Political Vel Craft

Veil Of Politics

54 Members of Congress Accepted Money From Hamas Terrorists: Federal Judge Confirms CAIR Are Hamas Terrorists!

Federal Judge Confirms CAIR ~ Are Hamas Terrorists.

In Case There are Any Doubts…

  1. Hamas is a U.S. State Department-designated terrorist organization that professes to be a “Nation of Jihad”.1, 2
  2. CAIR is a front organization of Hamas.3
  3. At least 54 Members of Congress are aiding, working with, taking money from and/or acting as a front for CAIR (i.e., Hamas, i.e., a U.S. State Department-designated terrorist organization).4

  1. The Palestine Authority has long been considered an entity supporting terrorism.5, 6, 7, 8 Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama have given nearly $600 Million in taxpayer money to the Palestine Authority.9
  2. Barack Obama and his Administration have close ties with Islamic radicals, CAIR, terrorists and terrorist organizations and they have implemented an agenda that supports terrorism.10, 11
  3. The publicly available evidence is abundant, clear as glass and cannot be ignored by any rational person. 54 Congressmen, Obama and Hillary are aiding terrorists and should be immediately arrested.
  4. Okay, America, it’s time for us to force our government to drop its charade.  We have terrorists, communists, socialists and criminals running our country and driving it into the dirt.12 Now we have clear and sufficient evidence to demand a historic investigation of these criminal elements.
  5. If the new House of Representatives does not immediately investigate, prosecute, impeach and/or jail these people for crimes, then America must assume that Republicans are active members of a now openly visible, terrorist Mafia organization that cannot be trusted to run the USA in the interest of law-abiding citizens.  In fact, if the GOP House does not take immediate action on this terrorist issue, logic would dictate to any reasonable person that terrorists have captured our government and that citizens must act immediately to protect themselves and their country from further harm or potential death.
  6. You don’t want to live in a terrorist country, do you? Send this article to your Congressman today and tell that anything short of IMMEDIATE public investigations and/or arrests beginning on January 5, 2011 is not an acceptable response. Spread the word to your family and friends! ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!


Obama’s 25 Charges Of Treason: Where’s Darrel Issa April 2014?

Congressman Issa… Are you Listening?

Congressman Issa

treason |ˈtrēzən|noun (also high treason)

The crime of betraying one’s country, esp. by attempting to kill the sovereign (We The People) ~ or overthrow the government : they were convicted of treason.• the action of betraying someone or something : doubt is the ultimate treason againstfaith.

treason \noun \ the treason of Benedict Arnold will be recounted for centuries:

treachery, disloyalty, betrayal, faithlessness; sedition, subversion, mutiny, rebellion; high treason, lèse-majesté; apostasy; literary perfidy. ANTONYMS allegiance, loyalty.

NUREMBERG PRINCIPLES

Principle I

Principle I states, “Any person who commits an act which constitutes a crime under international law is responsible therefor and liable to punishment.”

Principle II

Principle II states, “The fact that internal law does not impose a penalty for an act which constitutes a crime under international law does not relieve the person who committed the act from responsibility under international law.”

Principle III

Principle III states, “The fact that a person who committed an act which constitutes a crime under international law acted as Head of State or responsible government official does not relieve him from responsibility under international law.”

Principle IV

Principle IV states: “The fact that a person acted pursuant to order of his Government or of a superior does not relieve him from responsibility under international law, provided a moral choice was in fact possible to him”.

This principle could be paraphrased as follows: “It is not an acceptable excuse to say ‘I was just following my superior’s orders’”.

Previous to the time of the Nuremberg Trials, this excuse was known in common parlance as “Superior Orders“. After the prominent, high profile event of the Nuremberg Trials, that excuse is now referred to by many as “Nuremberg Defense“.

In recent times, a third term, “Lawful orders” has become common parlance for some people. All three terms are in use today, and they all have slightly different nuances of meaning, depending on the context in which they are used.

Nuremberg Principle IV is legally supported by the jurisprudence found in certain articles in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights which deal indirectly with conscientious objection.

It is also supported by the principles found in paragraph 171 of the Handbook on Procedures and Criteria for Determining Refugee Status which was issued by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR).

Those principles deal with the conditions under which conscientious objectors can apply for refugee status in another country if they face persecution in their own country for refusing to participate in an illegal war.

Principle V

Principle V states, “Any person charged with a crime under international law has the right to a fair trial on the facts and law.”

Principle VI

Principle VI states,

“The crimes hereinafter set out are punishable as crimes under international law:

(a) Crimes against peace:
(i) Planning, preparation, initiation or waging of a war of aggression or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances;
(ii) Participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the acts mentioned under (i).
(b) War crimes:
Violations of the laws or customs of war which include, but are not limited to, murder, ill-treatment or deportation of slave labor or for any other purpose of the civilian population of or in occupied territory; murder or ill-treatment of prisoners of war or persons on the Seas, killing of hostages, plunder of public or private property, wanton destruction of cities, towns, or villages, or devastation not justified by military necessity.

(c) Crimes against humanity:
Murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation and other inhumane acts done against any civilian population, or persecutions on political, racial, or religious grounds, when such acts are done or such persecutions are carried on in execution of or in connection with any crime against peace or any war crime.”

Principle VII

Principle VII states, “Complicity in the commission of a crime against peace, a war crime, or a crime against humanity as set forth in Principle VI is a crime under international law.”

And trials there must be. No matter the cost, the nest of vipers on Capitol Hill, and all of the traitors in the government at large, must be brought to task for their behavior, or a free America is doomed.

Milquetoast Fox News, which is financed by the same Saudi prince funding CAIR – continue to invite Awad and other CAIR leaders on the air to argue against airport profiling and other issues on CAIR’s agenda. Fox has offered CAIR guests full segments unopposed by critics and without viewer caveats regarding CAIR’s court-documented terror connections.

The 20-page order, signed by U.S. District Judge Jorge A. Solis, cites “ample evidence” that CAIR participated in a “criminal conspiracy” led by the Holy Land Foundation, Hamas’s main fundraising arm in the U.S. As a result, the judge refused CAIR’s request to strike its name from documents listing it as an unindicted co-conspirator in the case.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

It is therefore ordered that the District Clerk for the Northern District of Texas shall file and seal the Amicus Curaie Brief of the Council on American-Islamic Relations in Support of the Unindicted Co-Conspirators’ First and Fifth Amendment Rights, which has been decided herein.

The Clerk shall also seal Attachment A to the Government’s Trial Brief, filed May 29, 2007 [Docket No. 656]. It is also ordered that all pleadings, records, documents, orders and other papers concerning (1) CAIR’s Amicus Brief, (2) CAIR’s Motion for Leave to file Amicus Brief, and (3) ISNA’s and NAIT’s Motion [Docket Nos. 777, 778, 797, 799, 850, 851] including this Order be sealed. All these documents shall be kept sealed until further order of this Court.

It is so ORDERED, this 1st

3:04-CR-0240-P Order Page 20 of 20

day of July 2009.

_________________________________ JORGE A. SOLIS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

HERE ARE THE ANTI-SEMITES:

Arizona

  1. Raul Grijalva

California

  1. Lois Capps
  2. Sam Farr
  3. Bob Filner
  4. Barbara Lee
  5. Loretta Sanchez
  6. Pete Stark
  7. Michael Honda
  8. Lynn Woolsey
  9. Jackie Speier
  10. Diane Watson
  11. George Miller

Connecticut

  1. Jim Himes

Indiana

  1. Andre Carson

Iowa

  1. Bruce Braley

Kentucky

  1. John Yarmuth

Maryland

  1. Elijah Cummings
  2. Donna Edwards

Massachusetts

  1. Michael Capuano
  2. William Delahunt
  3. Jim McGovern
  4. John Tierney
  5. John Olver
  6. Stephen Lynch

Michigan

  1. John Conyers
  2. John Dingell
  3. Carolyn Kilpatrick

Minnesota

  1. Keith Ellison
  2. Betty McCollum
  3. James Oberstar

New Jersey

  1. Donald Payne
  2. Rush Holt
  3. Bill Pascrell

New York

  1. Yvette Clarke
  2. Maurice Hinchey
  3. Paul Tonko
  4. Eric Massa

North Carolina

  1. David Price

Ohio

  1. Mary Jo Kilroy
  2. Marcy Kaptur

Oregon

  1. Earl Blumenauer
  2. Peter DeFazio

Pennsylvania

  1. Chaka Fattah
  2. Joe Sestak

Vermont

  1. Peter Welch

Virginia

  1. Jim Moran

Washington

  1. Jim McDermott
  2. Adam Smith
  3. Jay Inslee
  4. Brian Baird

West Virginia

  1. Nick Rahall

Wisconsin

  1. Tammy Baldwin
  2. Gwen Moore

Virginia

  1. Glenn Nye

“Muslims are the vilest of animals…”

“Show mercy to one another, but be ruthless to Muslims”

“How perverse are Muslims!”

“Strike off the heads of Muslims, as well as their fingertips”

“Fight those Muslims who are near to you”

“Muslim mischief makers should be murdered or crucified”

Hate speech?  Incitement to violence?  Sounds like it to us, but a knowledgeable Muslim would have to disagree. Why would Muslims not consider this to be hate speech?

How is it that we can post these quotes with full certainty that CAIR won’t be contacting the media (or Congress) with wild-eyed accusations of Islamophobia?

Well, for one thing, we don’t actually agree with any of these disgusting statements, of course.  But the real reason is that Muslims themselves honestly believe these quotes to be the literal, eternal word of Allah.  In fact, CAIR is promoting this hate speech on their own website!

It is actively propagating the very literature that contains these comments, even while sanctimoniously claiming that it is working against hate and violence.

But… isn’t CAIR a Muslim organization?  What’s the catch? Well, if you haven’t guessed it already, these are quotes from the Qur’an in which we’ve replaced the word ‘Christian’, ‘Jew’ or ‘unbeliever’ with the word ‘Muslim.’

Here is how they actually appear in the literature that groups like CAIR are pushing:

Sura (8:55) – Surely the vilest of animals in Allah’s sight are those who disbelieve

Sura (48:29) – Muhammad is the messenger of Allah. And those with him are hard (ruthless) against the disbelievers and merciful among themselves

Sura (9:30) – And the Jews say: Ezra is the son of Allah, and the Christians say: The Messiah is the son of Allah… Allah (Himself) fights against them. How perverse are they!

Sura (8:12) – I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them

Sura (9:123) – O you who believe! Fight those of the unbelievers who are near to you and let them find in you hardness

Sura (5:33) – The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His messenger and strive to make mischief in the land is only this, that they should be murdered or crucified or their hands and their feet should be cut off on opposite sides or they should be imprisoned; this shall be as a disgrace for them in this world, and in the hereafter they shall have a grievous chastisement

TheReligionofPeace – CAIR’s Hate Speech

REFERENCES

1.www.state.gov/s/ct/rls/other/des/123085.htm

2.atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2010/12/hamas-prime-minister-haniya-we-are-a-nation-of-jihad-.html

3.www.wnd.com/?pageId=232181

4.www.rightsidenews.com/201001278384/us/politics-and-economics/hamas-54-democratic-congressmen.html

5. www.jcpa.org/art/brief1-11.htm

6.www.mfa.gov.il/MFA/Government/Communiques/2001/The%20Palestinian%20Authority%20and%20Terrorism%20-%20Picture

7. www.investigativeproject.org/blog/2010/07/palestinian-authority-again-honors-terrorist

8. www.state.gov/s/ct/rls/crt/2009/140889.htm

9. www.voanews.com/english/news/middle-east/US-Announces-Additional-Palestinian-Aid–107047048.html

10. www.commieblaster.com/obama/

11. www.commieblaster.com/world_obama/

12. www.commieblaster.com/progressives/

About these ads

Comments are closed.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 3,316 other followers