FIRST, LETS MEET GEORGE OBAMA – THE MALATO MESSIAH’S YOUNGEST BROTHER
SECOND, LETS MEET THOSE LEFT BEHIND IN CHICAGO, ” WHAT HAS BARRY DONE FOR THESE POOR PEOPLE OTHER THAN BILKING THEM FROM THEIR FEDERAL DOLLARS”?
THIRD, FOR ANYONE CAUGHT ON SOCIALIST TV CRYING IN ECSTASY AT OBAMA’S ELECTION – I URGE YOU TO CRY FOR YOUR BROTHERS AND SISTERS WHO GOT BILKED BY THIS EVIL TREASONOUS USURPER.
Poverty levels are on track for a record increase. Yes, despite all of the “stimulus” and “job summits” and other band aid fixes for the economy, Obama will own the largest poverty rate increase in history when it’s all said and done. This very fact makes The British Monarchy extremely happy – that is why Soetoro was muscled in.
Now I know there are many of you out there who still feel that Obama is to blame for none of our economic ills. Never mind the fact that the democrats have been in control of congress since January 2007 and Obama has been president since January 2009. That doesn’t assuage your feelings about that sorry George W. Bush. And no it doesn’t matter that within six to eight months after republicans take control of congress you’ll be blaming them for the continued economic malaise we’re in.
The fact is that not since the 1960’s war on poverty has there been such an increase in poverty levels. Obama’s economic policies have seemingly exasperated what he “intended” to fix. The 2009 Census shows about a 15% increase in poverty rate levels. That’s up from a little over 13%.
Also found within the survey, the child poverty rate increase about 1%. Naturally blacks and Latinos are the ones hardest hit. Some of the areas that showed the greatest poverty level gains were not surprisingly, Detroit, Los Angeles, and Las Vegas.
Obama’s poverty level increase will most likely be given scant coverage in the media. But hey, this isn’t his fault. He just inherited this mess. He’s spent the entire first half of his first term blaming the last administration while not manning up to anything. So expect him to spend the entire last half blaming the newly elected republican congress.
‘Welcome to Obamaville’ Sign At Homeless Tent City, Media Mum
A sign reading “Welcome to Obamaville Colorado’s Fastest Growing Community” appeared at a homeless tent city in Colorado Springs this week.
You probably didn’t hear about it because outside of two Colorado television stations nobody found this newsworthy.
By contrast, when word got out in March of a tent city in Sacramento, California, news media couldn’t get enough of the story.
Is it because that happened so soon after Inauguration Day that it could easily be blamed on George W. Bush, and that given the name given to this area that’s no longer possible?
According to LexisNexis and Google news searches, only KRDO and KJCT reported the appearance of this sign.
By contrast, Sacramento’s tent city garnered much national coverage in March. In fact, according to LexisNexis, television news outlets ABC, CBS, CNN, and NBC all covered it.
So did the Associated Press, the New York Times, the Washington Post, and Slate.
Yet not a peep about Obamaville.
Exit question: If the Colorado Springs tent city sign read “Welcome to Bushville,” do you think it would get more media attention?
Yes, that’s a rhetorical question.
- Half of Obamaville Lives in “Poverty” – Which is Exactly What Democrats Want (gunnyg.wordpress.com)
- BBC Panorama: Poor America (globalfree.wordpress.com)
- Poverty in America (thedarkglobe.wordpress.com)
- America’s homeless resort to tent cities (news.bbc.co.uk)
- Nearly Half of Americans Are Poor, Low-Income (newser.com)