Press release: Commissioner Of Social Security Defaulted In 2 Circuits, Obama Is In Default In California!

18 USC Chapter 96 – RACKETEER INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATIONS

Jesse Jackson Jr. Indicted On Conspiracy Charges: James Carville Predicted Democratic Scandal Streak Coming True!

Obama Fraud Ids: Every U.S. Citizen Is Urged To Call The Judiciary Committee Of The U.S. House Of Representatives!

Press Release

| February 18, 2013 |

Law offices of Orly Taitz

Commissioner of Social Security administration previously defaulted in RICO (Racketeering case) related to him covering up Obama’s use of a stlen CT Social security number, which was never assigned to him according o E-Verify and SSNVS.

Now he defaulted in yet another circuit: US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Notice of Default and motion for the default judgment was filed in DC.

Obama is currently in default in the US District Court for the Eastern District of California

Judges of these courts have to finally issue a default judgment and order production of all the original documents as part of the post judgment discovery. It is time to put an end to this national nightmare and national disgrace. It is time to end the most egregious case of the elections fraud, forgery and treason.

Court of Appeals Docket #: 11-5304	Docketed: 10/31/2011 Termed:05/25/2012
Nature of Suit: 2895 Freedom of Information Act of 1974	Docketed: 10/31/2011 Termed:05/25/2012
Orly Taitz v. Michael Astrue
Appeal From: United States District Court for the District of Columbia
Fee Status: Fee Paid

Case Type Information:

1) Civil US

2) United States

Originating Court Information:
District: 0090-1 : 1:11-cv-00402-RCL				Lead: 1:11-cv-00402-RCL
Trial Judge: Royce C. Lamberth, U.S. District Judge Date Filed:02/16/2011 Date Order/Judgment: Date NOA Filed: 08/30/2011 10/25/2011

Silver: Criminal History In The Making ~ With Silver Not Being Mined Gold Is Approaching 5Xs More Supply Above Ground Than Silver!

Update Orly Taitz Noonan Case: 1:25pm EST No Decision As Of Yet ~ 5 Of 9 Justices With No Signature For With-Held Pleadings Continues!

03/16/2012		RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION FILED [1364625] to motion for summary affirmance [1353593-2](Reply to Response by Mail and Response to Cross Motion due on 03/29/2012) combined with a MOTION FILED [STYLED AS “MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF THE APPELLANT”] by Orly Taitz for summary reversal [Service Date: 03/15/2012 by US Mail] Pages: 1-10. [11-5304]
04/27/2012		MOTION filed [1371429] by Orly Taitz for default judgment. (Response to Motion served by mail due on 05/07/2012) [Service Date: 04/24/2012 by US Mail] Pages: 1-10. [11-5304]
05/25/2012		PER CURIAM ORDER filed [1375820] denying motion for default judgment [1371429-2]; denying motion for summary reversal [1364625-2]; granting motion for summary affirmance [1353593-2], withholding issuance of the mandate. Before Judges: Rogers, Griffith and Kavanaugh. [11-5304]
06/04/2012		PETITION filed [1377943] by Appellant Orly Taitz for rehearing en banc. [Service Date: 05/31/2012 by US Mail] Pages: 16-20. [11-5304]
06/20/2012		SUPPLEMENT [1380221] to petition for rehearing en banc [1377943-2] filed by Orly Taitz [Service Date: 06/18/2012] [11-5304]
07/30/2012		MOTION filed [1387271] by Orly Taitz to recall mandate (Response to Motion served by mail due on 08/09/2012) [Service Date: 07/26/2012 by US Mail] Pages: 1-10. [11-5304]
08/02/2012		CLERK’S ORDER filed [1387293] Upon consideration of appellantâ€™s motion to recall the mandate, it is ORDERED that the motion be dismissed as moot. No mandate has issued in this case. A petition for rehearing en banc remains pending before the court. The mandate issued July 24, 2012, in No. 11-5306, Taitz v. Ruemmler, where no petition for rehearing was received by the court. [1387271-2] [11-5304]
08/09/2012		PER CURIAM ORDER, En Banc, filed [1388336] denying petition for rehearing en banc [1377943-2] Before Judges: Sentelle, Henderson, Rogers, Tatel, Garland, Brown, Griffith and Kavanaugh. [11-5304]
08/29/2012		MANDATE ISSUED to Clerk, District Court [11-5304]
01/29/2013		MOTION filed [STYLED AS “MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION DUE TO NEW EVIDENCE AND NEW DECISIONS”] [1417882] by Orly Taitz to recall mandate (Response to Motion served by mail due on 02/11/2013) [Service Date: 01/28/2013 by US Mail] Pages: 11-15 with attachments. [11-5304]