WASHINGTON – Is this the case that will break the presidential eligibility question wide open?
The Supreme Court conferred today on whether arguments should be heard on the merits of Kerchner v. Obama, a case challenging whether President Barack Obama is qualified to serve as president because he may not be a “natural-born citizen” as required by Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution.
- Take Action: Repeal the Monsanto Protection Act!
- Foreign Troop Buildup In Colombia: To Confiscate U.S. Citizen’s Defense Weapons In The United States Of America.
- Fact: Obama Shuts Down Air Defense System on US/Mexico Border!
- Breaking => Gang Of Eight Gone Wild Violates Will Of The People: Approves $6.3 Trillion New Taxpayer Debt For Immigration Amnesty!
- CIA, Bill Clinton, George Bush Jr., & Barack Obama Indicted By Congressional “Constitutional Task Force” For Crimes Against Humanity!
- U.S. Captain Of The Army Orders Dzerzhinsky’s aka; “Rothschild’s U.S. Home Land Security” To Return Assault Weapons Back To Department Of Defense March 27, 2013.
- Issa ~ Hillary Clinton Involved In Benghazi Murder Cover Up!: How Obama & Hillary Left Americans to Die: Hillary Accepts Culpability!
Unlike other eligibility cases that have reached the Supreme Court, Kerchner vs. Obama focuses on the “Vattel theory,” which argues that the writers of the Constitution believed the term “natural-born citizen” to mean a person born in the United States to parents who were both American citizens.
“This case is unprecedented,” said Mario Apuzzo, the attorney bringing the suit. “I believe we presented an ironclad case. We’ve shown standing, and we’ve shown the importance of the issue for the Supreme Court. There’s nothing standing in their way to grant us a writ of certiorari.”
If the Supreme Court decides to grant the “writ of certiorari,” it may direct a federal trial court in New Jersey to hear the merits of the case, or it may choose to hear the merits itself. The court’s decision on the writ could be announced as early as Wednesday.
If any court hears the merits of the case, Apuzzo says it will mark the “death knell” for Obama’s legitimacy.
“Given my research of what a natural-born citizen is, he cannot be a natural-born citizen so it’s a death knell to his legitimacy. What happens on a practical level, how our political institutions would work that out, is something else,” Apuzzo told WND.
Urgent Action Free Fax: Tell Your Senators That $6.3 Trillion Is Too High A Price To Pay For The Gang Of Eight’s Amnesty!
Apuzzo observed it is “undisputed fact” that Obama’s father was a British subject.
A hearing on the merits “is also a death knell because it would allow discovery so we would be able to ask him for his birth certificate, and we don’t know what that would show,” according to Apuzzo. “We might not even get to the question of defining ‘natural-born citizen.’ If he was not born in the U.S., he’d be undocumented, because he’s never been naturalized. We don’t even know what his citizenship status is. Hawaii has said they have his records, but that’s hearsay. We have not seen the root documents.”
Another attorney who has brought Obama eligibility cases to the Supreme Court, Philip Berg, agrees that discovery would sink Obama’s presidency.
“If one court had guts enough to deal with this and allow discovery, Obama would be out of office,” Berg told WND. “We would ask for a lift of Obama’s ban on all of his documents. The last official report said Obama has spent $1.6 million in legal fees [keeping his papers secret], and the total is probably over $2 million now. You don’t spend that kind of money unless there’s something to hide, and I believe the reason he’s hiding this is because he was not born in the United States.”
“The Supreme Court has never decided to hear the merits of an eligibility case,” Berg added. “If the Supreme Court would decide to hear a case, Obama would be out of office instantly. If Congress decided to hear a case, Obama would be out of office.”
“They’re taking a different approach, arguing that both parents must be citizens,” Berg noted.
Apuzzo is arguing the “Vattel theory,” which asserts that the term “natural-born citizen” as used in the Constitution was defined by French writer Emer de Vattel. Vattel, whose work, “The Law of Nations,” was widely known and respected by the founding fathers, used the term to mean an individual born of two citizens.
- Two Soviet Senators Charles Schumer & Al Franken Told IRS To Target Constitutionalists! Rothschild’s Sovietism Ended In Russia On 25 December 1991.
- Monsanto Has Been Removed And Banned By: Austria, Bulgaria, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Japan, Luxembourg, Madeira, New Zealand, Peru, South Australia, Russia, France, and Switzerland!
- German Police Officers Take Off Helmets & Marched With German Citizens Against Rothschild European Central Bank!
According to Apuzzo, Congress and the courts have addressed the question of who can be an American citizen, for example regarding former slaves, Asian immigrants, and American Indians. However, the term “natural-born citizen” has never been altered.
“The courts and Congress have never changed the definition,” said Apuzzo. “The founding fathers understood that the commander-in-chief of the armed forces needed to have two American citizens as parents so that American values would be imparted to him.”
Apuzzo said the Supreme Court had clearly accepted Vattel’s definition of “natural-born citizen” in “dicta,” or statements made in opinions on cases addressing other matters. He cited Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall’s opinion in the 1814 “Venus” case, in which Marshall endorses Vattel’s definition.
Apuzzo also cites the writings of founding father David Ramsay, an influential South Carolina physician and historian who used similar language to Vattel.
- France Ditches Pelosi’s Dream Machine: The European Union.
- The Legend Of Barry Soetoro As Barack Hussein Obama II
- Nancy Pelosi’s California, Leads United States In Poverty Rankings!
Previous cases challenging Obama’s eligibility have all been rejected on technical grounds. Numerous courts have decided that the plaintiffs do not have “standing” to bring a suit against Obama because they have failed to prove they are directly injured by his occupation of the Oval Office.
“To me that’s false,” said Berg. “The 10th Amendment refers to ‘we the people.’ If the people can’t challenge the president’s constitutionality, that would be ridiculous.”
“My clients have a right to protection from an illegitimately sitting president,” said Apuzzo. “Every decision he makes affects the life, property, and welfare of my clients.”
Apuzzo said the founding fathers had good reason to require the president to be a natural-born citizen.
“They were making sure the President had the values from being reared from a child in the American system, and thereby would preserve everybody’s life, liberty and property in the process.
“They made that decision, so my clients have every right to expect the president to be a natural-born citizen. It goes to all your basic rights, every right that is inalienable. The president has to be a natural-born citizen.”
Who would ever in the House Or Senate question that the House Speaker would have altered Congressional Records For Soetoro/Obama. Thus, disarming the process of questioning the vetting process when roll was called by Dick Cheney.
ELECTORAL VOTE COUNT 2009
So why is this fraud? It is very simple:Pelosi and the DNC obviously prepared 2 documents but discarded the first in favor of hiding the truth and to CTA (cover their ass). It was the second document (the Exhibit 2 document) that was delivered to the Election Commission and is now of record in all fifty state Election Commission offices, state DNC headquarters, complete with date stamps, matching signatures, even the same Notary of Public authentication, and absent the constitutional text.Not only is this fraud, it is a conspiracy:When the truth finally gets out and Obama goes down for eligibility,
good ol’ Nancy babe is in BIG trouble.
WILL THESE TWO DOCUMENTS THROW PELOSI AND TOP DEMOCRATS INTO FELONY PRISON? INSTEAD OF HIDING THEIR FRAUD UPON AMERICA?
Pelosi signed two Official Certifications of Nomination for Obama and Biden at the DNC Convention last August. Read the language carefully and note the difference between them:
FIRST ONE (referencing the Constitution)

SECOND ONE (WITHOUT ANY REFERENCE TO THE CONSTITUTION)

WHY WAS THE CONSTITUTIONAL REFERENCE REMOVED ?
Commenter SAYS:
“Just thinking out aloud here, see what you think”
Every copy I have seen online of an Hawaii CoLB has shown the place of birth as Oahu, County Honolulu. Isn’t that a little odd?
via Anti-Mullah:
Surely one or two should be from another island or another county?
Makes me think that ALL Certifications of Live Birth, Accepted OR Filed, bear that same information. (Until someone shows something different, anyway).
So, the original birth certificate for a child born in Hawaii shows the details relevant to the birth, and can be amended,(CHANGE OF NAME, ADOPTION ETC.,) with amendements shown only on the original.
Or, a late Certification could be applied for, (up until 1972 IIRC) whereby an out-of-state birth could be registered, and FILED. Again, this information remains on the original document…
When a ‘copy’, a Certification of Live Birth is requested, it’s by no means a ‘copy’ of the original birth certificate, it’s simply a standard form on which, as we know, the parents, the parents Race and the name of the child are shown.
Are you with me? The Place of Birth OAHU and the County HONOLULU may simply relate to the location of the OFFICE where the document was issued.
Therefor every CoLB shows the same, Place of Birth OAHU, County, HONOLULU.
AND THAT MAKES EVERYONE WHO HAS A COLB A CITIZEN OF THE US???
The next question might be, just how many people does this apply to? Thousands?
ALSO INTERESTING FOOD FOR THOUGHT (2009)
With the approaching September 9th Federal Court hearing scheduled in Santa Ana, California, in the matter of Obama providing documentation to show PROOF OF ELIGIBILITY to be in the People’s House, and has any basis in reality rather than smoke and mirrors and deception, the article below might be a precursor of some very uncomfortable truths emerging.Not just for Obama, Nancy Pelosi (as shown above) and the Democratic National Committee but also for Hawaii.

Connecting The Dots In The “Sealed Lawsuit”;
Obama Conspiracy To Defraud The System:
As the trail of life becomes the interstate highway of courtroom trials for our beloved leader, Barack Obama, it is perhaps time to weave the fabric of Barack’s Muslim, Kenyan, Indonesian, Hawaiian serape to explain just what he is hiding by hiring his platoon of lawyers.
- Obama Has Proven That The Executive Branch Can No Longer Exist When As A Lone Wolf He Disregards The Constitution: Petition For Psychiatric Evaluation Of Presidential Candidates.
- Psychiatric Evaluation Of Resident Obama!
- Obama’s Big Ruse: Osama Bin Laden Died 11 Years Ago!
- The Ongoing Mysterious Deaths Of 9/11 Witnesses!

Occidental College opens up the door to Barack Obama declaring in writing he is not American, but foreign. This progresses to Columbia in this fraud, Barrack concludes he is owed a little summer vacation with his Pakistani buddies. He goes into Pakistan once again on an Indonesian passport which signifies again Barack Obama is Indonesian as Americans could not get into Pakistan. Obama would have probably gotten away with the money fraud, if he had not been too cheap and decided he just had to flip the bird to the American system and get into Pakistan.
Those records prove he is an affirmed triple citizen of British Kenya, Indonesia and America, if not Canada registration too. Any part of which disqualifies him for President of the United States.Barack Obama is like the crook who steals a million dollars, but has to go back and pick up the bank President’s pen in greed and that is the 20 dollar item that gets him busted.
There are federal records for these Obama applications for funding in the Department of Education. As of Barack Obama attempting to further smear George W. Bush in releasing Bush documents, to take the heat off of Barack, the Dunham, Obama, Soetero education files are now open to the Freedom of Information act as all papers associated with a President are, as Barack Obama made this a presidential issue when he hired attorneys to cover up what was being hidden at Occidental College.
This is a matter for the Justice Department as it is money fraud of college funds and it is a matter for the Republican minority in Congress to demand and hold hearings investigating this.
Those records all exist and if someone destroyed them and they are missing, that is a federal crime by which Barack Obama has benefited, so he is then a guilty co conspirator in another felony. If you get money from someone illegally, and someone else burns the papers protecting you, you are just as guilty as the person who lit the match.
That is how all of this ties together from Hawaiian welfare fraud, Occidental College student finance fraud and Barack Obama currency fraud defrauding the American public of funds and places of education for it’s own citizens.
Related articles
- Putin’s Purge Of The Rothschild Money Changers From Russia: Another Rothschild Goon Found Dead & Another Flees To U.K.
- Monsanto Has Been Removed And Banned By: Austria, Bulgaria, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Japan, Luxembourg, Madeira, New Zealand, Peru, South Australia, Russia, France, and Switzerland!
- Nancy Pelosi backs up President Obama on Social Security cuts (dailykos.com)
- Obama v. Pelosi (and the rest of us?) (prairieweather.typepad.com)
- Banking Cabal Sues Apple Macintosh For Antitrust: While Rothschild Merges All Weather Channels, Banks, & Gorbachev Merges All Farm Land For U.N.’s Agenda 21 Violating Antitrust Laws! (politicalvelcraft.org)
- The bankruptcy of the Obama-Pelosi ‘progressive’ agenda (conservativeread.com)
-
- Obama: The Only U.S. President To Be Sued Part I – Pravda.Russia (politicalvelcraft.org)
- The birther manifesto – Tea Party Nation (gds44.wordpress.com)
- Citizens Urged To Demand Congressional Investigation Of Obama: Time For The Charade To Stop! (politicalvelcraft.org)
- Did You Know Anwar al-Awlaki Was Eligible To Run For President? You Know, The 20th. Hijacker Of 9/11 (politicalvelcraft.org)
- Attorney asks judge to have Obama vetted (wnd.com)
- Arpaio calls for federal inquiry into Obama’s birth certificate (rawstory.com)
- What if …? (He’s not a natural born citizen) (genomega1.wordpress.com)
- “Natural Born Citizen” It’s in the Constitution for a Reason (conservativesonfire.wordpress.com)
- Is Putative President Barack Obama’s Mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, Really Known As Jo Ann Newman? (politicalvelcraft.org)
- Rewriting History to Elect a Dubious Future (dakotavoice.com)
-
-
Obamacare’s Ticking Time Bomb: Capp’s Law. (politicalvelcraft.org)
-
The Media’s Yo-Yo On The GOP Candidacy: NWO’s Council On Foreign Relations Controls U.S. Media! (politicalvelcraft.org)
-
If Obama Is Not A Natural Born Citizen Then Neither Is Marco Rubio (godfatherpolitics.com)
-











