End of Liberty, posted with vodpod
Category Archives: nuremberg
Weekend Reflections: Martha Coakley: Rape Of American Citizens – “Yes We Can”
M E M O R A N D U M
To: All Employees
From: Human Resources Due to the current financial situation caused by the slowdown in the
Economy, Congress has decided to implement a scheme to put workers of 50
Years of age and above on early retirement, thus creating jobs and
Reducing unemployment.
Should Roman Catholics Support Congressman Ron Paul? : An Examination Of A Conscience!
God In Turn Set Us Free: The man who had died came forth, bound hand and foot with wrappings, and his face was wrapped around with a cloth. Jesus said to them, “Unbind him, and let him go.” John 11:44
Within 4 Days Of The Christ Banishing The Money Changers From The Temple….
Rothschild’s Federal Reserve: Backstabbing Of The Middle East Arabs ~ Their Libyan End Game Hopes!
CURRENTLY 2011, BARNEY FRANK, AND HARRY REID ARE SITTING ON THE LEGISLATION THAT WOULD REVERSE THE BAILOUT OF THE LONDON BASED BANKS
BILL CLINTON’S REPEALING OF THE GLASS STEAGALL ACT ~ WHICH PROTECTED THE AMERICAN CITIZEN’S SAVINGS!
Before Listening To Lyndon LaRouchePAC Please Consider How We Bailed Out/Absorbed The International Banking Cartel’s Massive Debt On The Housing Bubble Scam. This Scam Was Accrued BY Writing Fraudulent Mortgages To People When The Banks Had No Money. So They Used Paper Contracts Saying That The Predatory Mortgages Derived aka; Derivative their value from some other property like perhaps a hospital building, a bridge, or another residential house etc etc.
Now Please Consider That The Glass Steagall Act If Reenacted, Would Nullify This Past Bailout Of $Trillions And Bankrupt Those Who Are Driving The New World Order, Who Are Also Driving Other Nation States In The Ground By Derivative Paper.
So When I Thought About The Republicans Like [ Cantor And Boehner ] Speak About Saving $60 Billion (hey remember when they promised $100B?) By Defunding Some Programs, While Barry Soetoro Wants Another $153 Billion Himself For Fannie/Freddie Bailout, It Was Easy To Conclude That The Republicans Are Doing Absolutely NOTHING Of Significance, Except In Perhaps In Throwing To The American Public A Tiny $60 Billion Dollar Moral Bone. I Though Of The Activities Of Eric Cantor Who IS FINANCED By London And Those Who May Think The Republicans Are Really On A Roll, Of The Merry Ole’ Land Of Oz.
WE MUST REENACT THE GLASS STEAGALL ACT TO NULLIFY THE $TRILLIONS ~ SURLY THE TIME SPENT BY THE REPUBLICANS CURRENTLY TO SWEEP UP THE INSIGNIFICANT CRUMBS OF DEBT, CAN BE UTILIZED FAR MORE EFFICIENTLY, BY GETTING BARNEY FRANK TO RELEASE THE GLASS STEAGALL ACT AND ALLOW IT FOR AN UP DOWN VOTE.
LONDON’S NWO END GAME HOPES ~ Which Is Not The British Government!
Lindsey Williams Exclusive: Nwo to Target Iran & Saudi Arabi Next, Oil to Hit $200 a Barrel 1/5
Lindsey Williams Exclusive: Nwo to Target Iran & Saudi Arabi Next, Oil to Hit $200 a Barrel 2/5
Lindsey Williams Exclusive: Nwo to Target Iran & Saudi Arabi Next, Oil to Hit $200 a Barrel 3/5
Lindsey Williams Exclusive: Nwo to Target Iran & Saudi Arabi Next, Oil to Hit $200 a Barrel 4/5
Lindsey Williams Exclusive: Nwo to Target Iran & Saudi Arabi Next, Oil to Hit $200 a Barrel 5/5
Angelides Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission Report: Reintroduce Glass Steagall To Save The United States.
GET THE REPORT
To view the report of the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission, you can download the report in full or download a section of the report by clicking on the links below. You can also order the Commission’s authorized and official versions of the report by clicking on your preferred option in the box on the right.
- Download Full Report with Dissents (PDF)
- Table of Contents
- Commissioners
- Commissioner votes
- Staff list
- Preface
- Conclusions of the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission
- Part I: Crisis on the Horizon
- Part II: Setting the Stage
- Part III: The Boom and Bust
- Part IV: The Unraveling
- Part V: The Aftershocks
- Dissenting Views By Keith Hennessey, Douglas Holtz-Eakin, and Bill Thomas
- Dissenting Views By Peter J. Wallison
- Appendix A: Glossary
- Appendix B: List of Hearings and Witnesses
- Notes
- Index
- Errata
CONCLUSIONS
How did it come to pass that in 2008 our nation was forced to choose between two stark and painful alternatives — either risk the collapse of our financial system and economy, or commit trillions of taxpayer dollars to rescue major corporations and our financial markets, as millions of Americans still lost their jobs, their savings, and their homes?
The Commission concluded that this crisis was avoidable. It found widespread failures in financial regulation; dramatic breakdowns in corporate governance; excessive borrowing and risk-taking by households and Wall Street; policy makers who were ill prepared for the crisis; and systemic breaches in accountability and ethics at all levels. Here we present what we found so readers can reach their own conclusions, even as the comprehensive historical record of this crisis continues to be written.
Conclusions of the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission
Dissent Joined by Keith Hennessey, Douglas Holtz-Eakin, and Bill Thomas
United States Of America
FCIC Report: The Moral Test, posted with vodpod
Feb 2011
I have long stated that our current market crash was caused by a lending industry taking advantage of a government deregulation intended to make home ownership available to more Americans. In a classic example of the Law of Unintended Consequences, the deregulation allowed lenders to sell virtually any loan they created regardless of whether or not the borrower was qualified for the loan. This house of cards eventually crashed when original teaser rates re-set and millions of borrowers could no longer afford the loans.
In 2008, Congress created a Commission to investigate the cause of the crash and appointed Sacramentan, Phil Angelides, to head it. In a blistering report that followed 18 months of testimony and fact-gathering, Angelides and his Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission blamed a wide cast of characters for the epic meltdown, including executives of insurance giant AIG and Goldman Sachs and government policymakers like Alan Greenspan, Timothy Geithner and Ben Bernanke. The report said human error created the crisis. The Report blamed mortgage lenders for the flood of risky subprime loans that ignored “a borrower’s ability to pay.” Wall Street investment banks recklessly packaged the loans into toxic securities that exposed the entire financial system to melt down, the report concludes.
The panel held four field hearings, all in communities that were among the hardest hit by the real estate crash: Sacramento, Las Vegas, Bakersfield and Miami. In Sacramento, commissioners heard about the Central Valley’s vulnerability to the housing price bubble. One witness testified that appraisers were pressured by lenders to make inflated appraisals so shaky loans would go through. The final report mentions Sacramento numerous times, noting that housing prices more than doubled in a five-year stretch.
All the while, government watchdogs were asleep. For more than 30 years, lawmakers and presidents bought into the free-market ethic backed by the likes of Greenspan, the former Federal Reserve chairman. “The sentries were not at their posts,” the report said. However, following the release of the report, government officials lost no time in getting to finger-pointing. The crisis commission’s findings were caught up in immediate partisan bickering. While the report was endorsed by the six Democrats on the commission, the four Republicans refused to sign off on its conclusions.
At the press conference introducing the report, Mr. Angelides made no bones about where he stood on this question: This was an avoidable crisis, he said bluntly. As the report puts it, “The crisis was the result of human action and inaction, not of Mother Nature or computer models gone haywire. If only regulators had been willing to regulate; if only Wall Street had done proper due diligence on the mortgages it was securitizing; if only subprime companies had acted more honorably; if only the credit ratings agencies had said no when asked to slap triple-A ratings on subprime junk. If only, if only, if only”.
Now comes the real test of whether our leaders will put back in place the economic regulations necessary to prevent irresponsible lending while not stopping the economic recovery which is just beginning. We need to have a thriving lending system for our nation to continue to grow and prosper. But that lending system owes a duty to us all to act reasonably and responsibly… a duty sadly lacking in causing this market crash.
London’s BRIC is Falling Down, posted with vodpod
Lyndon LaRouche
Repeal of Glass-Steagall Center-Stage in Angelides Report; Wall Street Apologists go Berserk and Lie
February 9, 2011 • 10:45AM
In assigning responsibility for the 2007-08 financial collapse. the Final Report of the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission (FCIC) places crucial emphasis on banking deregulation, and particularly the erosion and repeal of Franklin Roosevelt’s Glass-Steagall Act.
The Commission’s mandate from Congress did not include making recommendations for resolving the current crisis and preventing a future one, but economist and statesman Lyndon LaRouche has identified the restoration of Glass-Steagall, which was repealed in 1999, as the critical and essential condition for halting the present collapse and beginning to rebuild our economy.
Chapter 2 of Part II of the FCIC report entitled “Setting the Stage,” chronicles the rise of what it calls the “shadow banking system” of investment banks, money-market funds and “hot money,” parallel to the commercial banking system, and shows indisputably how deregulation allowed the shadow banking system to grow and outstrip the regulated banks, to the point of their collapse in 2007-08.
The report cites as pivotal, the 1933 passage of the Glass-Steagall Act, with its establishment of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, intended to protect depositors’ monies, prevent bank panics and to discourage excessive risk-taking in the banking system. But as the shadow banking system grew in the 1970s and 1980s, the commercial banks argued they they had been trapped in a straightjacket since the 1930s by Glass-Steagall, which strictly limited their participation in the speculative securities markets.
The FCIC Report documents the step-by-step drive for deregulation in the 1980s and 1990s—justified by arguments for unlimited competition and “innovation,” typified by the argument put forward by Fed chairman Alan Greenspan, that “unfettered markets create a degree of wealth that fosters a more civilized existence.”
“Beginning in 1987,” the FCIC report states, “the Federal Reserve accommodated a series of requests from the banks to undertake activities forbidden by Glass-Steagall.” The movement continued to dismantle the regulations that restricted depository institutions’ activities in the capital markets. “In 1991, the Treasury Department issued an extensive study calling for the elimination of the old regulatory framework for banks, including removal of all geographic restrictions on banking and repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act.”
Chapter 4 recounts the events of the 1990s, when the parallel banking system was booming, commercial banks were acting more like investment banks, and the largest banks were pressing regulators, state legislators, and Congress to remove almost all remaining regulation, especially that which separated commercial banks from securities firms and insurance companies. In 1998, Citicorp forced the issue of Glass-Steagall repeal, with its merger with Travelers insurance company to form Citigroup; and the next year, Congress compliantly passed the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, lifting most of the remaining Glass-Steagall restrictions. The FCIC cites a New York Times report that Citigroup’s Sandy Weill hung a plague in his office with his portrait and the caption, “Shatterer of Glass-Steagall.”
“The biggest bank holding companies became major players in investment banking,” says the Angelides Report. “The strategies of the largest commercial banks and their holding companies came to more resemble the strategies of investment banks.”
And on it went—until it predictably blew up in 2007.
- They Protest Too Much -
Both of the dissenting FCIC reports, coming from the four Republican members of the 10-person commission, singled out the mention of Glass-Steagall, explicitly denying that the repeal of Glass-Steagall was a cause of the crisis.
Peter Wallison, who for years has been the leading Wall Street propagandist for deregulation, accuses the Commission’s majority of only looking for facts to support their assumptions about deregulation, “greed and recklessness on Wall Street,” etc., and he then declares, astoundingly, that: “No significant deregulation of financial institutions occurred in the last 30 years. The repeal of a portion of the Glass-Steagall Act, frequently cited as an example of deregulation, had no role in the financial crisis.”
Wallison’s entire tedious, lying, almost 100-page argument, is that the sole cause of the crisis was the federal government’s housing policy which encouraged poor people to buy houses they couldn’t afford, exemplified by the role of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and the Community Reinvestment Act.
Wallison’s argument was too much for even the other three Republicans on the Commission, who were not so sweeping in their dismissal of the majority’s analysis, but who nonetheless assert that “Neither the Community Reinvestment Act nor removal of the Glass-Steagall firewall was a significant cause.”
These arguments, dismissing the crucial role of the repeal of Glass-Steagall and other financial deregulation, have been repeated incessantly, and lyingly, by Wall Street apologists since the release of the truthful and irrefutable Angelides Report.
- Obama’s Web Of Debt: Its The Derivatives Stupid.
- THE BRITISH ARE BACK! Obama’s 800 Lb. Gorilla: The Treasonous Derivative Bailout ~ Exchanging Worthless Derivative Paper For Future Exorbitant Taxation Of Our Lives.
- Tom Coburn Has A SOTU Statement: Dr. RINO Coburn Voted For The Massive Tax Hikes On Americans, For London’s Fraudulent Paper Derivative Banking Scheme Bailout: Glass Steagall Act Would Nullify This Bailout Immediately.
- America Nulls & Voids Obama’s Counterfeit Debt With The Glass Steagall Act : Britain Threatens War!
A Call For Nuremberg Trials In The United States: Soetoro Treason aka; obama.
End of Liberty, posted with vodpod
Treason
NUREMBERG PRINCIPLES
Principle I
Principle I states, “Any person who commits an act which constitutes a crime under international law is responsible therefor and liable to punishment.”
Principle II
Principle II states, “The fact that internal law does not impose a penalty for an act which constitutes a crime under international law does not relieve the person who committed the act from responsibility under international law.”
Principle III
Principle III states, “The fact that a person who committed an act which constitutes a crime under international law acted as Head of State or responsible government official does not relieve him from responsibility under international law.”
Principle IV
Principle IV states: “The fact that a person acted pursuant to order of his Government or of a superior does not relieve him from responsibility under international law, provided a moral choice was in fact possible to him”.
This principle could be paraphrased as follows: “It is not an acceptable excuse to say ‘I was just following my superior’s orders’”.
Previous to the time of the Nuremberg Trials, this excuse was known in common parlance as “Superior Orders“. After the prominent, high profile event of the Nuremberg Trials, that excuse is now referred to by many as “Nuremberg Defense“.
In recent times, a third term, “Lawful orders” has become common parlance for some people. All three terms are in use today, and they all have slightly different nuances of meaning, depending on the context in which they are used.
- Barry Soetoro
Nuremberg Principle IV is legally supported by the jurisprudence found in certain articles in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights which deal indirectly with conscientious objection.
It is also supported by the principles found in paragraph 171 of the Handbook on Procedures and Criteria for Determining Refugee Status which was issued by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR).
Those principles deal with the conditions under which conscientious objectors can apply for refugee status in another country if they face persecution in their own country for refusing to participate in an illegal war.
Principle V
Principle V states, “Any person charged with a crime under international law has the right to a fair trial on the facts and law.”
Principle VI
Principle VI states,
“The crimes hereinafter set out are punishable as crimes under international law:
- (a) Crimes against peace:
- (i) Planning, preparation, initiation or waging of a war of aggression or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances;
- (ii) Participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the acts mentioned under (i).
- (b) War crimes:
- Violations of the laws or customs of war which include, but are not limited to, murder, ill-treatment or deportation of slave labor or for any other purpose of the civilian population of or in occupied territory; murder or ill-treatment of prisoners of war or persons on the Seas, killing of hostages, plunder of public or private property, wanton destruction of cities, towns, or villages, or devastation not justified by military necessity.
- Georeg Soros
- Murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation and other inhumane acts done against any civilian population, or persecutions on political, racial, or religious grounds, when such acts are done or such persecutions are carried on in execution of or in connection with any crime against peace or any war crime.”
Principle VII
Principle VII states, “Complicity in the commission of a crime against peace, a war crime, or a crime against humanity as set forth in Principle VI is a crime under international law.”
And trials there must be. No matter the cost, the nest of vipers on Capitol Hill, and all of the traitors in the government at large, must be brought to task for their behavior, or a free America is doomed.
Locking Down America!
High Noon In America: As 1776 Repeats Itself, In America’s Battle Against The British Monarchy’s/International Banking Cartel
Objectively consider the following recent events:
Why did Obama just recently stop the lawful return from South Korea of 100,000 World War II antique surplus M1 Carbine and M1 Grand rifles that were to be shipped to the curio firearms market in The States? The relic riffles are not considered an item purchased by drug cartels. Buyers of relic rifles have for decades been excluded from certain registration requirements; that has resulted in government not being able to track the weapons. It is apparent Obama does not want these relic riffles in the hands of Americans.
Recently you may have read about the Obama government ordering hundreds’ of new X-Ray Vans that will be traveling our streets, without warrants secretly x-raying Americans, peering though Citizens’ homes and vehicles, exposing Americans and their families to X-rays. X-ray vans are an affront to privacy, literally allowing government/police to view Citizens in their bedrooms. Americans need to ask Obama if independent studies were conducted to determine if Citizens could develop Cancer, if (repeatedly exposed) to X-rays by police when in their vehicles and in their homes? Continued Low Radiation Exposure is Accumulative and believed to cause Cancer. Police intend to use the X-Ray Vans to search for drugs and weapons.
X-Ray Vans can ALSO be positioned to secure perimeters by the military or police to control civil unrest and instances of revolt, to screen and stop Citizens carrying guns, cameras; any item. Why did the government order hundreds X-Ray Vans?
See: http://blog.alexanderhiggins.com/2010/10/03/privacy-america-feds-xray-vans-watch-home-6252/
Obama the last six months and certain members of Congress have proposed or taken steps to give President Obama unprecedented power to crush Americans’ civil liberties, to incarcerate without trial Citizens that speak out—effectively gagging and Locking down America. For example: In April 2010 Obama during a national security speech, asked Congress for the Power to imprison Americans not on evidence or probable cause, but on government’s word someone might support or commit a violent act in the future; Thought Police?
ILLUMINATI, “we corrupt in order to rule.”
Obama wants to curtail the 4th, 5th and 6th Amendments including allowing the FBI warrant-less wiretapping of all Americans’ electronic communications including no warrant searches of Internet Activity and emails. No doubt that will make Citizens afraid to communicate by phone or email and worry, someone might say something inappropriate during a phone call or send email that will cause their arrest if they don’t report it to police. Police too easily can take an innocent person’s hastily written email, fax or phone call out of context to allege a crime or violation was committed to cause an arrest or asset forfeiture. There are over 200 U.S. laws and violations mentioned in the Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act of 2000 and the Patriot Act that can subject property to civil asset forfeiture. Under federal civil forfeiture laws, a person or business need not be charged with a crime for government to forfeit their property. US private contractors and their operatives (people/asset bounty hunters) work so closely with police exchanging information to arrest Americans and or share in the forfeiture of their assets, they appear to merge with police. Under Obama’s no warrant proposal anything said on a phone or in an email can be used by government against someone in a trial or civil proceeding, e.g. an asset forfeiture proceeding, the latter requiring only a civil preponderance of evidence to forfeit property, little more than hearsay.
On March 4, 2010, Senator John McCain introduced S.3081 The “Enemy Belligerent Interrogation, Detention, and Prosecution Act of 2010.” If passed, the government can use (only suspicion) or less to curtail an individual’s Constitutional Protections against unlawful arrest, detention and interrogation without benefit of legal counsel and trial. According to McCain’s S.3081, Government would not be required to provide (detained individuals) Miranda Warnings or even an attorney. Americans could be interrogated and held indefinitely in military custody on only suspicion of being an Unprivileged Enemy Belligerent suspected of; having engaged in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners; or purposefully and materially (supported) hostilities against the United States; its coalition partners or civilians. “Materially Supporting Hostilities” against the United States could include any person or group that spoke out or demonstrated disapproval against an agency of U.S. Government; Government could allege attending a protest supported hostilities.
When you read McCain’s bill it appears “suspicion” is not necessary for government to detain and interrogate Americans. If the government is allowed warrant-less wiretapping of Citizens’ phones, Internet Activity, e.g. email, any statement or comment could be taken out of context, used under McCain’s bill to deem someone supported or engaged in hostilities to cause their indefinite detention. Note that Government is already referring to lawful demonstrators as Terrorists, and increasingly spies on lawful Americans and protesters that speak out. See McCain Senate bill S.3081:
http://assets.theatlantic.com/static/mt/assets/politics/ARM10090.pdf
When one objectively views Obama’s recent actions and certain Members of Congress, e.g. John McCain on March 4th 2010 introduced S.3081 that would curtail Constitutional Protections, jailing Americans without probable cause or warrant; government spying on Citizens in their homes using hundreds of X-ray Vans; Obama’s request FBI/NSA without warrants wiretap all Citizens’ phone and other private electronic communications, one might ask, does the Obama Government intend to Lock Down America? If you think about it, much of what Obama has already done and intends, will crush our Constitutionally protected freedoms amounting to Marshal Law although the President is not calling it that.
Compare where the U.S. is headed, crushing political dissent, government/police intimidating Citizens from speaking or writing their opinions, with Hitler’s 1933 Discriminatory Laws shown below.
DECREE OF THE REICH PRESIDENT FOR THE PROTECTION OF THE PEOPLE AND STATE
Note: Based on translations by State Department, National Socialism, 1942 PP. 215-17, and Pollak, J.K., and Heneman, H.J., The Hitler Decrees, (1934), pp. 10-11.7
In virtue of Section 48 (2) of the German Constitution, the following is decreed as a defensive measure against Communist acts of Violence, endangering the state:
Section 1
Sections 114, 115, 117, 118, 123, 124, and 153 of the Constitution of the German Reich are suspended until further notice. Thus, restrictions on personal liberty, on the right of free expression of opinion, including freedom of the press, on the right of assembly and the right of association, and violations of the privacy of postal, telegraphic, and telephonic communications, and warrants for house-searches, orders for confiscations as well as restrictions on property, are also permissible beyond the legal limits otherwise prescribed.
Section 2
If in a state the measures necessary for the restoration of public security and order are not taken, the Reich Government may temporarily take over the powers of the highest state authority.
Section 4
Whoever provokes, or appeals for or incites to the disobedience of the orders given out by the supreme state authorities or the authorities subject to then for the execution of this decree, or the orders given by the Reich Government according to Section 2, is punishable—insofar as the deed, is not covered by the decree with more severe punishment and with imprisonment of not less that one month, or with a fine from 150 up to 15,000 Reichsmarks.
Who ever endangers human life by violating Section 1, is to be punished by sentence to a penitentiary, under mitigating circumstances with imprisonment of not less than six months and, when violation causes the death of a person, with death, under mitigating circumstances with a penitentiary sentence of not less that two years. In addition the sentence my include confiscation of property.
Whoever provokes an inciter to or act contrary to public welfare is to be punished with a penitentiary sentence, under mitigating circumstances, with imprisonment of not less than three months.
Lt. Gen. (Ret.) W.G. Boykin
Section 5
The crimes which under the Criminal Code are punishable with penitentiary for life are to be punished with death: i.e., in Sections 81 (high treason), 229 (poisoning), 306 (arson), 311 (explosion), 312 (floods), 315, paragraph 2 (damage to railroad properties, 324 (general poisoning).
Insofar as a more severe punishment has not been previously provided for, the following are punishable with death or with life imprisonment or with imprisonment not to exceed 15 years:
1. Anyone who undertakes to kill the Reich President or a member or a commissioner of the Reich Government or of a state government, or provokes to such a killing, or agrees to commit it, or accepts such an offer, or conspires with another for such a murder;
2. Anyone who under Section 115 (2) of the Criminal Code (serious rioting) or of Section 125 (2) of the Criminal Code (serious disturbance of the peace) commits the act with arms or cooperates consciously and intentionally with an armed person;
3. Anyone who commits a kidnapping under Section 239 of the Criminal with the intention of making use of the kidnapped person as a hostage in the political struggle.
Section 6
This decree enters in force on the day of its promulgation.
Reich President
Reich Chancellor
Reich Minister of the Interior
Reich Minister of Justice
ObamaNation raped & killed 1,000 Christians
Living Under The Fear Until Nothing Else Remains : Armada of U.S. and Israeli Warships Head for Iran
THESE WARSHIPS SHOULD BE HEADED FOR THE UNITED KINGDOM WITH THEIR BARRELS LEVELED AT LONDON’S BILDERBERGS, GOLDMAN SACHS, ROTHSCHILDS, & ALL SEDITIOUS NEW WORLDERS!
THIS IS AN ABSOLUTE FARCE, OUR SOLDIERS GIVING THEIR LIVES FOR ALREADY RICH & GREEDY BLACK HEARTS OF THE BRITISH MONARCHY! This has nothing to do with the good people of Britain, who are actually going through the same crap. In fact, U.K. is the next country to go into bankruptcy – its all has to do with de-population mechanisms and centralizing the wealth back into the International Banking Cartel based in London/Monarchy. The British Monarchy/Committee of 300/Illuminati/Bilderbergs etc are all encapsulated by The Committee of 300 and the other venues of their designs, are carried out in general by the (Illuminati-Physical Violence) (Bilderbergs-Economic Violence) etc etc.
The Speech That Brought The End To President Kennedy, By The Monarchial Sociopaths For Monarchial NWO Under The Useless Queen.
Ted Turner To Be Visited By 3 Spirits? – CNN Bastardizing American Soldiers As Islamic Fascists!
This is a war that will weaken The United States Like Never Before and that is what the Monarchy/Banking Cartel wants.
Whats to come ‘after’ that? Perhaps A Reckoning With Russia, China, and/or North Korea!
OUR LORD WAS RIGHT – LUST FOR MONEY IS THE ROOT TO ALL EVIL!
Hats Off To Tomas!
British Operative Barry Soetoro
Democrats Installed Present Day Fascist Regime In Iran!
Muslims & Mexicans Obama’s M&M’s : Kenya – Obama’s Training Camp For America? – Christians Were Burnt In Their Kenyan Churches!
Nuremberg Trial Of The National Socialists aka; Nazis:
The indictments were for:
- Participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of a crime against peace
Bilderbergs Wants Americans Disarmed And Dependent On Government
- Planning, initiating and waging wars of aggression and other crimes against peace.
Iran has to go much deeper than Iraq for oil and cannot produce enough gasoline to meet soaring domestic demand.
BILDERBERGS GROUP STOPPED SELLING GASOLINE TO IRAN – AOL Video
Therefore Iran Built Nuclear Energy for energy independence
Bilderbergs Green Light Attack On Iran June 2010
This is after Iran Agreed To Stand Down
More than twelve U.S. and Israeli warships, including an aircraft carrier, passed through the Suez Canal on Friday and are headed for the Red Sea. “According to eyewitnesses, the U.S. battleships were the largest to have crossed the Canal in many years,” reported the London-based newspaper al-Quds al-Arabi on Saturday.
The Israeli newspaperHaaretz reported Egyptian opposition members criticized the government for cooperating with the U.S. and Israeli forces and allowing the passage of the ships through Egyptian territorial waters. The Red Sea is the most direct route to the Persian Gulf from the Mediterranean.
Retired Egyptian General Amin Radi, chairman of the national security affairs committee, told the paper that “the decision to declare war on Iran is not easy, and Israel, due to its wild nature, may start a war just to remain the sole nuclear power in the region,” according to Yedioth Internet, an Israeli news site.
The passage of a warship armada through the Suez Canal and headed for the Persian Gulf and Iran is apparently not deemed important enough to be reported by the corporate media in the United States.
Egypt recently rejected an Israeli request to prevent Gaza aid ships from passing through the Suez Canal. According to a report by al-Jazeera, Israel appealed to Egyptians asking them to prevent the passage of Iranian ships through the Suez Canal. The Egyptians responded that due to international agreements on movement through the Suez Canal, Egypt cannot prevent ships from passing through the canal unless a ship belongs to a state that is at war with Egypt. Iran and Egypt are not at war.
The United States and Israel, the sole nuclear-armed power in the Middle East, have not ruled out a military strike to destroy Iran’s nuclear program.
A number of Israeli politicians and scholars have admitted Israel has used its nuclear weapons for “compellent purposes,” in short forcing others to accept Israeli political demands.
CHILDREN OF THE APOCALYPSE
Israel’s threats to use nuclear weapons have increased significantly since it was discovered in 2002 that Iran was building uranium enrichment facilities. Israel’s former Prime Minister Ariel Sharon “called on the international community to target Iran as soon as the imminent conflict with Iraq is complete,” the Sunday Times reported on November 5, 2002. The United States invaded Iraq on March 20, 2003.
Earlier this month Israel leaked to the press that they had permission from Saudi Arabia to use their air space to attack Iran. “In the week that the UN Security Council imposed a new round of sanctions on Tehran, defence sources in the Gulf say that Riyadh has agreed to allow Israel to use a narrow corridor of its airspace in the north of the country to shorten the distance for a bombing run on Iran,” the Sunday Times reported on June 12. On June 14, the ambassador of Saudi Arabia to UK Prince Mohammed bin Nawaf issued a categorical denial of the report
Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
June 19, 2010Crimes against humanity
