Fanatic Presidential Candidate Romney, Voted For Population-Control.

Myth Romney

Mitt is involved and this is not what we need to protect the USA.

Romney Voted for Population-Control ~ The Fanatic Presidential Candidate

So we’ve learned over the past few days that a trio of Mitt Romney’s chosen advisers helped the Obama administration craft ObamaCare. And on top of that, that Gov. Romney sought the advice of Malthusian green activist John Holdren, when Romney was considering a cap and trade regime for Massachusetts.

Holdren’s views humanity as a plague on the planet and the Industrial Revolution as a tragic mistake. The fewer people, he believes, the better, and he’s not shy about the ways he would use to reduce their number.

Why Gov. Romney, a reasonable person, would pick such a man to advise him on anything is beyond us.

On Jan. 1, 2006, Massachusetts became the first state to regulate CO2 emissions from power plants, something the Obama administration is trying to do to all states through the Environmental Protection Agency’s draconian job-killing regulations and mandates.

A Dec. 7, 2005 memo from the governor’s office announcing the new policy listed among the “environmental and policy experts” providing input to the policy one “John Holdren, professor of environmental policy at Harvard University.”

This is the same person who wrote that a “massive campaign must be launched to restore a high-quality environment in North America and to de-develop the United States.”

Holdren wrote that along with Paul and Anne H. Ehrlich in the “recommendations” section of their 1973 book, “Human Ecology: Problems and Solutions.”

Paul Ehrlich is also the author of the 1968 book, “The Population Bomb,” which warned of imminent mass starvation from overpopulation unless excess humanity is dispensed with.

Holdren has spoken in favor of such things as forced abortions, confiscation of babies, mass involuntary sterilization, bureaucratic regulation of family size, and a planetary regime to enforce climate regulation and population control.

Romney, speaking at a University of New Hampshire town hall on June 3, said: “I don’t speak for the scientific community, of course, but I believe the world’s getting warmer. I can’t prove that, but I believe based on what I read that the world is getting warmer. And number two, I believe that humans contribute to that.”

So do Holdren and Al Gore.

In June, Gore, on his blog, praised Romney’s climate stance: “While other Republicans are running from the truth, he is sticking to his guns in the face of the anti-science wing of the Republican Party.”

We need someone who will put American People first Not Corporate Profits or Government and Bureaucratic Ideology first !!!!!!!

Eugenicists Romney Holdren

White House Science Czar Says He Would Use ‘Free Market’ to ‘De-Develop the United States’

White House Office of Science and Technology Director John P. Holdren told that he would use the “free market economy” to implement the “massive campaign” he advocated along with Paul Ehrlich to “de-develop the United States.”


By Wayne Allyn Root , June 6th, 2010

Barack Hussein Obama is no fool.
He is not incompetent.
To the contrary, he is brilliant.
He knows exactly what he’s   doing.

“I place economy among the first and most important virtues, and public debt as the greatest of dangers. To preserve our independence, we must not let our rulers load us with perpetual debt.”

President Jefferson

He is purposely overwhelming the U.S. economy to
create systemic   failure,
economic crisis and social chaos –
thereby destroying capitalism and
our country from within.

Barack Hussein Obama was my college classmate
Columbia University , class of ’83).

He is a devout Muslim, do not be fooled.
Look at his Czars…anti-business..anti-American.
As Glenn Beck correctly predicted from day one,  Barack Hussein Obama is
following the plan of Cloward & Piven, two professors at Columbia University .

They outlined a plan to socialize America by overwhelming the  system
with government spending and entitlement demands.
Add up the clues below.  Taken individually they’re alarming.
Taken as a whole, it is a brilliant, Machiavellian game plan to turn
the United States into a socialist/Marxist state with a permanent majority
that desperately needs government for survival … and can be counted on to always vote for bigger government.

Why not?
They have no responsibility to pay for it.

Universal Health Care . The health care bill had very little to do with   health care.  It had everything to do with unionizing millions of   hospital and
health care workers, as well as adding 15,000 to 20,000 new IRS agents
(who will join government employee unions).

Obama doesn’t care that giving free health care to 30 million Americans
will add trillions to the national debt.
What he does care about is that it cements the dependence of those 30 million
voters to Democrats and big government .

Who but a socialist revolutionary would pass this reckless spending bill
in the middle of a depression?

Cap and Trade..
Like health care legislation having nothing to do  with
health care, cap and trade has nothing to do with global warming.
It has everything to do with redistribution of income, government control of the economy and a criminal payoff to Obama’s biggest contributors.
Those powerful and wealthy unions and contributors (like GE, which owns NBC, MSNBC and CNBC) can then be counted on to support everything Obama  wants.
They will kick-back hundreds of millions of dollars in contributions to Obama and the Democratic Partyto keep them in power.
The bonus is that all the new taxes on Americans with bigger cars,
bigger homes and businesses helps Obama “spread the wealth around.”

Make Puerto Rico a state.

Who’s asking for a  51st state?
Who’s asking for millions of new welfare recipients and government entitlement addicts in the middle of a depression?
Certainly not American taxpayers.
But this has been Barack Hussein Obama’s plan all along.
His goal is to add two new Democrat senators, five Democrat congressman and a  million loyal Democratic voters who are dependent on big government.

Legalize 12 million illegal Mexican immigrants.
Just giving these 12 million potential new citizens free health care alone could overwhelm the system and bankrupt America .
But it adds 12 million reliable new Democrat voters who can be counted on to support big government.
Add another few trillion dollars in welfare, aid to dependent children, food stamps, free medical, education, tax credits for the poor, and eventually Social Security .

American International Group
Image via Wikipedia

Stimulus and bailouts.
Where did all that money go?

  • It went to Democrat contributors, organizations (ACORN), and unions including billions of dollars to save or create jobs of government employees  across the country.
  • It went to save GM and Chrysler so that their employees could keep paying union dues.
  • It went to AIG so that Goldman Sachs could be bailed out(after giving Obama almost $1 million in contributions).
  • A staggering $125 billion went to teachers (thereby protecting their union  dues).

All those public employees will vote loyally Democrat to protect their
bloated salaries and pensions that are bankrupting America .
The country goes broke, future generations face a bleak future, but Obama,
the Democrat Party, government, and the unions grow more powerful.
The ends justify the means.

Raise taxes on small business owners, high-income earners, and job

Put the entire burden on only the top 20 percent of  taxpayers,
redistribute the income, punish success, and reward those who did
nothing to deserve it (except vote for Obama).

Reagan wanted to dramatically cut taxes in order to starve the government.
Barack Obama wants to dramatically raise taxes to starve his political  opposition.

With the acts outlined above, Barack Hussein Obama and his  regime have

  • Created a vast and rapidly expanding constituency of voters dependent on big government.
  • A vast privileged class of public employees who work for big government.
  • And a government dedicated to destroying capitalism and installing themselves as socialist rulers by overwhelming the system.

Add it up and you’ve got the perfect Marxist scheme — all devised by
my Columbia University college classmate Barack  Hussein Obama
using the Cloward and Piven Plan .

True per Snopes!

Eugenicist & Romney Advisor John Holdren
Mao Tse Tung ~ British Banker's De-Populator. The British Imperialists Gave Back Hong Kong, But They Kept Their Banks There To Prosper.

Population Control is a Concept Whose Time Has Come-And Gone.

De-Development aka; Depopulation was gradually, but decisively, disproved by rapidly-improving agricultural technology.

The Banker’s Simply Want To Turn This Fact On Its Head, So As To Prosper At The Sake Of The World’s Citizens!

They Have MAde Their Money Now They Do Not Want To Pay Out On Health Insurance, Social Security, Automobile Insurance, Pensions, Shorted Silver, Shorted Gold, etc etc etc etc etc. 

The Origins of Population Control. The modern population control movement was inspired by Rev. Thomas Malthus, who published his landmark work Essay on the Principle of Population in 1798.

The heart of Malthus’ philosophy, and the cornerstone of the original population controller’s credo, is evidenced in the following passage from his Essay:

The power of population is indefinitely greater than the power of the earth to produce subsistence for man. Population, when unchecked, increases in a geometrical ratio. Subsistence increases only in an arithmetical ratio. . . . By that law of our nature which makes food necessary to the life of man, the effects of these two unequal powers must be kept equal. This implies a strong and constantly operating check on population from the difficulty of subsistence.

For more than a century, the early population control movement worked hard to create the Malthusian impression that worldwide mass starvation was just around the corner.

In a 1920 interview with R.C. Martens, a self-described “Authority Upon the World Food Situation,” Margaret Sanger’s Birth Control Review claimed:

Within the next few months millions of human beings, mostly Europeans, will starve to death. Food to meet the needs of the Earths’ population is lacking and cannot be produced in time to avoid the great crash?the crash which will, as its chief incident, cost uncounted millions of lives, and bring in the train of that disaster no one knows what governmental and social changes.15

Figure 1 below is an anti-natalist cartoon from the June 1918 issue of the Birth Control Review. It shows a “Mother Earth” figure punching the baby-bearing stork in its long beak and shouting: “Hey, you! Can’t you realize that we need quality, not quantity?”

Malthus’ theory was gradually, but decisively, disproved by rapidly-improving agricultural technology, and it became obvious at the beginning of the 20th Century that world food production could indeed easily stay far ahead of the increase in population. His ideas were promulgated before the demographic and agricultural sciences were fully developed. When the science caught up with the times, then population controllers had to find other justifications for their philosophy and activities.

Changing Justifications. Since they could no longer use imminent food shortages as a rationale for their theories, population controllers needed a new justification for their activities.

Since about 1960, population control organizations have portrayed the growing population of the world as a threat to the environment and to the “quality of life” of all people.

As Table 1 and Figure 2 show, the population of the world began to ramp steeply upward in about the year 1940, addeding 4 billion people in a little less than 60 years-an average of a fair-sized city (about 1.3 million) per week.

Certainly this was a cause of alarm for all reasonable people, but many did not respond in a reasonable manner.

Human Life International

<SALUTE> Tony!