Throw McConnell Out

House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) joined Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) last week in declaring war on conservatives.

John Boehner called conservatives “ridiculous” for opposing the budget agreement that increases spending, raises taxes, and funds Obamacare while Mitch McConnell previously called us stupid “traitors” who should be locked in a bar and “punched in the nose.”

These Republican leaders are attacking conservatives because they don’t like it when the grassroots hold them accountable.

Unfortunately, their attacks go beyond words. A top conservative aide in the House was fired last week for opposing John Boehner’s budget and Mitch McConnell has blacklisted political firms that work for conservatives.

What these leaders are doing to conservatives is no different from what the IRS got caught doing to them this summer. They’re using their power to discriminate against people they see as a political threat.

James Madison on How to Enforce the Constitution

THROW THE BUMS OUT

There’s no question anymore about where the Republican leadership stands. They hold the grassroots in contempt and are working to destroy us. The real question is what we’re going to do about it.

Will we let them remain in office and continue to help the Democrats enact their liberal agenda OR will we fight back and replace establishment Republicans with true conservatives in the 2014 primary elections?

The Republican establishment has decided what they’re going to do.

The strategic communications advisor for the National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC) said their goal is to defeat conservatives in “every primary” next year. Every primary. Their focus isn’t on electing a Republican majority.

Instead, their top goal is to defeat conservatives because they don’t want more people like Ted Cruz (R-TX), Mike Lee (R-UT), and Rand Paul (R-KY) to be elected.

We can’t let them win the 2014 primaries. If we do, we will have more debt, higher taxes, and Obamacare will never be repealed.These Republicans have been in Washington too long and they’re no longer willing to fight for our principles [Constitution]. They’re hostile to the people who elected them.

Fortunately, we have a choice. We can work together to promote the most promising conservative candidates in the country. We have identified five outstanding U.S. Senate candidates who will stand up to the big spenders in both parties.

Matt Bevin (R-KY)
Chris McDaniel (R-MS)
Ben Sasse (R-NE)
Rob Maness (R-LA)
Milton Wolf (R-KS)

These are full spectrum conservatives who understand that the oath of a senator is to “support and defend” the Constitution of the United States.

The Republican establishment is doing everything it can to defeat these candidates so they won’t win without your help. The most powerful thing you can do to help is donate directly to their campaigns.

Nothing upsets the Republican establishment more than when you donate to candidates. It’s why they attack SENATE CONSERVATIVES FUND the SCF so. We have shown that we can help conservatives defeat the establishment by getting thousands of freedom-loving Americans to make donations to their campaigns.

If you’ve already donated to these candidates, we thank you. It’s making a big difference. You’ve helped us invest over $1.5 million in these critical races. If you haven’t donated, please consider giving at least $5 to a candidate today. The stakes could not be higher.

Thank you for staying informed and for standing up for liberty.

Best regards,

Matt Hoskins
Executive Director
Senate Conservatives Fund

The real question is what we’re going to do about it.

The Senate Conservatives Fund (SCF) pays all processing and handling fees so they receive 100% of your contributions.

Campaign For Liberty

Nearly 75% of the American people support Audit the Fed. As it becomes increasingly clear that, in the words of former Fed official Andrew Huszar, the Fed’s Quantitative Easing program is “the greatest backdoor Wall Street bailout of all time,” I expect that number to grow.

So if you think Audit the Fed should be C4L’s top priority, please vote for “OPTION #1: PASS AUDIT THE FED”

So if fighting ObamaCare is your top priority, please vote for “OPTION #2: REPEAL THE INDIVIDUAL MANDATE”

If you think fighting a new National ID scheme should be Campaign for Liberty’s top priority, please vote for “OPTION #3: STOP THE NATIONAL ID DATABASE”

So if you think rolling back the surveillance state is most important, please vote for “OPTION #4: PROTECT OUR FOURTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS”

So if you think exposing Big Government politicians is most important, please vote for “OPTION #5: FIGHT BACK IN 2014”

Of course, there’s one other option. It’s the option I hope and pray you’ll choose. That’s “OPTION #6: FIGHT EVERYWHERE.”

Sign the petition: Boehner Must Resign

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Understanding The Difference Between Gold Back Capitalism & Paper Derivative Backed Fiat Paper ~ Keynesian Mafia Economics Of Rothschild.

Isn’t it strange? We are living in the 21st century, a period of time in which people buy land on the moon, humanity has dozens of satellites providing GPS services, and real time traffic information.

The internet brings people and information as close as one click, science and technology are making historic break throughs … but economists cannot agree on the real cause of the latest financial crash (2008).

Generally speaking, there are two schools of thoughts when it comes to diagnosing the 2008 crash. One is based on free market principles and is detailed in Austrian economics. The other is based on [communism’s] central planning and is centered around Keynes (hence, Keynesian economics).

As noted by Barrons, journalist Jeremy Hammond had the ingenious idea of contrasting the Austrian, free-market school of economics with the Keynesian, pro-government on the recent financial crisis through a close examination of the words of two commentators:

former Congressman Ron Paul, schooled in the Austrian perspective, versus the Nobel Prize–winning Keynesian and New York Times columnist Paul Krugman.

You might think a mere politician would be no match for a Nobel laureate, but in this case, think again.

As forecaster, diagnostician, and prescriber, Ron Paul offers rich insights, while Krugman, true to his Keynesian perspective, gets things wrong at virtually every turn.

Pope Francis Warns Against The “Prêt-à-porter” Of Wealth Distribution That Advocates “Depravity Of Free Will”.

Hammond’s book “Ron Paul vs. Paul Krugman: Austrian vs. Keynesian Economics in the Financial Crisis“ reviews the records of Ron Paul and Paul Krugman on the question of the housing bubble.

Who correctly predicted it?
Who has offered the more reasonable explanation as to its cause?
Who has offered the more sensible response to the bursting of the housing bubble and the financial crisis its precipitated?
Most importantly, whose admonitions should we now be regarding as we move into the future?

In short, who is the true prophet, and who the false?

ROLLING STONE : ROTHSCHILD CORRUPTION GOES MAINSTREAM

To illustrate the objective analysis of the book, we show one of the many quotes that the author has used. This example is a quote from Paul Krugman a couple of days before the NASDAQ implosion:

In February 2000, Krugman hailed the “booming” economy and “extraordinary prosperity” the country was experiencing.

As the bubble neared its peak, he commented on the view that “the whole stock market, not just the Dow, is inflated by a speculative bubble.”

He said that he was “sympathetic but not entirely convinced” of this view. “I’m not sure that the current value of the NASDAQ is justified, but I’m not sure that it isn’t.”

Thus, on the eve of it bursting, Krugman was still not convinced of the existence of the bubble Ron Paul had already been warning about for years.

Another illustrative example is a quote from Ron Paul after the NASDAQ crash who more or less predicts the next financial crisis based on the Fed’s monetary policy:

In October 2000, Ron Paul observed that with the ongoing financial crisis, politicians and economists were “talking about a symptom and not the cause.
The cause is the Federal Reserve.
The problem is that the Federal Reserve has been granted authority that is unconstitutional to go and counterfeit money, and until we recognize that and deal with that, we will continue to have financial problems.”
He repeated, “we have already seen signs of economic troubles ahead” because the Fed had planned to continue its monetary inflation in answer to the financial crisis.
“Without savings, true capital investment cannot be maintained,” he said.
“Creation of credit out of thin air by the Fed was the original problem, so it surely can’t be the solution.”