The Montgomery County Sheriff’s Office is weeks away from launching an unmanned aerial asset to help deputies fight crime. The ShadowHawk helicopter is six-feet long, weighs fifty pounds and fits in the back of an SUV.
“We can put it over a fire, put it over ahazmat spill, put it over a house with a suspect barricaded inside and literally give the incident commander the ability to look at the entire scene with a bird’s eye view, ” Chief Deputy Randy McDaniel said.
There is much hoopla over Felipe Calderone’s speech to Congress, and his chastising of America for Arizona having to gall to actually protect its citizen from the scourge of illegal immigration. The atrocities didn’t end there, however.
The second atrocity was committed by the Democrats in Congress who actually clapped, then gave Calderone a standing ovation!
For most Conservatives, that was the real atrocity, besides the idea that some third-rate rinky-dink president would have the nerve to lecture us. However there was a third atrocity that went mostly unnoticed…but not by me.
The atrocity is the Republican’s reaction.
Many would say that the Republicans were right not to react, and these same people were comforted that Republicans sat on their hands and remained quiet. Well they could not be more wrong!
By not saying anything, Republicans allowed, yet again, the narrative of the Left to win out. As we say in sales,
In all interactions a sale is made.
Republicans looked like voiceless eunuchs, while Pelosi and the rest of the Liberal incorrigibles SOLD the idea to the WORLD that the US believes its sovereignty is not worth fighting for. This is despite Americans overwhelming opposition to illegal immigration, and for the record overwhelming opposition to illegal immigration…by the WORLD!
Liberal Democrats don’t have to care what Americans think, because Republicans fight like sissies! Always have and with few exception, always will!
Instead of sitting there in quiet “defiance,” the passive aggressive pansies that make up the current crop of Republicans should have shouted to the rafters in unison: “ES UN MENTIROSO…HIJO! Translated: “YOU LIE…BOY!”
How DARE Calderone come to our country and lecture us on illegal immigration, when Mexico doesn’t allow illegal immigration?!
How dare he lecture us on “racial profiling,” when (1) Arizona’s law had nothing to do with racial profile, and (2) Mexico allows for racial profile?
The Republicans should have shut Calderone down during his speech with their outrage. And if that didn’t work, they should have ALL gotten up and walked out!
This is yet another example of why we need warriors, and these example seem to happen almost daily.
If the fire burns in your belly against illegal immigration, there is no amount of decorum that should allow you to let the president of Mexico lecture you on it, without you shouting, “ES UN MENTIROSO…HIJO!”
Calderone and the rest of Mexico should respect the laws of the United States, even if they don’t respect the traitors who currently govern this country. Instead Calderone exports drug gang violence and disease from a country that he can’t run well enough for anybody to want to stay. And if his people don’t want to stay then who in the *bleep* does he think wants to go? According to this article, nobody.
Mexican tourism has fallen off big time, even in the resort areas. Don’t even consider going to a border town, where murder rates are in the hundreds per month, equally all major US cities combined in some Mexican border towns. Talk about the Wild Wild West! Kidnappings at the rate of 200 per month, more than all the kidnappings in the US combined.
America isn’t the Third World. If a military coup does occur here it will be civilized. That it has never happened doesn’t mean it wont. Describing what may be afoot is not to advocate it. So, view the following through military eyes:
Officers swear to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic.” Unlike enlisted personnel, they do not swear to “obey the orders of the president of the United States.”
Top military officers can see the Constitution they are sworn to defend being trampled as American institutions and enterprises are nationalized.
They can see that Americans are increasingly alarmed that this nation, under President Barack Obama, may not even be recognizable as America by the 2012 election, in which he will surely seek continuation in office.
They can see that the economy — ravaged by deficits, taxes, unemployment, and impending inflation — is financially reliant on foreign lender governments.
They can see this president waging undeclared war on the intelligence community, without whose rigorous and independent functions the armed services are rendered blind in an ever-more hostile world overseas and at home.
They can see the dismantling of defenses against missiles targeted at this nation by avowed enemies, even as America’s troop strength is allowed to sag.
They can see the horror of major warfare erupting simultaneously in two, and possibly three, far-flung theaters before America can react in time.
They can see the nation’s safety and their own military establishments and honor placed in jeopardy as never before.
So, if you are one of those observant military professionals, what do you do?Wait until this president bungles into losing the war in Afghanistan, and Pakistan’s arsenal of nuclear bombs falls into the hands of militant Islam?Wait until Israel is forced to launch air strikes on Iran’s nuclear-bomb plants, and the Middle East explodes, destabilizing or subjugating the Free World?What happens if the generals Obama sent to win the Afghan war are told by this president (who now says, “I’m not interested in victory”) that they will be denied troops they must have to win? Do they follow orders they cannot carry out, consistent with their oath of duty? Do they resign en masse?Or do they soldier on, hoping the 2010 congressional elections will reverse the situation? Do they dare gamble the national survival on such political whims?Anyone who imagines that those thoughts are not weighing heavily on the intellect and conscience of America’s military leadership is lost in a fool’s fog.Will the day come when patriotic general and flag officers sit down with the president, or with those who control him, and work out the national equivalent of a “family intervention,” with some form of limited, shared responsibility?Imagine a bloodless coup to restore and defend the Constitution through an interim administration that would do the serious business of governing and defending the nation. Skilled, military-trained, nation-builders would replace accountability-challenged, radical-left commissars. Having bonded with his twin teleprompters, the president would be detailed for ceremonial speech-making.Military intervention is what Obama’s exponentially accelerating agenda for “fundamental change” toward a Marxist state is inviting upon America. A coup is not an ideal option, but Obama’s radical ideal is not acceptable or reversible.Unthinkable? Then think up an alternative, non-violent solution to the Obama problem. Just don’t shrug and say, “We can always worry about that later.”AGJ
A chilling report from the Foreign Military Intelligence Directorate (GRU) prepared for Prime Minister Putin warns today that United StatesPresident Barack Obama has had served on 14 US Governors National Security Letters (NSLs) warning that if their actions in attempting to form what are called State Defense Forces are not halted they will face “immediate” arrest for the crime of treason.
Texas may have roughly one-fourth of the nation’s oil supply, but voters in the state apparently welcome the competition: 77% support offshore oil drilling, five points higher than the 72% who support it nationwide.
A new Rasmussen Reports survey shows only nine percent (9%) of voters in the Lone Star State oppose offshore drilling, while another 91% approve.
The idea, in fact, seems to be universally popular, with support from 89% of Conservatives, 85% of voters not affiliated with either major party and even 53% of Democrats.
While President Obama has banned on offshore drilling, he has kept it in place off the coasts of California and New England because of political opposition there. Sixty percent (80%) of Texas voters think offshore drilling should be allowed off those coastlines, too, comparable to views nationally. Sixteen percent (16%) oppose drilling off those states. Roughly one-in-four (24%) are undecided.
Despite their support for offshore drilling, 41% of Texas voters believe states should have the right to ban drilling of their own shorelines, slightly less supportive than the view nationally. Thirty-four percent (34%) disagree, and 26% aren’t sure.
80% of Conservative voters and 63% of unaffiliateds favor drilling off New England and California.
Republican and unaffiliated voters are less supportive than Democrats of states having the right to ban drilling off thier own coastlines.
Most voters in California and Massachusetts ALSO support resumption of offshore oil drilling.
The following video was shot in March when Infowars reported on the existence of mass graves in Arizona and Texas. On March 28, we posted photos of a mass grave site at the Houston National Cemetery administered by the Veterans Administration.
Infowars received an email today pointing us to a video of the mass grave site.
“Could this be related to what is going on in Phoenix? I noticed both the concrete structures that go in the ground as well as some plastic coffin liners. Could it be a regular expansion of the cemetery? It seems to be an operation of a smaller scale than what is going on in Phoenix, or perhaps I am late and many of the concrete structures are already in the ground and covered up,” a reader noted in an email sent with photo attachments.
On March 25, Infowars posted a report filed by Shepard Ambellas on an apparent mass grave site under construction at the National Memorial Cemetery in Phoenix, Arizona.
In February, Infowars reposted a report by D. H. Williams of the Daily Newscaster revealed a meeting between Indiana county municipal officials in the vicinity of Chicago and officials with FEMA and the Department of Homeland Security. According to Williams’ sources, DHS and FEMA officials presented several scenarios, including the need for mass graves.
