U.S. Constitution Is Not Congruous With A 1961 OBAMA COLB

Statutes In Play During 1961 are as follows:

Hawaii Revised Statute 338-178 allows registration of birth in Hawaii for a child that was born outside of Hawaii to parents who, for a year preceding the child’s birth, claimed Hawaii as their place of residence. Statute 338 is in substance and 178 are minor revisions.The Certificate of Hawaiian Birth program was established in 1911, during the territorial era, to register a person born in Hawaii who was one year old or older and whose birth had NOT been previously registered in Hawaii.

Obama Born Again? 2 1/2 Years Of Deception & A $2.8 Million Law Tab In Blocking Eligibility Lawsuits! But Wait, Why Did Barry Lie On His 2004 Senate Papers?

Since Hawaii issues “Certificates of Live Birth” (COLB) to children not born in Hawaii and “Birth Certificates” to children who are born in Hawaii, the only way to know where Hussein Obama was actually born, is to view Hussein Obama’s original Vault birth certificate from 1961 that shows the name of the hospital and the name and signature of the doctor that delivered him.

The only thing that has been released is a form from Hawaii (COLB) that the state of Hawaii itself, will not allow to be used to even get a drivers license or cash a check. It’s basically good for hanging on the wall or putting in a baby book. The “Vault Form” birth certificate is the form that would prove someone is born in the United States. It would list the hospital, attending physicians, witnesses, original name, etc that “proves” ones identity and in Obama’s case, his natural-born citizenship status required by The United States Constitution. That has not been provided and is kept tightly wrapped under lock and key. The COLB provided by the Obama camp does not prove birthplace and is actually issued up to a year later for American and Foreign National children born overseas. Two quick examples of Foreign Nationals receiving a Hawaiian COLB are Maya Soetoro and Dr. Sun Yat-sen.

The Mistakes Of The Obama COLB Cult.

  1. A Hawaiian COLB, is NOT Primae Facie Evidence Of Birth Place For A Foreign National On The Year 1961.
  2. A Hawaiian COLB, Does NOT Show Place Of Birth For A Foreign National On The Year 1961.
  3. One of the most common errors, is to compare 1961 Hawaiian Law, With more recent years of Hawaiian Law, which is like trying to mix water and oil.
  4. Obama by his own free volition, proffered a COLB To The American Public as suggested evidence congruous with The U.S. Constitution. This is known as Presumptive Evidence and there is the owed duty to validate such Presumptive Evidence with Conclusive Evidence or Prima facie Evidence. When applying for employment as a U.S. President by the dictums of The U.S. Constitution, one cannot substitute; A) Newspaper Articles, B) The Book, ‘Dreams From My Father’, or  C) COLB  ~ for a Vault Birth Certificate.
  5. Obama to date, has signed an executive order 13489 prohibiting any of the following to be released for validation ~ yet 13489 may contain weaknesses, in that he has already spent over $2 Million in fighting transparency upon the same.
  • Actual long-form birth certificate (NOT an easily-forged electronic copy of a short-form COLB document which is not Prima facie evidence)
  • Passport files
  • University of Chicago Law School scholarly articles
  • Harvard Law Review articles
  • Harvard Law School records
  • Columbia University records
  • Columbia University senior thesis, “Soviet Nuclear Disarmament”
  • Occidental College records, including financial aid that he may have received
  • Punahou School records, where Mr. Obama attended from the fifth grade until he finished high school
  • Noelani Elementary School records, where Barack Obama attended kindergarten (according to the Hawaii Department of Education, students must submit a birth certificate to register — but parents may bring a passport or student visa if the child is from a foreign country)
  • Complete files and schedules of his years as an Illinois state senator from 1997 to 2004
  • Obama’s client list from during his time in private practice with the Chicago law firm of Davis, Miner, Barnhill and Gallard
  • Illinois State Bar Association records
  • Baptism records
  • Obama/Dunham marriage license
  • Obama/Dunham divorce documents
  • Soetoro/Dunham marriage license
  • Soetero/Dunham Adoption records

The United States Justice Foundation (USJF) served officials at Occidental College with a subpoena to produce records concerning Barack Obama’s attendance there during the 1980’s, because those records could document whether he was attending as a foreign national. You see, Mr. Obama attended the school on a scholarship — and there are questions as to whether the financial aid he received was reserved for foreign students. The Obama attorneys have bent over backward to block us. He doesn’t want anyone to see those records. He’s STILL trying to hide them; those financial records STILL have not been released.

Obama's Nuremberg

Barack Hussein Obama flat-out refuses to show the one document that would confirm or deny his true identity, parentage, and birth origin — his original, “vault” birth certificate.

In March 2008, a lawsuit was filed to remove John McCain, the GOP candidate, from the ballot because his natural-born status was also in doubt. John McCain immediately responded by showing his actual, original “vault” birth certificate to Congress.

On June 12, 2008, about three months after John McCain settled his eligibility issue, the pressure on Obama to do the same led to the release of what was called his “original birth certificate” — an image copy, not a paper copy, by his campaign, not by himself, to the Daily Kos blog, not to Congress, or to anyone even remotely responsible for vetting him and without a ‘legal electronic signature’.

Moreover, what Obama submitted for “release,” was not an image copy of his original birth certificate as claimed. It was an abbreviated transcript of a birth record called a “Certification of Live Birth” (COLB).  HOWEVER, the image itself was a fabricated forgery intended to mimic this transcript. Since a forged birth document cannot represent a true birth record, it means that someone committed forgery just to keep Obama’s actual birth record from ever being known. What makes it a forgery?

Many people who also saw this image had said that it was a “fake,” and that the document pictured in the image could not possibly be genuine. The image anomalies that they pointed out as proof of a forgery included those that I had found and reported, working independently. Here is an annotated list of them:

  1. The image contains digital signatures of Photoshop
  2. Only one side of alleged COLB shown (COLB is two-sided)
  3. Missing second-fold line while first fold-line is shown
  4. Missing the embossed Seal of Hawaii
  5. Missing the State Registrar’s signature
  6. Unusual and unnatural pixilation between the letters of text data
  7. Original text was removed by pasting a layer of background over them
  8. Different text was typed onto a text layer and merged with background layer
  9. Pixel blocks of text data are different from the data headers
  10. Heavy and unnecessary sharpening of the whole image, except for the border
  11. Border was created as a separate layer and merged with other layers
  12. Border pattern is more blurred than the background
  13. Border pattern more transparent than those on genuine scans
  14. Top and bottom black border bars have less pixilation than text
  15. Border bars are more black in color than any of the text
  16. Absence of green, background pixels inside the border bar text
  17. White lines between border bars and pattern (both sides)
  18. Image colors are very different from scan images of real COLBs
  19. Lack of pixilation in black rectangle covering certificate number
  20. Different blocking artifacts from JPG compression found across the image

The consensus was that this Certification of Live Birth document image (COLB) had been heavily doctored. What we didn’t know were the lengths to which the Obama Campaign and his enablers in the media went to rebuff any claims of forgery by personally attacking anyone for even suggesting it. They called us “tin-foil hat wearing, right-wing conspiracy nuts,” or “birthers” for short, but these titles are tame in comparison to the vicious and virulent slurs hurled our way. Rather than respond with some confirmatory evidence to support the claim that the scan image was genuine, they offered all kinds of logical excuses as to why it wouldn’t be fake, coupled with comments from individuals and fact-checking groups claiming to be non-partisan but clearly shilling for Obama. The common denominator here is that all of them failed to provide a single shred of valid evidence that Obama’s actual COLB document was even printed in June 2007 by Hawaii’s DOH, let alone scanned a year later. Even if it had been validated as an authentic COLB, it was still painfully Presumptive evidence and not a ‘vault’ birth certificate or Prima facie.

One thing that no one could deny, was that a black graphic rectangle was added to the image to redact the COLB’s certificate number, and then resaved, permanently altering the COLB shown in the image, and in effect, changing the image itself. The caveats did appear on the COLB document.


In other words,”Which part of this caveat did the “birther”/Constitutionalists critics NOT understand?

There were enough alterations in this one image to fill a book on “How to falsify an image and hide the signs of forgery.”. Nothing about this image was genuine, yet, five weeks later, Factcheck posted a set of nine digital photos of what they claim was the same, alleged birth certificate used to make the scan image.

Conspiracies in Presidential elections do happen. Does “Watergate” ring a bell?

Recently, another Illinois politician was impeached for selling Obama’s Senate seat. It that act really worse than committing felony document fraud, as defined by Chapter 18 of the United States Code, Section 1028, Fraud and related activity in connection with identification documents, authentication features, and information?.

Factcheck.org: False Claims And Undisclosed Conflict Of Interest

FactCheck.org is an arm of the powerful Annenberg Foundation which also runs the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, the entity which employed Barack Obama as its chairman of the board. FactCheck.org conducted an allegedly “independent” analysis of Obama’s 2007 computer-generated birth document (see above).

According to the National Review, the Annenberg Challenge was founded by former “Weather Underground” terrorist Bill Ayers, who apparently played a pivotal role in politically positioning Obama to run for public office. See this National Review article detailing Obama’s relationship to Annenberg and Ayers and its unsuccessful efforts to review the archives of the Annenberg Challenge.

FactCheck is guilty of making the patently false claim that the Hawaii “…Department of Health confirmed Oct. 31 that Obama was born in Honolulu…” See Born In The USA?. Hawaii officials have made NO such claim.

On the same web page FactCheck also falsely states that, “FactCheck.org staffers have now seen, touched, examined and photographed the original birth certificate.” In truth, the document examined by FactCheck is a 2007 computer-generateddocument and is obviously not the “original” Obama 1961 birth certificate sought by the Foundation. These are simply and unequivocally, false statements.

Snopes.com Owned And Operated By Left Wing Fanatics

Barbara and David Mikkelson are the owners of Snopes and are extreme liberal loons who reside at the Democratic Underground.orgCalifornia.

One their latest articles at the Democratic Underground is titled, Holy Mother-Fucker The Church

Fri Mar 06th 2009, 11:14 PM



Either Pelosi Is Wrong Or The United States Constitution Is Wrong ~ Because A 1961 COLB Doesn’t Cut It.






1) The DNC never ‘certified’ that Obama met all legal requirements for the office of president, like the RNC did for McCain.”

2) Forensic Document Expert Noticed undue stress in the signatures in the first document. This may likely lead one to suspect that the signers were signing under duress of conscience.

3) In 1961 Ann Durham was too young to confer U.S. Citizenship upon her newborn.

4) The Constitution, Article 2, Section 1, states, “No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President.”

5) Obama spending $2+ Million dollars to maintain non-transparency, on conclusive evidence that the #1 document portends and is allegedly affirmed by Pelosi’s hand. This is one                  incongruous situation.

6) When Obama affirmed that he never went by any other name in his life, when signing documents to become an Illinois Senator, this is incongruous also because he went by the name of Barry Soetoro when he was adopted into Indonesia by his step dad. In order to be adopted into Indonesia, Barry could only be an Indonesian citizen and never a dual citizen, if he was ever recognized as a U.S. citizen it was at this point Barry was expatriated. This is why the records at Occidental University are important ~ they would show foreign scholarship /grants etc etc. Ask anyone if they can tie down a timeline with official documents on Barry Soetoro aka; Barrack Obama and the answer will be no. Now why is that?