hungry individuals have always proven valuable to those attempting to establish the one world government.

Ostensibly the Religious Right is a social movement comprised mainly of evangelical Protestants, fundamentalist Christians and other conservatives who embrace the same religious goals and viewpoints regarding United States government policies. Allegedly the movement is not partisan. However, most participants are associated with the Republican Party. A cartoon character on the front cover of Sheldon Rampton and John Stauber’s book Banana Republicans says to the other: You’re either with the Republican Party – or you’re with the terrorists! There’s no middle ground! Don’t you agree? Despite claims to the contrary, GOP does not stand for God’s Own Party![1] A meaningful phrase about unity has been mangled and politicized to essentially evoke long-term support for war. Jesus said: “He that is not with me is against me; and he that gathereth not with me scattereth abroad.” [2]

Theological conservatism does not make an individual a member of the Religious Right. Up until about 1975, Christians, focusing on their own sins, typically avoided the corrupt world of politics but were persuaded that they have a civic, as well as a religious, responsibility to participate. Now there are hundreds of Religious Right groups of various sizes and visibility. Some concentrate on a single issue and derive their finances through fundraising efforts and are incorporated as 501 (c) 3 or 4. A tax exempt status of 501 (c) 3 prohibits political activity and candidate endorsement. To skirt that prohibition, some organizations create legal departments and house a stable of lobbyists to conduct those efforts. Interestingly, selective prosecution enables the government-friendly groups to participate and direct otherwise questionable activities. Conversely, anti-war preachers who vocalize their concerns jeopardize everything. Here are a few “approved” groups:

  • ·         Christian Coalition of America: Founded in 1989 by Pat Robertson. He resigned in 2001. There are 30 chapters throughout the country. Robertson also foundedOperation Blessing, a cover for other activities?
  • ·        American Center for Law and Justice: Founded by Pat Robertson in 1990. Jay Sekulow is their Executive Director and Chief Counsel.
  • ·        Citizens for Excellence in Education: Founded by Robert L. Simonds. Against the separation of church and state. They have nationwide chapters.
  • ·        Concerned Women for America (CWA): Founded in 1979 by Beverly LaHaye. 500 regional groups across the country. This group is against separation of church and state. LaHaye is a trustee of Falwell’s Liberty University. CWA supported the Nicaraguan Contras. [3]
  • ·        Coral Ridge Ministries (CRM): founded in 1974 by Rev. D. James Kennedy, an ardent opponent of separation of church and state. “CRM has the greatest number of TV station affiliates of any religious program in the U.S. Altogether, nearly 3 million people listen weekly to CRM programming on radio or television.” [4]
  • ·        Eagle Forum: Founded in 1972 by Phyllis Schlafly to oppose the Equal Rights Amendment. Eagle Forum Education and Legal Defense Fund, the Eagle Forum’s foundation. Affiliate Groups: The Eagle Forum Collegians, a network for conservative college students. The Eagle Forum PAC contributes to right-wing political campaigns.
  • ·        Focus on the Family: Founded in 1977 by Dr. James Dobson who is broadcast daily on more than 3,000 radio facilities in North America and other places and reaches over 200 million people every day. Dobson has been very influential in Republican Administrations as a “family” expert. Donald Paul Hodel, FOF’s President, is a former Reagan Administration official who served as U.S. Under Secretary of the Interior, U.S. Secretary of Energy, and U.S. Secretary of the Interior. He also served as the president of the Christian Coalition from 1997 to 1999.
  • ·        Family Research Council: This group, located in Washington DC, was founded in 1981 by Dr. James Dobson. It was originally headed by Gary Bauer. It is now headed by Tony Perkins. Their objective is to establish a conservative Christian standard of morality in all of America’s domestic and foreign policy.
  • ·        National Legal Foundation: Founded in 1985 by Pat Robertson and funded by Robertson’s Christian Broadcasting Network (no longer affiliated). “The mission of the National Legal Foundation is to prayerfully create and implement innovative strategies that, through decisive action, will cause America’s public policy and legal system to support and facilitate God’s purpose for her.” [5]
  • ·        American Family Association (AFA): founded in 1977 by Rev. Donald Wildmon, a United Methodist minister. The original name was the National Federation for Decency. The focus of this group is media criticism. Wildmon called for a shutdown of PBS. They also attempt to restrict businesses that do not discriminate against such things as homosexuality. They perpetuate misinformation regarding the separation of church and state. They have 100 employees and five full-time lawyers. The Center for Law and Policy is an AFA affiliate. They sell a variety of books on their web site.
  • ·        Traditional Values Coalition: The largest church-lobby in the United States Founded in 1980 by Rev. Louis Sheldon.  This group claims over 43,000 churches nationwide representing 12 denominations.
  • ·        Chalcedon: Founded by the late Rousas John Rushdoony, father-in-law of Gary North and the creator of an 800 page explanation of the Ten Commandments and their cultural application for today. It is the original, defining text of Reconstructionism. Reconstructionists pattern their strict theological ideologies after John Calvin. Calvinism is very elitist.

Many of the issues these groups have embraced have captured the attention of other religious congregations who share their concerns. However, their commonality is that they are absolutely and mistakenly hostile to separation of church and state. Most of the movement’s ambitious, charismatic leaders claim biblical inerrancy and actively call for a fundamentalist return to the Bible and seek to impose their far-right positions on everyone else through the political process. The skillful leaders emotionally marshal the masses through radio and television. They realize that their greatest success is in building bottom-up support. Rather than focus on the White House or Congress, they encourage participation in local politics. Any successful movement must begin in the local neighborhoods.

This mobilization did not alter their primary goals – influence court appointments, elections and government policy with regard to a variety of social issues: pro-life, pro-family, home-schooling, prayers in school, anti-gay, etc. Why would anyone question a pro-family stance? Focusing on other people’s sins draws attention away from our own. Hatred isn’t inherent; it is learned and institutionalized by otherwise good citizens. Abhorrence of sin is often transferred to the sinner generating bigotry and often violence – that same sort of violence that enables otherwise good people to engage in warfare and kill men, women and children, conveniently labeled as terrorists.

Prohibition did not diminish drunkenness any more than a marriage amendment will curb homosexuality. The merging of religion and politics, a lethal mixture, may produce a Taliban-like tyranny. Some religicrats are attempting to create a sinless society by imposing restrictive regulations. There is a certain attraction, for many, in contributing to a cause to affect some sort of a change. This appeal, accompanied by money, rarely changes individuals. Men rarely change from the outside in but rather from the inside out. Dutiful contributors might feel heart swells while increasingly wealthy recipients shield their elite positions in tax exempt foundations. The best way for responsible individuals to make a difference in society is best accomplished by living honest, respectful lives and teaching their children respect and integrity, rare characteristics.

The implementation of legalized abortion set up the perfect environment for thousands of outraged Christians to be manipulated into thinking they could fight this moral monstrosity which a deliberately stacked Supreme Court passed. The Constitution guarantees life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Therefore the government has an obligation to protect the most vulnerable of all its citizens – the children. The planners orchestrated a divisive situation and, great during campaigns but forgotten after every election. The phrase, “freedom of choice” is a deadly misnomer.

The thoughts of our own sweet children produce outrage towards abortion, bringing moral people, easy targets, into a movement they may otherwise not comfortably join. Christians understand that aborted, martyred children return, in glory, to God. The blood of the innocent shall stand as a witness against the perpetrators. Even influential bystanders often cannot intercede in behalf of the innocent. These precious children are often discarded in the same violent manner that Christ was. However, God, not individuals, will judge all circumstances. Abortion will always exist despite big contributions and efforts to anti-abortion groups. One on one, we might inspire better choices. Mass opposition, often accompanied by violence, does not typically succeed. What is the ultimate goal of this or any other social movement?

Many feel that the single greatest threat to church-state separation in America is the movement known as the Religious Right. Organizations and leaders representing this religio-political crusade seek to impose a fundamentalist Christian viewpoint on all Americans through government action. [6] Righteousness cannot be enforced by government.

“Religious liberty and separation of church and state are the cornerstones of the American way of life. The Framers of the Constitution designed the First Amendment’s religion clauses to embrace two key concepts: the government will not endorse or oppose any particular religious viewpoint (or religion generally), and will not interfere with the right of citizens to practice their faith. As Thomas Jefferson put it, the American people created a ‘wall of separation between church and state.’” [7] The word “separation” is not mentioned in the Constitution but is allude to in the First Amendment. A thorough reading of the founding documents and the application of common sense should prevail.

Cultural conservatism has been the goal of the Neo-Right since the Reagan years. Americans witnessed the birth of a bevy of highly visible Religious Right preachers with a similar agenda. By 1990 the Free Congress Foundation, a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization founded in July 1974 by Paul Weyrich and Joseph Coors, had both sufficient members and money to target and defeat opponents at will. Chairman Paul Weyrich’s agenda as stated in Dallas in August 1980: “We are talking about Christianizing America. We are talking about simply spreading the gospel in a political context.” This sounds like a lofty, benign goal unless you evaluate exactly which brand of Christianity, among the many denominations, he is promoting. And what if you are not Christian?

When a government accepts and promotes one religion over another and adjusts laws to accommodate that religion, they are interfering with the most basic human right: to worship or not worship God according to one’s own conscience. The Savior did not work through the government to compel individual righteousness. His disciples did not engage lobbyists to travel to Rome to financially reward acquiescent government officials in order to force people to stop committing sin. His disciples did not procure armor and horses and preemptively attack the “evil axis” of their day. They did not encourage their version of our CIA to assassinate non compliant foreign leaders.

His message was a message of peace even to the point of turning the other cheek. Have you personally ever done that? It works – loving your enemy changes his or her heart. Praying for our enemy changes our heart. Religion is feeding the hungry, clothing the naked and visiting the sick. Charitable contributions should benefit individuals who have authentic needs. We shall always have the poor among us. It is up to religious leaders to inspire individuals to keep the commandments according to denominational ideals and principles; if Christian, then follow Him. Rather than focus on the many evils of society, we must each focus on our own sins. We all have them – it is just a matter of degree. I believe in a just God who takes our individual circumstances into account. The proper path to redemption does not require a political trip to Rome or Capital Hill. One begins the genuine journey with a broken heart, humble self-evaluation, repentance, personal obedience, and love of all others. This ultimately brings us peace and leads us to God.

Despite the guarantees of the First Amendment, America is one of the most propagandized countries on the planet due to government regulation, deregulation, selective licensing, discriminatory editing, substantial money from ideology-minded, tax exempt foundations, accelerated, unwarranted promotion of slanted print material, biased partisanship and network privatization. Freedom of the press (any and all media) could easily be redefined: the organizations, corporate, religious or government that maintain any degree of control over America’s information sources have unlimited freedom to willfully indoctrinate or distort our perceptions. As a result, Orwell’s 1984 has become our reality, with its massive “newspeak” vernacular fully functional.

In the last four or more decades, through character assassination, disinformation, misinformation, lack of objectivity, lack of reasonable dissent, deliberate omissions and downright dishonesty, the entire country has been culturally moved to the far right without so much as a whimper. Conservatives and their Religious Right colleagues seized control of the media while claiming they have no voice. One of their ignoble tactics is their unsubstantiated declaration of liberal bias – significantly hyped by checkbook journalists with such titles as Bias: A CBS Insider Exposes How the Media Distort the News, Liberalism is a Mental Disorder, Persecution, How Liberals Are Waging War Against Christians, Godless: The Church of Liberalism, and  Slander.

Liberalism, once the champion of social justice, is intentionally and aggressively associated with every contemptible, evil aspect of American culture. As a consequence, most individuals are anxious to be defined as conservative which, under the last administration, should be subject to scrutinizing interpretation. Distracted, polarized, lemming-like citizens have been brainwashed, propagandized and ultimately victimized into believing whatever the compromised corporate media dishes out. Too busy watching reality TV, many overlook reality. The masses accept the misinformation about poor suppressed, silenced conservatives because, they contend, how could dozens of claimants be wrong?

Ironically, leaders of the Religious Right, also very visible and vocal, claim media and public censorship of religion and religious phrases and words despite a vast multitude of Christian broadcasters. They are quick to cry bias and just as speedy in demanding additional censorship for those they disagree with by targeting advertisers.

The Trinity Broadcasting Network was founded by Dr. Paul Crouch Sr. and the Christian Broadcasting Network was created by Pat Robertson in 1960. It has had a long and diversehistory. Their trade organization is the National Religious Broadcasters Association which boasts 1600 members who disseminate their messages through radio, television, and the Internet. They claim to reach 141 million listeners and viewers.  Many of these same 1600 entities publish books, email newsletters and magazines. They also maintain substantial snail-mail databases through which they accrue financial pledges, amass huge amounts of cash and disseminate information and political recommendations. Read this very enlightening essay on this organization.

Unfortunately, according to Pew, 30 percent of all Americans obtain their news from talk radio and cable television – many never open a book. A large percentage get their “news” from the Fox Network whose employees receive the morning memo, a directive on how to spin the “news” of the day. Roger Ailes, autocratic president of Fox News, has a throng of “journalists” and guests who push right-wing propaganda disguised as news. They are notorious in their attacks on dissenting opinions. On other stations, people are frequently fired for divulging embarrassing facts. Others censor themselves in order to retain their jobs.

Despite his claim, Bill O’Reilly is not looking out for you; he is looking out for himself while making boatloads of money. In this regard, he is not unique among the Fox personalities, except for his notorious belligerent arrogance. While Fox, owned by Rupert Murdoch, appears to be the most right of center, many stations now promulgate the same government misinformation while demonizing any dissenters. Bill Kristol’s (PNAC*) Weekly Standard, established in 1995, was assisted by a $3 million annual subsidy from Murdoch. [1] Fox Network, experiencing wide viewer acceptance and financial success, has set the standard for other networks. Party propaganda is passed off as news on this alleged “fair and balanced” cable channel. They decide what to report and what to conceal. Don’t rely on news reports to form your opinions of the world or other people.

Obedience-trained Americans, aptly conditioned, often write letters to networks or newspapers that reveal unpleasant facts. Citizens don’t want to know about all the un-American activities that our government initiates in our country or in other countries. So obviously, with a see-no-evil, hear-no-evil mentality, the disobedient but objective journalist is erroneously considered treasonous, unpatriotic, or even worthy of incarceration. Just ask Peter Arnett! The Pentagon pressured CNN regarding Arnett’s enlightening segment entitled “Valley of Death” which revealed Operation Tailwind.

It is the job of the press to censure the government, not the other way around. The press has a watchdog responsibility: “A variety of court opinions have found that the press has an important function as a guardian of democracy and as a check upon governmental abuse. U.S. Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black perhaps best summarized this vital theme of American constitutional law in his final concurring opinion in the 1971 ‘Pentagon Papers’ case: The government’s power to censor the press was abolished so that the press would remain forever free to censure the Government. The press was protected so that it could bare the secrets of government and inform the people.” [2]

“The courts have rejected most attempts by the government to impose prior censorship. The best-known recent example of such a government attempt was the Nixon administration’s call for a permanent injunction against publication of the “Pentagon Papers” by The New York Times and The Washington Post, based on the claim that publication of the highly classified documents on the history of U. S. involvement in Vietnam would cause grave damage to the United States. In a 6-3 vote, the Supreme Court determined that the government failed to meet the “heavy burden of showing justification of such a restraint.” [3]

On the other hand, profanity, sexual innuendos and graphic portrayals masquerade as entertainment. Sex, an unfortunate selling point, pervades every aspect of our lives. Family-friendly shows disappeared and were replaced with “adult” programming. Many people were initially shocked. First we abhorred the the so-called entertainment, then we tolerated it and ultimately many have embraced what the networks daily dish out. Cultural tolerance establishes the real standards of programming integrity. People actually watch this rubbish which has incrementally descended from mildly offensive to outright vulgarity. Our “entertainment” reflects our own and the nation’s morality.

Most parents, Democrat or Republican, are justifiably alarmed and concerned for their children. As a result, we are anxiously amenable; we even request and embrace additional censorship laws to protect us from the vileness that pervades the corporate-owned airways. However, we already have federal laws, albeit infrequently enforced, that should suffice.[4] We do not need, nor should we desire, increased censorship but rather enforcement of existing decency standards. Stations have a public, moral responsibility that should supersede financial opportunities. Moreover, parents should supervise their children, and themselves, and not abdicate that responsibility to the government. Ideally, we chose our entertainment – no one forces morally destitute garbage upon the sanctity of our homes.

When broadcast radio began in November 1920, the airwave spectrum, according to official government theory, was in short supply. As a consequence, they determined that it was necessary to license and regulate the use of this public commodity. Obviously, anyone with a political or religious philosophy, product or service wanted airtime. Consequently, by 1922 there were 576 stations licensed by the Secretary of Commerce, Herbert Hoover. By 1925 there were sixty-three stations owned by churches or religious groups. [5] The Department of Commerce sponsored a series of conferences for major broadcasters. At the first meeting, a Westinghouse representative complained to Hoover that certain inferior stations, according to him, lacked substance and recommended that only preferred people be allowed to broadcast with a national limit of 12-15 stations. [6]

The Radio Act of 1927 established the Federal Radio Commission (FRC) which later became the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). In 1929 a set of guidelines known asGreat Lakes Broadcasting Co., apparently based on an acquisition by NBC, was issued by the FRC. Accordingly, a station was to accommodate the “tastes, needs and desires of all substantial groups among the listening public…in some fair proportion, by a well-rounded program, in which entertainment, consisting of music of both classical and lighter grades, religion, education and instruction, important public events, discussions of public questions, weather, market reports, and news, and matters of interest to all members of the family.”[7]

According to the official government story, regulation of some kind was essential due to a barrage of signal interference. Selectively licensing broadcasters solved the dilemma of allocating the alleged limited amount of airwave frequency. Government regulations, regardless of public airwave ownership, surely stifle the free dissemination of ideas in an open marketplace. The airwaves were defined as public property and put under the guardianship of the Commission especially selected by the government. [8]

Possible partisan or religious bias of both broadcasters and government-appointed commissioners was obviously an issue. “The station itself must be operated as if owned by the public….It is as if people of a community should own a station and turn it over to the best man in sight with this injunction: ‘Manage this station in our interest…’ The standing of every station is determined by that conception.” [9] Broadcasters began acting as public trustees and communities apparently made certain naïve assumptions that this charge would never be violated. See this page for a comprehensive discussion about the political ramifications of broadcast policy.

The Communications Act of 1934 [10] established the regulatory Federal Communications Commission (FCC) which began operating on July 11, 1934 with seven commissioners appointed by the President, and confirmed by the Senate. This was changed to five in 1983. [11]

In 1942 the National Association of Evangelicals (NAE) was created by conservative evangelicals to raise awareness against those who they felt had abandoned the true gospel of Jesus Christ. “In 1944, the NAE formed the National Religious Broadcasters (NRB), whose goals were more specific to safeguarding access for its conservative evangelical membership to the airwaves, in addition to providing protection from competition with liberal denominational broadcasters and the United States government.” [12]

License renewals depended on compliance to FCC regulations. However, policy changes occurred in 1960 which allowed TV stations to sell additional airtime to religious broadcasters which appeared to fulfill the station’s public interest obligation. So, even more Televangelists began to fill the airwaves as well as their portfolios. Why preach and pass the plate to limited weekly congregations when one could captivate the spiritually starved multitudes willing to commit to monthly financial pledges for legitimate in addition to contrived causes that never culminate with any degree of measurable success.

The National Religious Broadcasters maintains that it regulates its broadcasters and views government regulation as interference. A congressional committee was convened to question the practices and behavior of many broadcasters but it was squelched. “When called before the oversight committee of the House Ways and Means Committee in October 1987, several of the nation’s leading religious broadcasters told Congressman J. J. Pickle (D-Tex.) and his colleagues that they were quite capable of regulating themselves.” [13]

The Fairness Doctrine, adopted by the FCC in 1949, reiterated the earlier policies that directed station licensees to provide ample opportunity for diversity and opposing opinions. As a result, licensees, under the auspices of the Fairness Doctrine, agreed to devote adequate airtime to concerns of public interest and to transmit conflicting opinions about those issues. “They must allow all points of view. That requirement was to be enforced by FCC mandate.” [14] President Kennedy invoked the Fairness Doctrine to challenge the imbalanced right-wing presentations of biased broadcasters. [15]

Mark S. Fowler, a communications lawyer appointed to head the FCC by President Ronald Reagan, aggressively opposed the Fairness Doctrine as well as the First Amendment. “He set about pruning, chopping, slashing, eliminating, burying and deep-sixing fifty years of regulations that guarded against monopolistic practices and excessive commercialism and protected the public interest standard.” [16]

There were some on the right who had manipulated the Fairness Doctrine in order to inculcate right-wing ideology into the media. Phyllis Schlafly, a Reagan revolution promoter, favored its retention but she was out-maneuvered by people like Terry Dolan. He was the co-founder and national chairman of the 300,000 – member National Conservative Political Action Committee (NCPAC) and organized and headed the Conservative Alliance (CALL). In 1984 NCPAC received $775,000 from Rev. Moon, a foreign entity. Dolan stated that the secret of fundraising, used to target opponents, is to “make them angry and stir up hostilities.” “The shriller you are, the easier it is to raise funds. That’s the nature of the beast.”[17] He raised 7.6 million in 1979-1980 and spent 3.3 million targeting Democratic senators. [18] “Most of the $1 million NCPAC spent on independent expenditures during the 1980 Senate races financed attack ads against incumbents. A NCPAC target could face as many as 72 negative radio ads a day and 200 television commercials per week, well before the election.” [19]

Billionaire Richard Mellon Scaife, heir to the Mellon banking, oil, and aluminum fortune, finances many right-wing activities through his organization Landmark Legal Foundationwhich was set up to influence education and attack EPA regulations. Scaife also used this foundation to challenge the constitutionality of the Fairness Doctrine. The Heritage Foundation, conservative right-wing think tank, also supported repeal. [20] The Landmark Legal Foundation receives donations from the Sarah Scaife Foundation, Scaife-funded Carthage Foundation, Castle Rock Foundation, and the John M. Olin foundation. Exxon Mobil has also made donations. [21]

The Fairness Doctrine, along with diversity, fairness, equal time and objectivity was rescinded in 1987. Television and radio stations were no longer required to present both sides of important or controversial issues nor give equal time to candidates. [22] Objectivity was replaced by opposition to anything contradictory to the party line. Apparently this mentality also applied to religion. The majority of all religious programs may be classified as conservative evangelical. Most, despite denomination, appear Republican-friendly. However, it is important to remember that the Religious Right does not represent every evangelical or every Christian.

The Religious Right merged with the conservative movement after the Communist boogeyman was vanquished and then, because of sheer numbers, ultimately began dictating Republican Party policy. This also includes discontinuing government funding to secular groups in favor of Religious Right groups. Right-wing fundamentalists, with a great network of committed members, were primed to take on society’s demons and clean up the country. The pious conservative crusade, accelerated in the last twenty five years, is often driven by bigotry, social intolerance and fanaticism under the umbrella of traditional values and a perverted interpretation of compassion. Cleaning the inner vessel has given way to cleaning up the whole country through government intervention.

It is difficult to perceive where the influence of the Religious Right ends and the Republican Party begins. Are the blind leading the blind in this symbiotic relationship? Falwell, now deceased, and Robertson both blamed liberalism for the events of 9/11, almost before the towers fell. However, it didn’t take too long before the Religious Right focused their antagonism at Islam, the new “axis of evil.” Franklin Graham, who led Bush’s inaugural prayer, denounced Islam on television as “a very evil and wicked religion.” Reverend Jerry Vines, a past president of the Southern Baptist Convention, which had strong ties to the Bush administration, called the Muslim prophet Muhammad a “demon-obsessed pedophile.” These remarks were widely reported in the Arab press but somehow failed to make the “fair and balanced” Fox News. [23] No wonder 70% of evangelical leaders assume that Islam is a “religion of violence.” Given the number of Iraqi deaths since Christian America’s invasion, it would appear that Christians are the most violent.

America has approximately 2,000 denominations – Christians, Jews, Hindus, Buddhists, Muslims, Atheists and others. America is also full of sin. In political planning, particularly among the secret society elite, nothing is coincidental. The prevalence of sin would easily pave the way for the merging of religion and government. Politico-religionist activists, assuming the moral high road, are attempting to redeem America through government regulation while trashing the just law of the land – the Constitution, a secular document meant to protect each individual regardless of religious status.

*Project for a New American Century

Maneuvering the religious feelings of others to enhance one’s political career or influence voter acceptance is certainly not a new device. Hypocritically manipulating votersfor any ulterior motive is an egregious yet common practice. However, integrity is not a characteristic that we usually attribute to politicians – despite personal claims of religiosity. In fact, such claims should immediately arouse suspicion. Political rhetoric is professionally contrived to evoke emotion and support. After an election, when power reveals character, actions define motives more than campaign rhetoric as officials continue to solicit support for self aggrandizing programs that function in favor of the power elite, alias big contributors, while falsely promising benefits to the populace. If one will not uphold their oath to the Constitution which includes the phrase “so help me God,” why would we expect him or her to honor promises to their constituents – mere strangers at best?

A candidate’s religiosity should not play any part in the election or appointment process. George W. Bush asserts that he is a Christian. Whether he is sincere or not is insignificant unless he makes domestic or foreign relations decisions based on his ideology. Apparently his conversion was a direct result of his attempts to save his marriagefrom the effects of his habitual drinking. Did Bush’s new Christian piety replace his allegiance to Skull and Bones, the same secretive order that his father and grandfather had embraced? If we are to evaluate a tree by its fruit then what can we surmise from Bush’s actions? Are preemptive wars that have killed thousands of men, women and children compatible with Christianity? How about the death penalty? Do tax breaks for the wealthy fulfill Christ’s admonition to “feed the hungry and clothe the naked?” True Christianity is not just rhetoric but Christ-like behavior. Thomas Jefferson stated: “It is in our lives and not in our words that our religion must be read.” [1]

Genuine religion is a personal matter between an individual and God, not a contrivance to capture constituency support. Some presidential candidates have rightfully regarded religious preferences as personal. John F. Kennedy said: “I believe in a president whose views on religion are his own private affair, neither imposed upon him by the nation or imposed by the nation upon him as a condition to holding that office.” [2] Kennedy told the Greater Houston Ministerial Association: “I do not speak for my church on public matters and the church does not speak for me.” He reminded the religious group that other faiths had experienced intolerance in the past and could again. “Today, I may be the victim, but tomorrow it may be you.” [3]

George Washington wrote: “I have often expressed my sentiments, that every man, conducting himself as a good citizen, and being accountable to God alone for his religious opinions, ought to be protected in worshipping the Deity according to the dictates of his own conscience.” [4]

Thomas Jefferson wrote only one book, Notes on Virginia, which clarifies his opinions about religious freedom. In a letter to Benjamin Rush, he said “Religion is a subject on which I have ever been most scrupulously reserved.” Further, he stated “I have considered it as a matter between every man and his Maker, in which no other, and far less the public, had a right to intermeddle.” [5]

There should never be a religious litmus test for any political or appointed office. Article Six states: “but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.” [6] According to Bush, so-called activist leftist judges would not be appointed because he, contrary to Article 6 of the Constitution,[7] said the following: “I believe that it points up the fact that we need common sense judges who understand that our rights were derived from God. Those are the kind of judges I intend to put on the bench.” [8] Technically our “rights” were determined by constitutional law or more precisely by the court’s interpretation of that constitutional law.

A litmus test on abortion is a deceptive, distractive, “horse already out of the barn” false carrot instigated for the majority of Americans who view this practice as abominable. Roe versus Wade was passed by 7 out of 9 judges based on a faulty interpretation of a document that guarantees life, liberty and happiness for every citizen. Abortion was deliberately legalized by a stacked court as a divisive, “divide and conquer” tactic. New Right political strategists turned abortion into an issue that energized the Religious Right into a mass movement. It brought people together, Protestants and Catholics, who had never before participated in politics. The images of dead babies propelled new political activists to evaluate other issues and ultimately mobilized and utilized them to facilitate the whole right-wing agenda. [9]

Both men and women want abortion repealed – enough citizens who will gladly endorse candidates who employ right-wing rhetoric regarding abortion. Candidate acceptance on that one issue cements voter approval despite questionable history, secret society affiliation, and other problematic issues. We idealistically elect candidates or approve of officials who portray themselves as anti-abortion but who eagerly, for self-promoting motives, vote against the Constitution in dozens of other vital issues such as CAFTA, the formation of the North American Community, suspension of the Geneva Conventions, acquiescing to preemptive war and other life-changing, Bill of Rights slashing issues. Naïve Americans put all their eggs into the abortion or marriage amendment basket – two moral issues that we have no ability to change or control no matter how many donations we make to organizations or political candidates who manipulate those issues for huge financial gains. There is no comprehensive litmus test to cover all of the evil designs that are created in the secret society board rooms of the financial elite.

Karl Rove, a long-time Bush operative, counseled Bush in his 1978 run for a Texas congressional seat. Still around in 2004, Rove, the evil genius, political attack strategist, advised the candidate to endorse a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage. It was a political device designed to draw additional conservative votes. Religious leaders could then urge their parishioners to support this “compassionate conservative” who understood their moral concerns.

The very vocal, government-approved Christian Right has opposed civil rights for homosexuals for the last three decades. James Dobson claims that homosexuality undermines our entire society and is hurtling us towards Sodom and Gomorrah. What next – yellow insignias to define specific citizens not worthy of civil rights? One group should not exercise so much influence! Yet they seek to strip the rights of unpopular cultural minorities by pressuring the government. They send out tons of direct-mail appeals, employ voter blackmail against public officials (who should represent everyone) and have the means to employ expensive lobbyists.

It is more than just a matter of same-sex marriage. They could just as well have proposed an amendment against infidelity but that would have embarrassed a myriad of politicians who, only after being discovered, confess their indiscretions. The whole issue became more important with the passage of same-sex marriage in Massachusetts in 2003. Currently, in many states it is legal to fire an individual discovered to be gay, despite their job performance. Landlords may evict or refuse to rent to homosexual individuals. Laws have been enacted in some localities that ban such discrimination. The Christian Right opposes these antidiscrimination laws. [10]

Despite anyone’s feelings about homosexuality, no one should be targeted because of their personal moral decisions. Our rarely-read founding documents guarantee life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness for everyone – including gays and lesbians. A government regulation that seeks to control our God-given agency in order to prevent certain behaviors is a satanical tyranny. The federal government does not have the constitutional authority to impose a moral code on the masses no matter how morally-depleted society has become.

To cement Bush’s Christian image, an alleged “documentary” was “independently” produced by Grizzly Adams Productions Inc. to counter Michael Moore’s anti-war movie Fahrenheit 9/11, which was released October 5, 2004. Supposedly, according to the introduction, this right-wing film was produced without involvement from Bush or his handlers. [11] This purportedly inspirational film, George W. Bush: Faith in the White House was loosely based on two books: Tom Freiling’s George W. Bush: on God and Country and David Aikman’s A Man of Faith: The Spiritual Journey of George W. Bush. It became available in Christian bookstores by August 30, 2004, just in time for the Republican convention in New York, and in mainstream stores by October 5, 2004. It was marketed for $14.95 but they freely distributed the DVD to as many as 300,000 churches, a very small expenditure considering the value of such a political endorsement. No one in this documentary acknowledged the constitutional boundary between church and state or the tax-exempt issue. [12] Interestingly, the churches that showed this film were not threatened by the IRS. What about churches that express anti-war sentiments?

When evangelical property developer and FITWH executive producer Ted Beckett was asked about the problems in the Middle East he replied, “I see it basically as a conflict between Christians and the religion of Islam, which is a religion of hate.” That statement sets the tone of the piece which reinforces the Bush theory that it’s best to rule unquestioningly from the Mouth of God.” [13]

Some Christian conservatives attended an invitation-only, no-press-allowed “Family, Faith and Freedom Rally,” on August 31, 2004 brought about by the efforts of Ralph Reed, former Christian Coalition Director, and Senator Sam Brownback as part of the Bush campaign. Brownback told the crowd: “We must win this culture war.” He also condemned same-sex marriage, abortion and criticized the principle of separation of church and state. [14]

Not content to merely return their man to the White House, after the 2004 election Focus on the Family warned their supporters, the “values voters,” about the grave “moral issues” and the activist judges that continue to put our nation in peril. In an email to their supporters Focus on the Family said: “The future of our nation is still in danger. We must be careful to not only protect what has been won, but move forward aggressively, pressing for the pro-family, pro-life and pro-mortality agenda we believe in. In other words, we must strike while the iron is hot.” [15] Many of the questionable judges were, in fact, appointed by Republicans but this exaggerated issue creates a viable diversion for right-wing activists and the complicit media.

“According to Time magazine, after Bush’s re-election, a group of evangelicals, known as “The Arlington Group,” wrote Karl Rove a letter signed by former presidential candidate Gary Bauer, Don Wildmon, Focus on the Family’s James Dobson, Paul Weyrich and Jerry Falwell demanding that Bush not waver and support a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage. Rove is credited with turning out millions of fundamentalist voters in the 2004 presidential election. Rove also managed to turn out hundreds, if not thousands, of evangelical and fundamentalist election ‘fixers,’ who ensured that Democratic votes were suppressed, miscounted, undercounted, discounted, and not counted.” [16]

Several Catholic field coordinators were hired by the Republic National Committee to visit Catholic churches to urge support for George W. Bush. This is certainly counter to the First Amendment as well as IRS tax exempt policies. During a visit to Pope John Paul II, Bush’s top aids asked the pope’s advisors to push pressure on American bishops to become ensconced in politics and involved in cultural issues during the impending reelection campaign. [17]

Stylishly suited political candidates hire Madison Avenue type media advisors, speech writers and even religious advisors to properly package themselves for voter acceptance. George W. Bush hired David Barton as a religious advisor during his 2004 campaign. Barton, a dedicated history revisionist spin master, is also a well-known opponent of the religious clauses of separation of church and state contained in the First Amendment. [18] Barton was the vice-chair of the Texas Republican Party. George W. is certainly not the first to employ a religious advisor – his father used the same tactics for the same objectives.

Perception management is crucial on the campaign trail where winning is everything. He managed the move to the White House – twice. How has that elite “victory” impacted the civil and religious freedoms of other Americans?

Presidential candidate George H. W. Bush hired evangelist Doug Wead, a divorced Assemblies of God preacher as a consultant in order to “galvanize the Religious Right.”[1] Wead helped prepare Bush by acting out the part of televangelist Pat Robertson in a months-long series of exhaustively researched and well-financed mock presidential debates. [2] He coached the elder Bush on evangel-speak to help him connect with Christian fundamentalists.

A little more than a decade later, George W. Bush, already proficient in evangel-lingo, also hired Wead, the consultant. Evangelicals immediately recognize Bush as a professed “born-again Christian.” [3] Wead, unbeknownst to Bush, taped many of their telephone conversations over a two year period of time. “The conversations spend much time on Bush’s religious beliefs and his courting of the evangelical right.” [4]

After Bush had become president he told Richard Land, president of the Southern Baptist Convention Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission, “God wanted me to be president.” [5] Post election, Bush’s propagandists, like David Frum, could employ phrases like “axis of evil” for Bush’s State of the Union address on January 29, 2002.[6] It was sweet to the ears of his Religious Right constituency. Bush is surrounded by theocon handlers like Frum, author of The Right Man: The Surprise Presidency of George W. Bush. Chapter one opens with “Missed you at Bible study.” Frum co-authored An End To Evil: What’s Next in the War on Terror with Project for a New American Century (PNAC) charter member Richard Perle. Frum, like other Bush associates, has the perfect credentials – he was a senior fellow at the foundation-financed right-wing Manhattan Institute for Public Policy Research from 1995 to 2001. [7]

Bush’s first use of the word “crusade” was five days after 9/11 and divulged his Christian Zionist mentality. He said: “This is a new kind of — a new kind of evil.  And we understand.  And the American people are beginning to understand. This crusade, this war on terrorism is going to take a while.” [8] This fallacious war on terror did not start with 9/11. Bush’s crusade, the Iraqi Invasion, was repackaged and expensively sold as Operation Iraqi Liberation and then Operation Iraqi Freedom. The benign words “liberation” and “freedom” are Orwellian 1984 “newspeak” used to deceptively evoke support for long term warfare. Bush recently discontinued using the ambiguous phrase “stay the course.” He was asked its meaning at a news conference on Oct. 11 but refused to be pinned down. [9]

“Stay the course means keep doing what you’re doing,” he said. “My attitude is, don’t do what you’re doing if it’s not working; change.” [10]

He added: “Stay the course also means don’t leave before the job is done. And that’s — we’re going to get the job done in Iraq. And it’s important that we do get the job done in Iraq.” [11] And what job is that – the establishment of permanent military bases on one of the earth’s biggest oil fields?

With continuous support from distinctive Christian theocons, Bush professes that the Iraqi quagmire is a “good versus evil” crusade and that he is on God’s errand. On June 4, 2003, Bush reportedly said: “God told me to strike at al-Qaeda and I struck them, and then he instructed me to strike at Saddam, which I did, and now I am determined to solve the problem in the Middle East.” [12] He doesn’t mention that al-Qaeda and Saddam were both established and financed by the CIA. Nor does he acknowledge that monstrous sums of taxpayer dollars are pumping up administration-friendly companies who make millions of dollars as a result of the Iraqi invasion. Claiming that God approves of the horrific death toll and continuing violence against non threatening foreign citizens is a shameful effort to cover the stench of death emanating from theMiddle East.

James Robison, the televangelist, met with Karl Rove and Governor George Bush who told him: “I feel like God wants me to run for president.” … “I can’t explain it, but I sense my country is going to need me. I know it won’t be easy, on me or my family, but God wants me to do it.” Robison set up a meeting with a group of major Pentecostal and Southern Baptist preachers who gathered around Governor Bush to lay hands on him. At another meeting “one pastor led a prayer asking God to ‘put the mantle of a champion’ on Bush.” [13]

You define a tree by its fruit. George Bush invaded Iraq without just provocation despite his claims: “See, free nations are peaceful nations. Free nations don’t attack each other. Free nations don’t develop weapons of mass destruction.” [14] America, a “free” nation, manufactures the majority of the world’s weapons, even those used against our own military during warfare. America, a “free” nation, invaded Iraq. According to Bush’s prerequisites, are we peaceful, are we free?

Laura Bush, revising history, claimed: “No American President ever wants to go to war. Abraham Lincoln didn’t want to go to war, but he knew saving the union required it. Franklin Roosevelt didn’t want to go to war—but he knew defeating tyranny demanded it. And my husband didn’t want to go to war, but he knew the safety and security of America and the world depended on it.” [15]  Humanitarian justifications are always used by the privileged elite, before or after the assault, to gain sympathetic support and to recruit canon fodder.

George W. Bush repeatedly claims that he has a direct pipeline to God. When discussing the imminent Iraqi invasion with Pat Robertson, “Bush insisted that he had a more direct pipeline to God than the pope!” [16] In 2003, Bush appeared before a cheering crowd at a Dallas Christian Youth Centre and told them about being “born again.” Behind him were two banners: “King of Kings,” and the other declared “Lord of Lords.” “The symbolism of how fervent Christianity has become deeply entwined with the most powerful man on the planet could not have been stronger.” [17]

This highly effective visual prepared for the impressionable is similar to the cleverly maneuvered “Mission Accomplished” exploitation on the correctly re-positioned USS Abraham Lincoln (minus San Diego in the background) when he gave a speech May 1, 2003. [18] The USS Abraham Lincoln and its sailors waited offshore for hours instead of heading into port after its 10-month voyage. Or, how about staged publicity production with the troops as props at Fort BraggVisual manipulation appears to be a tactic employed by the best of the Bush handlers, genius Karl Rove, “one of the most brilliant political operatives ever.” [19]

In addition to using religion, “Rove re-packaged Bush as a brand. Instead of a Yale graduate who was scion of a blue-blood Connecticut family, Bush was presented as a straight-shooting Texan. Instead of showing off his 10,000 square-foot house on an estate that is larger than the Kennedy and Kerry compounds combined, Bush told everyone he lived on a ranch. Instead of defending his being the only presidential candidate ever convicted of a felony (drunk driving), Bush shifted the debate to President Clinton’s adultery. While hobnobbing with Enron CEO Ken Lay, indicted Tom DeLay and influence-peddler Jack Abramoff, who has pled guilty to bribery of top government officials, Bush adroitly ‘positioned’ himself as a drugstore, truck-driving man.” [20]

“According to the General Accounting Office (GAO), Bush spends more than four times on PR than any of his predecessors. His PR department has twice as many employees as the Clinton administration. Public relations agency Ketchum was paid more than $1 million in taxpayer funds to produce video PR releases designed to look like news reports. The Bush administration used $240,000 of taxpayer money to pay conservative commentator Armstrong Williams to promote Bush’s education policies.”[21]

It is all about perception management and Bush’s expensive PR team will use any issue and spend any amount to create the right facade. Bush is a multi-faceted international bank puppet who functions according to any given situation or congregation, Jewish[22] or Christian.

“Religion is the most dangerous energy source known to humankind. The moment a person (or government or religion or organization) is convinced that God is either ordering or sanctioning a cause or project, anything goes. The history, worldwide, of religion-fueled hate, killing, and oppression is staggering.” [23]

“Religious crusades are often counterproductive; they tend to end up in unsustainable occupations of people who — surprise! — believe they have their own pipeline to the Almighty.” [24] Three years plus after the American invasion of Iraq, Americans are still dying along with thousands of Iraqis in a war purportedly against terror. Iran is also in the cross hairs. [25] The only benefactors are HalliburtonKBRBlackwaterCaci and L3Titan who are stepping over bodies to pick up dollars.

Jerry Falwell, the religious leader of a 501C3 organization, endorsed Bush by saying: “I believe it is the responsibility of every political conservative, every evangelical Christian, every pro-life Catholic, every traditional Jew, every Reagan Democrat, and everyone in between to get serious about re-electing President Bush.” [26] The New York Times, July 16, 2004

In certain cultures individuals attribute godly characteristics to their top political leader. Bush facilitates this belief because he represents himself as having a prophetic style of direct communication with deity. With God’s alleged stamp of approval, attested to by numerous religious leaders, it is easy to manipulate the constituency. On July 9, 2004 he told an Amish group: “I trust God speaks through me. Without that, I couldn’t do my job.” [27]

Jim Jones’s history may hold an answer to this phenomenon. “He not only proved the obvious fact that people are blinded by their religious beliefs and will only impute goodness, mercy, and religious motivations to their leader, but Jim Jones proved the efficacy of the basic teaching of Machiavelli: a leader must only appear to have the qualities of goodness—he need not actually possess those attributes.” [28] The illusion of goodness proves as effective as goodness itself.

“In fact, Machiavelli taught that it is dangerous for a leader to practice goodness. Instead, he must pretend to be good and then do the opposite. Machiavelli taught that a leader will succeed on appearances alone. A good leader puts his finger to the wind and changes course whenever it is expedient to do so.” [29]

“After the Sept. 11 attacks, the White House carefully scripted the religious service in which the president declared war on terrorism from the pulpit of the National Cathedral. The president declared to the nation, ‘our responsibility to history is already clear: to answer these attacks and rid the world of evil.’ With most every member of the Cabinet and the Congress present, along with the nation’s religious leaders, it became a televised national liturgy affirming the divine character of the nation’s new war against terrorism, ending triumphantly with the ‘Battle Hymn of the Republic.’ War against evil would confer moral legitimacy on the nation’s foreign policy and even on a contested presidency.” [30]

“A simplistic ‘we are right and they are wrong’ theology rules out self-reflection and correction. It also covers over the crimes America has committed, which lead to widespread global resentment against us.” [31] Power, without principle, is tyranny. Proud nations or people, who suppose moral superiority, employ religious sentimentality and arrogantly boast in their own strength are frequently left to their own devices and ultimately fall into decadent destruction.

Jim Wallis reminds us that it matters more that we are on God’s side instead of claiming God is on our side. Does God really play favorites when both sides pray for assistance? Does God really care about who wins the high school football game? Shouldn’t any issue, particularly a life and death situation, be decided by correct principles rather than who has the most advanced weapons, a preemptive advantage, questionable motives and the most money and men?

Before the invasion, Bush said to a group of church leaders at the National Association of Religious Broadcasters conference in Nashville that he was totally “at peace” about striking the “evil” Saddam Hussein. “If anyone can be at peace, I am at peace about this.” Apparently this invasion had more to do with Bush’s religious ideology than anything else that would possibly warrant an invasion. Paul O’Neill, in his book The Price of Loyalty, states that “ideology ruled the White House.” “Ideology is a lot easier, because you don’t have to know anything or search for anything.” … “You already know the answer to everything.” [32]

General William G. “Jerry” Boykin, Deputy Undersecretary of Defense for Intelligence, appeared at the Good Shepard Community Church in Boring, Oregon in June 2003, not the first or last of such an event. During his multimedia presentation he said: “Now ask yourself: Why is this man in the White House? The majority of Americans did not vote for him. Why is he there? … He’s in the White House because God put him there for a time such as this. God put him there to lead not only this nation but to lead the world in such a time as this.” [1]

He  further stated, “We in the army of God, in the house of God, kingdom of God, have been raised for such a time as this.” This is reminiscent of the Old Testamentphrase: “and who knoweth whether thou art come to the kingdom for such a time as this?” [2] Some commentators, like Patrick Buchanan, saw nothing wrong with what Boykin said. Others viewed any hint of criticism as an attack on Christian values by the equally devious Democratic Party. [3]

The concept that “God installed Bush” was disseminated by naïve pastors to numerous congregations. Consequently, prior to the Iraqi invasion, James Merritt, a former Southern Baptist Convention president, confirmed Bush’s self-proclaimed status as “God’s man for this hour” particularly because of the events of 9/11. [4] So God installed Bush as a defender, someone to lead Americans into an immoral war? Yet this concept was circulated throughout Christendom and Bush became the new leader of the religious right in America.

Another subtle selling of the Iraqi invasion is defined in the best-selling book series Left Behind by Reverend Timothy LaHaye, one of the original founders, along with Jerry Falwell, of the Moral Majority. LaHaye is a past president of the Council for National Policy, a secretive forum, created in 1981, for leading U.S. conservative political leaders, financiers and religious right activist leaders. Hatching secretive plots behind closed doors has always been productive to the elitists. How many earth-shaking, secret societies does the average person belong to? As mentioned in previous articles, Prescott, George H. W. and George W. Bush were or are life-long members of Skull & Bones, also known as the Brotherhood of Death. Prescott, grandfather of George W, provided financial aid to Hitler through the Union Banking Company of which he was president. [5]

LaHaye’s novels, written with collaborator Jerry Jenkins, are allegedly based on biblical prophecies about the return of Jesus after a battle between God and Satan. It may have been what inspired the Southern Baptist Conference, the largest Protestant denomination, to support the war in Iraq, despite their official 2000 policy. [6] Evangelicals consistently supported the Bush administration’s campaign to democratize Iraq more than most other domestic religious groups according to polls conducted in 2006 by both Pew and Zogby International. [7]

Many religious leaders have denounced America’s current warfare. Of course, because of tax-exempt issues, they cannot preach an anti-war sermon without IRS agents descending on them. [8] Religious leaders who sanction the war, with its death and mutilation, never receive visits from the IRS for discussing political issues. War-loving leaders, with their minions, are not unique as evidenced by former crusades, large and small. Bill Press suggests the following criteria that should be met before America engages in warfare:

  • ·        There must be a just cause for a war.
  • ·        A just war can be waged only as a last resort.
  • ·        The ultimate objective of war must be to bring peace.
  • ·        There must be serious prospect of success; bloodshed without hope of victory cannot be justified.
  • ·        The war must be declared by a legitimate authority; no private individuals or groups can launch a war.
  • ·        The violence used in the war must be proportional to the injury suffered.
  • ·        Noncombatants must not be intentionally harmed.
  • ·        Prisoners and conquered peoples must be treated justly. [9]

Iraq did not perpetuate 9/11 and had no plans or the military capacity to attack the United States. [10] Anti-war, demonized Democrats are not seen as compassionate, caring, or even Christian but are simply vilified as unpatriotic or un-American. Yet, despite their alleged “godlessness,” they regularly appear more Christian and compassionate than the religiously correct Republicans. I am not a Democrat or a Republican; I am a Constitutionalist.

Some theocons, assembled as the Apostolic Congress, worked “hand in hand” with Bush to develop domestic and Middle East policies. Apparently, congressional officials abdicated their responsibility to others who dictated policy compatible with their “end-time rapture” objectives.

The problem was not that George W. Bush discussed policy with people who demanded right-wing solutions to achieve peace in the Middle East, or with devout Christians. It is that he is discussed policy with Christians who didn’t care about peaceful objectives at all but were focused on a rapture and the resulting peace. [11] On the other hand, Bush rejected Jim Wallis’ invitation to meet with his organization, Call to Renewal, to discuss peaceful, weaponless alternatives to the Iraqi invasion. [12]

Nonetheless, Bush did accept a suggestion from Wallis before the inauguration: In December 2000, Bush met with Wallis and thirty or more clergy members in the classroom of a Baptist church in Austin, Texas. Bush enquired: “How do I speak to the soul of the nation?” Additionally, Bush and Wallis talked about their personal life journeys. Bush said: “I’ve never lived around poor people,” Wallis remembers Bush saying. “I don’t know what they think. I really don’t know what they think. I’m a white Republican guy who doesn’t get it. How do I get it?” This is certainly not a shocking statement from a member of the elite country club set – born in the lap of luxury with the proverbial silver spoon in his mouth! His privileged status, rather than any personal qualifications, installed him at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. Wallis replied: “You need to listen to the poor and those who live and work with poor people.”

Bush immediately called his speechwriter, Michael Gerson, who was in attendance, and said, “I want you to hear this.” A month later, Bush, in a speech said an almost identical line – “many in our country do not know the pain of poverty, but we can listen to those who do.” His speechwriter added Wallis’ empathetic words to Bush’s inaugural address. [13]

Self-righteousness, frequently a by-product of fundamentalism, is dangerous whether it is Christian, Islam, or any other religion. Dr. Calvin Morris, executive director of the Chicago-based Community Renewal Society, told World Magazine (Marvin Olasky is the magazine’s editor-in-chief), “It is ironic, and dangerously so, that the present Bush administration rails against the religious fundamentalism of the Taliban and Al Qaeda, while asserting a similar fundamentalism of its own. This administration needs to realize that God is not an adherent of American foreign policy, but a God above all nations and ideologies.” [14]

The “crusade” against terror, now under another title, is stripping citizens of their constitutionally-guaranteed freedoms. War on anything – drugs, poverty, crime, cancer, Aids, pornography or terrorism – is bogus. Most frequently it constitutes money going from the voter’s pockets into the pockets of big business without any recognizable benefit to the citizens. The government’s current “war on terrorism” constitutes a war against individual freedoms. Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, in speaking about military warfare, reminded us: “A state of war only serves as an excuse for domestic tyranny.” [15]

Daniel Webster said: “I apprehend no danger to our country from a foreign foe… Our destruction, should it come at all, will be from another quarter. From the inattention of the people to the concerns of their government, from their carelessness and negligence, I must confess that I do apprehend some danger.”  [16]

Any leader who wishes to accrue power, distract the citizens from social or economic problems or improve ratings frequently uses war, now without the troublesome ordeal of constitutional congressional approval. Bush, the self-described messenger of God who prayed for strength to do the Lord’s will, was not troubled about shredding the U.S. Constitution. [17]

Some fundamentalists attempted to establish a “God-centered government” with total control over every aspect of our lives. This intolerant control eliminated all religious freedom, except that proscribed by the ruling party. Our government is only obliged to punish illegal behavior, not satanically exercise control over individual beliefs and conscience. Many Christian fundamentalists endorse punitive punishment, harsh sentencing for all criminals, nuclear war, and starving sanctions for tens of thousands. They have adamantly endorsed death, yet vehemently opposed, often with violence, abortion. Was it or is it genuine opposition or simply “stone-throwing” judgments against assumed “evil” behavior or is it about unrighteous dominion (control)? What is it with some Christians who justify selective violence? Where is Christian mercy in this so-called godly-genocidal war?

Across the globe, our military is enforcing democracy on oil-rich Iraq while obliterating evil-doers – that is, anyone who resists occupation. Hitler focused on the Jews, Bush, not as definitive, focused on obscure terrorists and open-ended warfare. Not surprisingly, Hitler joined a secret society, the Thule Society in 1919 whose membership later became the foundation of the Nazi Party. [18] He apparently did whatever was required to gain support and power including the manipulation of religion. Hitler said: “Hence today I believe that I am acting in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator: by defending myself against the Jew, I am fighting for the work of the Lord.”[19] Hitler, despite claims to the contrary was an alleged Christian; he manipulated the religious populace and successfully, subtly merged religion and politics, with appropriate photo ops and speeches, all for political power with its inherent financial perks and big bucks for the military-industrial-complex. It is all about control, money and the resources of the earth!

German Soldiers wore belt buckles inscribed with the following: “Gott mit uns” (God is with us). Hitler’s troops were frequently sprinkled with holy water by the priests. Before fascism, before Hitler and his political power grab, facilitated by the Reichstag fire, Germany was a Christian country whose obedient citizens were programmed and propagandized to blindly follow all authority figures, political and ecclesiastical. No questions asked! “The Nazis demonized and then destroyed their enemies, after first intimidating and then liquidating their domestic opponents.  The German propaganda machine cranked out misinformation and outright lies in the state-supported media, suppressing the truth and threatening anyone who dared to speak or print opposition to the war regime.” [20] Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. said: “Never forget that everything Hitler did in Germany was legal.”

Historian Alan Bullock said: “Hitler never abandoned the cloak of legality; he recognized the enormous psychological value of having the law (as well as the church) on his side. Instead, he turned the law inside out and made illegality legal.”

Repetitive war indoctrination and American imperialism have replaced the Sermon on the Mount. Twisting the scriptures for theocon political objectives is trusting in the “arm of flesh.” [21] We need to distinguish truth amongst the “many kinds of voices” abroad in the land. None of them are without significance. [22] Christians need to wake up, speak up and stand up for genuine Christian ideals!

One of the fourteen defining characteristics of fascism is: “Religion and Government are Intertwined – Governments in fascist nations tend to use the most common religion in the nation as a tool to manipulate public opinion. Religious rhetoric and terminology is common from government leaders, even when the major tenets of the religion are diametrically opposed to the government’s policies or actions.” [23] Obviously, the common religion in America is Christianity.

Sinclair Lewis said: “A tyrant must put on the appearance of uncommon devotion to religion. Subjects are less apprehensive of illegal treatment from a ruler whom they consider god-fearing and pious. On the other hand, they do less easily move against him, believing that he has the gods on his side.” [24] “When fascism comes to America it will be wrapped in the Flag - and Carrying a Cross.” [25]

Allegedly, scripturally-based churches granted allegiance to the government and their mass mutilation and killing of strangers. Do we actually believe that the lives of foreigners have less value than our own? Silent Christian spectators acquiesce to and even participate in those atrocities, fueled by ardent nationalism and indoctrinated against an alleged enemy. We are not answerable to our government employees (the elected). We cannot justifiably say “I was just following orders.” The government is accountable to the electorate. We are all, however, accountable to God.

According to the globalists, the Constitution must be crushed in order to establish global governance. Every freedom must be revoked; the Bill of Rights must be misrepresented with persuasive propaganda from the most trusted sources. The entire deceptive operation must appear to benefit the masses. It must be shrewdly executed with focused determination or the populace may awaken and revolt.

The religious persecution that drove settlers from Europe to the British North American colonies sprang from the conviction, held by Protestants and Catholics alike, that uniformity of religion must exist in any given society. This conviction rested on the belief that there was one true religion and that it was the duty of the civil authorities to impose it, forcibly if necessary, in the interest of saving the souls of all citizens. [1]

Religious intolerance and persecution is rampant in many countries. Because of the religious intolerance directed at my own ancestors I am adamant about separation of church and state. Religious reformer John Rogers, a distant but direct ancestor (11th great grandfather), was burned at the stake on February 4, 1555 at Smithfield, near Warwick, Nottinghamshire, England during the reign of Mary Tudor. He was a close associate of William Tyndale and an editor of the “Matthew Bible.” Rogers was the first British Protestant martyr under Queen Mary. “On the Monday morning of his death, the Sheriff had shown Rogers a document promising pardon if he would recant. ‘That which I have preached with my lips will I seal with my blood,’ was the answer.” [2]

The Constitution established our federal government. That document is a two way agreement; it is every citizen’s social contract with their government. Accordingly, all of our rights are protected – except the ones we willingly give up. Driven by government-provoked fear, we frequently give up sovereignty for alleged security. We are relinquishing, little by little, our God-given freedoms and will eventually wake up enslaved in a tyrannical, controlling state.

Mass persuasion by public officials, news commentators, teachers and some church leaders falsely claim that we live in a democracy rather than a republic. Some of those same individuals claim that “separation of church and state” is not a constitutional concept. Repetitive lies, accepted as fact, soon gain acceptance by those who fail to read the available documents. “The most brilliant propagandist technique will yield no success unless one fundamental principle is borne in mind constantly… it must confine itself to a few points and repeat them over and over.”— Joseph Goebbels, Nazi Propaganda Minister.

Individual rights were completely absent from the first draft of the Constitution. “Unless assured that a bill of rights would be passed, many states threatened to withhold ratification of the Constitution. Consequently, in 1789, the First Congress of the United States adopted the first ten amendments to the Constitution, known collectively as the Bill of Rights. Ratification of these amendments by the required number of states occurred in 1791.” [3]

First Amendment: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

Madison’s first draft of the First Amendment read: “The civil rights of none shall be abridged on account of religious belief or worship, nor shall any national religion be established, nor shall the full and equal rights of conscience be in any manner, or on any pretence, infringed.” [4] It is highly significant that religion, of all the liberties embodied in the Bill of Rights, is the very first freedom mentioned. The First Amendment, possibly the most important in the Bill of Rights, enumerates five freedoms: religion, speech, press, assembly, and petition. Those God-given freedoms facilitate individual participation in the process of self-government.

The Bill of Rights pertains to and was designed to protect the individual rights of each and every person. The specific tenets of the Bill of Rights were not rights granted to the government, an artificial body created by the citizens. The right of “free exercise” pertains to individuals, not to government. Therefore, a government entity or any person representing that entity cannot claim or seize “free exercise.” The “free exercise” of an individual’s religion, not the government’s religion, is constitutional. Consequently, a government employee may not constitutionally direct any type of religious observance while functioning in that government-sponsored occupation.

The Religious Right and their minions endorse their versions of school prayer. My children attended school to study math, grammar, penmanship, history, biology, science, and to enhance their already developed reading skills. I did not send them to school to learn to pray. We pray regularly in our home and at church. Citizens should not be obligated to pay taxes for students to learn how to pray. Given America’s diversity, what kind of a prayer would it be: Catholic, Baptist, Seventh-day Adventist, Episcopalian, Jewish, Methodist, Mormon? Which students are going to feel discomfort or suffer mild to aggressive persecution for not being the “right” religion? Will the students who belong to the “right” religion feel compelled to openly pray for the “sinful” student – to save his or her soul from hell? Governments should not sponsor any activity that contributes or provokes persecution or aggression towards others based on religion or ethnicity.

“The Establishment Clause thus stands as an expression of principle on the part of the founders of our Constitution that religion is too personal, too sacred, too holy, to permit its ‘unhallowed perversion’ by a civil magistrate. Another purpose of the Establishment Clause rested upon an awareness of the historical fact that governmentally established religions and religious persecutions go hand in hand.” [5]

Thomas Jefferson stated: “No provision in our Constitution ought to be dearer to man than that which protects the rights of conscience against the enterprises of the civil authority.”

Despite the intentionally secular foundation of the constitution, there have been and will continue to be controversial court cases, many perpetuated by stables of high-priced attorneys retained by different factions of the Religious Right to publicize the questionable premise that America’s Christians are consistently persecuted. The actual objective of such lawsuits is to outrage the voters who will then demand specific religious freedoms even if it means incremental loss of religious freedoms or discrimination for others. The very people who should make every effort to protect religious freedom are, in fact, jeopardizing it.

In colonial times, many European monarchs referred to their nations as Christian countries. However, sinners and hypocrites comprised the bulk of their local populace. Nations, like people, are defined by their national character and moral fortitude. To the colonial, Roger Williams, residency in a particular place did not equate to Christianity. [6] Likewise, given our duplicitous propensity for class discrimination, abortion, offensive war, the economic destabilization of other countries and deathly sanctions, referring to America as a Christian nation casts super serious doubt upon our interpretation of a Christian.

Many, particularly in the Religious Right, claim that the United States was established as a Christian nation rather than a free nation. They perpetuate this erroneous theory in order to attract other morally upright people who might naïvely embrace the Religious Right’s spurious agenda. However, to appeal to others, they downplay the word “Christian” and include others they may have previously attempted to discredit as non Christian. “By referring more ecumenically to the United States as a religious nation, they invite other religious traditions to join a family-values crusade launched originally by a particular form of Christian faith.” … “A shift in rhetorical strategy to widen political appeal does not affect the substantive issues at stake.” [7]

Every decent person is for “family values” but not through government enforcement. People who endorse separation of church and state do not hate religion! Justifiable objections arise when some “Christian leaders” demand that their particular version of religion be incorporated into the nation’s laws.

In every age, religious advocates have attempted to influence others through government enforcement. Individuals seeking political office frequently use religion to draw support from the religious community. Campaign customs have significantly changed in the last four to five decades. Candidates discuss ideology instead of specific political issues that detrimentally affect every single citizen. View one of John F. Kennedy’s campaign speeches and then evaluate contemporary candidate rhetoric – it is a night and day difference.

The founding fathers had respect for religion and it is because of that respect that they resisted some of the religious leaders of the day and refrained from merging the operations of government with religion. To serve Dominionist goals, it is relatively easy to harvest ambiguous quotes from the founders that appear to endorse the merging of church and state. There are sufficient public examples that history revisionists use to “prove” that religion and politics are compatible.

The phrase “In God we trust” is on our money as a result of the pressure and ranting of Horace Bushnell, a Connecticut preacher, who said that the Civil War was “divine retribution” for America’s acceptance of “speculative and infidel” ideas that government was not ordained by God. It is a blasphemous insult to put God’s very name on worthless paper printed by the international bankers who hijacked our economy and are currently draining America’s resources. The majority of people may actually trust money and the power it gives more than they trust God. In today’s corrupt climate, anyone can literally “buy anything in the world for money” and it is outrageous to attach God’s name to filthy lucre, made filthier by the mass destruction that it causes in the hands of those who seek total control.

“Render, therefore, to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s and to God the things that are God’s.” –Mark 13:17 and Luke 20:25

Blaming Lincoln’s war of northern aggression on infidels is akin to some current religious leaders who claim that 9/11 is the result of our country’s homosexual tolerance. Falwell remarked: “I really believe that the pagans, and the abortionists, and the feminists, and the gays and the lesbians who are actively trying to make that an alternative lifestyle, the ACLU, People For the American Way, all of them who have tried to secularize America. I point the finger in their face and say ‘you helped this happen.’” [8]How discomforting that some religious leaders, who have similar, though secret lifestyles, reject individuals and dispel them from their midst rather than inviting everyone into their realm in order to love and teach them. Isn’t it time that we separate church and hate. What happened to true worship – emulation?

Perhaps Falwell’s apology was insincere considering that he continues to define others in negative terms such as being anti-Christ. This “Christian” preacher’s unabashed comments are regularly heard in the “conservative,” administration-friendly media. [9] This is so radically different from his methodology before he combined his abilities with those who spearheaded the most current assault on the religious clauses within the First Amendment.

The suddenly star-struck Falwell was a typical preacher who understood the gospel process up until his merger with the ultra conservative New Right. Falwell said the following during the civil rights movement of the 1960s: “We have a message of redeeming grace through a crucified and risen Lord. Nowhere are we told to reform the externals. We are not told to wage a war against bootleggers, liquor stores, gamblers, murderers, prostitutes, racketeers, prejudiced persons or institutions, or any other existing evil as such. The gospel does not clean up the outside but rather regenerates the inside.” [10]

Changing society begins with changing oneself. Religious practitioners need to address the individuals in their congregations – that is their job. The churches must get back to doing what they are supposed to do – not lobby government officials to instill additional mountains of repressive, bigoted regulations designed to disenfranchise certain groups and strip others of their individual freedoms. That is hardly moral or just. Morality, especially from an apparently immoral human entity like the government, cannot come from the top down. It will deliver quite the opposite.

Many prefer fast food religion rather than repentance and “feasting upon the word of God.” Repentance changes hearts which then results in better behavior including a desire to bury the weapons of war, support peace and view one’s alleged enemies in a completely different light. Good behavior as a result of government enforcement, a function that many want the government to assume, does not impact the heart and soul.

Personally, I would not entrust a government that kills the citizens of weaker countries with the task of saving my soul. Nor would I trust the very vocal religious practitioners who support such senseless slaughter. It appears that many individuals, including religious leaders, have created the “Uncle Sam” golden calf. Rather than self-reliance, a by-product of accepting responsibility and repenting for one’s own behavior, many rely upon “Uncle Sam” to solve every dilemma or enforce better behavior. It is all a diabolical deception to strip us all of our free agency and the very ideals and principles we cherish.

Opposition in all things, necessary for personal growth, allows for the existence of evil, personified by Lucifer, provocateur of all contention. Lucifer, the usurper, stealthily strives to strip everyone of their freedom, establish his allegedly classless, democratic dominion by working through compliant, ego-driven leaders seeking “the glory of the world.” Armed with the enticing temptations of earth’s abundant treasures and pleasures, just imagine Lucifer’s success rate when he offers even more prosperity and power to unprincipled people. Lucifer and his insatiable minions seek totality through force and thus must rule with “blood and horror on the face of the earth.” Lucifer has always induced certain character-weak, often morally-compromised individuals to unite into secret societies or associations to carry out his ultimate, opposing-God objective of a New World Order.

Though the “powers of darkness prevail upon the earth,” we “know not the hearts of the men in our own nation” particularly because many Americans suffer from a media-induced state of ignorance. We are over-run with secret societies, where power-seeking participants swear allegiance to each other through secret oaths. They are all working towards the same satanical objective and attempt to function and influence every aspect of society and culture. Nations that uphold the disease-like spread of secret societies, large or small, are ripe for destruction.

“Is this the man that made the earth to tremble, that did shake kingdoms; that made the world as a wilderness, and destroyed the cities thereof; that opened not the house of his prisoners?” [1]

From the Civil War forward, war has been poured out upon all nations. Many erroneously believe that the Civil War was about abolishing slavery, a despicable institution. The war was about tariffs, protecting certain industries and ultimately strengthening the federal government. The fallacious justification of liberating the slaves followed the deaths of at least 618,000 people. [2] War was unnecessary – there were alternatives. The same neoconservative do-gooder, “ending tyranny in our world” [3] mental manipulation is used in the current “democracy-building” efforts of the U.S. Bringing liberty to the world, America’s quest, apparently requires demolition of infrastructure, bombs, bloodshed, carnage, depleted uranium, white phosphorus or napalm, occupation and permanent military bases. War and reconstruction produce big money and thin out the population on both sides.

Bloodshed and famine attend the carnage of combat and rumors of wars. [4] Rumors of war (hearsay) are frequently propagated by corrupt, compromised officials to justify preemptive “shock and awe” bombing campaigns against defenseless civilians. We resist taking the first shot but rather rely on sanctions or embargoes to provoke response. If those fail, responding to a Northwoods style attack would be justified.

The U.S. battleship Maine sank as a result of an explosion in Havana Harbor on February 15, 1898. This was during William McKinley’s presidency. He was known as a defender of the gold standard. He was against a full-blown war, preferring diplomacy instead. Though it was later determined to be an internal explosion, it was blamed on the Spanish. After hearing reports of Spanish atrocities in Cuba, the U.S. “liberated” the Cubans. Americans continue to fall for the atrocity claims. Combat ensued betweenAmerica and Spain which culminated on August 12, 1898. Two days later, the U.S. sent 11,000 occupational troops to the Philippines. The Filipinos resisted the U.S. liberation for three years. [5] An estimated 200,000 to 1,000,000 Filipino civilians were killed. Approximately 16,000 Filipinos were killed in combat. By contrast, only 4,200 American soldiers were killed. [6]

For $20 million dollars Spain ceded the Philippine Islands, Puerto Rico and Guam to the United States in the Paris Peace Treaty signed on December 10, 1898 and ratified by the United States Senate on February 6, 1899. It became effective on April 11, 1899. “Many people did not approve of America seizing territory far from its shores, but McKinley, who agonized over the decision, finally approved the takeover.” [7]

McKinley was re-elected in 1900 and was shot on September 6, 1901 at 4:07 p.m. at the Pan-American Exposition in Buffalo, New York by an alleged emotionally demented anarchist, Leon Czolgosz. Patsies are always young, demented and alone. McKinley died of his wounds on September 14, 1901 and was succeeded by pro-war Theodore Roosevelt. [8] It is significant that of forty-three presidents, eight have been the target of “assassins.” Four of those presidents died. [9]

In some instances, politicians have very personal reasons to comply with their New World Order handlers. Woodrow Wilson, son of a Presbyterian minister, had the financial and political support of the Rockefellers, Jacob Schiff, Bernard Baruch, and others in his successful 1910 bid for governor of New Jersey. Coincidentally, they also had the love letters he wrote to Mary Peck, his mistress while he was president of Princeton (1902-1910), for which they paid $65,000. [10] Therefore he made the perfect morally compromised presidential candidate. He was certainly not the first or the last who was installed because of the contents of his private closet.

Paul Warburg, a Republican, contributed a substantial amount of money to Wilson’s presidential campaign. His brother made similar contributions to the incumbent William Howard Taft. Theodore Roosevelt, the third candidate and opposed to a central bank, ran under his new Bull Moose Party. George Perkins and Frank Munsey of the J. P. Morgan Company poured money into both the Roosevelt and Taft campaigns which split the vote and gave the election to Wilson. [11] A financial coup took place in 1913. We are financially insolvent. Our national treasures have been seized by international loan sharks.

In 1916 President Woodrow Wilson said: “I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated governments in the civilized world. No longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men.” [12]

Wall Street financed the Chinese revolution of 1912, the Mexico Revolution in 1915-16, the Panama Canal controversy of 1913. “The purpose of the revolution was to deprive Colombia, of which Panama was then a part, of $40 million and to acquire control of the Panama Canal.” [13]

Wall Street financed the Bolshevik Revolution in 1917 prior to World War I. “Documents in the State Department files demonstrate that the National City Bank, controlled by Stillman and Rockefeller interests, and the Guaranty Trust, controlled by Morgan interests, jointly raised substantial loans for the belligerent Russia before U.S. entry into the war, and that these loans were raised after the State Department pointed out to these firms that they were contrary to international law. Further, negotiations for the loans were undertaken through official U.S. government communications facilities under cover of the top-level ‘Green Cipher’ of the State Department.” … “Clearly the Morgan-Rockefeller interests were not interested in abiding by international law. … There was no hesitation on the part of these firms to use State Department facilities for the negotiations. Further, in spite of protests, the State Department allowed the messages to go through.” [14]

“During World War I Germany raised considerable funds in New York for espionage and covert operations in North America and South America. It is important to record the flow of these funds because it runs from the same firms — Guaranty Trust and American International Corporation — that were involved in the Bolshevik Revolution and its aftermath.” [15] An estimated six to twelve million Russians were killed by Stalin prior to World War II. Several million were killed after the war when Roosevelt delivered one-third of Europe to Stalin as part of the settlement conferences. [16]

The planning of the Second World War started in 1919 after Adolf Hitler had joined a secret society called the Thule Society. The Society was not a working-man’s group as it included amongst its members: “judges, police-chiefs, barristers, lawyers, university professors and lecturers, aristocratic families, leading industrialists, surgeons, physicians, scientists, as well as a host of rich and influential bourgeois.” The membership of the Thule Society also became the foundation of the Nazi Party. [17]

Wall Street financed Hitler and his proposed 1,000 year Reich. It was supposedly a failure but it produced profits and supplied the United States with practical experience through CIA-transplanted German war criminals who were expert in segregation and concentration camp logistics, propaganda tactics, group-think mentality, crisis psychology via the orchestrated Reichstag fire and continued medical and eugenics experimentation. “The Rockefeller Foundation helped found the German eugenics program and even funded the program that Josef Mengele worked in before he went to Auschwitz.” [18] Former “enemies,” now associates contributed their scientific “expertise” to the ongoing globalist momentum in America. The devastating chaos of World War II, with death, destruction and the political realignment of the nations – divvied up with previous allies now redefined as cold war “enemies,” failed to implement the New World Order.

What was referred to as the Office of Strategic Services (OSS), America’s first intelligence agency, established June 13, 1942, developed world-wide clandestine capability and employed almost 13,000 men and women. [19]

One of the functions of OSS was to organize and conduct psychological warfare. Psychological warfare, a propaganda tactic with any government that wants to marshal the troops, includes “a constant repetition of fabricated atrocity stories which are designed to prove that the enemy were all ‘bad guys’ who had to be eliminated so we ‘good guys’ could live in peace.” [20]

“OSS, ended on October 1, 1945, trained many of the leaders and personnel who formed the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). Their ranks included four future Directors of Central Intelligence: Allen Dulles, Richard Helms, William Colby, and William Casey.” [21] Personnel and the assets ultimately went into a new organization called the Central Intelligence Group (CIG) until the National Security Act of 1947 turned CIG into the Central Intelligence Agency. CIA ranks have swollen dramatically since then probably to include a patsy department where people are properly schooled as perpetrators yet who make dramatic appearances in public prior to their “crime” and leave sufficient evidence for miraculous discovery.

“Allen Dulles was the OSS chief of European operations during World War II and was quite active in post-war covert schemes, such as Operation Paperclip and Operation National Interest, to move Nazi personnel and assets out of Germany and into the American sphere.”

George Herbert Walker, along with partner Averell Harriman, established W. A. Harriman & Co. Bank in November 1919. In 1926 Prescott S. Bush was installed as Vice-President of W. A. Harriman & Co. In 1928, W. A. Harriman bought Dresser Industries, paying $4,000,000 for Dresser’s corporate stock and made it a public company by issuing 300,000 shares of stock. Neil Mallon, with no experience in the oil business, was installed as company president. Prescott Bush was the banking representative who helped finance the deal that established Dresser and served on the company’s board. [22] Dresser produced the incendiary bombs that were used on Tokyo. [23] Dresser also made gaseous diffusion pumps for the Manhattan atomic bomb project. [24] Prescott financed Hitler through the Union Banking Corporation[25]

In 1931 Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. merged with W. A. Harriman & Co., the railroad empire. The Harriman railroads shipped oil for John D. Rockefeller of Standard Oil. Samuel P. Bush, father of Prescott, owned Buckeye Steel Castings Co. which manufactured parts for the Harriman railroad company. [26] During World War II Prescott was a director of two companies – Dresser Industries, oil field equipment manufacturer, and until recently a part of Halliburton, and the second was Vanadium Corporation of America. “They were both involved in atomic energy projects.” [27]

“George H. W. Bush worked for Dresser Industries in several positions after the war, from 1948-1951.” [28] Dresser Industries acquired M.W. Kellogg, an oil services company, in 1988. On September 29, 1998, Dresser formally merged with rival company Halliburton. Dick Cheney, a long-time member of the CFR, negotiated the $7.7 billion deal. [29] Halliburton then issued 176 million new shares of its common stock to Dresser shareholders. [30] On 10 April 2001 the Dresser division (excluding the former Kellogg division) entered an agreement to separate itself from Halliburton because of “more than 300,000 asbestos claims filed against a Dresser subsidiary located in Pennsylvania that made construction products containing the substance.” [31] Halliburton “split its operations into two distinct entities in order to protect its assets from the asbestos litigation. Halliburton positioned Kellogg, Brown & Root under Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. [32]

It would have cost Halliburton billions, in both cash and stock, to settle the asbestos claims. [33] This is despite the Bush administration’s attempts to get Congress to limit asbestos liability. But, Arlen Specter has come to the rescue with his Asbestos Trust Fund Bill, purportedly to help victims. I wonder – would this fund assist the numerous victims of 9/11 in as much as the asbestos dissemination was the result of alleged “terrorists,” or would it reduce government financial culpability? Now, Halliburton’s liability will be limited to $450 million. Halliburton, with government contracts, recovered and their purchase of Dresser possibly saved the Dresser stockholders, perhaps even Bush family stock? [34] It wouldn’t be the first time!

Halliburton’s support of Lyndon Johnson resulted in several contracts including the construction of military bases during the Vietnam War. After the Persian Gulf War in 1991, then-Defense Secretary Cheney, who directed our first invasion of Iraq, paid Brown & Root to conduct “a study on the benefits of military outsourcing.” Months later, Cheney paid them an additional $5 million to update the report. “In 1992, Brown & Root was awarded the U.S. Army’s first Logistics Civil Augmentation Program (LOGCAP) contract, an omnibus contract that allows the Army to call on KBR for support in all of its field operations, including combat, peacekeeping and humanitarian assistance.” [35]

“On March 24, 2003, the Army announced publicly that KBR had been awarded five task orders in Iraq potentially worth $7 billion to implement the plan.” “KBR was awarded a $100 million contract in 2002 to build a new U.S. embassy in Kabul, Afghanistan, from the State Department.” “KBR has also been awarded 15 LOGCAP task orders worth more than $216 million for work under ‘Operation Enduring Freedom,’ the military name for operations in Afghanistan. These include establishing base camps at Kandahar and Bagram Air Force Base and training foreign troops from the Republic of Georgia.” “On Feb. 27, 2004, the Coalition Provisional Authority’s Program Management Office in Baghdad awarded KBR a contract worth nearly $51.5 million for “electrical power transmission” in Iraq.” [36]

Many have acknowledged secretive entities, like the CIA, but have been persuaded that this corrupt organization has a legitimate function – like deterring communism or spreading democracy (socialism). It was actually created for several purposes – one of which is assisting multinational business. This often includes assassination, military coups, overthrowing democratic leaders, drug trafficking, staging riots, and destabilizing countries. [1] Natural resources are regularly seized through violent contrived circumstances as a consequence of private allegiances in corporate chambers, secret societies or government offices.

One of the individuals who came up with the blueprint for the CIA was Robert A. Lovett, a former board member of Brown Brothers Harriman. Lovett “was the fourth United States Secretary of Defense, serving in the cabinet of President Harry S. Truman from 1951 to 1953 and in this capacity, directed the Korean War. He was promoted to the position from deputy secretary of defense.” Coincidently, he was a member of the Skull and Bones society at Yale University. [2] Lovett, “father of the CIA,” was nominated for the Brotherhood of Death by Prescott Bush, Neil Mallon, and Roland Harriman. One of George H. W. Bush’s sons was named after Mallon: Neil Mallon Bush, born January 22, 1955. Mallon was a one-time president of Dresser Industries. [3]

Though not CIA, it is interesting that Neil Mallon Bush, of Hinckley and Silverado fame, owner of Austin-based Ignite Learning, founded in 1999, has benefited substantially from the woes of others. Many of the transplanted Katrina victims will use the software program COW, cost of $10,000 per school, as a result of Barbara Bush’s undisclosed, generous, but earmarked, contribution to the Bush-Clinton Katrina Fund. Barbara and son, Neil, presented the program at a special reception to “showcase everyone’s efforts in helping the hurricane evacuee students who ended up in Houston.” Is this an example of the phrase – charity begins at home? “Neil Bush reportedly toured former Soviet Union countries promoting Ignite with Russian tycoon Boris Berezovsky.” [4]

With money from Brown Brothers Harriman, George H. W. Bush, with partners Hugh and Bill Liedtk formed Zapata Petroleum Corporation, an oil exploration company. Bush bought out his partners in 1954 and by 1958 was drilling on the Cay Sal Bank in the Eastern Gulf of Mexico, later used as a base for CIA raids on Cuba. These islands had been leased to Howard Hughes, a huge Nixon supporter, the previous year. “The CIA was using companies like Zapata to stage and supply secret missions attacking Fidel Castro’s Cuban government in advance of the Bay of Pigs invasion. The CIA’s codename for that invasion was ‘Operation Zapata.’” [5] “In 1969, Zapata bought the United Fruit Company of Boston, another company with strong CIA connections.” [6] All Bush and Zapata associated records covering the years 1960 and 1966 were destroyed when Bush became vice president in 1981. Bush was CIA director from 1976-1977.

The CIA supported “Papa Doc” and “Baby Doc” Duvalier, Saddam Hussein, Mobutu Sese Seko, The Shah of Iran, General Noriega, General Pinochet, General Prosper Avril, Ferdinand Marcos, and others. See a defined list of covert activities. When our government, through the monopoly media, demonizes some foreign leader – he has either rejected a big business proposal or is duly elected and serves the best interests of his country rather than the best interests of the U.S.

The CIA created al Qaeda, the database and instigated Islamic fundamentalism by training 100,000 fundamentalist Muslim mujahadeen. “Zbigniew Brzezinski not long ago revealed that on July 3, 1979, unknown to the American public and Congress, President Jimmy Carter secretly authorized $500 million to create an international terrorist movement that would spread Islamic fundamentalism in Central Asia and ‘destabilize’ the Soviet Union… The CIA called this Operation Cyclone and in the following years poured $4 billion into setting up Islamic training schools in Pakistan (Taliban means student). Young zealots were sent to the CIA’s spy training camp in Virginia, where future members of al Qaeda were taught ‘sabotage skills’ – terrorism.” [7] It was Camp Peary, where young Afghans, Arabs from Egypt and Jordan, and even some African-American black Muslims were taught “sabotage skills”. [8]

“Between 1978 and 1992, the US government poured at least $6 billion (some estimates range as high as $20 billion) worth of arms, training and funds to prop up the mujahadeen factions. Other Western governments, as well as oil-rich Saudi Arabia, kicked in as much again. Wealthy Arab fanatics, like Osama bin Laden, provided millions more.”

The Constitution is gone. Despite the orchestrated media distraction, it is a moot point whether someone swears to uphold the Constitution on a Koran, once owned by Thomas Jefferson, or a Bible. Swearing on a bible or anything else hardly demonstrates sincerity but rather provides proof that a majority of our “elected” officials have perjured themselves. One’s word is his/her bond and should suffice – which means no swearing at all. Ron Paul, a Washington anomaly, is possibly the only exception. There have been other elected, ethical officials who recognized and spoke out about the globalist agenda like Congressman Larry P. McDonald who said: “The drive of the Rockefellers and their allies is to create a one-world government combining super-capitalism and Communism under the same tent, all under their control…. Do I mean conspiracy? Yes I do. I am convinced there is such a plot, international in scope, generations old in planning, and incredibly evil in intent.” McDonald, who had announced presidential intentions for 1988, allegedly died on September 1, 1983 aboard flight 007, Korean Airlines (KAL) which purportedly was shot down by the Soviets.  [9]George P. Schultz, then-U.S. Secretary of State, terminated the speedy investigation of the incident in December 1983 by saying that the plane had flown off its scheduled course and had strayed into Soviet airspace. [10]

The presidency and balance of power are gone, usurped by imperialistic puppet kings. The old conservatism that favored less government has been replaced by neo-conservatism. Congress no longer writes laws in the best interests of the citizens – they are busy with campaigning, pork-barrel popularity and entertaining fat cat corporate lobbyists. Many laws originate with presidential executive orders. Wars are undeclared! Citizens don’t declare wars. They just die in them. Wars, with Americans as cannon fodder, are designed to break the U.S. economy and impoverish Americans while enriching the elite. Iran is obviously next on the war agenda.

“The twentieth century was the bloodiest in all history. More than 170 million people were killed by governments with ten million being killed in World War I and fifty million being killed in World War II. In regard to the fifty million killed in World War II, it is significant that nearly 70 percent were innocent civilians, mainly as a result of the bombing of cities by Great Britain and America.” [11] Then there was Korea, Vietnam, the Gulf War and the many unpublicized CIA wars. Meanwhile, some Americans, rather than focusing on America’s brutality, naïvely concentrate on made-in-the-U.S. terrorists – the perfect manufactured enemies!

Population reduction, a globalist goal, allows monopoly ownership of the earth’s resources – less population means more for them! War, famine, suppressed cures for catastrophic diseases, abortion acceptance, and health-destroying, cancer-producing Monsanto monopolized genetically modified foods all reduce world population and produce big profits.

The current orchestrated war on terror, arbitrarily designated after 9/11, has now been expanded to encompass “radicals and extremists,” which may include anyone who dissents, hates asparagus, dislikes certain colors, or attracts any arbitrary official attention. In a tyranny, dissenters may be branded and suppressed. We really have a government carrying out a war against its own citizens. Tantalizing propaganda continues to propel patriotically-energized, well-intentioned individuals, citizens or not, tosacrifice life, limbs and health to “fight for our freedoms,” a euphemism for mass murder to enrich Halliburton, Carlyle, Monsanto, Bechtel and other corporations who win no-bid contracts from their administration pals. Top management executives, closely allied with compliant, powerful government officials, focus on their exorbitant, extravagant, unwarranted corporate compensation packages while veterans struggle for assistance with their war-related depleted uranium illnesses or personality disorders.

“There is no nation on earth powerful enough to accomplish our overthrow. … Our destruction, should it come at all, will be from another quarter. From the inattention of the people to the concerns of their government, from their carelessness and negligence, I must confess that I do apprehend some danger. I fear that they may place too implicit a confidence in their public servants, and fail properly to scrutinize their conduct; that in this way they may be made the dupes of designing men, and become the instruments of their own undoing.” — Daniel Webster, June 1, 1837

All governments, who harbor corruption and usurpation through secret societies, will fail. Throughout history, the power elite, with their alternative agendas, treasonous alliances, have orchestrated government coups, assassinations, national destabilizations and counterfeit “elections” in order to implement the satanical One World Order, also known as Babylon, the great. Naïve Americans have been deceptively duped, through our own “carelessness and negligence,” aided and abetted by the corporate-owned, history-modifying, government-friendly media after the elimination of the Fairness Doctrine during the Reagan administration.

Germar Rudolf said: “Whoever controls the histories of nations controls those nations and their peoples.” Americans often fail to appreciate history’s invaluable lessons. Current events, like 9/11, do not transpire in a vacuum but in well-established patterns. History is prologue. Broadcast “news” is sponsored by companies who are a part of the military/industrial/media complex, allied with a constitution-ignoring government which is compromised financially, morally and ethically.

Wall Street kingmakers decide who gets to be king, in the United States and elsewhere. Then they control the king. The bankers hire and fire:

“Indicative of this was a strange event which occurred in October of 1964. David Rockefeller, president of the Chase Manhattan Bank and Chairman of the Board of the Council on Foreign Relations, took a vacation in the Soviet Union. This is a peculiar place for the world’s greatest ‘imperialist’ to take his vacation, since much of the Communist propaganda deals with taking all of David’s wealth away from him and distributing it to ‘the people.’”

“A few days after Rockefeller ended his ‘vacation’ in the Kremlin, Nikita Khrushchev was recalled from a vacation at a Black Sea resort to learn that he had been fired. How strange! As far as the world knew, Khrushchev was the absolute dictator of the Soviet government and, more important, head of the Communist Party which runs the USSR.”

“Who has the power to fire the man who was supposedly the absolute dictator? Did David Rockefeller journey to the Soviet Union to fire an employee? Obviously the position of Premier in the Soviet Union is a figurehead with the true power residing elsewhere – perhaps in New York.” [12]

Decades ago our government “by the people” was surreptitiously replaced, through the “election” charade, a two party system of orchestrated opposites designed to divide. The republic, based on principled law, was transformed into a decadent cesspool of corruption – socialized democracy, conforming to the Communist Manifesto and controlled by the satanical, seductive power of secret societies. Bureaucratic covert agencies, established by the powerbrokers, supposedly serve the interests of “national security” or “national interests” – ruthless, pitiless pretenses for unmitigated greed demonstrated by the corporate elite minions who seize resources without responsibility or recognition of the rights of other people or countries. Looters, posing as public servants, have also plundered trillions from America’s coffers.

Any legitimate candidates, unapproved for election by the elite establishment, are vilified or exposed for various created infractions. Competency is insignificant – the handlers call all the shots. If per chance, by some fluke, a non compliant person gets elected, as in 1960, then that person may easily be eliminated by a lone gunman Manchurian candidate patsy who is immediately and conveniently made permanently unavailable. As noted previously, airplane mishaps are also effective – notwithstanding the collateral damage of fellow passengers, inconsequential to insiders!

Other influential unelected leaders who successfully lift and inspire others above the Order’s socially engineered class status are also eliminated and replaced with obedient minions who consequently reap wealth, enjoy regular media attention, and habitually play the race card while keeping their brothers in subjection and poverty. Martin Luther King Jr., the non violent civil rights activist, was castigated by the media as a Communist, a former tactic to censure anyone who opposed the elite agenda.

“Despite extensive surveillance, the FBI was never able to find any direct funding or other links between King and the Communist party.” [13] “The FBI began wiretapping King in 1961, fearing that communists were trying to infiltrate the civil rights movement, but when no such evidence emerged, the bureau used the incidental details caught on tape over six years in attempts to force King out of the pre-eminent leadership position.” [14] He openly expressed opposition to the Vietnam War and opposed U.S. involvement in South Africa and Latin America. He was allegedly killed by James Earl Ray, a petty criminal the day after his famous Mountaintop Speech in Memphis, Tennessee.

Changes made under every administration strip our freedoms. The 16th and 17th Amendments were passed during the Taft administration. The Income Tax and Federal Reserve Act, the 16th Amendment, was quietly pushed through congress immediately before Christmas by Senator Nelson Aldrich, maternal grandfather of Trilateral Commission founder David Rockefeller. Most of the lawmakers were unavailable for the vote. The 17th Amendment altered the manner in which senators are elected making it possible to financially manipulate elections.

“This is a startling revelation: $300 trillion of wealth is secretly controlled by an unspecified cabal of the world’s richest families. The power of the Rothschild family was evidenced on 24th September 2002 when a helicopter touched down on the lawn of Waddedson Manor, their ancestral home in Buckinghamshire, England. Out of the helicopter strode Warren Buffet, – touted as the second richest man in the world – and Arnold Schwarzenegger, candidate for the Governorship of California. They’d come to rub shoulders with James Wolfensohn, President of the World Bank and Nicky Oppenheimer, Chairman of De Beers at a two day conference hosted by Jacob Rothschild. Arnold went on to secure the governorship of one of the biggest economies on the planet a year later.” [15]

On Aug 9, 2004, Congressman Ron Paul said: “Liberty is lost through complacency and a subservient mindset. When we accept or even welcome automobile checkpoints, random searches, mandatory identification cards, and paramilitary police in our streets, we have lost a vital part of our American heritage. America was born of protest, revolution, and mistrust of government. Subservient societies neither maintain nor deserve freedom for long.” [16]

Opposite sides of contemporary wars, particularly from the U.S. Civil War, are typically orchestrated and financed by the international banking cartel for population depletion, resources management, money manipulation and destruction of national economies, redistribution of inhabitants and realignment of borders. Complicit, compromised insiders simulate enemy assaults, demonize “their” chosen military targets in order to provoke anger, recruit cannon fodder and fuel mass insecurity while denouncing all opposition. Dictatorial governments manage perceptions through expensive public relations firms, disseminate disinformation through the monopoly media and propagate flag-waving, self-righteous nationalism to justify offensive invasions. War is the enforcement mechanism of the satanical New World Order.

In January 1943, Stalin, Roosevelt and Churchill met in Casablanca to discuss the unconditional surrender of Germany. At the end of 1943, at the Russian Embassy in Tehran, Stalin and Roosevelt drank a toast to the deaths of 50,000 German officers to be shot at the conclusion of the war. Unconditional surrender is an ominous term – it signaled the complete abolition of the German government and loss of all treaty rights, including protection of prisoners under the Geneva Conventions. [1]

In September 1939, prior allies, Stalin and Hitler joined forces in the invasion, dismantling and decimation of Poland. However, Stalin, a genocidal murderer, escaped culpability at Nuremberg for the Katyn Forest slaughter. [2] This 1940 Soviet massacre of Polish prisoners was confirmed by James Bacque during his investigation in the KGB archives after they were opened in 1990.[3] It was also confirmed by Mikhail Gorbachev who, in 1989, produced the actual documents proving that the Soviet Secret Police, by orders from Stalin, murdered 21,587 Polish enemies of the Soviet state and buried them in the Katyn Forest. However, the contrived allegations against the Nazis were useful in fueling America’s hatred against all Germans, rather than the government thugs. [4]

Conquerors, those who have killed the most people, and frequently the conflict instigators often sponsor criminal tribunals for the vanquished – those who run out of money, men, and ammunition or no longer accommodate those who actually control. Many installed tyrants, feeling absolutely justified, actually demand exemption from their premeditated war crimes.

Notwithstanding the proposed “unconditional surrender” terms, Eisenhower gave a speech in Paris in March 1945 asserting that the United States would honor the Geneva Conventions with regard to humane treatment of prisoners, many captured as early as May 1943. Within days of the Paris speech, Eisenhower, without honor, surreptitiously signed an order establishing a deathly DEF (Disarmed Enemy Forces) status for all prisoners, even those who voluntarily surrendered. This action was against the civilized provisions of the Geneva Conventions which the United States signed, along with forty-six other countries, on July 27, 1929. [5] Germany ultimately admitted defeat on May 8, 1945. By June there were between 4,000,000 to 5,000,000 prisoners under Eisenhower’s jurisdiction – all with DEF status.

The Normandy Invasion took place on June 6, 1944. That fall, Churchill, Stalin and Roosevelt agreed to implement the Morgenthau Plan, actually created by Harry Dexter White, which would completely destroy German industry (against Geneva Conventions). Germany’s industry supported their importation of food which they did not produce themselves. Deliberate industrial destruction (by war or massive illegal immigration) results in job loss, homelessness, starvation and death. The official assumptions were that about 40% of the population would die – about 20 million German civilians. Moreover, at the Yalta Conference in February 1945, the victorious three, Roosevelt, Stalin and Churchill, discussed the realignment and dismemberment of Germany.

Henry C. Morgenthau was Secretary of the Treasury. His cohort, globalist Harry Dexter White, part of the department since 1935, was then chief international economist at the U.S. Treasury and “liaison between the Treasury and the State Department on all matters bearing on foreign relations.” [6] White, a treasonous insider agent, influenced the design and development of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank[7] He acted in that capacity at the United Nations Monetary and Financial Conference held at Bretton Woods, New Hampshire where the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), was also established. GATT is a United Nations agency created by a multinational treaty to promote trade by the reduction of tariffs and import quotas.

At the close of World War II, Americans were outraged and horrified by film footage of emaciated, dead bodies being mechanically discarded into mass graves and views of newly liberated individuals, little more than skeletons, filmed in their bleak, barren wooden bunks – abundant evidence of the atrocious criminal behavior by the incompetent, charismatic Hitler and the other amoral thugs who, with Wall Street money,[8] [9] had seized control of the government, orchestrated the Reichstag fire, targeted convenient enemies, quickly suspended personal liberties and instituted national ID under the guise of increased security. I wonder if there was a Reichstag Fire Truth Movement.

One has to wonder why the German populace weren’t outraged enough to speak out against such tyrannical activities. Is it possible that their government worked behind claims of “national security” and “national interests?” The average brainwashed citizen knew nothing about the foreign and domestic activities of their secretive government. All information, propaganda, was controlled by the government. One also has to wonder why ordinary German citizens, guards and military, would obey questionable orders.

Despite pandemic atrocities throughout Europe during that war, the major media focus has always been directed at the Nazi crimes against the Jews, perpetrated in such infamous places as Birkenau, Bergen-Belsen, Buchenwald, and Dachau – names that should remind us of man’s inhumanity to man. However, the Jewish people were not the only victims of the catastrophic satanically-staged New World Order event known as World War II.

The first Nazi camp, Dachau, was established in March 1933 for political prisoners – opponents of the Nazi regime, resistance groups, vocal dissidents and groups deemed racially inferior, such as Jews and Roma (Gypsies). [10] “It was located on the grounds of an abandoned munitions factory near the northeastern part of the town of Dachau, about 10 miles northwest of Munich in southern Germany. During the first year, the camp held about 4,800 prisoners.” From 1933 to 1945 Dachau inmates numbered 188,000. [11]

On May 20, 1940, the Nazis founded, in the Polish town of Oświęcim, the notorious camp, Auschwitz, infamous for sadistic medical experimentations, at the site of an old Polish brick army barracks adjacent to a railroad track, very convenient for merciless mass human transport.

Numerous camps were in Germany, Poland, Norway, Italy, Lithuania, Croatia, Austria, France and elsewhere. They were used for collection, detention, resettlement and extermination. Exact numbers are unknown, but millions, Christians, Jews, Communists were exterminated. The government, for economic exploitation, established camps in the vicinity of factories or industry – essentially labor camps. Perhaps the inmates did the work that Germans wouldn’t do? They built roads, worked in gravel pits, and later in the armaments production for the Nazi war machine. [12]

One of the definitions of fascism is corporate control coupled with a strong, centralized government. Many of the Nazi camps were designed as labor camps for government-friendly German corporations. Cheap labor produces more affordable “toys” for an approving, but thoughtless, populace. Corporations in cahoots with governments often lure cheap labor from poorer countries. Unpaid inmates provide even greater profits.

“Thousands of ‘security suspects’ released from German prisons in the autumn of 1942 were sent to concentration camps and literally worked to death under a program called ‘Annihilation through Work’ (Vernichtung durch Arbeit). Finally, captured members of national resistance movements were sent to concentration camps to be murdered upon arrival.” [13]

Moreover, there were about two hundred additional barbed-wire enclosed camps in Germany that incarcerated between four and five million individuals by June 1945. However, these camps lacked even the barest facilities found in other camps: barracks, laboratories, camp kitchens, infirmaries and latrines. In the absence of latrines, crowded inmates, standing almost shoulder to shoulder, by necessity, often relieved themselves where they stood – a growing quagmire of contaminating putrid mud. Latrines (ditches), where available, were death traps for those who slipped. Food, water and shelter, basic human necessities, were unavailable in these camps although there were sufficient resources available. These were not the German camps, but American camps, supervised by Eisenhower, where thousands of ordinary soldiers, ignorant of their government’s atrocities, ultimately starved and died.

Eisenhower, among numerous other “high” officials, past and current, proves that mediocre individuals frequently ascend any available ladder through complicit connections and stealthy agreements rather than native competence. Even costly ghost-written books, before or after their endeavors, suggest questionable qualifications or fictional legacies.

Americans were not outraged by the atrocities committed in these camps because they were completely ignored by the U.S. media, then and now. Subsidized and sanitized history books produced by The West German Foreign Office under the direction of Willy Brandt provide a long-term cover-up of the atrocities. [14] After the war and unknown to many outside of Germany, more than fifteen million Germans were driven from their homes in central and Eastern Europe. These were trusting civilians who accommodated their tyrannical government. This huge migration was according to the international agreement signed at Potsdam in 1945.

The Geneva Conventions are very clear on treatment of military prisoners. The agreement signed by most major countries on July 27, 1929 purportedly established humane treatment of enemies during World War II. Apparently, the Geneva Conventions meant little to the military leaders in charge. The American Propaganda Ministry consistently generated hatred of the German inmates who they claimed deserved incarceration, lack of basic human necessities and even torture, if necessary. Inhumane treatment at the hands of Germans or Americans is deplorable.

According to the Uniform Code of Military Justice, it is a soldier’s duty to disobey illegal orders. Military personnel may disobey illegal orders from a superior officer, even if that officer is the president. “In each case, military personnel have an obligation and a duty to only obey Lawful orders and indeed have an obligation to disobey Unlawful orders, including orders by the president that do not comply with the UCMJ. The moral and legal obligation is to the U.S. Constitution and not to those who would issue unlawful orders, especially if those orders are in direct violation of the Constitution and the UCMJ.” [15]

Concentration camps did not originate with the Nazis. History books often fail to mention the British use of concentration camps, first used to confine and control large numbers of civilians in South Africa during the second Boer War 1899-1902.  The Americans had Andersonville, Georgia and others during the Civil War.

Most Americans say little about Guantánamo Bay. Politicians who mention the camp, where hundreds are held without charges, are demonized as un-American or soft on terrorists. When the Japanese, even American born, were incarcerated, Americans maintained silence. After all, a Japanese life apparently had less value than an American life, given that America bombed two non military cities allegedly to “save American lives.”

Civilian Japanese internment began March 2, 1942 with Executive Order No. 9066 which was signed by Roosevelt on February 19, 1942. “Relocation centers” were located in California, Idaho, Utah, Arizona, Wyoming, Colorado, and Arkansas.

“Roosevelt’s executive order was fueled by anti-Japanese sentiment among farmers who competed against Japanese labor, politicians who sided with anti-Japanese constituencies, and the general public, whose frenzy was heightened by the Japanese attack of Pearl Harbor. More than 2/3rds of the Japanese who were interned in the spring of 1942 were citizens of the United States.” [16] It takes mass support against a specific group of people to make Concentration camps acceptable. Once they are tolerable for one group – say illegal aliens, they can be appropriated for others – anti-war dissidents, alleged terrorists, enemy combatants or anyone opposing government actions. Of course, this is intended to make the homeland safe. In 1922 when he was establishing the Gestapo, Hitler said the following: “An evil exists that threatens every man, woman and child of this great nation. We must take steps to insure our domestic security and protect our homeland.” Sound familiar?

In March 1942, the U.S. government began seizing the property and assets of Japanese-descended citizens, and the War Relocation Authority was formed to “assist” the Japanese-Americans who were being driven out of several states. By summer, well over 100,000 Japanese-Americans had been “evacuated” from the West Coast to other states and military prison camps. [17] Small similarities to the New Orleans evacuation are merely coincidental. Mass population movements function as social engineering.

The American government has written plans (PDF file) dated January 14, 2005 defining their Civilian Inmate Labor Program. Camps have already been established by nefarious presidential executive orders and through FEMA all over the country. See a complete list here or here. This is not recent but started in the Reagan administration. The Federal Emergency Management Agency plan called REX- 84 was drafted by Oliver North by order of Ronald Reagan.

We didn’t speak out when they arrested and incarcerated the Japanese for their own good. We didn’t speak out when they incarcerated some terrorists in Guantánamo. We were silent when we discovered information about rendition flights. Abu Ghraib was insignificant – it was thousands of miles away and purportedly it was a few isolated incidents. We are incredulous when we hear about FEMA camps in America – not in America, the land of the free. Who will speak out, if not Americans, when citizens are incarcerated for being old, non-productive, non-compliant, homosexual, the wrong religion or race, anti-war, and against high-level treason or critical of the growing state tyranny?

Details of the detainee operations are here as a PDF file. There is also a U.S. Army FM 3-19.40 Military Police (MP) Internment-Resettlement Operations: Military Prisons, Prisoners Of War (POW), Civilian Internees: Field Manual Guide Book available on CD-ROM at Amazon.

See also:

Martial Law Concerns, House of Representatives – March 11, 2003

American Prison Camps Are on the Way: The Military Commissions Act of 2006:

Rex 84: FEMA’s Blueprint for Martial Law in America

Homeland Security Contracts for Vast New Detention Camps

10-Year U.S. Strategic Plan For Detention Camps Revives Proposals From Oliver North by Peter Dale Scott

Bibliography:

The Morgenthau Plan and the Problem of Policy Perversion, Paper presented to the Ninth International Revisionist Conference by Prof. Anthony Kubek (A Must Read!)

Long before George W. Bush met with Paul Martin, then Canada’s Prime Minister and Vicente Fox, then Mexico’s president at Baylor University in the miserably memorialized city of Waco, Texas on March 23, 2005, he had a similar meeting in Göteborg, Sweden on June 14, 2001 with Romano Prodi, then European Commission President and Swedish Prime Minister Göran Persson, then President of the European Council. There were several reasons for this media-blacked-out meeting but the essential purpose was the discussion and implementation of the Transatlantic Agenda, supported by both E.U. and U.S. authorities. [1]

The Transatlantic Agenda was adopted on December 3, 1995 at the EU-US Summit in Madrid and signed by William Clinton, then U.S. president and Felipe Gonzalez, then Spanish Prime Minister and Jacques Santer, then European Commission President (1995 – 15 March 1999). The European Commission is the executive body of the European Union. [2] On 1 May 2004 the European Union (EU) undertook an historic enlargement, bringing the total number of Member States from fifteen to twenty five.

Then again from 25 to 26 June 2004, George W. Bush met with Romano Prodi and Taoiseach Bertie Ahern, then President of the European Council in the Dromoland Castle, County Clare, Ireland. [3] They discussed Iraq, the Middle East and counter-terrorism. The summit ended with an agreement between the satellite navigation systems, GPS from the US and the EU’s Galileo system, which secures full interoperability of the two satellite navigation systems. This agreement, initiated in December 1995, was signed by U.S. Secretary of State, Colin Powell, Commission Vice President Loyola de Palacio and Irish Foreign Minister, Brian Cowen. The system will be operational by 2008, possibly to coincide with Real ID[4]

The crux of this media-blacked-out summit: “The EU and the US are committed to a result-driven economic partnership focused on well-identified and mutually beneficial bilateral projects in all areas where better cooperation between governments and regulators can achieve common solutions to concrete problems affecting transatlantic business.” [5] They expanded on the Transatlantic Economic Partnership Action Plan of 1998 and the Positive Economic Agenda roadmap of 2002. Right, we never heard of those meetings or schemes either!

Another issue was non compliance with the WTO, “a legal system set up to regulate and bring order to world trade. As such, upon accession to the organization, WTO members agree to stand by and uphold any decisions that the WTO takes. Full compliance with WTO rulings is therefore one of the fundamental cornerstones on which the continued functioning of the international trade system rests.” [6]

Then there was the summit in June 2005 where they “launched the ‘Initiative to Enhance Transatlantic Economic Integration and Growth.’” And how about the meeting on November 30, 2005 in Brussels, Belgium which was a follow-up to the commitments made at the U.S.-EU summit in June 2005? The U.S. delegation was led by Commerce Secretary Carlos Gutierrez. “The delegations agreed to concrete action plans and timelines to tackle the most significant issues in the trans-Atlantic economy, according to a press release from the Council of the European Union.” [7] There was another meeting on November 9, 2006 where they talked about the Transatlantic Capital Market Integration. [8]

What next – the Amero? That is the least of our worries. While the astute are focused on the NAU there are other issues. Foreign Affairs, published by the CFR had the following to say: “the world economy and the international financial system have evolved in such a way that there is no longer a viable model for economic development outside of them.” [9]

“The right course is not to return to a mythical past of monetary sovereignty, with governments controlling local interest and exchange rates in blissful ignorance of the rest of the world. Governments must let go of the fatal notion that nationhood requires them to make and control the money used in their territory. National currencies and global markets simply do not mix; together they make a deadly brew of currency crises and geopolitical tension and create ready pretexts for damaging protectionism. In order to globalize safely, countries should abandon monetary nationalism and abolish unwanted currencies, the source of much of today’s instability.” [10] Given the CFR’s influence in foreign, national and personal policies, this is significant.

Then on April 30, 2007 there was yet another meeting, mentioned in the alternative media but blacked-out in the mass media. This meeting was entitled: Framework for Advancing Transatlantic Economic Integration Between the United States of America and the European Union with the opening paragraph: “Believing that deeper transatlantic economic integration and growth will benefit our citizens and the competitiveness of our economies, will have global benefits, will facilitate market access for third countries and will encourage other countries to adopt the transatlantic economic model of respect for property rights, openness to investment, transparency and predictability in regulation, and the value of free markets; … [11] There is an Open Skies agreement that will take effect on March 30, 2008 and will allow EU carriers to fly to anywhere in the US and vice versa.” The conspirators reaffirmed America’s commitment to the 2005 U.S.-EU Summit Declaration on Enhancing Transatlantic Economic Integration and Growth in which they “resolved to pursue a forward-looking agenda to enhance transatlantic economic integration and growth, and our commitments from the June 2006 Summit to redouble our efforts to reduce barriers to transatlantic trade and investment and our pledge to keep our investment regimes open and to build on existing investment flows to boost growth and create jobs in the transatlantic economy.” [12]

Further it was stated: “We have identified … projects, selected from the existing work program and other programs within the existing transatlantic dialogue, that will significantly enhance transatlantic economic integration, and we resolve to achieve progress on these projects within six to eight months of the effective date of this Framework, and at latest by the time of the 2008 EU-U.S. Summit.” [13]

There are co-chairs on both sides: “The Transatlantic Economic Council is hereby established, to be co-chaired, on the U.S. side, by a U.S. Cabinet-level official in the Executive Office of the President (embedded January 2005), Allan Hubbard and on the EU side by a Member of the European Commission, Vice President Guenter Verheugen, collaborating closely with the EU Presidency.” [14] Where is our comatose Congress on this “treaty,” this plan to integrate the EU and the United States? Some Americans have been heavily distracted by the North American Union and the open-on-purpose southern border.

So what kind of individual is Allan Hubbard, a huge contributor to the Republican Party? He attended the Bilderberg meetings in 2004 and 2005. The Logan Act specifically states that it is against the law for federal officials to attend secret meetings with private citizens to develop public policies. However, the American government was represented in 2005 at Rottach-Egern by Allan Hubbard, assistant to the president for economic policy and director of the National Economic Council. Others attended as well: “William Luti, deputy under secretary of defense; James Wolfensohn, outgoing president of the World Bank and Paul Wolfowitz, deputy secretary of state, an ideologue of the Iraq war and incoming president of the World Bank. By attending Bilderberg 2005 meeting, these people all broke federal laws of the United States.” [15]So, what else is new? Laws are for the rest of us.

During the George H.W. Bush Administration, big business personalities were placed in key regulatory positions. An effort to weaken certain regulations was led by Vice President Quayle who employed a group called the White House Council on Competitiveness to spearhead the campaign. “In 1991 the Council’s executive director, Allan Hubbard, was accused of a conflict of interest because of his financial holdings in corporations that stood to benefit from a deregulatory agenda. One of those companies was an Indiana chemical producer of which Hubbard was a half-owner.” [16] This company has done business with third world dictators. [17]

“By quashing an EPA recycling regulation that affected his family’s newspaper business, Quayle violated the most minimal ethical standards. One expert bluntly described the vice president’s actions as ‘the common alley-cat breed of conflict of interest.”’  Quayle gave Hubbard a waiver from our conflict-of-interest laws. This waiver allowed Hubbard to participate in clean-air regulatory decisions that directly affected his financial interests. [18] Hubbard owned stock in an electric utility company, another industry subject to new Clean Air Act requirements. In response to these conflict of interest charges the White House displayed a waiver from conflict of interest laws that Quayle granted Hubbard in June 1991. [19]

Hubbard attended Harvard Business School with George W. Bush and appears to travel in like-minded company. Hubbard raised more than $300,000 for Bush’s presidential campaigns and was intimately involved in Bush’s 2000 presidential campaign, holding policy tutorials for the candidate and recruiting other policy advisers for the campaign. “An original Bush ‘Pioneer,’ Hubbard raised more than $100,000 for the president’s 2000 campaign, then made the list of 221 Bush supporters last year who raised more than $200,000 each. He also contributed more than $94,000 to Republican candidates and campaign committees since the 2000 election cycle, according to the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics. His wife, Kathryn Hubbard, gave nearly $20,000 more.” [20] Allan B. Hubbard has always been a big Republican contributorfor which he was undoubtedly amply rewarded.

War, financed on both sides by international bankers, desolates lives, destroys economies, depletes resources, moves massive amounts of money and promotes despair, discouragement and dependence within the population and creates more wealth and power for the corporate elite. To the elite, common humanity functions merely as cannon fodder and labor, the cheaper, the better! The purpose of war is profit. War-torn people easily fall prey to the suggestions of the elitists who have ulterior and highly profitable motives in offering security and solace.

People willingly give up their freedoms when threatened. World War II gave rise to the two new super powers: the United States and the Soviet Union, a new enemy, heavily financed by Wall Street and industrialized with our tax money and technology – in Hegelian Dialectical terms – thesis and antithesis. Owning both sides ensures success – like owning both political parties.

Economic warfare directed by the British in an effort to reclaim her American colony began with deflation through the New York Panic of 1920-21. Next was the Crash of 1929. The British banking cabal was instrumental in shaping the Federal Reserve whose policies led to the wild speculation and ultimate crash, during the Great Depression of 1929. [21] The deliberate catastrophic crash was world-wide creating joblessness, hunger, disintegration of production and national bankruptcies.

The U.S. government alleged that the Second World War was caused by serious obstacles to free trade, exacerbated by the financial events of 1929 manifested in Nazi fascism and responsible for the tensions that led to the Second World War. As a consequence of their questionable theory, the conditions of receiving American economic aid included the implementation of a free trade policy.

Winston Churchill, an agent of the British banking cabal, gave a promotional speech at Zurich University on September 19, 1946 which was the first step towards European integration. Europe found integration acceptable for three reasons: awareness of their own vulnerability, to prevent further wars, “to create a freer, fairer and more prosperous continent.” [22]

America gallantly began to fight the “war on communism,” a precursor to the “war on terrorism.” In March 1947, Harry Truman appealed to Congress for funds (tax money) to support anti-communist forces in Greece. He then proclaimed a broad new policy – The Truman Doctrine, to keep communism in check throughout the world.[23] The premeditated provocateur provided U.S. citizens with visions of Armageddon-style annihilation giving our corporate-directed government ample justification for numerous bloody wars, carnage-creating conflicts, clandestine operations and starving economic sanctions against nonconformist countries who wish to retain their natural resources.

On April 16, 1948, sixteen European countries responded to the generous offer of U.S. economic aid through the Marshall Plan, purportedly to impede the expansion of communism. [24] The Organization for European Economic Cooperation (became the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development – OECD in 1960) was established in order to restore Europe’s economy under the Marshall Plan, the economic carrot, but not without conditions. Each recipient had to sign a strict agreement promising to balance its budget, free prices, halt inflation, stabilize its exchange rate and abolish trade restrictions and allocate scarce commodities.  The recipients had to devise a scheme to allocate aid in collaboration with each other. From the beginning America encouraged West European political and economic integration. [25]

America’s economy grew during the war; especially the military/industrial complex – the shipbuilders, aircraft and weapons manufacturers – and they wanted new customers. Conversely, European and Japanese industry and infrastructure were ravished. The Marshall Plan money, by agreement, had to be used to purchase American exports. They would begin their marketing in Europe – what a radical concept for American business. [26] Bomb them and then allow campaign-contributing-businesses to reap the rewards of marketing and rebuilding.

The Treaty of Paris created the benign amalgamation of the countries of Belgium, France, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, and West Germany. The treaty was signed on April 18, 1951 and expired on April 18, 2001. These countries were then referred to as the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC) purportedly to pool their coal and steel resources, a plan wholly supported by the elitists residing in the United States. [27]

The European Community (originally called European Economic Community) was founded on March 25, 1957 by the signing of the Treaty of Rome. With such common interests as economic, social and trade matters, the manipulated countries easily morphed into the European Union which was created on February 7, 1992 in Maastricht, Netherlands, known as the Maastricht Treaty (formally, the Treaty of European Union, TEU), for the place where it was signed. The treaty was entered into force on November 1, 1993. Down with independence and personal freedoms!

It appears we are on the fast track to the One World Order. With George H. W. Bush giving or selling our infrastructure through an Executive Order and his son, things looks pretty dismal. [28]

Thomas Jefferson said: “I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies . . . If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around [the banks] . . . will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered . . . The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs.” — Thomas Jefferson — The Debate Over The Re-charter Of The Bank Bill, (1809)

Next on the agenda: the full implementation of The North American Union which began as a seemingly innocuous document called the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America, just a collaboration to ensure prosperity for adjoining countries and safety from the terrorists, communists, Islamofascists or whichever enemy is currently targeted on the daily Two Minutes Hate segment distributed through the “fair and balanced”, everything-sounds-like-Fox-News, mass media by the Propaganda Ministry.[29]

Bibliography:

The Transatlantic Community: Helping Build Peace, Prosperity, and Security in the Greater Middle East

EU/US Merger: New Global Order By Stealth

The New Transatlantic Agenda

There are arguments from both sides of the oil issue: either we are quickly running out of oil or we have adequate oil to meet our requirements for generations. Both sides offer evidence, witnesses, experts and documentation to validate their assertions. Some peak-oil projects, funded by oil companies, are highly suspect. The very credible Lindsey Williams maintains that the North Slope in Alaska has as much crude oil as Saudi Arabia. Governor Frank H. Murkowski said in 2005 that there is enough oil on the North Slope to supply the entire United States for 200 years. [1] Antony Sutton, author of Energy, the Created Crisis, is adamant that we have sufficient oil. Conversely, I have read reports which support the peak oil theory. I personally believe, after research, that “there is enough and to spare.” Doom and gloom, Chicken Little oil scarcity claims have been propagated from the beginning. A scarcity, authentic or manufactured, of any crucial commodity accomplishes the following:

1.     Increases profits to those who manipulate that commodity.

2.     Allows the controllers to determine availability to the “right” people.

3.     In the case of energy – severely impacts lifestyle, progress and prosperity.

4.     Extracts more money from an often overburdened consumer.

Henry A. Kissinger, Rockefeller’s well-compensated, multi-purpose minion and long-time member of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) said: “Control the oil and you can control entire Continents. Control food and you control people.” [2] Michael Collon, Belgian author said: “If you want to rule the world, you need to control oil. All the oil. Anywhere.” [3]

The first very memorable “oil crisis” occurred in 1973. Nixon, obedient to his handlers, announced the demonetization of the dollar on August 15, 1971. This allowed time for the “real deciders” to plan their strategy. Eighty-four individuals, financial, corporate and political elitists, gathered at Saltsjöbaden, Sweden for the annual Bilderberg meeting. American attendee, Walter J. Levy, outlined the plan for a pending 400% increase in OPEC revenues, the exact percentage that Kissinger would demand of Saudi Arabian Shah. Their intentions were not prevention but rather a scheme on how to manage the projected abundance of oil dollars – what was later referred to by Herr Kissinger as “recycling the petrodollar flows.” The Bilderberg policy was to initiate a global oil embargo. [4]

An internal memo, dated January 8, 1973, from U.S. Bilderberg official Robert D. Murphy suggested a list of participants for the May 1973 meeting. He stated: “There will be room for only 20 Americans at Saltsjöbaden.” [5]

Those attending included Robert O. Anderson of Atlantic Richfield Oil Co., Lord Greenhill, chairman of British Petroleum, Sir Eric Roll of Siegmund G. Warburg (creator of Eurobonds), George Ball of Lehman Brothers Investment Bank, Henry Kissinger, William P. Bundy, Zbigniew Brzezinski (soon to be Carter’s national security advisor), David Rockefeller, Emilio G. Collado, Executive Vice President, Exxon Corp.; Gianni AgnelliOtto Wolff von Amerongen and Arthur H. Dean, CFR Director (1955-72) and a partner in Rockefeller-oriented Sullivan & Cromwell. Kissinger had requested Warburg to develop the Eurobonds ten years before. [6] A very small scheming elite group, centered in New York and London, influence the economy of the entire world.

The reasons for the “oil shock” were:

1. Launch a colossal assault against world industrial growth.

2. Tilt the balance of power back to the advantage of Anglo-American financial interests.

3. Control the world’s oil flows, their most powerful weapon.

4. Increase the world demand for U.S. dollars. [7]

Egypt and Syria invaded Israel on October 6, 1973 which came to be known as the Yom Kippur War. This war was “secretly orchestrated” by Herr Henry Kissinger, Nixon’s national security adviser as well as Secretary of State. Kissinger effectively managed the Israeli response through his close association with Simcha Dinitz. Kissinger, “Nixon’s intelligence czar,” through privileged channels, misrepresented motives, suppressed communications, and intercepted intelligence reports ensured that the war would progress and end with his “shuttle diplomacy” as planned in May 1973 at Saltsjöbaden. The Arabs, scapegoats for the Elite, were the recipients of the world’s rage and Kissinger was the recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize for 1973. [8]

A “fortuitous coincidence” was that, with oil’s huge price increase, British Petroleum, Royal Dutch Shell and other Anglo-American oil companies were able to substantially recoup the millions they had spent in the exploration of the North Sea oilfields. Meanwhile, in Vienna, OPEC countries met and decided to raise their prices by 70% and initiated an oil embargo on all oil sales to the U.S. and the Netherlands (major oil port for Western Europe) because of the U.S. support for Israel in the Middle East War. On October 17, 1973, OPEC demanded withdrawal of Israel from Arab territories occupied since June 1967 and the restoration of the legal rights of the Palestinians. Nixon was in the midst of Watergate, orchestrated by de facto president Kissinger and assisted by Alexander Haig. [9] There are detectable reasons for Kissinger, a Rockefeller asset, to “Watergate” Nixon, a man he detested and swore he would never work for – he didn’t. [10] In addition, the Watergate fiasco distracted the masses from the grave economic situation.

Uninformed Nixon attempted to get U.S. Treasury officials to force OPEC to lower oil prices but was bluntly instructed, via a memo, that the bankers had mandated the dollar “recycling” program to accommodate the higher oil prices. Jack F. Bennett, Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for International Monetary Affairs (until July 1974), had counseled Nixon towards his 1971 dollar demonetization decision. Bennett, at Kissinger’s direction and according to an established agreement with the Saudis to finance the U.S. government deficits, had arranged for David C. Mulford to go to Saudi Arabia to act as an “investment adviser” to SAMA. His job was to “guide the Saudi petrodollars investments to the correct banks, naturally in London and New York. The Bilderberg scheme was operating just as planned.” [11]

Led by Exxon, some oil companies had created a short supply of domestic crude oil, supported by Nixon on advice from his aids. By January 1974, oil prices had increased by 400%. In December 1974, nine powerful bankers, including David Rockefeller, approached New York mayor Abraham Beame. They made him an offer he could not refuse – unless he assigned management of the city’s vast pension funds to them – the Municipal Assistance Corporation – then their complicit media cronies would financially destroy the city. This decreased the amount of money available for roadways, bridges, hospitals, schools and the laying-off of tens of thousands of city workers in order for New York City, the biggest city in the country, to service their bank debt. Similar circumstances occurred in other parts of the world: bank collapses, grave trade deficits, unemployment, inflation, and industrial and transportation depression in the more industrial nations. In third-world countries, the consequences were even more severe. [12]

While devastating to the populace, the oil companies flourished: Exxon, Mobil, Texaco, Chevron, and Gulf. OPEC’s petrodollars were deposited into the right banks in New York and London: Chase Manhattan, Citibank, Manufacturers Hanover, Bank of America, Barclays, Lloyds and Midland Bank. [13] These events set the stage for the debt crisis of the 1980s.

The globalist decision of August 1971 to remove the dollar from a fixed, gold-backed exchange rate system generated a shift to double-digit inflation, urban decay, mounting unemployment and excessive interest rates. The Kissinger-orchestrated Middle East oil crisis of 1973-74 was designed to de-industrialize and eventually transform the United States from the world’s largest creditor nation to the world’s biggest debtor nation.

A review of history further helps to reveal ruthless business patterns that have shaped current circumstances – including yet another war resulting in death and bloodshed for the benefit of the greedy, insatiable elite.

Beginning with the Civil War, the opportunistic, monopolistic John D. Rockefeller sold inflated-priced Harkness whiskey to the Federal troops. Recognizing the huge profitability in war with the right commodity, he built his first oil refinery in 1863 along the Cuyahoga River (Ohio) to accommodate the growing needs of the raging Civil War which he and others, like J. P. Morgan, had purchased their way out of for $300.

The Rothschild controlled National City Bank of Cleveland gave Rockefeller his first loan. In 1865 Rockefeller, for $72,500, bought out his partners (Henry Flagler, Samuel Andrews, Stephen V. Harkness) and price-chopped or otherwise destroyed his competitors by purchasing supporting industries such as pipelines, railroad tank cars, terminal facilities and barrel manufacturing factories. He soon incorporated the growing imperialistic Standard Oil Company in 1870 to fully exploit the growing Russian kerosene market as well as the curative “snake-oil” market in the U.S.

In what Ohio historian Christopher Eiben called “a brilliant stroke of corporate back scratching,” “Rockefeller sold shares to bankers who lent him millions and railroaders who gave him great freight deals, including rebates on rivals’ shipments.” [14] “Working through the Wall Street firms of Kuhn, Loeb & Co., and J. P. Morgan Co., the Rothschilds financed John D. Rockefeller so that he could create the Standard Oil Empire. They also financed the activities of Edward Harriman (railroads) and Andrew Carnegie (steel).” [15]

By 1873 Standard Oil, by hook or crook, had acquired about 80 percent of the refining capacity in Cleveland which was about one third of the U.S. total. Interestingly enough, the stock market crashed on September 18, 1873 and created a six year recession allowing Standard Oil to seize refineries in Pennsylvania’s oil region, Pittsburgh,Philadelphia and New York. Rockefeller controlled approximately 90% of the oil refined as well as most of the oil marketing facilities in the U.S. by 1878. [16] Ruthless Rockefeller, who detested competition, founded the first global monopoly and was supplying 90% of the world’s oil, 70% overseas. Great Britain also experienced economic depression in 1873 replete with pandemic unemployment and bankruptcies. Two years later, the Rothschilds provided a sizeable loan (£4,080,000) to enable the British government to acquire a controlling share of the Suez Canal. [17]

Rockefeller had built the world’s biggest business in Cleveland, Ohio. Standard Oil sold over “300 refining byproducts” from Vaseline to chewing gum. In 1882, he created the Standard Oil Trust, suggested by Samuel Dodd, Standard Oil’s attorney, to eviscerate and devour all of the independent oil producers and refiners both nationally (250 competitors in the U.S.) and internationally. A trust is when stockholders in a group of companies transfer their shares to a single set of trustees who control all of the companies which constitutes a monopoly. “In exchange, the stockholders received certificates entitling them to a specified share of the consolidated earnings of the jointly managed companies.” [18] Rockefeller’s “trust” became an example to other “businessmen” who embraced the “trust” concept – always at the expense of the working man. Rockefeller took his growing Goliath to Manhattan in 1883 where he “influenced urban sprawl.” [19]

Russia’s oil industry accelerated in the latter part of the 19th century due to an oil boom at the Caspian Sea town of Baku, which had opened in 1873 and at Galicia (now in Poland). The Rothschild banking family had major interests in the oil-wells of Baku, Russia. Beginning in 1875, Ludvig and Robert Nobel built an oil empire known as the Brothers Nobel, or Branobel, based on oil deposits in Baku on the Caspian Sea. [20] By 1883, Standard Oil’s imports were not as essential to the Russian market for reasons that follow. [21]

Britain’s Marcus Samuel, future founder of Shell Oil, developed tankers capable of carrying oil in cost-cutting bulk transport through the Suez Canal. The maiden voyage of the “Murex,” the first tanker, was in 1892. Remember, Great Britain had a controlling interest in the Suez Canal, thanks to the Rothschilds. Marcus and his brother also established bulk oil storage at ports in the Far East. In addition, they contracted with a Russian group, controlled by the Rothschilds, “for the long-term supply of kerosene” which put them in high-risk direct competition, abhorrent to Rockefeller, with Standard Oil. The Samuel brothers named their company The Tank Syndicate but renamed it in 1897 to the Shell Transport and Trading Company. [22]

Rockefeller and his accomplices felt that they were above the law until the passage of the Sherman Antitrust Act on July 2, 1890, enacted by Congress based on their Constitutional power to regulate interstate commerce. It was signed into law by President Benjamin Harrison. In 1892, the Ohio Supreme Court ordered the disbanding of the Standard Oil Trust, an illegal monopoly. “Standard Oil was subsequently reorganized in 1899 as a holding company under the name of Standard Oil Company of New Jersey. That state had conveniently adopted a law that permitted a parent company to own the stock of other companies.” [23]

In 1896 Standard Oil contributed $250,000 to Republican William McKinley’s presidential campaign against Democrat William Jennings Bryan, a supporter of antitrust legislation. [24] McKinley was opposed to the imperialistic, expansionist Spanish-American War. Yet, to retain office in the next election, he asked Congress to declare war against Spain in 1898. He signed the Gold Standard Act in 1900.

In September 1901, William McKinley, allegedly a Rockefeller tool, was shot by Leon Czolgosz (son of Polish immigrants), labeled as an “anarchist” although he didn’t belong to any rebel groups. Czolgosz was immediately “tried and executed by the Establishment.” The assassination was manipulated by the Establishment to subtly discredit rebellion and anyone who might justifiably dissent. The Elite, in any age, would actually prefer to prohibit dissent. It is similar to our current administration saying: “Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the attacks of September the 11th…” [25] and by implication – let us never tolerate conspiracy theorists.

Following the assassination, various anti-sedition and anti-conspiracy laws were passed by the Establishment. Who benefited by McKinley’s death – Teddy Roosevelt who was supported by the contending Morgan (as opposed to Rockefeller) wing of the Republican Party. Roosevelt immediately started using the anti-trust weapon to try to destroy Rockefeller’s Standard Oil and Harriman’s Northern Securities, both bitter enemies of the Morgan world empire. [26]

Woodrow Wilson, son of a Presbyterian minister, had the financial and political support of the Rockefellers, Jacob Schiff, Bernard Baruch, and others in his successful 1910 bid for governor of New Jersey. They also had the love letters he wrote to Mary Peck, his mistress while he was president of Princeton (1902-1910), for which they paid $65,000. [27] Therefore he later made the perfect, morally compromised presidential candidate. The following unconstitutional acts were engineered during the administration of the obedient Rockefeller minion, Woodrow Wilson:

1913: The Sixteenth Amendment – authorized income taxes (never ratified)

The Seventeenth Amendment – direct popular election of Senators

Underwood Tariff – lowered duties

Federal Reserve Act – created the un-federal Federal Reserve System

Through the years, Standard Oil received bad press as a result of their cutthroat business practices and the muckraking reports of people like Ida Tarbell and writer/activist Upton Sinclair. Rockefeller hired Ivy Lee in 1914 as their public relations manager to clean up their image and appear philanthropic. [28] A public relations professional, with media complicity, also discredits or disgraces any national or foreign opponent.

For decades, voters merely decide to cast a vote – the actual decisions regarding candidates and the orchestrated consequences of those calculated choices are made in covert CFR committee meetings, Bilderberg assemblies, pentagon offices and corporate boardrooms. Voters ultimately suffer the extreme penalties and the elite benefactors, the “deciders” remain unscathed.

 Spingola

Related articles