Federal Judge John Roll Murdered Gabrielle Giffords Wounded: Coincidence Judge Roll Was Murdered Because He Overturned The Brady Gun Control Bill Which Was In Violation Of The Bill Of Rights.

You may call me a conspiracy theorist, if I can call you a coincidence theorist.

Washington DC – -(Ammoland.com)- On September 30 2014 gun control proponents Gabby Giffords, former Democratic Congresswoman from Arizona, and her husband puppet master Mark Kelly will release a book intended to be another step in their campaign for the passage of more gun control.

The book is titled, Enough: Our Fight To Keep America Safe From Gun Violence ( tiny.cc/twgnmx ) .

According to the NY Daily News, a portion of the book revolves around recounting the events of January 8, 2011–the day on which Jared Loughner shot and killed six and wounded fourteen, including Giffords, in a Tucson Safeway parking lot.

Judge John Roll Overturned The Unconstitutional Brady Bill. Judge Roll Was Murdered In The Gabrielle Gifford's Shooting. — Judge John Roll Overturned The Unconstitutional Brady Bill. Judge Roll Was Murdered In The Gabrielle Gifford’s Shooting.

U.S. Federal Judge John Roll died after being shot along with 18 others while attending a constituent outreach event held by U.S. Representative Gabrielle Giffords in Casas Adobes, near Tucson, Arizona.

Judge John Roll’s O R D E R Overturning The Brady Bill’s Unconstitutionality In Violation Of The 10th. Amendment

The Court finds that in enacting section 18 U.S.C. 922(s)(2), Congress exceeded its authority under Article 1, section 8 of the United States Constitution, thereby impermissibly encroaching upon the powers retained by the states pursuant to the Tenth Amendment. The Court further finds that the provision, in conjunction with the criminal sanctions its violation would engender, is unconstitutionally vague under the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff Sheriff Richard Mack’s complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief is GRANTED IN PART. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter a judgment declaring 18 U.S.C. 922(s)(2) to be unconstitutional. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant United States of America and its agents are PERMANENTLY ENJOINED from further enforcing 18 U.S.C. 922(s)(2)

All other provisions under review are deemed severable from the offending subsection and are found not to violate the United States Constitution.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions are deemed MOOT by virtue of this order and this case is DISMISSED.

Dated: June 28, 1994

JOHN M. ROLL

United States District Judge

The Turner Report

Tucson Marks Anniversary Of Judge Roll’s Murder & Gifford Shootings: The Sheriff’s Judge Who Upheld The Constitution And Reversed Congress!

Giffords and Kelly present Loughner’s attack as proof of the need for expanding background checks to cover every gun sale–retail and private–in America.

Loughner went through such a background check in order to purchase the gun he used in his attack.

However, Kelly argues that expanded background checks are still necessary and he blames “the political class” for being “too afraid” to discuss and enact more gun control.

Gabrielle Giffords and husband Mark Kelly

The book also argues for new laws against gun trafficking, new regulations on gun shows, and new rules for online firearm sales.

Follow AWR Hawkins on Twitter @AWRHawkins

About:
AWR Hawkins holds a PhD in military history from Texas Tech University.

Ammoland

the remains of U.S. District Judge John Roll arrives at the St. Elizabeth Ann Seton Church before his funeral on Friday, Jan. 14, 2011, in Tucson, Ariz. — The remains of U.S. Federal District Judge John Roll arrives at the St. Elizabeth Ann Seton Church before his funeral on Friday, Jan. 14, 2011, in Tucson, Ariz.

“He was just a tremendous person, everyone respected him,” said Michael Massee, 48, who served as a law clerk for Roll in U.S. District Court in Tucson from 1994 to 1996. “In his previous career, he had been a prosecutor mostly, but even the defense attorneys I knew respected him and had no fear of appearing before him because you knew, like an umpire, he would call the strikes and balls fairly.” Syracuse