SCOTUS Rehearing: Request On Soetoro Recusal Technicality Was Denied. Law Tab +$1.7 Million And Still No Birth Certificate!

No. 10-678

Title:

Gregory S. Hollister, Petitioner

Barry Soetoro, et al.

Docketed:

November 23, 2010

Lower Ct:

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

Case Nos.:	(09-5080)
Decision Date:	March 22, 2010
Rehearing Denied:	August 23, 2010

~~~Date~~~	~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Nov 22 2010	Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 23, 2010)
Nov 22 2010	Appendix of Gregory S. Hollister filed. (Volumes I, II, III)
Dec 22 2010	Waiver of right of respondents Barry Soetoro, et al. to respond filed.
Dec 29 2010	DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 14, 2011.
Dec 30 2010	Request for recusal received from petitioner.
Jan 18 2011	Petition DENIED.
Feb 7 2011	Petition for Rehearing filed.
Feb 16 2011	DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 4, 2011.
Mar 7 2011	Rehearing DENIED.

~~Name~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~	~~~~~~~Address~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~	~~Phone~~~
Attorneys for Petitioner:
John David Hemenway	4816 Rodman Street, NW	(202) 244-4819
Washington, DC 20016
johndhemenway@comcast.net
Party name: Gregory S. Hollister
Attorneys for Respondents:
Marc Erik Elias	Perkins Coie, LLP	(202)-434-1609
Counsel of Record	700 Thirteenth Street, NW, Suite 600
Washington, DC 20005-3960
melias@perkinscoie.com
Party name: Barry Soetoro, et al.

It was in January that the court denied, without comment, a request for a hearing on the arguments. But the attorney at the time had submitted a motion for Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan, who were given their jobs by Obama, to recuse.

Should Obama ultimately be shown to have been ineligible for the office, his actions, including his appointments, at least would be open to challenge and question.

At the time, the Supreme Court acknowledged the “motion for recusal” but it changed it on official docketing pages to a “request.” And it reportedly failed to respond to the motion.

wnd