Global Warming Fraud Exposed – So Why Did Bambi Go To Copenhagen? -> DAMAGE CONTROL! In An Attempt To Salvage Fellow Hedge Funders Investments In Alternative Energy Companies!

Whoa … “if you own any shares in alternative energy companies I should start dumping them NOW.”

THIS SHOULD ALL START A MAJOR SELL OFF AND SINK THESE ORCHESTRATING PUMP/DUMP SCHEMERS, USING NATIONAL MEDIA AS THEIR PROPAGANDA TOOL!

MR ANTI ROTHSCHILD ‘GEORGE CARLIN’!

Senator to demand probe of global-warming ‘fraud’

WELCOME TO OBAMALAND: I’VE SEEN YOUR FUTURE AND IT DOESN’T WORK

Al Gore is a FRAUD: Peer Reviewed Scientific Study

Antarctic Ice Growing Same As Arctic!

30,000 Scientist Sue Al Gore For Global Fraud: No Global Warming – NASA: Planet Cooling Since 2003

Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) Was A Perpetrated Fraud

Late last week, servers at Britain’s Climate Research Unit, a part of the University of East Anglia, were hacked and over 172 megabytes of data dumped onto the internet for public access.

The data paints an ugly picture of scientists operating as political hacks orchestrating smear campaigns against global warming dissidents, deleting files rather than make their data publicly available, and manufacturing data to prove their case when the actual data does nothing of the sort.

The University of East Anglia has confirmed the authenticity of the documents. With that confirmation, we see global warming for what it is — a scam perpetuated by scientists intent on gaining access to money.

Even the Washington Post has felt the need to cover this story. The Australian Herald Sunwas one of the first to cover the story. They note:

The 1079 emails and 72 documents seem indeed evidence of a scandal involving most of the most prominent scientists pushing the man-made warming theory – a scandal that is one of the greatest in modern science. I’ve been adding some of the most astonishing in updates below – emails suggesting conspiracy, collusion in exaggerating warming data, possibly illegal destruction of embarrassing information, organized resistance to disclosure, manipulation of data, private admissions of flaws in their public claims and much more. If it is as it now seems, never again will “peer review” be used to shout down skeptics.

This is clearly not the work of some hacker, but of an insider who’s now blown the whistle.

Ed Morrisey, at Hot Air, and others have done significant digging into the emails and documents. The highlights are:

  1. Prominent environmental scientists organize a boycott of scientific journals if those journals publish scholarly material from global warming dissidents.
  2. The scientists then orchestrate attacks on the dissidents because of their lack of scholarly material published in scientific journals.
  3. The scientists block from the UN’s report on global warming evidence that is harmful to the anthropogenic global warming consensus.
  4. The scientists, when faced with a freedom of information act request for their correspondence and data, delete the correspondence and data lest it be used against them.
  5. The scientists fabricate data when their data fails to prove the earth is warming. In fact, in more than one case, scientists engaged in lengthy emails on how to insert additional made up data that would in turn cause their claims to stand out as legitimate.
FELON GEORGE SOROS

Andrew Bolt of the Australian Herald Sun has sifted through the emails and finds some surprises that, at first, he was not sure were authentic, but have now been confirmed to be authentic. One, from Kevin Trenbeth in Bolder, CO, to a group of fellow global warming scientists, admits “that [they] can’t account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that [they] can’t. The CERES data published in the August BAMS 09 supplement on 2008 shows there should be even more warming: but the data are surely wrong.”

Another, from Professor Phil Jones at the Climate Research Unit, admits he “completed Mike’s Nature trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (ie from 1981 onwards) amd from 1961 for Keith’s to hide the decline [in global temperatures].”

This is damning stuff.

RS

Yes, there is now growing skepticism over the veracity of the global warming conjecture since Cimategate broke.  For those new to the scandal, RedState has the highlights:

  1. Prominent environmental scientists organize a boycott of scientific journals if those journals publish scholarly material from global warming dissidents.
  2. The scientists then orchestrate attacks on the dissidents because of their lack of scholarly material published in scientific journals.
  3. The scientists block from the UN’s report on global warming evidence that is harmful to the anthropogenic global warming consensus.
  4. The scientists, when faced with a freedom of information act request for their correspondence and data, delete the correspondence and data lest it be used against them.
  5. The scientists fabricate data when their data fails to prove the earth is warming. In fact, in more than one case, scientists engaged in lengthy emails on how to insert additional made up data that would in turn cause their claims to stand out as legitimate.

CON ARTIST BARRY SOETORO
Whoa … “if you own any shares in alternative energy companies I should start dumping them NOW.”   The FRC’s Tony Perkins writes,

Last week’s Climategate showed how misguided the President’s environmental policies–like cap-and-trade policies–have been. By cracking into the servers of the Climatic Research Units, hackers exposed the fraud of global warming in dozens of emails written by the world’s environmental experts. According to the messages, scientists were manipulating the facts to hide their own inconvenient truth, which is that global temperatures have actually been on the decline. Of course, plenty of scientists had debunked those theories before the controversy, but President Obama insisted on moving forward with his agenda in direct contradiction to the facts.


Yes, there were many who didn’t need explicit evidence of misrepresentation to see the games that were being played.  Wesley J. Smith, writes,

I didn’t need these e-mails to figure out the game being played by the global warming hysterics… Here’s a clue: If the Democratic Congress refuses to investigate, they know it’s true. Ditto the UN and the UK Parliament. Alas, that is my prediction..” –

Sadly, global warming has become a cause that has been used to support any number of illigitmate agendas.  For example, fund contraception and abortion before global warming destroys the earth. A mandate (wink) is not necessary.”  Now the house of is collapsing and the church of global warming has been exposed.

Update from Michelle Malkin:

The [New York] Times’ lead environmental blogger, Andrew Revkin, haughtily refused to reprint damning e-mails leaked by a hacker in the burgeoning “ClimateGate” scandal. The documents reveal a long trail of manipulated data, but Revkin balked at the ill-gotten trove. The blabbermouths at the Times had no problem exposing national security secrets to undermine Bush. But shed light on scientific hoaxes that undermine Al Gore? Unethical!

PLB